"Crash" Reed

BobbyM
Posts
21439
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
2/28/2011 6:30pm Edited Date/Time 2/28/2011 6:32pm
Pdub wrote:
Mr. Consistency is known for his consistent ability to make supercross podiums. He is NOT known for crashing. But over the past three years, he has...
Mr. Consistency is known for his consistent ability to make supercross podiums. He is NOT known for crashing. But over the past three years, he has shown remarkable consistency for his ability to get James to hit the ground

2009 - A1: Chad fell in the whoops, knocking James down and out of the race
2010 - PHX: Chad rammed James in a turn, sending both down and breaking his own hand
2011 - ATL: Chad cut James off, causing them both to go down

By the timeline, we can see this trend is a fairly new development in the career of the Aussie supercross superstar. Is this an intentional new tactic, the "if you can't beat 'em, wreck 'em" strategy? If so, how long before bones are broken and seasons ruined?
http://bobbymx.com/a109_sx/james_reed_crash2.wmv

http://bobbymx.com/JBS/bubba_rc_unadilla.wmv

http://bobbymx.com/JBS/bub_done.wmv

DAMN GOOD BAIT PAUL! hehehe


and i'd wreck somebody to win a title or race...what racer wouldn't?
JOHN CHOATE
Posts
2024
Joined
9/18/2008
Location
Dallas, NC US
2/28/2011 6:31pm
Zycki11 wrote:
You guys can not possibly still think that Chad was trying to take Stewart out in Vegas? If he wanted to take him out, he would...
You guys can not possibly still think that Chad was trying to take Stewart out in Vegas? If he wanted to take him out, he would of hit him a lot harder. Chad simply showed him some attitude and made a statement telling Stewart he is not afraid of him. He knew James was riding tight. It was obvious too everyone. Take out move? It was not.
Nerd wrote:
Chad was definitely trying to take out Stewart in Vegas. 100-percent. Without a doubt.
Funny, I didn't think that was a total take out move at all in Vegas. IMO, I thought CR could have hit JS a lot harder in Vegas. Looked like a hard love tap. Atlanta was way, way worse and dangerous. Again, if you bump someone at less than a 45 degree, that's rubbing (for the most). When it's at or close to 90 freakin' degrees, that is a take out move!!!
jamma10
Posts
10573
Joined
8/24/2008
Location
Bristol GB
2/28/2011 6:33pm Edited Date/Time 2/28/2011 6:49pm
jamma10 wrote:
Nerd you realise you're starting to fight the embers of a fire that has been raging for the past two days?! Some people just want to...
Nerd you realise you're starting to fight the embers of a fire that has been raging for the past two days?!

Some people just want to see it as a deliberate, cynical take out move - and there isn't anyway to change their mind, no matter how much sense you may talk or examples you may show them.
jms217 wrote:
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way...
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way that they wouldn't have came together chad was right there when james turned and took off.
it was a 'deliberate' block pass, it was not a 'deliberate' take out move... hence why Reed steered infront of, and not directly into Stewart. It was miscalculated and I felt a little sorry for James but from a totally unbiased perspective it was the kind of split second decision & manouvre almost any racer would make in a similar, high stakes situation.

What people also seem to forget is that Stewart remounted before Reed, had he just got his head down and charged for the line he would have finished second. Instead he chose to focus on slowing down and weaving about in front of Reed, which is actually what lost him a podium spot.
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK US
2/28/2011 6:34pm
jamma10 wrote:
Nerd you realise you're starting to fight the embers of a fire that has been raging for the past two days?! Some people just want to...
Nerd you realise you're starting to fight the embers of a fire that has been raging for the past two days?!

Some people just want to see it as a deliberate, cynical take out move - and there isn't anyway to change their mind, no matter how much sense you may talk or examples you may show them.
jms217 wrote:
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way...
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way that they wouldn't have came together chad was right there when james turned and took off.
People like you really make it easy.

What was your take on Stewart landing on JT?
My take is that it was a racing incident?

