All

as i was reading #3 i thought about Unadilla and then you listed it. that track was done so good. there’s a difference tho between a track jump being oversized and a jump that just needs to be braked up to like henry hill at budds creek for example. in real life if you pin it off of it you’re going to land in the corner like doug henry did. in the game, if you pin it off of it you’ll land in the corner, but that’s because of overspeed not cause the jump was made incorrectly. but i know...

i’m only going to say this one more time. again, the game feels like a completely different game between the two views. i don’t care about the technicalities, i’m talking about what i feel and what i experience. the same thing that numerous people on here and on youtube have said. the game is better in FPV because the physics feel different. i don’t care about the reasons, it is what it is. that’s been my only statement. if i feel something different in comparison to something else, i call it the physics. perception is reality!

Let me take a stab at it: #1- I am bored with the current physics, but simply due to the old saying "for every smoking hot broad, there is a dude tired of f#@%ing her". I am ready for their next title #2- IF you tune to jump to the moon, max preload frequently, and hall mach 5 constantly, you will boom to the moon #3- The "moon" physics has a lot to do with track design and steepness/magnitude/scaling of jumps. The more "realistically" scaled/pitched tracks and jumps feel good (Unadilla, Oakland), while others like Ironman, Budds Creek, Big Horn...

Go to page 22 of the October issue of Racer X. "The plan is to offer the second package of the first six tracks - Hangtown, Fox Raceway, Thunder Valley, High Point, WW Ranch, and Southwick - early next year."

i already said call it what you want. of course they don’t have a different physics engine for the changes in view but you can’t deny the difference in gameplay feel in just about every aspect. and that’s my only point. it’s not just about what you’re seeing....it’s what you’re feeling as well. it’s different. it’s bizzare if this is new information to you. again, it’s like this in all games. it has to be by design. in FPV what you’re experiencing is that of the screen and the bars/front end, for lack of a better explanation...you are the TV/computer...

135:00 On ironman?? Damn, wonder where I can gain 10s...

the FPV (first person view) in all out is much different than previous mxvsatv tittles. of course, its the same in the sense that its a view thats over the bars and its not third person view, but with All out, the specific way the FPV view is designed, combined with the physics and gameplay feel, is the reason why many people say its the best way to play the game. the overall gameplay and physics is what makes it so good. im actually confused by your statement. you say you played FPV in previous games and had very few...

The new tracks are scaled perfectly in my opinion. I've spent about an hour on each track in time trial mode. It's perfect having to brake for sharp corners and having the ruts in the right spots. Not too many but just enough. I got a 1:59 at Millville today and was so happy to break that 2 minute mark. I honestly have the most fun on Millville though. If you hit it just right, you can make it a step down double after the uphill triple after the Chadapult. Also, save a lot of time hitting the commandments section...