Supercross v. Motocross injury rate

Bradj70
Posts
82
Joined
1/30/2016
Location
San Antonio, TX US
Has any statistics ever been completed with supercross versus motocross injury percentage at the pro level? Or even percentage of severe injury? I love watching supercross, it's exciting it's a show, it's got a cool factor with the rhythms and peaky jumps, but I suspect it produces more injury per season then motocross, curious if there has been a Stat produced on this
2
6
|
kb228
Posts
6160
Joined
1/31/2018
Location
Mansfield, OH US
4/13/2022 8:09am
You put humans on wheels with an engine and then tell them to fly 60+ feet through the air and also race each other youre going to have injuries no matter what
5
2
cwel11
Posts
1908
Joined
12/4/2019
Location
Orangeville, PA US
4/13/2022 8:59am
Actually wondered this myself. Missed races SX vs MX. Definitely seems like SX is more of a meat grinder.
2
1
soggy
Posts
5900
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
UT US
Fantasy
4355th
4/13/2022 9:04am
This thread oughta be full of factual info 🙄
3
2

The Shop

TeamGreen
Posts
31773
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
4/13/2022 9:21am
Racer X has weekly injury reports...I wouldn't be surprised if Davey's got enough data to put something together.
7
chasetwo79
Posts
1167
Joined
12/1/2019
Location
Truckee, CA, CA US
4/13/2022 9:27am
The timing of outdoors skews the data. People get to round 1 of outdoors and are either returning from a SX injury or they’ve been beat up for 17 rounds of being put through the meat grinder and show up already ran down.
5
1
DonM
Posts
7419
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
4/13/2022 10:10am
MXGP has just as many injuries as SX, it ebbs and flows…riding dirt bikes is dangerous regardless of where you ride them…
1
1
Bradj70
Posts
82
Joined
1/30/2016
Location
San Antonio, TX US
4/13/2022 10:38am
TeamGreen wrote:
Racer X has weekly injury reports...I wouldn't be surprised if Davey's got enough data to put something together.
That would be some cool data to see, also injury rate of supercross only athletes vs moto only if they exist. In just interested in what the data points to
2
1
RichieW13
Posts
1906
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Thousand Oaks, CA US
Fantasy
3180th
4/13/2022 11:11am Edited Date/Time 4/13/2022 11:12am
chasetwo79 wrote:
The timing of outdoors skews the data. People get to round 1 of outdoors and are either returning from a SX injury or they’ve been beat...
The timing of outdoors skews the data. People get to round 1 of outdoors and are either returning from a SX injury or they’ve been beat up for 17 rounds of being put through the meat grinder and show up already ran down.
Yeah, the data would be real messy. You'll have some guys missing MX races due to injuries from SX. Ferrandis announced he's out for the rest of SX season. But if his injury instead happened with 5 rounds of the MX series left, would he still pull out, or would he come back since he would still have plenty of time to come back to SX in 5 months?

Also, in MX you have 40 guys racing the "main" event, compared to 22 in SX. Do the guys racing for 30th place in MX have the same intensity as the guys racing for 10th? So are they less likely to have bad crashes? Do we even hear about it if somebody like Scott Meshey (to pick a name at random) has a practice crash that keeps him out for 3 weeks?

In general, are guys more or less motivated to return to racing SX compared to MX?
3
mx 219
Posts
3844
Joined
8/15/2010
Location
South Central, PA US
Fantasy
1607th
4/13/2022 12:21pm Edited Date/Time 4/13/2022 12:21pm
chasetwo79 wrote:
The timing of outdoors skews the data. People get to round 1 of outdoors and are either returning from a SX injury or they’ve been beat...
The timing of outdoors skews the data. People get to round 1 of outdoors and are either returning from a SX injury or they’ve been beat up for 17 rounds of being put through the meat grinder and show up already ran down.
RichieW13 wrote:
Yeah, the data would be real messy. You'll have some guys missing MX races due to injuries from SX. Ferrandis announced he's out for the rest...
Yeah, the data would be real messy. You'll have some guys missing MX races due to injuries from SX. Ferrandis announced he's out for the rest of SX season. But if his injury instead happened with 5 rounds of the MX series left, would he still pull out, or would he come back since he would still have plenty of time to come back to SX in 5 months?

Also, in MX you have 40 guys racing the "main" event, compared to 22 in SX. Do the guys racing for 30th place in MX have the same intensity as the guys racing for 10th? So are they less likely to have bad crashes? Do we even hear about it if somebody like Scott Meshey (to pick a name at random) has a practice crash that keeps him out for 3 weeks?

