Racer X - Alessi bashing

burn1986
Posts
12246
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA, USA
4/7/2011 12:56pm Edited Date/Time 4/7/2011 1:04pm
GrapeApe wrote:
Yes, I read it. It gave equal coverage to Stewart, Villopoto, Reed, Dungey, and Canard, which was actually the point of the entire column. Are you...
Yes, I read it. It gave equal coverage to Stewart, Villopoto, Reed, Dungey, and Canard, which was actually the point of the entire column.

Are you okay today? I ask because I care Smile
Here we go. . . - from RacerX Redux Toronto:

Look at the last few weeks as a reference. Chad Reed was faster than Ryan Dungey in Atlanta. But Dungey was clearly faster than Reed in Indy, where he caught him, crashed, then caught him again. But then Dungey wasn’t faster than Reed last week in Jacksonville, in fact, when Dungey lost the pace of Reed and Trey Canard, many declared his championship hopes dead and buried. Now, one week later, Dungey turns the tables on Canard and Reed and beats them both in Toronto the exact same way they beat him in Jacksonville! By the way, Canard caught and passed Dungey twice in the heat race, but Dungey was better in the main. Amazing.

Each time you think you finally have this season figured out, it changes as soon as you can say “next week.” Two weeks ago Ryan Villopoto was in control, now he’s not even in the points lead. It was clearly not Chad Reed’s championship when he was digging his head out of the sand on the first lap in Los Angeles. Now he is in the points lead. And a few days ago, no one thought this could be Dungey’s year, either, until he won in Toronto, and look at that, he’s down just eight points despite losing at least fifteen in Anaheim with a derailed chain.


You combine that with this week's.

Judge for yourself. Its slanted.
lucero10x
Posts
1624
Joined
9/25/2009
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
4/7/2011 1:00pm
Matthes wrote:
We go to the races, watch them, speak to riders and teams and form an opinion on what happened. It's called an "editorial". If you want...
We go to the races, watch them, speak to riders and teams and form an opinion on what happened. It's called an "editorial".

If you want the blow by blow of what happened and without opinion, stick to the race report.
So I read that right. I thought so. Thanks, Steve.

I can respect that it is an editorial for sure. But, I don't like the dismissive and sarcastic attitudes. Kinda like the dude that got flogged by Vital who "reported" for the LA Times on the SX in Dodger Stadium. He was pretty much a dick regarding something a lot of us hold dear and he heard about it. And the fact that someone writes an editorial and labels it editorial does not exempt them from a retort, a reply or a disagreement. Just cause it's an editorial doesn't mean it came with a hold harmless agreement. People who read it still have their opinions and will likely voice them regarding the content, tone etc. Hence what we have here.

Furthermore to bridge the gap in such a lazy fashion as JW did with the Alessi ruined Dungeys night comment was fuckin ridiculous and he needed to be called out on it. Come on, man. You can't blame the fact that Dungey lost that race on Alessi. Guess what, guys, if Canard starts in front of Dungey, currently, and doesn't fall, he is going to beat him.
GrapeApe
Posts
9005
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX, USA
4/7/2011 1:23pm
lucero10x wrote:
So I read that right. I thought so. Thanks, Steve. I can respect that it is an editorial for sure. But, I don't like the dismissive...
So I read that right. I thought so. Thanks, Steve.

I can respect that it is an editorial for sure. But, I don't like the dismissive and sarcastic attitudes. Kinda like the dude that got flogged by Vital who "reported" for the LA Times on the SX in Dodger Stadium. He was pretty much a dick regarding something a lot of us hold dear and he heard about it. And the fact that someone writes an editorial and labels it editorial does not exempt them from a retort, a reply or a disagreement. Just cause it's an editorial doesn't mean it came with a hold harmless agreement. People who read it still have their opinions and will likely voice them regarding the content, tone etc. Hence what we have here.

