RMZ electric start.

3strokemx
Posts
3341
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
1 day ago
deadlo wrote:
I can tell you from personal experience I have never had an issue clicking the button, but have plentyyy times kicked my bike in a racing...

I can tell you from personal experience I have never had an issue clicking the button, but have plentyyy times kicked my bike in a racing panic for what felt like 5 minutes completely gassed after.


I guess one comes down to when your kicking a bike not in a rush, you can pretty easily get a solid kick in and have no issue. Try that in a race, in gear, on a hill, on a jump face, etc etc. 

3strokemx wrote:
That is user perspective, from a mechanical perspective I cant see how there would be a benefit. There are costs though, weight penalty and increased chance...

That is user perspective, from a mechanical perspective I cant see how there would be a benefit. There are costs though, weight penalty and increased chance of system failure.

Thanks for confirming my panic hypothesis from earlier.

deadlo wrote:
User experience is what matters lol. I would say a solid majority here would not buy a kickstart dirtbike today. Not because they can’t kick a...

User experience is what matters lol. I would say a solid majority here would not buy a kickstart dirtbike today. Not because they can’t kick a bike over, but we’ve all had the experiences explained above and the benefits FAR outweigh the negatives. 

Heres your answer though: mechanically, a button turns over the bike instantly many many times. A kick start is 1 kick to turn it over. I don’t think I need to go further into how this is beneficial lol. Have you owned both? 

Yeah I've owned both, would gladly take the kickstarter any day of the week.

    I've broken the wire to the start button during a race, had to bumpstart because the battery died at a race, had starter clutches wear out, and today I'm buying a new starter motor!  Never had a kickstarter fail though.  

Estart doesn't turn engine over "many many times" because the voltage drops after you press the button, after 3 seconds it's not turning anything over until you let off the button and try again (most mfgs suggest waiting 30 seconds)

If you pay attention you'll notice when riders get into an awkward situation, they start the bike then reorient themselves to get back on the bike before proceeding. With a kicker you can reorient yourself first, then start the bike.  It's the same steps (and time cost) but in a different order.   

Someone who panics or has poor clutch control might think the estart is essential, but it doesn't eliminate their problems, just kicks the can down the road a little while longer.
 

19
3strokemx
Posts
3341
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
1 day ago

Starks don't need a button or kickstarter 😁

they need a whole ass generator 😆

3
2
Beta480RX
Posts
566
Joined
12/30/2025
Location
Helena, MT, USA
1 day ago

I've broken multiple kickstarters over the years. Levers snapped, springs broken, levers stuck down, etc...

First year RMZ 450s had the entire run recalled because the kickstarters broke. Cases had to be replaced.

If your e-start quits spinning the motor after 3 seconds you've got a battery problem and obviously don't know how to care for an electrical system of any kind. Should stick to YZ250s in that case.

5
1

The Shop

Sandusky26
Posts
3538
Joined
7/28/2021
Location
Eastern, NC, USA
1 day ago
theres a few things they have publicly noted. Weight isnt a major concern, PMG and JGR both noted that the weight works to their advantagee, making...

theres a few things they have publicly noted. Weight isnt a major concern, PMG and JGR both noted that the weight works to their advantagee, making a 450 too light with that much power can cause it to be unstable. 

Id speculate also, that since the motor and the chassis are refined versions of the OG 05 bike; its flex characterics and balance are very good as noted by some tuners. being the case, adding electric start not only adds weight from the motor/battery but it would need  serious redesign along with the frame  to avoid pitfalls others like honda ran into where while maintaining what the bike already has

kevin204 wrote:
I’m not sure where you’re getting your information from, but the current RM-Z450, outside of being a yellow, kickstart, single cylinder 450cc 4 stroke motocross bike...

