How to Fix Supercross

tprice07
Posts
2373
Joined
9/29/2009
Location
Fort Dodge, IA US
Edited Date/Time 2/27/2016 12:11pm
Take the emphasis off the championship, or do away from it all together. I know it is fun watching people race smart vs race for the win. At the end of the night, is a person winning a championship more entertaining than 2-3 guys going balls out for the win?

So how do they do that? (Drop Championship)
- Increase purse for winner significantly over the rest (still increase the rest as well)
- Drop the Heats, Semis and LCQs (less time on track)
- Run two 10 lap mains (no overall, just individual races)
- Keep practice time the same
- Stop making flowing tracks
- Get rid of sand sections

If you want to watch who is the most consistent/smartest (Championship still in tact)
- Start Dungey backwards on the line, or with a 25 point deficit (kidding)
- Go to MXDN points style system (exclude the team portion)
- 1st gets 1 point, 2nd gets 2, 3rd gets 3, so on...person with lowest points wins the championship. Maybe give a point reduction for pole position.
- Still get rid of Heats, Semis and LCQs.
- Ramp up the practice time, allow riders to get the track nailed down...give the casual viewer 20 minutes per class of real racing. I almost fall asleep watching 4 hours of boring ass racing..

Like I said before at the end of the day who, as a viewer, gives a shit about a championship. You could have someone win a championship without ever winning..just by being the one who doesn't crash out.

This is somewhat in response to the chase system..but more so because I want to see what people have as alternatives to the current system and rumored chase system.

Please attack me below with your contradicting ideas :-)




(also I'm aware of the chase topic but this is not that topic, this is for alternatives you guys would want to see..
|
Roostermx58
Posts
1507
Joined
9/18/2013
Location
Raleigh/Durham, NC US
2/26/2016 12:11pm
I don't think having just 2 mains is gonna draw much viewer attention (on TV or in the stadium). Hardly anyone comes to watch practice. With lap-times around 1 min, the whole broadcast with 250's and 450's would be over in an hour. I personally need more racing than that. I also don't complain about the current broadcast being 3 hours long! Smile
Frodad78
Posts
2157
Joined
1/11/2012
Location
TX US
2/26/2016 12:14pm
I love the whole night of racing, in my house its an event.
lostboy819
Posts
11520
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Somewhere, CO US
Fantasy
1342nd
2/26/2016 12:17pm
Make the points awarded between 1st place and 2nd a significant amount so that winning individual races you can make up points and still be in the hunt even if you had a injury or slow start to the season.
tprice07
Posts
2373
Joined
9/29/2009
Location
Fort Dodge, IA US
2/26/2016 12:21pm
lostboy819 wrote:
Make the points awarded between 1st place and 2nd a significant amount so that winning individual races you can make up points and still be in...
Make the points awarded between 1st place and 2nd a significant amount so that winning individual races you can make up points and still be in the hunt even if you had a injury or slow start to the season.
That works to an extent but that also means Dungey would likely have this championship locked up now.

The Shop

Moto810
Posts
815
Joined
1/25/2015
Location
Milton, WV US
2/26/2016 12:28pm Edited Date/Time 2/26/2016 12:34pm
Supercross is well Supercross. Not really saying it is broken. However it would be nice to see them fresh it up a bit.


Less CA rounds would be a good start. Keep it at 3 I would think.

Maybe make the 250 class a support class with stock type rules

Consider the 450 class the premier class and run two 10 lap main events.