Furthermore to bridge the gap in such a lazy fashion as JW did with the Alessi ruined Dungeys night comment was fuckin ridiculous and he needed to be called out on it. Come on, man. You can't blame the fact that Dungey lost that race on Alessi. Guess what, guys, if Canard starts in front of Dungey, currently, and doesn't fall, he is going to beat him.
After the race, the Suzuki guys were kind of bummed Mike did that, because there was absolutely no chance he was going to hold off Dungey for 19 more laps, so he basically wrecked Dungey’s race for no real reason—if Dunge had gotten to second on the first lap it may have changed everything.


Why are you blaming JW for something he was just relaying from the Suzuki camp?
Weege
Posts
26
Joined
1/1/2011
Location
Morgantown, WV, USA
4/7/2011 1:24pm
For Burn, here's a snippet from the previous Redux from Jacksonville, with more overwhelming praise for Dungey.

What about The Dunge? I just can’t figure it out. It was there for the taking, but he didn’t take it. Before the season, a lot of potential scenarios were trotted out, but I don’t think anyone believed there would be a race where Dungey got up to third and just couldn’t keep the pace of Chad Reed and Trey Canard. Not picking on Canard, but one of them is a rookie, and he has two wins. Dungey had a shot at him in Houston and could have done it here. Where was the anger from last week?

It almost seems like I said bad things about him in a race where he got third and good things about him in a race in which he won? Where do I come up with this!? When a guy wins, you usually write more positive things about him than when he loses...

For lucero, I was making fun of a KTM press release about an AMA certified holeshot. I don't see that as ruining an entire company, its bikes or its employees. It was just a joke about one single press release. I also own a KTM. And I don't own any of the other brands of bikes.

I was merely reporting what the Suzuki dudes said after the race. I never said Dungey would have won the race if Alessi hadn't passed him, or that Alessi should not have done that. I did say that it could have changed things, and it obviously could have. But I don't have any problems with what Mike did. I'm just telling you what happened, I wasn't railing against what he did.

Same with T Hahn deal on the last lap. I wasn't saying what he said was good or bad, I'm just telling you that he said it.

The Shop

sdfog1
Posts
966
Joined
5/24/2009
Location
Flower Mound, TX, USA
4/7/2011 1:27pm
Weege wrote:
For Burn, here's a snippet from the previous Redux from Jacksonville, with more overwhelming praise for Dungey. [i]What about The Dunge? I just can’t figure it...
For Burn, here's a snippet from the previous Redux from Jacksonville, with more overwhelming praise for Dungey.

What about The Dunge? I just can’t figure it out. It was there for the taking, but he didn’t take it. Before the season, a lot of potential scenarios were trotted out, but I don’t think anyone believed there would be a race where Dungey got up to third and just couldn’t keep the pace of Chad Reed and Trey Canard. Not picking on Canard, but one of them is a rookie, and he has two wins. Dungey had a shot at him in Houston and could have done it here. Where was the anger from last week?

It almost seems like I said bad things about him in a race where he got third and good things about him in a race in which he won? Where do I come up with this!? When a guy wins, you usually write more positive things about him than when he loses...

For lucero, I was making fun of a KTM press release about an AMA certified holeshot. I don't see that as ruining an entire company, its bikes or its employees. It was just a joke about one single press release. I also own a KTM. And I don't own any of the other brands of bikes.

I was merely reporting what the Suzuki dudes said after the race. I never said Dungey would have won the race if Alessi hadn't passed him, or that Alessi should not have done that. I did say that it could have changed things, and it obviously could have. But I don't have any problems with what Mike did. I'm just telling you what happened, I wasn't railing against what he did.

Same with T Hahn deal on the last lap. I wasn't saying what he said was good or bad, I'm just telling you that he said it.
Hey! It's that Weegie guy!
yosmithy
Posts
770
Joined
10/29/2006
Location
Austin, TX, USA
4/7/2011 1:27pm
Weege wrote:
For Burn, here's a snippet from the previous Redux from Jacksonville, with more overwhelming praise for Dungey. [i]What about The Dunge? I just can’t figure it...
For Burn, here's a snippet from the previous Redux from Jacksonville, with more overwhelming praise for Dungey.

