ESPN 2 vs Speed coverage

Nutty C
Posts
463
Joined
10/28/2009
Location
Waterdown, CA
Edited Date/Time 1/26/2012 9:50pm
I kind of preffered the ESPN 2 coverage over the present. How about you people ?
|
skin517
Posts
3
Joined
9/7/2010
Location
Glyndon, MN, USA
10/6/2010 10:19am
i agree, it seems like they have the announcers talk about dumb stuff in the interviews and non-race coverage, also i would rather see an extended overview of the other moto rather that some of the thinks they put in there
mx295
Posts
4296
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Quartz Hill, CA, USA
10/6/2010 10:27am
skin517 wrote:
i agree, it seems like they have the announcers talk about dumb stuff in the interviews and non-race coverage, also i would rather see an extended...
i agree, it seems like they have the announcers talk about dumb stuff in the interviews and non-race coverage, also i would rather see an extended overview of the other moto rather that some of the thinks they put in there
x2
FreshTopEnd
Posts
13352
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
10/6/2010 10:38am
ESPN treated MX like crap. And ESPN didn't produce the show; they took what was provided to them by the production company and pretty much played it any time they wanted other than when it was scheduled.

ATKpilot99
Posts
10496
Joined
4/13/2010
Location
Lake Geneva, WI, USA
10/6/2010 10:41am
ESPN treated MX like crap. And ESPN didn't produce the show; they took what was provided to them by the production company and pretty much played...
ESPN treated MX like crap. And ESPN didn't produce the show; they took what was provided to them by the production company and pretty much played it any time they wanted other than when it was scheduled.

Good point . And it was pre empted by other stuff a lot too. I'll take today's coverage any day.

The Shop

300zx
Posts
126
Joined
7/22/2008
Location
Baltimore, MD, USA
10/6/2010 12:04pm
Good find! Paul Page is a great announcer. Part II and III







BLAHBLAH
Posts
1118
Joined
4/9/2010
Location
Sacramento, CA, USA
10/6/2010 12:26pm
ESPN treated MX like crap. And ESPN didn't produce the show; they took what was provided to them by the production company and pretty much played...
ESPN treated MX like crap. And ESPN didn't produce the show; they took what was provided to them by the production company and pretty much played it any time they wanted other than when it was scheduled.

x2

If you like staying up till 2am to try and catch a supercross from 4 rounds ago just to be disaapointed that they are broadcasting a fishing show instead, vote espn2.
agency399
Posts
402
Joined
2/20/2009
Location
Deer River, NY, USA
10/6/2010 12:54pm
ESPN treated MX like crap. And ESPN didn't produce the show; they took what was provided to them by the production company and pretty much played...
ESPN treated MX like crap. And ESPN didn't produce the show; they took what was provided to them by the production company and pretty much played it any time they wanted other than when it was scheduled.

BLAHBLAH wrote:
x2 If you like staying up till 2am to try and catch a supercross from 4 rounds ago just to be disaapointed that they are broadcasting...
x2

If you like staying up till 2am to try and catch a supercross from 4 rounds ago just to be disaapointed that they are broadcasting a fishing show instead, vote espn2.
Exactly............how quickly we forget.

Thanks for coming on board speed.

Post a reply to: ESPN 2 vs Speed coverage

The Latest