The Shop

2/28/2011 6:35pm
Nerd wrote:
Good to know irony is lost on you. Can I call you Alanis?
You really are funny Nerd, but you still haven't answered the question?

I would like to stay and play but gotta get things done around the house. See ya around Nerd and no, I don't like the name Alanis - she did have one good song though, what was they name of it...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v9yUVgrmPY
Nerd
Posts
6155
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
2/28/2011 6:41pm
Nerd wrote:
Good to know irony is lost on you. Can I call you Alanis?
You really are funny Nerd, but you still haven't answered the question? I would like to stay and play but gotta get things done around the...
You really are funny Nerd, but you still haven't answered the question?

I would like to stay and play but gotta get things done around the house. See ya around Nerd and no, I don't like the name Alanis - she did have one good song though, what was they name of it...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v9yUVgrmPY
Wow, nothing gets past you...
Nerd
Posts
6155
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
2/28/2011 6:42pm
Zycki11 wrote:
You guys can not possibly still think that Chad was trying to take Stewart out in Vegas? If he wanted to take him out, he would...
You guys can not possibly still think that Chad was trying to take Stewart out in Vegas? If he wanted to take him out, he would of hit him a lot harder. Chad simply showed him some attitude and made a statement telling Stewart he is not afraid of him. He knew James was riding tight. It was obvious too everyone. Take out move? It was not.
Nerd wrote:
Chad was definitely trying to take out Stewart in Vegas. 100-percent. Without a doubt.
Funny, I didn't think that was a total take out move at all in Vegas. IMO, I thought CR could have hit JS a lot harder...
Funny, I didn't think that was a total take out move at all in Vegas. IMO, I thought CR could have hit JS a lot harder in Vegas. Looked like a hard love tap. Atlanta was way, way worse and dangerous. Again, if you bump someone at less than a 45 degree, that's rubbing (for the most). When it's at or close to 90 freakin' degrees, that is a take out move!!!
Chad's line was consistent through the turn. The "close to 90" was because Stewart turned down into him. But rest assured Reed was trying to take Stewart out in Vegas.
TeamGreen
Posts
36732
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
2/28/2011 6:43pm
Nerd wrote:
Dude, I love this stuff. The multiverse thing really fucks with my head, though. Mathematically, yeah, that works. But in reality it's nuts. Like, I get...
Dude, I love this stuff. The multiverse thing really fucks with my head, though. Mathematically, yeah, that works. But in reality it's nuts. Like, I get the concept, but can't imagine how it can possibly be true.

I realize that at "singularity" most of the laws of physics break down, but it still seems weird to think of aliens using something like that to travel with...
TeamGreen wrote:
It's all jus' a way for some folks to imagine an explanation for shit they don't understand or can't explain; hence, "The Beginning". "Point-Singularity" isn't too...
It's all jus' a way for some folks to imagine an explanation for shit they don't understand or can't explain; hence, "The Beginning".

"Point-Singularity" isn't too far from the Bible...

"And then, he rested."

You're right, it's all silly; but, fun.
Nerd wrote:
I live like 20 miles from Pasadena...
There're some people down there that you'll get a kick outta: In the end...

"We don't know".

But, they love tryin' to figure things out.

Me?

I'm a practical (particle) kinda guy. I like tearin' shit apart and figuring out "what it is/was" and where it "is/went".

When I was a kid, I would get in trouble for tellin' the geniuses that wanted to name "their" particles after them-selves or their pet-names that they were "Full of Shit"; because, you wouldn't believe that...

These "particles" haven't been "seen".

They've been "calculated" into existence.

I'm still laughin'...

Yup, some of these douchers even got "The Prize".

Classic.
jemcee
Posts
12700
Joined
8/11/2008
Location
AU
2/28/2011 6:44pm Edited Date/Time 2/28/2011 6:44pm
jamma10 wrote:
Nerd you realise you're starting to fight the embers of a fire that has been raging for the past two days?! Some people just want to...
Nerd you realise you're starting to fight the embers of a fire that has been raging for the past two days?!