What about The Dunge? I just can’t figure it out. It was there for the taking, but he didn’t take it. Before the season, a lot of potential scenarios were trotted out, but I don’t think anyone believed there would be a race where Dungey got up to third and just couldn’t keep the pace of Chad Reed and Trey Canard. Not picking on Canard, but one of them is a rookie, and he has two wins. Dungey had a shot at him in Houston and could have done it here. Where was the anger from last week?

It almost seems like I said bad things about him in a race where he got third and good things about him in a race in which he won? Where do I come up with this!? When a guy wins, you usually write more positive things about him than when he loses...

For lucero, I was making fun of a KTM press release about an AMA certified holeshot. I don't see that as ruining an entire company, its bikes or its employees. It was just a joke about one single press release. I also own a KTM. And I don't own any of the other brands of bikes.

I was merely reporting what the Suzuki dudes said after the race. I never said Dungey would have won the race if Alessi hadn't passed him, or that Alessi should not have done that. I did say that it could have changed things, and it obviously could have. But I don't have any problems with what Mike did. I'm just telling you what happened, I wasn't railing against what he did.

Same with T Hahn deal on the last lap. I wasn't saying what he said was good or bad, I'm just telling you that he said it.
You journalists destroy lives!!
burn1986
Posts
12246
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA, USA
4/7/2011 1:37pm Edited Date/Time 4/7/2011 1:37pm
Well, Weege I appreciate you coming on here and doing a little damage control, but don't you think that was a little strong against Alessi and for Dungey?

I said the same thing when Steve Cox totally degraded Wharton on an accident with Canard last year. He totally blasted him.

The same thing here. While I don't think you totally blasted him, you kind of went overboard with the whole whoop thing. Maybe get a Q&A with Alessi.
Weege
Posts
26
Joined
1/1/2011
Location
Morgantown, WV, USA
4/7/2011 1:53pm
It's not damage control because I didn't do anything wrong here. I told you what the Suzuki guys said. I've said plenty of bad about Dungey this year. I didn't totally blast Alessi, I said that he passed Dungey back, he got passed in the whoops, and that the family once built a whoop track to help him out. All true. I mean, you're on Vital. You know how big the "blast the Alessis" scale goes and I'm not even near it.

If you prefer, we can go with "everyone is equally awesome and there's nothing good, bad, exciting, fun funny or cool happening at the races" next week. But that's not the truth.

P.S. I had to come back on here because the AMA Motocross Championship is starting, and I'm doing TV. I'm sure I'll be on the receiving end of some blasting myself soon.
lucero10x
Posts
1624
Joined
9/25/2009
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
4/7/2011 1:53pm
Weege wrote:
For Burn, here's a snippet from the previous Redux from Jacksonville, with more overwhelming praise for Dungey. [i]What about The Dunge? I just can’t figure it...
For Burn, here's a snippet from the previous Redux from Jacksonville, with more overwhelming praise for Dungey.

What about The Dunge? I just can’t figure it out. It was there for the taking, but he didn’t take it. Before the season, a lot of potential scenarios were trotted out, but I don’t think anyone believed there would be a race where Dungey got up to third and just couldn’t keep the pace of Chad Reed and Trey Canard. Not picking on Canard, but one of them is a rookie, and he has two wins. Dungey had a shot at him in Houston and could have done it here. Where was the anger from last week?

It almost seems like I said bad things about him in a race where he got third and good things about him in a race in which he won? Where do I come up with this!? When a guy wins, you usually write more positive things about him than when he loses...

For lucero, I was making fun of a KTM press release about an AMA certified holeshot. I don't see that as ruining an entire company, its bikes or its employees. It was just a joke about one single press release. I also own a KTM. And I don't own any of the other brands of bikes.

I was merely reporting what the Suzuki dudes said after the race. I never said Dungey would have won the race if Alessi hadn't passed him, or that Alessi should not have done that. I did say that it could have changed things, and it obviously could have. But I don't have any problems with what Mike did. I'm just telling you what happened, I wasn't railing against what he did.