I’m not sure where you’re getting your information from, but the current RM-Z450, outside of being a yellow, kickstart, single cylinder 450cc 4 stroke motocross bike, has nothing in common with the 2005 model. 

your not wrong. while the frame has undergone multiple iterations, its the same same dimensions, seat height, etc. the motor while it underwent multiple revisions  ...

your not wrong. while the frame has undergone multiple iterations, its the same same dimensions, seat height, etc. the motor while it underwent multiple revisions   is still based on the og design. they never went in another direction with the frame like honda or yamaha or even kawi who were all searching for new handling characteritics like sharper turning or mass centralization. or even motors, honda abandoned the sohc, yamaha flipped the cylinder, kawasaki got rid of its fire breather. 

the current rmz450  is a refined version of what it started as. 

The 05 was a carbureted 4 speed with a completely different frame and 47mm showas. It was completely new in 08. The 26 RMZ has very little in common with the 05. I've had a 05 and 18 model.

1
deadlo
Posts
534
Joined
8/29/2017
Location
Harker heights, TX, USA
1 day ago
3strokemx wrote:
That is user perspective, from a mechanical perspective I cant see how there would be a benefit. There are costs though, weight penalty and increased chance...

That is user perspective, from a mechanical perspective I cant see how there would be a benefit. There are costs though, weight penalty and increased chance of system failure.

Thanks for confirming my panic hypothesis from earlier.

deadlo wrote:
User experience is what matters lol. I would say a solid majority here would not buy a kickstart dirtbike today. Not because they can’t kick a...

User experience is what matters lol. I would say a solid majority here would not buy a kickstart dirtbike today. Not because they can’t kick a bike over, but we’ve all had the experiences explained above and the benefits FAR outweigh the negatives. 

Heres your answer though: mechanically, a button turns over the bike instantly many many times. A kick start is 1 kick to turn it over. I don’t think I need to go further into how this is beneficial lol. Have you owned both? 

3strokemx wrote:
Yeah I've owned both, would gladly take the kickstarter any day of the week.    I've broken the wire to the start button during a race...

Yeah I've owned both, would gladly take the kickstarter any day of the week.

    I've broken the wire to the start button during a race, had to bumpstart because the battery died at a race, had starter clutches wear out, and today I'm buying a new starter motor!  Never had a kickstarter fail though.  

Estart doesn't turn engine over "many many times" because the voltage drops after you press the button, after 3 seconds it's not turning anything over until you let off the button and try again (most mfgs suggest waiting 30 seconds)

If you pay attention you'll notice when riders get into an awkward situation, they start the bike then reorient themselves to get back on the bike before proceeding. With a kicker you can reorient yourself first, then start the bike.  It's the same steps (and time cost) but in a different order.   

Someone who panics or has poor clutch control might think the estart is essential, but it doesn't eliminate their problems, just kicks the can down the road a little while longer.
 

Buddy, you’re talking directly out of your butthole here. It’s totally fine for you prefer a kickstart, but let’s not make stuff up and act like there is no advantage to Estart lol. 

3
2
3strokemx
Posts
3341
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
1 day ago
deadlo wrote:
User experience is what matters lol. I would say a solid majority here would not buy a kickstart dirtbike today. Not because they can’t kick a...

User experience is what matters lol. I would say a solid majority here would not buy a kickstart dirtbike today. Not because they can’t kick a bike over, but we’ve all had the experiences explained above and the benefits FAR outweigh the negatives. 

Heres your answer though: mechanically, a button turns over the bike instantly many many times. A kick start is 1 kick to turn it over. I don’t think I need to go further into how this is beneficial lol. Have you owned both? 

3strokemx wrote:
Yeah I've owned both, would gladly take the kickstarter any day of the week.    I've broken the wire to the start button during a race...

Yeah I've owned both, would gladly take the kickstarter any day of the week.

    I've broken the wire to the start button during a race, had to bumpstart because the battery died at a race, had starter clutches wear out, and today I'm buying a new starter motor!  Never had a kickstarter fail though.  

Estart doesn't turn engine over "many many times" because the voltage drops after you press the button, after 3 seconds it's not turning anything over until you let off the button and try again (most mfgs suggest waiting 30 seconds)

If you pay attention you'll notice when riders get into an awkward situation, they start the bike then reorient themselves to get back on the bike before proceeding. With a kicker you can reorient yourself first, then start the bike.  It's the same steps (and time cost) but in a different order.   