Some people just want to see it as a deliberate, cynical take out move - and there isn't anyway to change their mind, no matter how much sense you may talk or examples you may show them.
jms217 wrote:
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way...
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way that they wouldn't have came together chad was right there when james turned and took off.
jamma10 wrote:
it was a 'deliberate' block pass, it was not a 'deliberate' take out move... hence why Reed steered infront of, and not directly into Stewart. It...
it was a 'deliberate' block pass, it was not a 'deliberate' take out move... hence why Reed steered infront of, and not directly into Stewart. It was miscalculated and I felt a little sorry for James but from a totally unbiased perspective it was the kind of split second decision & manouvre almost any racer would make in a similar, high stakes situation.

What people also seem to forget is that Stewart remounted before Reed, had he just got his head down and charged for the line he would have finished second. Instead he chose to focus on slowing down and weaving about in front of Reed, which is actually what lost him a podium spot.
you still here jms? I thought I gave you enough rope...

if stewart was racing and not just riding the whole altercation could've been avoided or at the very least, noone would've gone down..

I would say this is just my opinion but it's pretty much the opinion of any racer that's not blinded by the love of a 25 year old supercross rider (notice i didn't say motocross rider)
TeamGreen
Posts
36732
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
2/28/2011 6:45pm
Nerd wrote:
Chad was definitely trying to take out Stewart in Vegas. 100-percent. Without a doubt.
Funny, I didn't think that was a total take out move at all in Vegas. IMO, I thought CR could have hit JS a lot harder...
Funny, I didn't think that was a total take out move at all in Vegas. IMO, I thought CR could have hit JS a lot harder in Vegas. Looked like a hard love tap. Atlanta was way, way worse and dangerous. Again, if you bump someone at less than a 45 degree, that's rubbing (for the most). When it's at or close to 90 freakin' degrees, that is a take out move!!!
Nerd wrote:
Chad's line was consistent through the turn. The "close to 90" was because Stewart turned down into him. But rest assured Reed was trying to take...
Chad's line was consistent through the turn. The "close to 90" was because Stewart turned down into him. But rest assured Reed was trying to take Stewart out in Vegas.
The "close to 90" was because Stewart turned down into him.

Jus' like he did in PHX, last-year.
BobbyM
Posts
21439
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
2/28/2011 6:46pm
none of this bullshit compares to kdubs takeout of dv in phoenix
jms217
Posts
207
Joined
11/6/2010
Location
Fort Dodge, IA US
2/28/2011 6:47pm
jamma10 wrote:
Nerd you realise you're starting to fight the embers of a fire that has been raging for the past two days?! Some people just want to...
Nerd you realise you're starting to fight the embers of a fire that has been raging for the past two days?!

Some people just want to see it as a deliberate, cynical take out move - and there isn't anyway to change their mind, no matter how much sense you may talk or examples you may show them.
jms217 wrote:
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way...
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way that they wouldn't have came together chad was right there when james turned and took off.
jmar wrote:
People like you really make it easy.

What was your take on Stewart landing on JT?
My take is that it was a racing incident?
People like you need to shut the fuck up and quit thinking that you know everything.
JT fucked up on that jump and eek mental help.and slowed way down when he was right infront of stewie who didn't mess up and landed on him.
reed could'vet tried to make the pass a hell of a lot better than what he did. He was almost going backwards before stewie(who didn't have much of a choice) hit him. if he would've waited to the next corner he probably could've had him, but instead he cost both of them points. What did he think was going to happen when he cut over like that? Even RC said it didn't make sense, but i'm sure you know more than him.
2/28/2011 6:49pm
Wow....a completely retarded topic turns (is turning) into something equally retarded....science vs religion. Great.