Same with T Hahn deal on the last lap. I wasn't saying what he said was good or bad, I'm just telling you that he said it.
Thanks for the explanation. I don't think that you ruined, could have ruined or may ruin an entire company with those statements. You did show a pretty sarcastic and dismissive attitude toward their effort, however, and that is fine.

Since you have been monitoring, can you clear up my point of misunderstanding? Did suzuki say or imply this whole statement?: "..."the Suzuki guys were kind of bummed Mike did that, because there was absolutely no chance he was going to hold off Dungey for 19 more laps, so he basically wrecked Dungey’s race for no real reason—if Dunge had gotten to second on the first lap it may have changed everything". And furthermore, do you agree with all or part and which do you agree with and which do you not agree with?

I read it as the suzuki guys said there was no way he was going to hold off Dungey for 19 laps (i agree) and you concluded from that Mike ruined Dungeys race or concluded that the suzuki guys thought this (bullshit either way).
burn1986
Posts
12246
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA, USA
4/7/2011 1:58pm
Fair enough. Thanks,
englishman
Posts
2818
Joined
3/7/2008
Location
England, GB
4/7/2011 1:59pm Edited Date/Time 4/7/2011 1:59pm
Love the hair.
Mstock
Posts
2044
Joined
9/14/2010
Location
Middleton, WI, USA
4/7/2011 2:44pm
Thanks Weege. Nice to hear your own thoughts. Refreshing. The whole "nobody should mess with the leaders" thing is lost on me though. If Allessi is a better starter than JS, CR, RV and TC then they deserve to be held up. They did not start as good and for that they pay a price. Or should they just run the top 5 after Daytona every year?
peelout
Posts
18404
Joined
1/6/2011
Location
Ogden, UT, USA
4/7/2011 2:54pm
lucero10x wrote:
Thanks for the explanation. I don't think that you ruined, could have ruined or may ruin an entire company with those statements. You did show a...
Thanks for the explanation. I don't think that you ruined, could have ruined or may ruin an entire company with those statements. You did show a pretty sarcastic and dismissive attitude toward their effort, however, and that is fine.

Since you have been monitoring, can you clear up my point of misunderstanding? Did suzuki say or imply this whole statement?: "..."the Suzuki guys were kind of bummed Mike did that, because there was absolutely no chance he was going to hold off Dungey for 19 more laps, so he basically wrecked Dungey’s race for no real reason—if Dunge had gotten to second on the first lap it may have changed everything". And furthermore, do you agree with all or part and which do you agree with and which do you not agree with?

I read it as the suzuki guys said there was no way he was going to hold off Dungey for 19 laps (i agree) and you concluded from that Mike ruined Dungeys race or concluded that the suzuki guys thought this (bullshit either way).
i'm with Weege...

but...

lucero10x
Posts
1624
Joined
9/25/2009
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
4/7/2011 3:01pm
peelout wrote:
i'm with Weege... but... [img]http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/8995/2db06is.gif[/img]
i'm with Weege...

but...

I am just confused.
Weege
Posts
26
Joined
1/1/2011
Location
Morgantown, WV, USA
4/7/2011 6:17pm
First of all, peelout, if you're going to attach videos like that to posts I'm in on, I WILL RESPOND TO EVERY POST EVER FROM NOW ON!!! Yeah!!

As for the Dunge/Suz thing, it's been analyzed too far now. Once we get into word by word we're probably digging for more meaning then is really there. A few team guys were bench racing at the truck after the race, bummed that Alessi did that. For what it's worth, Dungey came walking by himself and wanted none of it, he didn't use it as an excuse and didn't want to be part of the conversation because I think he knows it's just racing and didn't have a problem with what Mike did.

But this is what team guys do--all around, not just Suzuki--they pull for their guy a little too much sometimes. And they didn't say Dungey would have won or anything like that, or that it cost him the race. They just said they were bummed Mike did that, because MAYBE things would have turned out differently.