In general, are guys more or less motivated to return to racing SX compared to MX?
I think you would almost have to look at this data based on whether they were racing or testing for motocross or supercross. That is the only fair way to do it that I can think of. I would go by the rounds missed, but rather when the injury occurred.
2
Leave Us To
Posts
1145
Joined
10/21/2015
Location
Rocky River, OH US
4/13/2022 12:25pm
DonM wrote:
MXGP has just as many injuries as SX, it ebbs and flows…riding dirt bikes is dangerous regardless of where you ride them…
What data are you basing MXGP has just as many injuries as SX claim opinion on?
1
1
chasetwo79
Posts
1167
Joined
12/1/2019
Location
Truckee, CA, CA US
4/13/2022 12:54pm
chasetwo79 wrote:
The timing of outdoors skews the data. People get to round 1 of outdoors and are either returning from a SX injury or they’ve been beat...
The timing of outdoors skews the data. People get to round 1 of outdoors and are either returning from a SX injury or they’ve been beat up for 17 rounds of being put through the meat grinder and show up already ran down.
RichieW13 wrote:
Yeah, the data would be real messy. You'll have some guys missing MX races due to injuries from SX. Ferrandis announced he's out for the rest...
Yeah, the data would be real messy. You'll have some guys missing MX races due to injuries from SX. Ferrandis announced he's out for the rest of SX season. But if his injury instead happened with 5 rounds of the MX series left, would he still pull out, or would he come back since he would still have plenty of time to come back to SX in 5 months?

Also, in MX you have 40 guys racing the "main" event, compared to 22 in SX. Do the guys racing for 30th place in MX have the same intensity as the guys racing for 10th? So are they less likely to have bad crashes? Do we even hear about it if somebody like Scott Meshey (to pick a name at random) has a practice crash that keeps him out for 3 weeks?

In general, are guys more or less motivated to return to racing SX compared to MX?
mx 219 wrote:
I think you would almost have to look at this data based on whether they were racing or testing for motocross or supercross. That is the...
I think you would almost have to look at this data based on whether they were racing or testing for motocross or supercross. That is the only fair way to do it that I can think of. I would go by the rounds missed, but rather when the injury occurred.
But even so, by the time we get to MX, lots of dudes have “injuries” but are just spent from a brutal SX season.

I know people are going to flame me but I really think the product would be much better for both SX and MX if riders got paid to focus on the one they want.

It might even lead to an expanded MX series. Imagine if we could go back to having nationals in March in Florida? Shit, we could do an outdoors series that starts in The southern states when it’s actually nice there so places like Florida and Texas get opportunities to have nationals. Imagine if riders weren’t just riding outdoors with their eye on a vacation and SX training but full invested like the MXGP series is.

I know up till this point it’s been a money issue. But, I’m hopeful this world SX series will finally lead to a split that’s sustainable for both disciplines. And more Moto for us as consumers
3
1
ToolMaker
Posts
7772
Joined
11/19/2011
Location
Escondido, CA US
Fantasy
1338th
4/13/2022 1:19pm
IF, and a big IF, you did a comparison, I think it would be much more interesting to categorize where on the track, IE what obstacle cause said injury. It seems if you removed the whoops, your injury rate would drop 90% in SX.
1
1
ToolMaker
Posts
7772
Joined
11/19/2011
Location
Escondido, CA US
Fantasy
1338th
4/13/2022 1:25pm
RichieW13 wrote:
Yeah, the data would be real messy. You'll have some guys missing MX races due to injuries from SX. Ferrandis announced he's out for the rest...
Yeah, the data would be real messy. You'll have some guys missing MX races due to injuries from SX. Ferrandis announced he's out for the rest of SX season. But if his injury instead happened with 5 rounds of the MX series left, would he still pull out, or would he come back since he would still have plenty of time to come back to SX in 5 months?

Also, in MX you have 40 guys racing the "main" event, compared to 22 in SX. Do the guys racing for 30th place in MX have the same intensity as the guys racing for 10th? So are they less likely to have bad crashes? Do we even hear about it if somebody like Scott Meshey (to pick a name at random) has a practice crash that keeps him out for 3 weeks?

In general, are guys more or less motivated to return to racing SX compared to MX?
mx 219 wrote:
I think you would almost have to look at this data based on whether they were racing or testing for motocross or supercross. That is the...
I think you would almost have to look at this data based on whether they were racing or testing for motocross or supercross. That is the only fair way to do it that I can think of. I would go by the rounds missed, but rather when the injury occurred.
chasetwo79 wrote:
But even so, by the time we get to MX, lots of dudes have “injuries” but are just spent from a brutal SX season. I know...
But even so, by the time we get to MX, lots of dudes have “injuries” but are just spent from a brutal SX season.