Someone who panics or has poor clutch control might think the estart is essential, but it doesn't eliminate their problems, just kicks the can down the road a little while longer.
 

deadlo wrote:
Buddy, you’re talking directly out of your butthole here. It’s totally fine for you prefer a kickstart, but let’s not make stuff up and act like...

Buddy, you’re talking directly out of your butthole here. It’s totally fine for you prefer a kickstart, but let’s not make stuff up and act like there is no advantage to Estart lol. 

image 3988
5
deadlo
Posts
534
Joined
8/29/2017
Location
Harker heights, TX, USA
1 day ago
3strokemx wrote:
Yeah I've owned both, would gladly take the kickstarter any day of the week.    I've broken the wire to the start button during a race...

Yeah I've owned both, would gladly take the kickstarter any day of the week.

    I've broken the wire to the start button during a race, had to bumpstart because the battery died at a race, had starter clutches wear out, and today I'm buying a new starter motor!  Never had a kickstarter fail though.  

Estart doesn't turn engine over "many many times" because the voltage drops after you press the button, after 3 seconds it's not turning anything over until you let off the button and try again (most mfgs suggest waiting 30 seconds)

If you pay attention you'll notice when riders get into an awkward situation, they start the bike then reorient themselves to get back on the bike before proceeding. With a kicker you can reorient yourself first, then start the bike.  It's the same steps (and time cost) but in a different order.   

Someone who panics or has poor clutch control might think the estart is essential, but it doesn't eliminate their problems, just kicks the can down the road a little while longer.
 

deadlo wrote:
Buddy, you’re talking directly out of your butthole here. It’s totally fine for you prefer a kickstart, but let’s not make stuff up and act like...

Buddy, you’re talking directly out of your butthole here. It’s totally fine for you prefer a kickstart, but let’s not make stuff up and act like there is no advantage to Estart lol. 

3strokemx wrote:
image 3988

30 seconds? Is that from the very first e start lol? I’ll attach the 2026 yz instructions. It says “a few seconds” to wait if it doesn’t start. Let’s also not forget those 5seconds of clicking the button, that’s equivalent to kicking the bike like 20 times lol. Just stop man. I truly don’t believe you’ve kicked a 4 stroke and used the button on a modern 4 stroke. It’s not even debatable how beneficial the button is especially in a race. 
 

IMG 0523 2.jpeg?VersionId=1CF C3
 

3strokemx
Posts
3341
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
1 day ago
deadlo wrote:
Buddy, you’re talking directly out of your butthole here. It’s totally fine for you prefer a kickstart, but let’s not make stuff up and act like...

Buddy, you’re talking directly out of your butthole here. It’s totally fine for you prefer a kickstart, but let’s not make stuff up and act like there is no advantage to Estart lol. 

3strokemx wrote:
image 3988
deadlo wrote:
30 seconds? Is that from the very first e start lol? I’ll attach the 2026 yz instructions. It says “a few seconds” to wait if it...

30 seconds? Is that from the very first e start lol? I’ll attach the 2026 yz instructions. It says “a few seconds” to wait if it doesn’t start. Let’s also not forget those 5seconds of clicking the button, that’s equivalent to kicking the bike like 20 times lol. Just stop man. I truly don’t believe you’ve kicked a 4 stroke and used the button on a modern 4 stroke. It’s not even debatable how beneficial the button is especially in a race. 
 

IMG 0523 2.jpeg?VersionId=1CF C3
 

lol ok I guess stalling is more of a problem for you than it is for me.

I don't like spending money on e-start components that fail every year. The next bike I buy will have a kickstarter.   

1
8
Phillip_Lamb
Posts
2164
Joined
12/14/2010
Location
ORANGEVALE, CA, USA
1 day ago Edited Date/Time 1 day ago
kevin204 wrote:
I’m not sure where you’re getting your information from, but the current RM-Z450, outside of being a yellow, kickstart, single cylinder 450cc 4 stroke motocross bike...