As for me, I think Mike has every right to try everything he can to stay in the battle. I totally, 100 percent think that move was okay. He's allowed to pass people back. I just tried to explain the race situation in detail so everyone can make their own conclusion--it happened so fast, some people may have missed it, so I explained what happened on the track and off.

I thought it was a cool nugget of info, news and gossip from the pits. But somehow two paragraphs made me out to be A) and Alessi/KTM hater and Cool a Dungey lover. I've written and spoken a lot of words this year, so at this point I've said good and bad things about pretty much every rider and team. Because they all have good days and bad. if you're looking for meaning within two paragraphs, it's like analyzing this Suzuki convo. We're digging way too deep here.
kong0036
Posts
1001
Joined
9/11/2006
Location
Sydney, AU
4/7/2011 6:38pm
Weege wrote:
First of all, peelout, if you're going to attach videos like that to posts I'm in on, I WILL RESPOND TO EVERY POST EVER FROM NOW...
First of all, peelout, if you're going to attach videos like that to posts I'm in on, I WILL RESPOND TO EVERY POST EVER FROM NOW ON!!! Yeah!!

As for the Dunge/Suz thing, it's been analyzed too far now. Once we get into word by word we're probably digging for more meaning then is really there. A few team guys were bench racing at the truck after the race, bummed that Alessi did that. For what it's worth, Dungey came walking by himself and wanted none of it, he didn't use it as an excuse and didn't want to be part of the conversation because I think he knows it's just racing and didn't have a problem with what Mike did.

But this is what team guys do--all around, not just Suzuki--they pull for their guy a little too much sometimes. And they didn't say Dungey would have won or anything like that, or that it cost him the race. They just said they were bummed Mike did that, because MAYBE things would have turned out differently.

As for me, I think Mike has every right to try everything he can to stay in the battle. I totally, 100 percent think that move was okay. He's allowed to pass people back. I just tried to explain the race situation in detail so everyone can make their own conclusion--it happened so fast, some people may have missed it, so I explained what happened on the track and off.

I thought it was a cool nugget of info, news and gossip from the pits. But somehow two paragraphs made me out to be A) and Alessi/KTM hater and Cool a Dungey lover. I've written and spoken a lot of words this year, so at this point I've said good and bad things about pretty much every rider and team. Because they all have good days and bad. if you're looking for meaning within two paragraphs, it's like analyzing this Suzuki convo. We're digging way too deep here.
Why do you even try to explain yourself Weege it won't help with these people . If you can wake up and smile and live with yourself each morning then you are doing just fine. I say don't change a thing weege , you are where you are for a reason and i for 1 respect and like your opinions on the insight you give us on SX/MX . Keep it up .
BobbyM
Posts
21436
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
4/7/2011 9:24pm Edited Date/Time 4/7/2011 9:27pm
burn1986 wrote:
Here are some quotes from the last RacerX Redux in regards to Mike Alessi. Yes, that was an AMA certified official holeshot. Canard ate Mike up...
Here are some quotes from the last RacerX Redux in regards to Mike Alessi.

Yes, that was an AMA certified official holeshot. Canard ate Mike up immediately, but Mike tried scrubbing the first triple hard to keep up. Then when Dungey made a pass, Alessi stuffed him right back. After the race, the Suzuki guys were kind of bummed Mike did that, because there was absolutely no chance he was going to hold off Dungey for 19 more laps, so he basically wrecked Dungey’s race for no real reason—if Dunge had gotten to second on the first lap it may have changed everything. Oh and about 20 seconds later, Mike hit the whoops and his run at the front was over.

Matthes and I felt bad seeing Mike struggle in the whoops, and his brother Jeff was sitting right in front of us. So we asked Jeff how Tony somehow missed out on teaching Mike the whoops back when he was teaching starts. According to Jeff, they have built full-scale supercross tracks with nothing but whoop sections—no jumps, just whoops. And yet it still didn’t work. Jeff also said he helped Mike after practice in Dallas, and if not for his advice, Mike wouldn’t have made the main event..

