Polar HRM Discount code

Polar has generated a code for 20% off units (except Ignite) and USA only. The code is in all caps MOTOX. On a side note, the Polar H10 transmitter will also record a training session when used with the Polar training app Beat. This will obviously not provide HR while riding but will also keep your watch safe. Aldon uses something for his riders which is why our product is generally not on their bars. Still working on getting a MX sports profile, I know already Smile
8
1
|
Bruce372
Posts
6329
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
8/2/2019 9:56am
I wish you still sold the RS100
lrantan
Posts
80
Joined
12/4/2007
Location
Edgewood, NM, USA
8/2/2019 10:43am
Thanks, got a OH-1
opyguy
Posts
587
Joined
8/22/2016
Location
Boston, MA, USA
8/2/2019 11:11am
What is the best model for Moto timing in your opinion?
cwtoyota
Posts
2404
Joined
3/11/2013
Location
Tacoma, WA, USA
8/2/2019 11:16am
Polar has generated a code for 20% off units (except Ignite) and USA only. The code is in all caps MOTOX. On a side note, the...
Polar has generated a code for 20% off units (except Ignite) and USA only. The code is in all caps MOTOX. On a side note, the Polar H10 transmitter will also record a training session when used with the Polar training app Beat. This will obviously not provide HR while riding but will also keep your watch safe. Aldon uses something for his riders which is why our product is generally not on their bars. Still working on getting a MX sports profile, I know already Smile
The advert for the H10 says: "built in memory".

Does this mean I can wear it standalone while I run, then download the data when I get back to my house?
If that's the case, are there buttons, or, is it necessary to connect via bluetooth to start/stop data logging?

I don't want to carry a phone.
1

The Shop

Lynch
Posts
728
Joined
3/14/2015
Location
SE
8/2/2019 11:17am
Awesome, shame I don't live in the US Sideways
Markee
Posts
3661
Joined
4/15/2013
Location
Suffolk, VA, USA
8/2/2019 11:44am
Man just bought a m430. Hey we have a Moto profile yet?!!
Markee
Posts
3661
Joined
4/15/2013
Location
Suffolk, VA, USA
8/2/2019 11:49am
Nope just looked. But hey the most physical demanding sport in the world just doesn't deserve it over badminton, jazz and kite surfing. Smh
3
8/3/2019 10:02am
Thanks for the interest and questions. For the OH1 and the H10, they both record a training session and transmit your heart rate to watch or the Polar training app, Beat. The OH1 needs a double press of the button and the blinking light will reflect its recording. For the H10, once you create a Polar Flow account, download the Beat app. Pair the H10 within the app. When you find a sports profile( I know, now MX profile Sad ). Before you start the training on the app which you do not want to take the phone for the ride, you will see an icon on the top right of the screen/phone. Tap the icon and you will get the option for the phone to record or the H10. Tap H10 and go Moto and return to the phone and app and end the session. The session will then get pushed to your Flow training diary.
The Polar M430 should do the job. If you training often and Moto, and think you might be overtraining at times, the Vantage M keeps track of your weekly training volume and in a few months gets the upgrade to Nightly Recharge currently on the Ignite. No need for the Vantage V. Hope this helps the three of you.
1
Justin_P
Posts
117
Joined
6/13/2019
Location
Hollis Center, ME, USA
6/4/2026 4:34am

Any chance somebody has a current code? Looking at a vantage m3 since my old watch has quit but they're spendy.

1
BoxcarWilly
Posts
1195
Joined
10/5/2023
Location
Thunder Bay, ON, CA
6/4/2026 6:41am
Justin_P wrote:

Any chance somebody has a current code? Looking at a vantage m3 since my old watch has quit but they're spendy.

Garmin Instinct is the way to go for a durable moto fitness watch. 

6
OwenJakes
Posts
1775
Joined
6/30/2023
Location
sebree, KY, USA
6/4/2026 9:46am

Garmin > Polar


First hand experience. 

4
Brent
Posts
5846
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Temecula, CA, USA
6/4/2026 12:31pm
OwenJakes wrote:

Garmin > Polar


First hand experience. 

Agreed.

I had used Polar Vantage products every day for the last 12 years, two weeks ago I switched to the Garmin ForeRunner 965.

 Superior data collection and higher quality information showing me what are my strengths and what I need to work on to improve my fitness.  HrV and V02 max results are constant with Garmin every day use. 

Garmin also has a specific training setting for motocross, where Polar barely acknowledges the sport exists. 

 

1
cwtoyota
Posts
2404
Joined
3/11/2013
Location
Tacoma, WA, USA
6/4/2026 4:00pm
OwenJakes wrote:

Garmin > Polar


First hand experience. 