I’m not sure where you’re getting your information from, but the current RM-Z450, outside of being a yellow, kickstart, single cylinder 450cc 4 stroke motocross bike, has nothing in common with the 2005 model. 

your not wrong. while the frame has undergone multiple iterations, its the same same dimensions, seat height, etc. the motor while it underwent multiple revisions  ...

your not wrong. while the frame has undergone multiple iterations, its the same same dimensions, seat height, etc. the motor while it underwent multiple revisions   is still based on the og design. they never went in another direction with the frame like honda or yamaha or even kawi who were all searching for new handling characteritics like sharper turning or mass centralization. or even motors, honda abandoned the sohc, yamaha flipped the cylinder, kawasaki got rid of its fire breather. 

the current rmz450  is a refined version of what it started as. 

Sandusky26 wrote:
The 05 was a carbureted 4 speed with a completely different frame and 47mm showas. It was completely new in 08. The 26 RMZ has very...

The 05 was a carbureted 4 speed with a completely different frame and 47mm showas. It was completely new in 08. The 26 RMZ has very little in common with the 05. I've had a 05 and 18 model.

my point was despite the NEW frames, suspension components etc. the rider triangle, the geometry of the frame, the basis of the motor design, are still there in the current rmz450.  its the original design, except its been REFINED, meaning they didnt scrap the whole concept and start over. 

in 09 honda released an entirely new chassis design and feel that was nothing like the 08

yamaha completely changed its motor and chassis designs in 2010, 

ktm/husq had a complete overhaul in 2016

 

for reference, ive had 2005, 2006, 2010, 2011, 2015 and 2018

 

jrb2216
Posts
151
Joined
8/25/2010
Location
Traverse City, MI, USA
23 hours ago
IMG 6758IMG 6762 0IMG 6761 0.png?VersionId=0sRZE.R7.Mr5IMG 6760
5
2
ando
Posts
4624
Joined
8/20/2009
Location
Perth, AU
22 hours ago
3strokemx wrote:
image 3988
deadlo wrote:
30 seconds? Is that from the very first e start lol? I’ll attach the 2026 yz instructions. It says “a few seconds” to wait if it...

30 seconds? Is that from the very first e start lol? I’ll attach the 2026 yz instructions. It says “a few seconds” to wait if it doesn’t start. Let’s also not forget those 5seconds of clicking the button, that’s equivalent to kicking the bike like 20 times lol. Just stop man. I truly don’t believe you’ve kicked a 4 stroke and used the button on a modern 4 stroke. It’s not even debatable how beneficial the button is especially in a race. 
 

IMG 0523 2.jpeg?VersionId=1CF C3
 

3strokemx wrote:
lol ok I guess stalling is more of a problem for you than it is for me.I don't like spending money on e-start components that fail...

lol ok I guess stalling is more of a problem for you than it is for me.

I don't like spending money on e-start components that fail every year. The next bike I buy will have a kickstarter.   

I’ve been riding and racing e start offroad bikes for nearly 25 years.  Never had one fail.

If you practice it and are quick, when you stall you can most of the time pull the clutch in, push the starter and be going again before the bike even stops moving.

1
1
ando
Posts
4624
Joined
8/20/2009
Location
Perth, AU
22 hours ago
3strokemx wrote:

From a mechanical persoective, how does an electric starter make the bike fire better than a kick lever?

deadlo wrote:
I can tell you from personal experience I have never had an issue clicking the button, but have plentyyy times kicked my bike in a racing...

I can tell you from personal experience I have never had an issue clicking the button, but have plentyyy times kicked my bike in a racing panic for what felt like 5 minutes completely gassed after.


I guess one comes down to when your kicking a bike not in a rush, you can pretty easily get a solid kick in and have no issue. Try that in a race, in gear, on a hill, on a jump face, etc etc. 

3strokemx wrote:
That is user perspective, from a mechanical perspective I cant see how there would be a benefit. There are costs though, weight penalty and increased chance...

That is user perspective, from a mechanical perspective I cant see how there would be a benefit. There are costs though, weight penalty and increased chance of system failure.

Thanks for confirming my panic hypothesis from earlier.

E start clearly turns the engine over faster than kicking, not even a contest.

If e start is so bad, why does almost every modern MX bike have it?  MX is probably the weakest use case for estart and they still use it.