It's like RacerX went out of their way to try and slam him? So, if Dungey loses the championship, it's somehow Alessi's fault? BS. Since when is it wrong to pass Dungey, or any racer, for that matter?! Hahn should have passed Reed too when he had the chance.
mostly true....mike doesn't need a track with lotsa whoops to be better at riding them and building the track proves that. what mike needs is a mind free of whoops...a mind with not one fucking whoop in sight...miles and miles of nothing but NO whoops. you can't ride a scooter very well without handlebars, same with the mind, when you mount yer handlebars on your mind you can control it much better...mike needs to get a "handlebar" on it.
BobbyM
Posts
21436
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
4/7/2011 9:29pm
burn1986 wrote:
Here are some quotes from the last RacerX Redux in regards to Mike Alessi. Yes, that was an AMA certified official holeshot. Canard ate Mike up...
Here are some quotes from the last RacerX Redux in regards to Mike Alessi.

Yes, that was an AMA certified official holeshot. Canard ate Mike up immediately, but Mike tried scrubbing the first triple hard to keep up. Then when Dungey made a pass, Alessi stuffed him right back. After the race, the Suzuki guys were kind of bummed Mike did that, because there was absolutely no chance he was going to hold off Dungey for 19 more laps, so he basically wrecked Dungey’s race for no real reason—if Dunge had gotten to second on the first lap it may have changed everything. Oh and about 20 seconds later, Mike hit the whoops and his run at the front was over.

Matthes and I felt bad seeing Mike struggle in the whoops, and his brother Jeff was sitting right in front of us. So we asked Jeff how Tony somehow missed out on teaching Mike the whoops back when he was teaching starts. According to Jeff, they have built full-scale supercross tracks with nothing but whoop sections—no jumps, just whoops. And yet it still didn’t work. Jeff also said he helped Mike after practice in Dallas, and if not for his advice, Mike wouldn’t have made the main event..

It's like RacerX went out of their way to try and slam him? So, if Dungey loses the championship, it's somehow Alessi's fault? BS. Since when is it wrong to pass Dungey, or any racer, for that matter?! Hahn should have passed Reed too when he had the chance.
So, if Dungey loses the championship, it's somehow Alessi's fault?


what fucking turd mitt said that...besides you of course?
BobbyM
Posts
21436
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
4/7/2011 10:46pm
lucero10x wrote:
I agree. It's like JW is on the too cool for school bandwagon and is in the group of guys that look down on and roll...
I agree. It's like JW is on the too cool for school bandwagon and is in the group of guys that look down on and roll their eyes at KTM and their efforts. He's like pfft, whatever. Like he has bought so much into the red, yellow, green and blue dominance that he can only shrug off and poke fun at the KTM effort in general. Definitely a dismissive tone to that writing regarding KTM and Alessi.
burn1986 wrote:
Definitely X2
weege, the guy that was at every GNCC race and was an intergral part of that series for years, the guy that covered it all and was obviously watching KTM kick fucking ass almost every week in some form or fashion. hung out with the ktoom folks and drank there reislng in a plastic cup every weekend....that weege?

yer fucking high.
BobbyM
Posts
21436
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
4/7/2011 10:54pm
kongols wrote:
I kind of do not like a fact that Racerx gone from "news site" to "opinion site".
Thelen20 wrote:
I don't even know what kind of site they are anymore, i can't find a pc that can run the cotton pickn thing!!! Soooo slow i...
I don't even know what kind of site they are anymore, i can't find a pc that can run the cotton pickn thing!!! Soooo slow i don't even go there anymre. Sucks cause i always liked thier content back when i could accually watch/read it
you crack me up..blame a website for the pile of shit you got at the flea market. fuckiiveseenitall....
DC
Posts
3889
Joined
5/1/2009
Location
Morgantown, WV, USA
4/8/2011 4:00am Edited Date/Time 4/8/2011 4:04am
Here, let me step in front of this bus: as a journalist and a fan, I find it puzzling that after nearly seven years of professional racing, and being one of the best outdoor riders on the planet, Mike Alessi still struggles in supercross to make the top five, let alone the podium. I really think it's in his head, and it stems from issues he has with getting through the whoops as quick as the guys who win the races and make podiums. He's got the talent, amazing amounts of talent, but he just can't get through the whoops the way he does the rest of the track.... And there really are no whoops outdoors, so its not an issue.

