"Crash" Reed

jmar wrote:

I have to be honest with you P.

I don't like fishing. It's boring, costly and makes you hands stink like fish.

Nerd wrote:

Doesn't make my response any less funny.

jakefortyeight wrote:

Well, wrong again. That is not my quote and really has nothing to do with what I believe. That quote is for my buddy Teefus. Do...

Well, wrong again. That is not my quote and really has nothing to do with what I believe. That quote is for my buddy Teefus.

Do you have any idea of what you are talking about at all?

jmar wrote:

Enlighten us Mr. Yankee Doodle Dandy.

Pdub wrote:

Mr. Consistency is known for his consistent ability to make supercross podiums. He is NOT known for crashing. But over the past three years, he has...

Mr. Consistency is known for his consistent ability to make supercross podiums. He is NOT known for crashing. But over the past three years, he has shown remarkable consistency for his ability to get James to hit the ground

2009 - A1: Chad fell in the whoops, knocking James down and out of the race
2010 - PHX: Chad rammed James in a turn, sending both down and breaking his own hand
2011 - ATL: Chad cut James off, causing them both to go down

By the timeline, we can see this trend is a fairly new development in the career of the Aussie supercross superstar. Is this an intentional new tactic, the "if you can't beat 'em, wreck 'em" strategy? If so, how long before bones are broken and seasons ruined?

Motodave15 wrote:

Bro, you forgot the fact that in 2009 reed tried to punt stewart in las vegas, with a fucking retarded move

Pdub wrote:

I didn't forget. I didn't bring it up because they didn't go down.

Nerd wrote:

Doesn't make my response any less funny.

jakefortyeight wrote:

Well, wrong again. That is not my quote and really has nothing to do with what I believe. That quote is for my buddy Teefus. Do...

Well, wrong again. That is not my quote and really has nothing to do with what I believe. That quote is for my buddy Teefus.

Do you have any idea of what you are talking about at all?

Nerd wrote:

Yes. When I put a quote as a signature online like this, normally it's something I agree with, or something that would be very obviously not...

Yes.

When I put a quote as a signature online like this, normally it's something I agree with, or something that would be very obviously not something I agree with.

Do you think aliens could've traveled from another planet to ours using the known laws of physics?

jmar wrote:

I have to be honest with you P.

I don't like fishing. It's boring, costly and makes you hands stink like fish.

TeamGreen wrote:

Were u @ that Strip-Club in San Felipe the other-nite?

I'm jus' askin'...

jakefortyeight wrote:

Well, wrong again. That is not my quote and really has nothing to do with what I believe. That quote is for my buddy Teefus. Do...

Well, wrong again. That is not my quote and really has nothing to do with what I believe. That quote is for my buddy Teefus.

Do you have any idea of what you are talking about at all?

jmar wrote:

Enlighten us Mr. Yankee Doodle Dandy.

jakefortyeight wrote:

Not the one trying to speak for everyone, that's Nerds job. Plus I'd rather hear what you think about the potential for Reed and Bubba's antics...

Not the one trying to speak for everyone, that's Nerds job. Plus I'd rather hear what you think about the potential for Reed and Bubba's antics leading to a season ending injury than engage in childish third grade name calling.

Oh wait, this is Vital - forgot where I was...

jakefortyeight wrote:

Well, wrong again. That is not my quote and really has nothing to do with what I believe. That quote is for my buddy Teefus. Do...

Well, wrong again. That is not my quote and really has nothing to do with what I believe. That quote is for my buddy Teefus.

Do you have any idea of what you are talking about at all?

Nerd wrote:

Yes. When I put a quote as a signature online like this, normally it's something I agree with, or something that would be very obviously not...

Yes.

When I put a quote as a signature online like this, normally it's something I agree with, or something that would be very obviously not something I agree with.

Do you think aliens could've traveled from another planet to ours using the known laws of physics?

TeamGreen wrote:

Yes, actually, the fundamentals on M-Theory explain all of this..."Universes Collide", etc. ...look into it. Even Hawking is coming around on this. Well, I could be...

Yes, actually, the fundamentals on M-Theory explain all of this..."Universes Collide", etc. ...look into it.

Even Hawking is coming around on this.

Well, I could be wrong, I was only 16 when the concept became familiar.

SLAC, that place will kill your mind.

jakefortyeight wrote:

Well, wrong again. That is not my quote and really has nothing to do with what I believe. That quote is for my buddy Teefus. Do...

Well, wrong again. That is not my quote and really has nothing to do with what I believe. That quote is for my buddy Teefus.

Do you have any idea of what you are talking about at all?

jmar wrote:

Enlighten us Mr. Yankee Doodle Dandy.

jakefortyeight wrote:

Not the one trying to speak for everyone, that's Nerds job. Plus I'd rather hear what you think about the potential for Reed and Bubba's antics...