I know people are going to flame me but I really think the product would be much better for both SX and MX if riders got paid to focus on the one they want.

It might even lead to an expanded MX series. Imagine if we could go back to having nationals in March in Florida? Shit, we could do an outdoors series that starts in The southern states when it’s actually nice there so places like Florida and Texas get opportunities to have nationals. Imagine if riders weren’t just riding outdoors with their eye on a vacation and SX training but full invested like the MXGP series is.

I know up till this point it’s been a money issue. But, I’m hopeful this world SX series will finally lead to a split that’s sustainable for both disciplines. And more Moto for us as consumers
I think you'd find a lesser quality MX series just because it's not as good for a television show.
I just don't see how you get main stream viewership like you can with SX.
Less money to pay the riders, so the good riders will gravitate to the money.
TM
1
chasetwo79
Posts
1167
Joined
12/1/2019
Location
Truckee, CA, CA US
4/13/2022 1:39pm
Maybe at first, but I think it could evolve into an Indy-Car/NASCAR style dynamic. Indy is the lesser series in popularity, but still very much respected and loved. Sometimes you could see riders hop back and forth in their careers like Tony Stewart and others did.

The bar to be a top tier professional motocross racer shouldn’t also require the ability to be a top tier SX racer.

This is why we keep getting blasted in the MXdN. We’ve got generalists who have to be good at both versus people who can be great at what the love and choose to do.

So maybe early on the product could be a little watered down, but with specialization comes better skill and I think it could even out.
1
Leave Us To
Posts
1145
Joined
10/21/2015
Location
Rocky River, OH US
4/13/2022 3:33pm Edited Date/Time 4/13/2022 3:36pm
chase279 said "I know people are going to flame me but I really think the product would be much better for both SX and MX if riders got paid to focus on the one they want."

I really think riders are getting paid today to focus on what they want. US riders do both disciplines with the rare SX only deal while the MXGP crowd does their thing. If it ain't broke don't fix it and our current SX & MX in the US works pretty well.

Regarding the World SX series, I am waiting for the series to come together before making any sport chaning predictions. Regarding the MXoN, I don't see how anything you've proposed has any hope for improving the US's chances. It makes my head hurt trying to process the watering down will over time increase riders abilities in a specific discipline.
sandman768
Posts
6667
Joined
3/21/2014
Location
Saratoga Springs, NY US
4/13/2022 5:55pm
I’m no statistician but it seems like a comparison could be done. Pick a year, say 2022. Take the RacerX injury report and keep a running tab until the year is over. I would think any injury incurred while practicing for said discipline would count for that discipline
1
1
ElliotB16
Posts
1090
Joined
6/10/2019
Location
Cairo, GA US
4/14/2022 6:21am
Go roll around a legit supercross track and it’s a no brainer. Shit can go wrong quick on those tight tracks
1
1
TeamGreen
Posts
31773
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
4/14/2022 6:24am
If this year is any sort of reference, it looks like SX takes down a helluva lot of riders.
Mit12
Posts
2049
Joined
6/23/2014
Location
Lake Havasu City, AZ US
4/14/2022 8:15am
I think that the injury rate is similar between SX and MX. It seems that SX has more minor injuries while MX has the more serious injuries.
2
Leave Us To
Posts
1145
Joined
10/21/2015
Location
Rocky River, OH US
4/14/2022 4:30pm
TeamGreen wrote:
If this year is any sort of reference, it looks like SX takes down a helluva lot of riders.
Especially with the man eater whoops all season long. Massive fail if that's anyone at Feld's idea of making the racing better.
1
2
FreshTopEnd
Posts
12492
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA US
Fantasy
4765th
4/15/2022 10:37am
TeamGreen wrote:
If this year is any sort of reference, it looks like SX takes down a helluva lot of riders.
Oddly enough, I think the outdoors took down Stew more often.
DaveB771
Posts
238
Joined
7/27/2011
Location
Minneapolis, MN US
4/15/2022 11:19am
You'd also have to factor in the amount of track time, especially in MXGP with their Saturday qualifying races.
Leeham
Posts
1095
Joined
10/29/2018
Location
Rochester, WA US
Fantasy
3371st
4/15/2022 12:38pm
I think the best way to do this is to count up the DNF/DNS for the race day. Crash in qualifying or during practice week leading up to the race day. Counts as one injury per discipline (SX or MX). I wouldn't count races afterwards. I reckon there is way more missed SX races. MX it seems its easier to limp around and still be somewhat in the mix. Top 10/15? Unless you are totally broken.

Post a reply to: Supercross v. Motocross injury rate

The Latest