And the Suzuki guys being bummed may stem from the fact that they were winning a lot last year, and finally got one this year, only to lose some momentum again(in their minds) when Ryan couldn't get past Mike cleanly. Mike of course rides for their old teammates Roger DeCoster and Ian Harrison, as they split from Suzuki to KTM after last year's amazing season, and maybe that was in their minds after the race in Dallas.... But that's just a guess.

I will say that I disagree with them, that it was good to see Mike trying hard and trying to make stuff happen. But when his own Alessi Weekly report starts out by describing how "dangerous" the track was and lists all the guys who crashed before it discusses his own results, obviously there are some comfort and confidence issues with Supercross within #800's camp. But come outdoors, I expect to see Mike back up front, battling for wins again.

Just my two cents, even though bench-racing should be free.

DC
MX Sports
jamma10
Posts
10573
Joined
8/24/2008
Location
Bristol, GB
4/8/2011 4:25am
peelout wrote:
i'm with Weege... but... [img]http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/8995/2db06is.gif[/img]
i'm with Weege...

but...

lucero10x wrote:
I am just confused.
I'm in love. Woohoo
Motodude
Posts
5321
Joined
2/2/2008
Location
Sydney, AU
4/8/2011 4:27am
DC, is Mike under your management banner this year?
burn1986
Posts
12246
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA, USA
4/8/2011 6:04am Edited Date/Time 4/8/2011 6:04am
I think Peelout said it best.

Thanks for the love BobbyM.
lucero10x
Posts
1624
Joined
9/25/2009
Location
Las Vegas, NV, USA
4/8/2011 2:04pm
Weege wrote:
First of all, peelout, if you're going to attach videos like that to posts I'm in on, I WILL RESPOND TO EVERY POST EVER FROM NOW...
First of all, peelout, if you're going to attach videos like that to posts I'm in on, I WILL RESPOND TO EVERY POST EVER FROM NOW ON!!! Yeah!!

As for the Dunge/Suz thing, it's been analyzed too far now. Once we get into word by word we're probably digging for more meaning then is really there. A few team guys were bench racing at the truck after the race, bummed that Alessi did that. For what it's worth, Dungey came walking by himself and wanted none of it, he didn't use it as an excuse and didn't want to be part of the conversation because I think he knows it's just racing and didn't have a problem with what Mike did.

But this is what team guys do--all around, not just Suzuki--they pull for their guy a little too much sometimes. And they didn't say Dungey would have won or anything like that, or that it cost him the race. They just said they were bummed Mike did that, because MAYBE things would have turned out differently.

As for me, I think Mike has every right to try everything he can to stay in the battle. I totally, 100 percent think that move was okay. He's allowed to pass people back. I just tried to explain the race situation in detail so everyone can make their own conclusion--it happened so fast, some people may have missed it, so I explained what happened on the track and off.

I thought it was a cool nugget of info, news and gossip from the pits. But somehow two paragraphs made me out to be A) and Alessi/KTM hater and Cool a Dungey lover. I've written and spoken a lot of words this year, so at this point I've said good and bad things about pretty much every rider and team. Because they all have good days and bad. if you're looking for meaning within two paragraphs, it's like analyzing this Suzuki convo. We're digging way too deep here.
well, you wrote it not me. lol.

I was not trying to twist what you wrote I was trying to comprehend it. That's all. I just wanted to know where you stood because your opinion seemed quite intertwined with some members of Team Suzuki.

This post clears it all up. Thank you. I am glad this is where you stand and I should have taken for granted it was where you stood but sometimes with paraphrasing and not using quotes it's hard to figure out where the sources opinion ends and the journalists starts.

I can't help but laugh at Team Suzuki for stating anything remotely close to Alessi ruining Dungeys race. The evidence in no way supports the conclusion. .

Post a reply to: Racer X - Alessi bashing

The Latest