Race day would go more like this

450 Heat 1
450 Heat 2
250 Heat 1
250 Heat 2
450 LCQ
250 LCQ
450 Main 1
250 Main
450 Main 2
Moto810
Posts
815
Joined
1/25/2015
Location
Milton, WV US
2/26/2016 12:29pm
Oh and move ArenaCross to the fall so that all the riders can compete in Supercross!
tprice07
Posts
2373
Joined
9/29/2009
Location
Fort Dodge, IA US
2/26/2016 12:30pm
I don't think having just 2 mains is gonna draw much viewer attention (on TV or in the stadium). Hardly anyone comes to watch practice. With...
I don't think having just 2 mains is gonna draw much viewer attention (on TV or in the stadium). Hardly anyone comes to watch practice. With lap-times around 1 min, the whole broadcast with 250's and 450's would be over in an hour. I personally need more racing than that. I also don't complain about the current broadcast being 3 hours long! Smile
I do watch the entire night and all the practice (I start practice live stream late and skip of B/C practice --sorry to those guys)

My personal thoughts are people would be much more interested in watching 2 main events + add in more behind the scenes stuff. People, including myself, really enjoy the "Behind the Scenes" stuff. The stadium fan will

An analogy: if you watch any other sport is the game anything other than what actually counts?
2/26/2016 12:35pm
lostboy819 wrote:
Make the points awarded between 1st place and 2nd a significant amount so that winning individual races you can make up points and still be in...
Make the points awarded between 1st place and 2nd a significant amount so that winning individual races you can make up points and still be in the hunt even if you had a injury or slow start to the season.
I never liked this approach.

I think "average finish" best determines the champion over the course of a season. Artificially weighing certain places does the riders a disservice IMO.

As for "fixing SX". Im not sure the on-track product needs much fixing. Feld & the AMA got things I wish they did differently and the trickle down effect to the teams & riders would benefit "the show" over time. But damn, the racing is pretty good and the polish of the production has finally grown up (sans Ralph). The field is really deep and for the first time in a LONG time the SX2 class actually feels like a feeder series. All of the best talent are on 450s like it should be.
Holigan
Posts
1444
Joined
6/18/2008
Location
Dallas, TX US
2/26/2016 12:39pm
Here is a quick fix to make Supercross more exciting:

1. Every 450 racer not named Ryan Dungey needs to ride faster.

Problem solved.
hvaughn88
Posts
8363
Joined
6/19/2013
Location
Conway, AR US
2/26/2016 12:41pm
Holigan wrote:
Here is a quick fix to make Supercross more exciting:

1. Every 450 racer not named Ryan Dungey needs to ride faster.

Problem solved.
ding ding ding
tprice07
Posts
2373
Joined
9/29/2009
Location
Fort Dodge, IA US
2/26/2016 12:51pm
Moto810 wrote:
Supercross is well Supercross. Not really saying it is broken. However it would be nice to see them fresh it up a bit. Less CA rounds...
Supercross is well Supercross. Not really saying it is broken. However it would be nice to see them fresh it up a bit.


Less CA rounds would be a good start. Keep it at 3 I would think.

Maybe make the 250 class a support class with stock type rules

Consider the 450 class the premier class and run two 10 lap main events.


Race day would go more like this

450 Heat 1
450 Heat 2
250 Heat 1
250 Heat 2
450 LCQ
250 LCQ
450 Main 1
250 Main
450 Main 2
I really like this.

1. With CA rounds I am so damn tired by the time the main is on I can barely keep my eyes open and I'm just in the midwest, I can't imagine East Coast folks.

2. "Stock type" for 250 class would be great! I would imagine the only restriction you could make would be on mapping, motor and pipe. The suspension would have to open for how gnarly those tracks get.

Also, OEMs would have more money to kick out some support to the privateers for bikes. Make for some even racing and better transition for riders coming in from amateurs.

3. Starting with 450s would be much better than 250s. That is a lot more interesting for a casual fan.

4. AX moved back to Fall and opener back in Des Moines, Iowa. Man I miss going to AX. I used to go every year as a kid then they moved it around and screwed it all up. Bastards. It fulfilled my hunger between MX and SX.