Not the one trying to speak for everyone, that's Nerds job. Plus I'd rather hear what you think about the potential for Reed and Bubba's antics leading to a season ending injury than engage in childish third grade name calling.

Oh wait, this is Vital - forgot where I was...

jmar wrote:

Enlighten us Mr. Yankee Doodle Dandy.

jakefortyeight wrote:

Not the one trying to speak for everyone, that's Nerds job. Plus I'd rather hear what you think about the potential for Reed and Bubba's antics...

Not the one trying to speak for everyone, that's Nerds job. Plus I'd rather hear what you think about the potential for Reed and Bubba's antics leading to a season ending injury than engage in childish third grade name calling.

Oh wait, this is Vital - forgot where I was...

Nerd wrote:

It's not my job. My job is to speak for me. That's all. And I do that. Perhaps the confusion stems from some sort of identity...

It's not my job. My job is to speak for me. That's all. And I do that. Perhaps the confusion stems from some sort of identity disorder or something. I'd get it checked if I were you.

Nerd wrote:

Yes. When I put a quote as a signature online like this, normally it's something I agree with, or something that would be very obviously not...

Yes.

When I put a quote as a signature online like this, normally it's something I agree with, or something that would be very obviously not something I agree with.

Do you think aliens could've traveled from another planet to ours using the known laws of physics?

TeamGreen wrote:

Yes, actually, the fundamentals on M-Theory explain all of this..."Universes Collide", etc. ...look into it. Even Hawking is coming around on this. Well, I could be...

Yes, actually, the fundamentals on M-Theory explain all of this..."Universes Collide", etc. ...look into it.

Even Hawking is coming around on this.

Well, I could be wrong, I was only 16 when the concept became familiar.

SLAC, that place will kill your mind.

Nerd wrote:

String theory?

You're talking about interdimensional travel, not interstellar travel. That's obviously not what I asked about.

TeamGreen wrote:

Yes, actually, the fundamentals on M-Theory explain all of this..."Universes Collide", etc. ...look into it. Even Hawking is coming around on this. Well, I could be...

Yes, actually, the fundamentals on M-Theory explain all of this..."Universes Collide", etc. ...look into it.

Even Hawking is coming around on this.

Well, I could be wrong, I was only 16 when the concept became familiar.

SLAC, that place will kill your mind.

Nerd wrote:

String theory?

You're talking about interdimensional travel, not interstellar travel. That's obviously not what I asked about.

TeamGreen wrote:

Wow, seriously...it'a all there. It's a matter of jumping thru the "Bang". There is a point in time when you can jump thru the contact point...

Wow, seriously...it'a all there. It's a matter of jumping thru the "Bang". There is a point in time when you can jump thru the contact point of the collision.

Hell, you almost get it.

Even the Stones get it.

jakefortyeight wrote:

Not the one trying to speak for everyone, that's Nerds job. Plus I'd rather hear what you think about the potential for Reed and Bubba's antics...

Not the one trying to speak for everyone, that's Nerds job. Plus I'd rather hear what you think about the potential for Reed and Bubba's antics leading to a season ending injury than engage in childish third grade name calling.

Oh wait, this is Vital - forgot where I was...

Nerd wrote:

It's not my job. My job is to speak for me. That's all. And I do that. Perhaps the confusion stems from some sort of identity...

It's not my job. My job is to speak for me. That's all. And I do that. Perhaps the confusion stems from some sort of identity disorder or something. I'd get it checked if I were you.

jakefortyeight wrote:

How come I feel like I am having a conversation with another Internet warrior who got beat up in third grade by the "Bullies" and is...

How come I feel like I am having a conversation with another Internet warrior who got beat up in third grade by the "Bullies" and is out to prove how "Smart" he is by impressing everyone with his superior whit and wisdom?

Really, bud it's a waste of my time.

Good luck with the anger thing....

Hahahaha

jmar wrote:

Nothing dirty about Reeds move, and I was the guy that was taking up for Stewart with the JT incident. Stuff goes down fast out there...

Nothing dirty about Reeds move, and I was the guy that was taking up for Stewart with the JT incident.

Stuff goes down fast out there, and these guys have to make a split second decisions and live by those decisions.

That's called racing.

jamma10 wrote:

Wormholes and Whatnot - good name for a band

jmar wrote:

Nothing dirty about Reeds move, and I was the guy that was taking up for Stewart with the JT incident. Stuff goes down fast out there...

Nothing dirty about Reeds move, and I was the guy that was taking up for Stewart with the JT incident.

Stuff goes down fast out there, and these guys have to make a split second decisions and live by those decisions.

That's called racing.

jakefortyeight wrote:

Well, I agree with the stuff goes down fast out there and that's racing part. My point and I happen to agree with the guy who...

Well, I agree with the stuff goes down fast out there and that's racing part. My point and I happen to agree with the guy who started the post, is that no matter how you see it or who's side you want to take, with the history of these two getting together and the fact of what may happen based on last years get together, we all stand to lose as it seems obvious these "Get togethers" have the real chance of ending either Chad or Bubba's season, maybe both.