1
racinstation
Posts
962
Joined
5/18/2013
Location
Driggs, ID, USA
21 hours ago
jrb2216 wrote:
IMG 6758IMG 6762 0IMG 6761 0.png?VersionId=0sRZE.R7.Mr5IMG 6760

The only post in this whole thread so far that matters!

7
3strokemx
Posts
3341
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
14 hours ago
deadlo wrote:
I can tell you from personal experience I have never had an issue clicking the button, but have plentyyy times kicked my bike in a racing...

I can tell you from personal experience I have never had an issue clicking the button, but have plentyyy times kicked my bike in a racing panic for what felt like 5 minutes completely gassed after.


I guess one comes down to when your kicking a bike not in a rush, you can pretty easily get a solid kick in and have no issue. Try that in a race, in gear, on a hill, on a jump face, etc etc. 

3strokemx wrote:
That is user perspective, from a mechanical perspective I cant see how there would be a benefit. There are costs though, weight penalty and increased chance...

That is user perspective, from a mechanical perspective I cant see how there would be a benefit. There are costs though, weight penalty and increased chance of system failure.

Thanks for confirming my panic hypothesis from earlier.

ando wrote:
E start clearly turns the engine over faster than kicking, not even a contest.If e start is so bad, why does almost every modern MX bike...

E start clearly turns the engine over faster than kicking, not even a contest.

If e start is so bad, why does almost every modern MX bike have it?  MX is probably the weakest use case for estart and they still use it.

Actually kicking turns the motor over faster, as long as the user does it correctly. 
 

Estart is common now because it gives marketing departments a feature to dangle in front of the basic consumer. Same reason automatic transmissions are common in cars even though they are inferior in performance and reliability.

Just because something is popular doesn't mean it is better.

6
3strokemx
Posts
3341
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
14 hours ago
Beta480RX wrote:
I've broken multiple kickstarters over the years. Levers snapped, springs broken, levers stuck down, etc...First year RMZ 450s had the entire run recalled because the kickstarters...

I've broken multiple kickstarters over the years. Levers snapped, springs broken, levers stuck down, etc...

First year RMZ 450s had the entire run recalled because the kickstarters broke. Cases had to be replaced.

If your e-start quits spinning the motor after 3 seconds you've got a battery problem and obviously don't know how to care for an electrical system of any kind. Should stick to YZ250s in that case.

What type of "care" is required for an estart system with Li-Ion or Li-Fe battery?

2
14 hours ago

Only on vital will people talk about bringing back two strokes and the 1999 number system, but want e-start on every bike. 

If a pro can win on any bike, a weekend warrior should be able to start any bike (500’s not included)! 

sarcasm

deadlo
Posts
534
Joined
8/29/2017
Location
Harker heights, TX, USA
14 hours ago
3strokemx wrote:
That is user perspective, from a mechanical perspective I cant see how there would be a benefit. There are costs though, weight penalty and increased chance...

That is user perspective, from a mechanical perspective I cant see how there would be a benefit. There are costs though, weight penalty and increased chance of system failure.

Thanks for confirming my panic hypothesis from earlier.

ando wrote:
E start clearly turns the engine over faster than kicking, not even a contest.If e start is so bad, why does almost every modern MX bike...

E start clearly turns the engine over faster than kicking, not even a contest.

If e start is so bad, why does almost every modern MX bike have it?  MX is probably the weakest use case for estart and they still use it.

3strokemx wrote:
Actually kicking turns the motor over faster, as long as the user does it correctly.  Estart is common now because it gives marketing departments a feature to...

Actually kicking turns the motor over faster, as long as the user does it correctly. 
 

Estart is common now because it gives marketing departments a feature to dangle in front of the basic consumer. Same reason automatic transmissions are common in cars even though they are inferior in performance and reliability.

Just because something is popular doesn't mean it is better.

Sooooo with your logic Anderson above there, who definitely appears to not have a kickstart on his suzuki, did so because it’s worse? Suzukis marketing department got to him? lol 

1
3strokemx
Posts
3341
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
13 hours ago

Just because he's testing it doesn't mean he will race with it.