We're gone from some complete moron doing their usual baiting (read the vitalmx rules you douche) to non moto. The only good thing about this thread is that there is now multiple reasons to delete it.
jms217
Posts
207
Joined
11/6/2010
Location
Fort Dodge, IA US
2/28/2011 6:49pm
jms217 wrote:
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way...
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way that they wouldn't have came together chad was right there when james turned and took off.
jamma10 wrote:
it was a 'deliberate' block pass, it was not a 'deliberate' take out move... hence why Reed steered infront of, and not directly into Stewart. It...
it was a 'deliberate' block pass, it was not a 'deliberate' take out move... hence why Reed steered infront of, and not directly into Stewart. It was miscalculated and I felt a little sorry for James but from a totally unbiased perspective it was the kind of split second decision & manouvre almost any racer would make in a similar, high stakes situation.

What people also seem to forget is that Stewart remounted before Reed, had he just got his head down and charged for the line he would have finished second. Instead he chose to focus on slowing down and weaving about in front of Reed, which is actually what lost him a podium spot.
jemcee wrote:
you still here jms? I thought I gave you enough rope... if stewart was racing and not just riding the whole altercation could've been avoided or...
you still here jms? I thought I gave you enough rope...

if stewart was racing and not just riding the whole altercation could've been avoided or at the very least, noone would've gone down..

I would say this is just my opinion but it's pretty much the opinion of any racer that's not blinded by the love of a 25 year old supercross rider (notice i didn't say motocross rider)
I don't think i'm going to make a response to what you have to say about the "racing incident" because the only thing you like to talk about every i see you post on a thread is gayness.
jemcee
Posts
12700
Joined
8/11/2008
Location
AU
2/28/2011 6:50pm
Nerd wrote:
Chad's line was consistent through the turn. The "close to 90" was because Stewart turned down into him. But rest assured Reed was trying to take...
Chad's line was consistent through the turn. The "close to 90" was because Stewart turned down into him. But rest assured Reed was trying to take Stewart out in Vegas.
man you are in three arguments in one thread
1. about how to argue and how you argue
2. bloody aliens and (i think) time travel
and
3. reeds racing move on stewart
and you're on point with all of them that's pretty impressive
motomike137
Posts
8180
Joined
4/22/2010
Location
Fenton, MI US
2/28/2011 6:50pm
BobbyM wrote:
none of this bullshit compares to kdubs takeout of dv in phoenix
Your right... Reed's move was a poor excuse and not even in the same league. If you can't get it done without getting yourself knocked down then maybe you just look desperate?
jemcee
Posts
12700
Joined
8/11/2008
Location
AU
2/28/2011 6:52pm
jamma10 wrote:
it was a 'deliberate' block pass, it was not a 'deliberate' take out move... hence why Reed steered infront of, and not directly into Stewart. It...
it was a 'deliberate' block pass, it was not a 'deliberate' take out move... hence why Reed steered infront of, and not directly into Stewart. It was miscalculated and I felt a little sorry for James but from a totally unbiased perspective it was the kind of split second decision & manouvre almost any racer would make in a similar, high stakes situation.

What people also seem to forget is that Stewart remounted before Reed, had he just got his head down and charged for the line he would have finished second. Instead he chose to focus on slowing down and weaving about in front of Reed, which is actually what lost him a podium spot.
jemcee wrote:
you still here jms? I thought I gave you enough rope... if stewart was racing and not just riding the whole altercation could've been avoided or...
you still here jms? I thought I gave you enough rope...

if stewart was racing and not just riding the whole altercation could've been avoided or at the very least, noone would've gone down..

I would say this is just my opinion but it's pretty much the opinion of any racer that's not blinded by the love of a 25 year old supercross rider (notice i didn't say motocross rider)
jms217 wrote:
I don't think i'm going to make a response to what you have to say about the "racing incident" because the only thing you like to...
I don't think i'm going to make a response to what you have to say about the "racing incident" because the only thing you like to talk about every i see you post on a thread is gayness.
oh i see focusing on the gayness again.. interesting

I mean It's cool man I think you'll find everyone supportive
jms217
Posts
207
Joined
11/6/2010
Location
Fort Dodge, IA US
2/28/2011 6:54pm
jemcee wrote:
you still here jms? I thought I gave you enough rope... if stewart was racing and not just riding the whole altercation could've been avoided or...
you still here jms? I thought I gave you enough rope...

if stewart was racing and not just riding the whole altercation could've been avoided or at the very least, noone would've gone down..