I ended up going with a light weight Garmin GPS watch (Forerunner 255) and it does the job.
GPS positioning is fairly accurate (for MTB and Motocross).
I don't need to carry my phone, or start / stop the activity via their app with Garmin the way the Polar allegedly requires you to do.

Garmin is a bit of a pain in the ass if you don't have their app.
The watch requires ephemeris data to quickly lock onto GPS satellite signals.  
If you don't connect via Bluetooth using Garmin Connect, or plug the watch into a computer running Garmin Express about once a week, the GPS will take up to 15 minutes to lock onto signals and it will not be as accurate.


Garmin's altimeter's fail pretty often (it's a barometric MEMS device inside the watch).
Garmin will tell you to clean the sensor, but that doesn't help.
The Garmin GPS based altimeter setting is not accurate or reliable, so it is not an effective alternative to the barometric altitude.
I disabled the altimeter since it was reporting double the actual climb on my rides and nothing (calibration, cleaning, etc) would fix it.

My personal watch may have failed due to compressed air use in the shop, but I found tons of reports that others have the same issue...

I'll buy another when this one dies.

OwenJakes
Posts
1775
Joined
6/30/2023
Location
sebree, KY, USA
6/5/2026 5:36am
OwenJakes wrote:

Garmin > Polar


First hand experience. 

cwtoyota wrote:
I ended up going with a light weight Garmin GPS watch (Forerunner 255) and it does the job.GPS positioning is fairly accurate (for MTB and Motocross).I...

I ended up going with a light weight Garmin GPS watch (Forerunner 255) and it does the job.
GPS positioning is fairly accurate (for MTB and Motocross).
I don't need to carry my phone, or start / stop the activity via their app with Garmin the way the Polar allegedly requires you to do.

Garmin is a bit of a pain in the ass if you don't have their app.
The watch requires ephemeris data to quickly lock onto GPS satellite signals.  
If you don't connect via Bluetooth using Garmin Connect, or plug the watch into a computer running Garmin Express about once a week, the GPS will take up to 15 minutes to lock onto signals and it will not be as accurate.


Garmin's altimeter's fail pretty often (it's a barometric MEMS device inside the watch).
Garmin will tell you to clean the sensor, but that doesn't help.
The Garmin GPS based altimeter setting is not accurate or reliable, so it is not an effective alternative to the barometric altitude.
I disabled the altimeter since it was reporting double the actual climb on my rides and nothing (calibration, cleaning, etc) would fix it.

My personal watch may have failed due to compressed air use in the shop, but I found tons of reports that others have the same issue...

I'll buy another when this one dies.

I use a 255 for my running. It sucks but I think you may need to go with a “better” watch for what you’re doing. I love the 255 and it’s pretty perfect but I don’t know if it’s built for altitude stuff or anything outdoorsy. If I start and finish my run in the same place sometimes it doesn’t even show that properly on the elevation 😂😂

1
cwtoyota
Posts
2404
Joined
3/11/2013
Location
Tacoma, WA, USA
6/5/2026 8:57am
OwenJakes wrote:

Garmin > Polar


First hand experience. 

cwtoyota wrote:
I ended up going with a light weight Garmin GPS watch (Forerunner 255) and it does the job.GPS positioning is fairly accurate (for MTB and Motocross).I...

I ended up going with a light weight Garmin GPS watch (Forerunner 255) and it does the job.
GPS positioning is fairly accurate (for MTB and Motocross).
I don't need to carry my phone, or start / stop the activity via their app with Garmin the way the Polar allegedly requires you to do.

Garmin is a bit of a pain in the ass if you don't have their app.
The watch requires ephemeris data to quickly lock onto GPS satellite signals.  
If you don't connect via Bluetooth using Garmin Connect, or plug the watch into a computer running Garmin Express about once a week, the GPS will take up to 15 minutes to lock onto signals and it will not be as accurate.


Garmin's altimeter's fail pretty often (it's a barometric MEMS device inside the watch).
Garmin will tell you to clean the sensor, but that doesn't help.
The Garmin GPS based altimeter setting is not accurate or reliable, so it is not an effective alternative to the barometric altitude.
I disabled the altimeter since it was reporting double the actual climb on my rides and nothing (calibration, cleaning, etc) would fix it.

My personal watch may have failed due to compressed air use in the shop, but I found tons of reports that others have the same issue...

I'll buy another when this one dies.

OwenJakes wrote:
I use a 255 for my running. It sucks but I think you may need to go with a “better” watch for what you’re doing. I...