And that would suck as I like the racing this year.

jmar wrote:

Nothing dirty about Reeds move, and I was the guy that was taking up for Stewart with the JT incident. Stuff goes down fast out there...

Nothing dirty about Reeds move, and I was the guy that was taking up for Stewart with the JT incident.

Stuff goes down fast out there, and these guys have to make a split second decisions and live by those decisions.

That's called racing.

jakefortyeight wrote:

Well, I agree with the stuff goes down fast out there and that's racing part. My point and I happen to agree with the guy who...

Well, I agree with the stuff goes down fast out there and that's racing part. My point and I happen to agree with the guy who started the post, is that no matter how you see it or who's side you want to take, with the history of these two getting together and the fact of what may happen based on last years get together, we all stand to lose as it seems obvious these "Get togethers" have the real chance of ending either Chad or Bubba's season, maybe both.

And that would suck as I like the racing this year.

gsxrcr28 wrote:

Steve aren't you friends with Chad and didn't James blow you off at Anaheim? Just asking?

Pdub wrote:

Mr. Consistency is known for his consistent ability to make supercross podiums. He is NOT known for crashing. But over the past three years, he has...

Mr. Consistency is known for his consistent ability to make supercross podiums. He is NOT known for crashing. But over the past three years, he has shown remarkable consistency for his ability to get James to hit the ground

2009 - A1: Chad fell in the whoops, knocking James down and out of the race
2010 - PHX: Chad rammed James in a turn, sending both down and breaking his own hand
2011 - ATL: Chad cut James off, causing them both to go down

By the timeline, we can see this trend is a fairly new development in the career of the Aussie supercross superstar. Is this an intentional new tactic, the "if you can't beat 'em, wreck 'em" strategy? If so, how long before bones are broken and seasons ruined?

Bennydic wrote:

They do seem to come together a lot, but A1 2009- Bubba missed a shift and jacked Reed. 2010-PHX 2 differing lines that came together-racing icident...

They do seem to come together a lot, but A1 2009- Bubba missed a shift and jacked Reed. 2010-PHX 2 differing lines that came together-racing icident 2011-ATL Racing incident. They are just the fastest 2 guys and are wanting to occupy the same territory at the same time. Chad does not seem to crash as much as JS7 nor take people out like he has and still does.JS7 has made himself quite a hit list over the years with Tedesco, Carmichael, Reed, Preston , McGrath, JT$ and so on and so on...........Let the record speak for itself...and the qeustion should really be "how long until James takes the career of a fellow rider?"

Pdub wrote:

Well, you can ask that question in your own thread, my friend. Of course, it has been asked many times before. I made a few statements...

Well, you can ask that question in your own thread, my friend. Of course, it has been asked many times before.

I made a few statements, asked two questions and got labeled a fisherman, a shitty, stink-bait using one at that.

All you guys had to say was "no, Reed isn't intentionally crashing into James" but that would be too... civil?

What was it that set you guys off? The headline? The question?

Nerd wrote:

You made a false assertion, so I corrected it and then speculated as to how you may have come to such a conclusion. That makes me...

You made a false assertion, so I corrected it and then speculated as to how you may have come to such a conclusion. That makes me angry? It's true that it's a waste of time, though.

Nerd wrote:

You made a false assertion, so I corrected it and then speculated as to how you may have come to such a conclusion. That makes me...

You made a false assertion, so I corrected it and then speculated as to how you may have come to such a conclusion. That makes me angry? It's true that it's a waste of time, though.

jakefortyeight wrote:

Come on smart guy, you're better than that. The second post of this thread is you belly aching about how stupid the post is and it...

Come on smart guy, you're better than that. The second post of this thread is you belly aching about how stupid the post is and it should be deleted. If it was about your opinion that you don't think the thread is worthy of your time, then don't open it.

But no, your answer is to delete it so no one else can see it - explain again how it is about you and no one else?

So if I have this right if you alone think a thread is not worthy it has to be deleted? That's a pretty big ego you got going there...

Your funny....

gsxrcr28 wrote:

Steve aren't you friends with Chad and didn't James blow you off at Anaheim? Just asking?

Nerd wrote:

James blew EVERYONE off at Anaheim 2 LAST YEAR. Yes. He hasn't blown me off this year. He's been really easy to work with and has...

James blew EVERYONE off at Anaheim 2 LAST YEAR. Yes. He hasn't blown me off this year. He's been really easy to work with and has given some very poignant and funny interviews.

As for being friends with Reed, not really. I've never had dinner with him or been invited to his house or anything like that. We have a good working relationship just like I have with most guys.

I loved Damon Bradshaw, RJ, etc. I have a feeling if most of you guys were around when those guys were, you'd have taken up badminton.