I would say this is just my opinion but it's pretty much the opinion of any racer that's not blinded by the love of a 25 year old supercross rider (notice i didn't say motocross rider)
jms217 wrote:
I don't think i'm going to make a response to what you have to say about the "racing incident" because the only thing you like to...
I don't think i'm going to make a response to what you have to say about the "racing incident" because the only thing you like to talk about every i see you post on a thread is gayness.
jemcee wrote:
oh i see focusing on the gayness again.. interesting

I mean It's cool man I think you'll find everyone supportive
There must be a shit load of fags down there in Australia. I'm sure you have fun seeing them every day, because that is all you can talk about now i'm done talking to so you can go fuck yourself or better yet find one of you fellow Austrailian gay fuck buddies he can do it for you.


Is there some way i can get a restraining order on you for this board.
Nerd
Posts
6155
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
2/28/2011 6:55pm
Funny, I didn't think that was a total take out move at all in Vegas. IMO, I thought CR could have hit JS a lot harder...
Funny, I didn't think that was a total take out move at all in Vegas. IMO, I thought CR could have hit JS a lot harder in Vegas. Looked like a hard love tap. Atlanta was way, way worse and dangerous. Again, if you bump someone at less than a 45 degree, that's rubbing (for the most). When it's at or close to 90 freakin' degrees, that is a take out move!!!
Nerd wrote:
Chad's line was consistent through the turn. The "close to 90" was because Stewart turned down into him. But rest assured Reed was trying to take...
Chad's line was consistent through the turn. The "close to 90" was because Stewart turned down into him. But rest assured Reed was trying to take Stewart out in Vegas.
TeamGreen wrote:
The "close to 90" was because Stewart turned down into him.

Jus' like he did in PHX, last-year.
No, I don't think that was the same. Chad was at a much different angle in the Phoenix crash.
bama205
Posts
1519
Joined
10/7/2010
Location
Williamson County, TN US
2/28/2011 6:55pm
Pdub wrote:
Mr. Consistency is known for his consistent ability to make supercross podiums. He is NOT known for crashing. But over the past three years, he has...
Mr. Consistency is known for his consistent ability to make supercross podiums. He is NOT known for crashing. But over the past three years, he has shown remarkable consistency for his ability to get James to hit the ground

2009 - A1: Chad fell in the whoops, knocking James down and out of the race
2010 - PHX: Chad rammed James in a turn, sending both down and breaking his own hand
2011 - ATL: Chad cut James off, causing them both to go down

By the timeline, we can see this trend is a fairly new development in the career of the Aussie supercross superstar. Is this an intentional new tactic, the "if you can't beat 'em, wreck 'em" strategy? If so, how long before bones are broken and seasons ruined?
you just a shit stirrer? this is a dumb post
Nerd
Posts
6155
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
2/28/2011 6:56pm
Nerd wrote:
Chad's line was consistent through the turn. The "close to 90" was because Stewart turned down into him. But rest assured Reed was trying to take...
Chad's line was consistent through the turn. The "close to 90" was because Stewart turned down into him. But rest assured Reed was trying to take Stewart out in Vegas.
jemcee wrote:
man you are in three arguments in one thread 1. about how to argue and how you argue 2. bloody aliens and (i think) time travel...
man you are in three arguments in one thread
1. about how to argue and how you argue
2. bloody aliens and (i think) time travel
and
3. reeds racing move on stewart
and you're on point with all of them that's pretty impressive
Ha. Yeah, I got shit to do. Thanks for reminding me.
jemcee
Posts
12700
Joined
8/11/2008
Location
AU
2/28/2011 6:57pm
jms217 wrote:
I don't think i'm going to make a response to what you have to say about the "racing incident" because the only thing you like to...
I don't think i'm going to make a response to what you have to say about the "racing incident" because the only thing you like to talk about every i see you post on a thread is gayness.
jemcee wrote:
oh i see focusing on the gayness again.. interesting