I use a 255 for my running. It sucks but I think you may need to go with a “better” watch for what you’re doing. I love the 255 and it’s pretty perfect but I don’t know if it’s built for altitude stuff or anything outdoorsy. If I start and finish my run in the same place sometimes it doesn’t even show that properly on the elevation 😂😂

I'll buy another compact and lightweight watch like the 255 whenever mine ages out.

Before I bought the 255, a friend loaned me his previous version of the Garmin Fenix watch for a few weeks.
His barometric sensor had failed, so he had just replaced it with the latest Fenix model. 
I liked the GPS accuracy, but I have zero interest in wearing a watch that heavy & bulky.

Those flagship model Garmins (three years ago) and the 255 had approximately the same built in functions and the same GPS system.
The occasional deviation in positioning and altitude over time is part of the deal with GPS and barometric altitude.
Most of the time they're very good, but sometimes the ephemeris data is imperfect, or you'll just get some drift due to other factors.
Remember that GPS depends on sub-microsecond timing from multiple satellites and all of that is processed in a tiny computer on your wrist.

I've done some work in GPS electronics and software, Garmin is up against a few constraints that make it really tough to get the accuracy and still meet our consumer demands for battery life, GPS lock time, etc. I think they're generally doing a better job than their competitors and the compromises they've chosen are almost invisible to most users.

1
Justin_P
Posts
117
Joined
6/13/2019
Location
Hollis Center, ME, USA
6/5/2026 9:37am

Thanks for the recommendations, but I had great luck with my original Vantage M and will be sticking with a Polar product, was just hoping someone had an active discount code to soften the cost burden just a bit.

OwenJakes
Posts
1775
Joined
6/30/2023
Location
sebree, KY, USA
6/5/2026 9:41am
cwtoyota wrote:
I ended up going with a light weight Garmin GPS watch (Forerunner 255) and it does the job.GPS positioning is fairly accurate (for MTB and Motocross).I...

I ended up going with a light weight Garmin GPS watch (Forerunner 255) and it does the job.
GPS positioning is fairly accurate (for MTB and Motocross).
I don't need to carry my phone, or start / stop the activity via their app with Garmin the way the Polar allegedly requires you to do.

Garmin is a bit of a pain in the ass if you don't have their app.
The watch requires ephemeris data to quickly lock onto GPS satellite signals.  
If you don't connect via Bluetooth using Garmin Connect, or plug the watch into a computer running Garmin Express about once a week, the GPS will take up to 15 minutes to lock onto signals and it will not be as accurate.


Garmin's altimeter's fail pretty often (it's a barometric MEMS device inside the watch).
Garmin will tell you to clean the sensor, but that doesn't help.
The Garmin GPS based altimeter setting is not accurate or reliable, so it is not an effective alternative to the barometric altitude.
I disabled the altimeter since it was reporting double the actual climb on my rides and nothing (calibration, cleaning, etc) would fix it.

My personal watch may have failed due to compressed air use in the shop, but I found tons of reports that others have the same issue...

I'll buy another when this one dies.

OwenJakes wrote:
I use a 255 for my running. It sucks but I think you may need to go with a “better” watch for what you’re doing. I...

I use a 255 for my running. It sucks but I think you may need to go with a “better” watch for what you’re doing. I love the 255 and it’s pretty perfect but I don’t know if it’s built for altitude stuff or anything outdoorsy. If I start and finish my run in the same place sometimes it doesn’t even show that properly on the elevation 😂😂

cwtoyota wrote:
I'll buy another compact and lightweight watch like the 255 whenever mine ages out.Before I bought the 255, a friend loaned me his previous version of...

I'll buy another compact and lightweight watch like the 255 whenever mine ages out.

Before I bought the 255, a friend loaned me his previous version of the Garmin Fenix watch for a few weeks.
His barometric sensor had failed, so he had just replaced it with the latest Fenix model. 
I liked the GPS accuracy, but I have zero interest in wearing a watch that heavy & bulky.

Those flagship model Garmins (three years ago) and the 255 had approximately the same built in functions and the same GPS system.
The occasional deviation in positioning and altitude over time is part of the deal with GPS and barometric altitude.
Most of the time they're very good, but sometimes the ephemeris data is imperfect, or you'll just get some drift due to other factors.
Remember that GPS depends on sub-microsecond timing from multiple satellites and all of that is processed in a tiny computer on your wrist.

I've done some work in GPS electronics and software, Garmin is up against a few constraints that make it really tough to get the accuracy and still meet our consumer demands for battery life, GPS lock time, etc. I think they're generally doing a better job than their competitors and the compromises they've chosen are almost invisible to most users.

I think the best thing is probably to use an old iPhone and strap it to the bar pad lol. 

Post a reply to: Polar HRM Discount code

The Latest