Funny thing, when I used to watch AX, I never knew or cared who was leading the points. just who won the race that night.
Roostermx58
Posts
1507
Joined
9/18/2013
Location
Raleigh/Durham, NC US
2/26/2016 12:52pm
Holigan wrote:
Here is a quick fix to make Supercross more exciting:

1. Every 450 racer not named Ryan Dungey needs to ride faster.

Problem solved.
hvaughn88 wrote:
ding ding ding
And 2 years ago we would have said the same about Villopoto. I wonder how RD5 would match up against RV2 this year? (that assumes RV2 was still training and riding)
2/26/2016 12:53pm
Disband Supercross altogether and expand Motocross to an 18- to 20-event season? That's always been my vote.
2/26/2016 1:04pm
Do away with 450 night show qualifying for the Main Event. This class is supposed to be the best in the world right? Do qualifying during the day for 22 man gate. Heats/Semis/LCQ would take about an hour. Make it an all day affair for those of us who bleed this sport. We already show up at or before 1-2pm anyway.

Start the night show with opening ceremonies and then go directly in to:

450 Dash - 6 Laps. Points to the top 5.
250 Heat 1
250 Heat 2
450 Sprint - 10 Laps. Points to the top 10.
250 LCQ
Track Prep
250 Main Event
450 Main Event - 20 laps. Points to top 20 and a larger cash prize.

More talent on the track. More opportunity for points. The first 6 laps of a Main Event are always crazy. The first 10 have produced some surprise leaders/efforts. The 20 lap is iconic and proves who is, without a doubt, a bad dude.

Only count the Main Event winner as the winner for the event.
BAMX
Posts
2842
Joined
1/22/2012
Location
Fallbrook, CA US
2/26/2016 1:18pm
I didn't know that there was anything that needed to be fixed other than the guys not named Dungey needing to be fast on a more consistent basis. Maybe the TV director should be better and follow more of the racers who are battling even for 10th instead of following the leader for 10 laps unchallenged.
hvaughn88
Posts
8363
Joined
6/19/2013
Location
Conway, AR US
2/26/2016 1:27pm
Holigan wrote:
Here is a quick fix to make Supercross more exciting:

1. Every 450 racer not named Ryan Dungey needs to ride faster.

Problem solved.
hvaughn88 wrote:
ding ding ding
And 2 years ago we would have said the same about Villopoto. I wonder how RD5 would match up against RV2 this year? (that assumes RV2...
And 2 years ago we would have said the same about Villopoto. I wonder how RD5 would match up against RV2 this year? (that assumes RV2 was still training and riding)
I'm not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing, haha
Ted722
Posts
4487
Joined
9/21/2011
Location
Sacramento, CA US
2/26/2016 1:40pm
Sorry, I can't get past the title.

Reminds me too much of the Chase thread...
Dezerted
Posts
637
Joined
11/10/2011
Location
Temecula, CA US
2/26/2016 1:46pm
1st 30 pts
2nd 23
3rd 20
4th 18
Rest 1 pt deduction from higher finisher
17,16 etc
Julian
Posts
489
Joined
8/24/2014
Location
PL
2/26/2016 1:48pm
450cc bikes need to go

250cc bikes should be the main class

and the support class should be 125cc two strokes

450cc on a tiny sx track is way, way overkill

this way, the manufacturers would have 125s, 250's and 450's to promote and sell since the 450's would show up in the outdoor races

but then actually, who needs 450cc's these days, we could just drop em and go 125 two stroke / 250 four stroke for both sx and mx

oh, and make the main 25 laps and all the other heats etc add 5 laps too

and take out about half the jumps..... the riders do not race when they are just hanging around up in the air
Roostermx58
Posts
1507
Joined
9/18/2013
Location
Raleigh/Durham, NC US
2/26/2016 1:49pm
hvaughn88 wrote:
I'm not sure if you're agreeing or disagreeing, haha
I agree with that last post! haha
Superdave19
Posts
1102
Joined
10/10/2012
Location
Spring, TX US
2/26/2016 1:52pm
+1 Julian-

450's to freakin' gnarly indoors.