I mean It's cool man I think you'll find everyone supportive
jms217 wrote:
There must be a shit load of fags down there in Australia. I'm sure you have fun seeing them every day, because that is all you...
There must be a shit load of fags down there in Australia. I'm sure you have fun seeing them every day, because that is all you can talk about now i'm done talking to so you can go fuck yourself or better yet find one of you fellow Austrailian gay fuck buddies he can do it for you.


Is there some way i can get a restraining order on you for this board.
it's funny cause i only mentioned it once after you mentioned it then you go on a rant about gay sex
jmar
Posts
14154
Joined
2/11/2007
Location
Oklahoma City, OK US
2/28/2011 6:58pm
jms217 wrote:
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way...
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way that they wouldn't have came together chad was right there when james turned and took off.
jmar wrote:
People like you really make it easy.

What was your take on Stewart landing on JT?
My take is that it was a racing incident?
jms217 wrote:
People like you need to shut the fuck up and quit thinking that you know everything. JT fucked up on that jump and eek mental help.and...
People like you need to shut the fuck up and quit thinking that you know everything.
JT fucked up on that jump and eek mental help.and slowed way down when he was right infront of stewie who didn't mess up and landed on him.
reed could'vet tried to make the pass a hell of a lot better than what he did. He was almost going backwards before stewie(who didn't have much of a choice) hit him. if he would've waited to the next corner he probably could've had him, but instead he cost both of them points. What did he think was going to happen when he cut over like that? Even RC said it didn't make sense, but i'm sure you know more than him.
Again

Board clowns like your self make this way to easy.
Pdub
Posts
1477
Joined
8/2/2006
Location
Wheaton, MD US
2/28/2011 7:00pm
Pdub wrote:
Mr. Consistency is known for his consistent ability to make supercross podiums. He is NOT known for crashing. But over the past three years, he has...
Mr. Consistency is known for his consistent ability to make supercross podiums. He is NOT known for crashing. But over the past three years, he has shown remarkable consistency for his ability to get James to hit the ground

2009 - A1: Chad fell in the whoops, knocking James down and out of the race
2010 - PHX: Chad rammed James in a turn, sending both down and breaking his own hand
2011 - ATL: Chad cut James off, causing them both to go down

By the timeline, we can see this trend is a fairly new development in the career of the Aussie supercross superstar. Is this an intentional new tactic, the "if you can't beat 'em, wreck 'em" strategy? If so, how long before bones are broken and seasons ruined?
bama205 wrote:
you just a shit stirrer? this is a dumb post
Just answer the question, man. Try to leave out the profanity if you can.
jamma10
Posts
10573
Joined
8/24/2008
Location
Bristol GB
2/28/2011 7:00pm Edited Date/Time 2/28/2011 7:06pm
jms217 wrote:
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way...
you don't think chad going straight across the track infront of some as being deliberate? Even if james would have slowed down there is no way that they wouldn't have came together chad was right there when james turned and took off.
jmar wrote:
People like you really make it easy.

What was your take on Stewart landing on JT?
My take is that it was a racing incident?
jms217 wrote:
People like you need to shut the fuck up and quit thinking that you know everything. JT fucked up on that jump and eek mental help.and...
People like you need to shut the fuck up and quit thinking that you know everything.
JT fucked up on that jump and eek mental help.and slowed way down when he was right infront of stewie who didn't mess up and landed on him.
reed could'vet tried to make the pass a hell of a lot better than what he did. He was almost going backwards before stewie(who didn't have much of a choice) hit him. if he would've waited to the next corner he probably could've had him, but instead he cost both of them points. What did he think was going to happen when he cut over like that? Even RC said it didn't make sense, but i'm sure you know more than him.
What did he think was going to happen when he cut over like that?