Wasn't there rumor of Kenny testing it last year?

2
deadlo
Posts
534
Joined
8/29/2017
Location
Harker heights, TX, USA
13 hours ago
3strokemx wrote:

Just because he's testing it doesn't mean he will race with it.

Wasn't there rumor of Kenny testing it last year?

And why do you suspect they are testing estart yet again? Could it be because they also know how beneficial it is to have estart and they want it? 

soggy
Posts
9060
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
12 hours ago
Beta480RX wrote:
It is only a very small amount of inertia, but these are also pros that notice every little thing.Some teams have gone as far as total...

It is only a very small amount of inertia, but these are also pros that notice every little thing.

Some teams have gone as far as total loss electrical systems (no stator under the flywheel) to get the inertia feel where a rider wants it.

Not that I meant to, but I found out I could make it about 50min of riding on my Husky 450FC without the stator functioning at all. And this was with a battery that isn't as good as some of them out there now!

ksithumper wrote:
As I said, lighten the flywheel. There is zero need to add inertia.  Correct, your ignition will run for a long time off a small battery. A...

As I said, lighten the flywheel. There is zero need to add inertia. 

 Correct, your ignition will run for a long time off a small battery. A starter motor won't though! Ditto EFI fuel pumps.

I’m not sure lightening the flywheel wheel to compensate for the drag of the idler gears would achieve the same feel as the kick start bike. 

1
Beta480RX
Posts
566
Joined
12/30/2025
Location
Helena, MT, USA
12 hours ago

@3strokemx the hills you choose to die on baffle me.

Between this estart bit and the Kawasaki 2 stroke thread you just really can't read a room.

But hey, you do you. If it wasn't for the oddball contrairian viewpoint, how would the rest of us know who the true nutjobs are? I suppose you are the forums version of a flat earth true believer.

5
jrb2216
Posts
151
Joined
8/25/2010
Location
Traverse City, MI, USA
11 hours ago

The version the dad tested before was the Pantera or something therefore made by Pantera this is completely in-house I think or at least by the Suzuki .

Beta480RX
Posts
566
Joined
12/30/2025
Location
Helena, MT, USA
7 hours ago
3strokemx wrote:

What type of "care" is required for an estart system with Li-Ion or Li-Fe battery?

Motocross bikes have minimal stator for the electrical system, and especially at lower RPMs.

Put the Lithium battery on a GOOD charger/maintainer regularly. A "Battery Tender" is not one of those. A Noco is good, an Optimate is best.

You also need to have a GOOD Lithium battery. There is a reason some batteries cost twice as much as others. AntiGravity small (401) and medium (801) case and NOT the restart OEM size are good, SuperB is the best.

I've got one LiFe battery (Ballistic) that is going on 15yrs old and is still in near perfect condition.

1
3strokemx
Posts
3341
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
7 hours ago
3strokemx wrote:

Just because he's testing it doesn't mean he will race with it.

Wasn't there rumor of Kenny testing it last year?

deadlo wrote:
And why do you suspect they are testing estart yet again? Could it be because they also know how beneficial it is to have estart and...

And why do you suspect they are testing estart yet again? Could it be because they also know how beneficial it is to have estart and they want it? 

Maybe Japan said they need to figure it out because the chuds wont buy the bike without it?

If they thought it was important, why wasn't it used last year?

3strokemx
Posts
3341
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
6 hours ago Edited Date/Time 6 hours ago
3strokemx wrote:

What type of "care" is required for an estart system with Li-Ion or Li-Fe battery?

Beta480RX wrote:
Motocross bikes have minimal stator for the electrical system, and especially at lower RPMs.Put the Lithium battery on a GOOD charger/maintainer regularly. A "Battery Tender" is...

Motocross bikes have minimal stator for the electrical system, and especially at lower RPMs.

Put the Lithium battery on a GOOD charger/maintainer regularly. A "Battery Tender" is not one of those. A Noco is good, an Optimate is best.

You also need to have a GOOD Lithium battery. There is a reason some batteries cost twice as much as others. AntiGravity small (401) and medium (801) case and NOT the restart OEM size are good, SuperB is the best.