Award points for heat wins- 1st thru 3rd, and allow them to drop the worst finish in a main event-
Dezerted
Posts
637
Joined
11/10/2011
Location
Temecula, CA US
2/26/2016 1:56pm Edited Date/Time 2/26/2016 1:56pm
My idea sucks and Julian's is the winner
2/26/2016 2:09pm
lostboy819 wrote:
Make the points awarded between 1st place and 2nd a significant amount so that winning individual races you can make up points and still be in...
Make the points awarded between 1st place and 2nd a significant amount so that winning individual races you can make up points and still be in the hunt even if you had a injury or slow start to the season.
I personally think just the opposite.

If the Championship and competitiveness within the championship is the goal, we need to tighten the points. In this sport there isn't huge variances in finishing spots persay. One because theres only 20 spots, and two; these days the same guys are battling for the most part the same positions week in and week out +/- 2-3 spots. So making say a 1 point difference between each finishing position makes the stakes of those 2-3 position swings greater in terms of total points and standing within the championship. Plus this limits how quickly one or two people and jump out to a massive lead. You finish one spot ahead of me two weeks in a row, in one week I can catch back up by finishing two spots in front of you in one week.

Couple that with point bonuses for starts and heat finishing (1-5 pays points or something 1st=5, 2nd=4...). I don't think supercross really needs "transformed" and am not interested in recreating the wheel, just altering the way points are awarded, as we do not have spec bikes for every rider (and I wouldn't want them too) so there are equipment advantages, physical conditioning is much more of a factor in this sport than many other forms of racing (Nascar) so there will always be a few that are in better shape than others, and we cant in this sport make talent of all racers equal. This will make each night and every aspect (qualifying races, starts, and mains) more interesting, as well keeping points tighter through out the championship, thus ensuring every round some one has a chance of making a move.
lostboy819
Posts
11520
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Somewhere, CO US
Fantasy
1342nd
2/26/2016 2:15pm Edited Date/Time 2/26/2016 2:17pm
lostboy819 wrote:
Make the points awarded between 1st place and 2nd a significant amount so that winning individual races you can make up points and still be in...
Make the points awarded between 1st place and 2nd a significant amount so that winning individual races you can make up points and still be in the hunt even if you had a injury or slow start to the season.
tprice07 wrote:
That works to an extent but that also means Dungey would likely have this championship locked up now.
Somebody has to win, you cant have it both ways.So what do you do about guys who win and win on a consistent basis, isn't that what racing is all about?
Zaugg
Posts
1084
Joined
9/1/2012
Location
Not California, CA US
2/26/2016 2:17pm
I didn't know Supercross was broken.

steveada
Posts
396
Joined
5/6/2011
Location
Evans, GA US
2/26/2016 2:25pm
1. Put some old cars between the jumps, people love to watch bikes jump over cars.
2. Stop grooming the track all day, old school moto guys will love it
3. Last man standing race, anything goes until only one bike on the track.
4. Random length race - after start, a computer generates number from 3-10, that is the lap the checkered flag flies, no white flag.
5. Joker lap - at some point during the race riders have to stop and pick up a Monster girl and run 1 lap with her on the bike.



h&m_cycle
Posts
4412
Joined
2/23/2014
Location
Steubenville, OH US
2/26/2016 3:06pm
Disband Supercross altogether and expand Motocross to an 18- to 20-event season? That's always been my vote.
Yes or maybe 8 supercross races in Jan. Feb. followed by a 2 week break into the Nationals in Mid-March of
MOTOCROSS...

please note.... all lower case letters were used in supercross Silly
kkawboy14
Posts
11494
Joined
6/5/2015
Location
TX US
2/26/2016 3:09pm
1) 450) 30 man gates
2) 250) 30 man gates, no more east/west
3) $1 million dollar payouts per event

Post a reply to: How to Fix Supercross

The Latest