The whole purpose of a move like that is to stand the other guy up, to make him slow down or ultimately stop, even if it means he bumps into the side of you. Reeds line was extra aggressive yes, but it was a last ditch effort and he was infront of James when they collided. There may be an 'unwritten rule' about what may or may not be deemed an acceptable pass, but that will always be subjective and just depends on whose side you're on. But there is nothing in the rule book that says that you cannot make full use of the whole track. Stewart, questionably, went high and wide and Reed clocked this early so he dived down the inside to cut him off.

It was miscalculated on Reeds part, but not malicious.
jms217
Posts
207
Joined
11/6/2010
Location
Fort Dodge, IA US
2/28/2011 7:00pm
jemcee wrote:
oh i see focusing on the gayness again.. interesting

I mean It's cool man I think you'll find everyone supportive
jms217 wrote:
There must be a shit load of fags down there in Australia. I'm sure you have fun seeing them every day, because that is all you...
There must be a shit load of fags down there in Australia. I'm sure you have fun seeing them every day, because that is all you can talk about now i'm done talking to so you can go fuck yourself or better yet find one of you fellow Austrailian gay fuck buddies he can do it for you.


Is there some way i can get a restraining order on you for this board.
jemcee wrote:
it's funny cause i only mentioned it once after you mentioned it then you go on a rant about gay sex
You know your pretty funny, good point there though your good at lureing people in. i will give you that.
motomike137
Posts
8180
Joined
4/22/2010
Location
Fenton, MI US
2/28/2011 7:02pm
jmar wrote:
People like you really make it easy.

What was your take on Stewart landing on JT?
My take is that it was a racing incident?
jms217 wrote:
People like you need to shut the fuck up and quit thinking that you know everything. JT fucked up on that jump and eek mental help.and...
People like you need to shut the fuck up and quit thinking that you know everything.
JT fucked up on that jump and eek mental help.and slowed way down when he was right infront of stewie who didn't mess up and landed on him.
reed could'vet tried to make the pass a hell of a lot better than what he did. He was almost going backwards before stewie(who didn't have much of a choice) hit him. if he would've waited to the next corner he probably could've had him, but instead he cost both of them points. What did he think was going to happen when he cut over like that? Even RC said it didn't make sense, but i'm sure you know more than him.
jamma10 wrote:
What did he think was going to happen when he cut over like that? The whole purpose of a move like that is to stand the...
What did he think was going to happen when he cut over like that?

The whole purpose of a move like that is to stand the other guy up, to make him slow down or ultimately stop, even if it means he bumps into the side of you. Reeds line was extra aggressive yes, but it was a last ditch effort and he was infront of James when they collided. There may be an 'unwritten rule' about what may or may not be deemed an acceptable pass, but that will always be subjective and just depends on whose side you're on. But there is nothing in the rule book that says that you cannot make full use of the whole track. Stewart, questionably, went high and wide and Reed clocked this early so he dived down the inside to cut him off.

It was miscalculated on Reeds part, but not malicious.
Aw heck Jamma... why you wanna go and get all logical... this thing has a chance to go all week!
jemcee
Posts
12700
Joined
8/11/2008
Location
AU
2/28/2011 7:02pm Edited Date/Time 2/28/2011 7:03pm
jms217 wrote:
There must be a shit load of fags down there in Australia. I'm sure you have fun seeing them every day, because that is all you...
There must be a shit load of fags down there in Australia. I'm sure you have fun seeing them every day, because that is all you can talk about now i'm done talking to so you can go fuck yourself or better yet find one of you fellow Austrailian gay fuck buddies he can do it for you.


Is there some way i can get a restraining order on you for this board.
jemcee wrote:
it's funny cause i only mentioned it once after you mentioned it then you go on a rant about gay sex
jms217 wrote:
You know your pretty funny, good point there though your good at lureing people in. i will give you that.
are you flirting with me?

I mean I'm flattered but I just don't swing that way but good on you

Post a reply to: "Crash" Reed

The Latest