I've got one LiFe battery (Ballistic) that is going on 15yrs old and is still in near perfect condition.

Exactly! Have you measured battery voltage during a start? 

It drops, then takes a few seconds to recover and contained energy decreases every cycle.

That's why you have to maintain/charge a battery and why mfgrs recommend a 15-30 second pause before refiring.  Even if the engine is turning, it still pulls voltage for spark and fuel (through the ecu) or it wont start. I suspect all Li batteries also have BMS for heat so they wont output when hot (after a few seconds) which reduces the risk of a thermal event.

 

So you might continue turning the engine (and burning your starter motor in the process) but it's not going to fire/start until the battery recovers.

deadlo
Posts
534
Joined
8/29/2017
Location
Harker heights, TX, USA
6 hours ago
3strokemx wrote:

Just because he's testing it doesn't mean he will race with it.

Wasn't there rumor of Kenny testing it last year?

deadlo wrote:
And why do you suspect they are testing estart yet again? Could it be because they also know how beneficial it is to have estart and...

And why do you suspect they are testing estart yet again? Could it be because they also know how beneficial it is to have estart and they want it? 

3strokemx wrote:
Maybe Japan said they need to figure it out because the chuds wont buy the bike without it?If they thought it was important, why wasn't it...

Maybe Japan said they need to figure it out because the chuds wont buy the bike without it?

If they thought it was important, why wasn't it used last year?

This is directly quoted from a Jason Anderson interview with racerx. Him politely saying he wants estart. So is he also a “chud”?

IMG 0529 7
3strokemx
Posts
3341
Joined
9/2/2010
Location
USA
6 hours ago
deadlo wrote:
And why do you suspect they are testing estart yet again? Could it be because they also know how beneficial it is to have estart and...

And why do you suspect they are testing estart yet again? Could it be because they also know how beneficial it is to have estart and they want it? 

3strokemx wrote:
Maybe Japan said they need to figure it out because the chuds wont buy the bike without it?If they thought it was important, why wasn't it...

Maybe Japan said they need to figure it out because the chuds wont buy the bike without it?

If they thought it was important, why wasn't it used last year?

deadlo wrote:
This is directly quoted from a Jason Anderson interview with racerx. Him politely saying he wants estart. So is he also a “chud”?

This is directly quoted from a Jason Anderson interview with racerx. Him politely saying he wants estart. So is he also a “chud”?

IMG 0529 7

So he thinks the bike is good, doesnt want to change it, e-start isnt a necessity, but Japan wants them to make the e-start work?  

Isn't that confirming exactly what I speculated earlier?

 

2
deadlo
Posts
534
Joined
8/29/2017
Location
Harker heights, TX, USA
6 hours ago Edited Date/Time 6 hours ago
3strokemx wrote:
Maybe Japan said they need to figure it out because the chuds wont buy the bike without it?If they thought it was important, why wasn't it...

Maybe Japan said they need to figure it out because the chuds wont buy the bike without it?

If they thought it was important, why wasn't it used last year?

deadlo wrote:
This is directly quoted from a Jason Anderson interview with racerx. Him politely saying he wants estart. So is he also a “chud”?

This is directly quoted from a Jason Anderson interview with racerx. Him politely saying he wants estart. So is he also a “chud”?

IMG 0529 7
3strokemx wrote:
So he thinks the bike is good, doesnt want to change it, e-start isnt a necessity, but Japan wants them to make the e-start work?  Isn't...

So he thinks the bike is good, doesnt want to change it, e-start isnt a necessity, but Japan wants them to make the e-start work?  

Isn't that confirming exactly what I speculated earlier?

 

Alright. You’re obviously 12 with poor reading comprehension or troll level 9000.  It’s been fun chatting. You’re a funny guy man. Keep that right leg strong brotha! 

Pop Shmoke
Posts
2247
Joined
6/17/2020
Location
Boston, MA, USA
4 hours ago

Maybe this starter mod isnt so dumb after all.. 

 

1

Post a reply to: RMZ electric start.

The Latest