Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
Pretty funny that you'd criticise Jimmy Kimmel for being - of all things - egotistical and self serving...
You don’t have a side? LMFAO😂😂😂😂
Gold, Jerry, Gold!!
Dana White sure enjoyed the ruckus. 😀
I gotta say, it does have a vibe of one of those murder dinners where someone gets killed and all the dinner guests have to figure out who dunnit.
"You really think the joke Kimmel made was a call for Trump to be killed?"
100%. The same as I believe when you frame your questions as someone offering an "alternate motive" to a situation that has no basis, you're just trying to divert the discussion from the real problem. While many people can pose a legitimate innocent question, when the same person does the same thing repeatedly, a pattern emerges that they are just trying to divert the attention away from unscrupulous methods of the left.
TM
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Free shipping: VITALMX
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
And to be fair, the age joke is not very far off from some of the comments Trump himself has made about his own death. He has joked multiple times about getting into heaven . I know I've heard him talk about his own mortality and joke about it other times too. Kimmel's joke aired on his show last week before the recent attempt on Trump and his admin . Had he aired it after the Correspondents dinner incident , than it would be in bad taste. But that timeline should matter .
It seems SOME Republicans do not care that they have a bias that distorts their views and do not try to interpret something how it was intended. Instead interpreting it in whatever way fits into their agenda. And that really can apply to people in general, its not exclusive to a single party unfortunately. And many people do not care to try and factor their own bias into something.
How about the bill for the ballroom not falling on US taxpayers when it was supposed to be funded by donations and Trump. What happened to that? Did the party that was going to make a big donation back out? was there ever anybody pledging to donate the amount they needed?
While I can see a true need for a venue like that, Trump said so many times that it wouldn't cost taxpayers a dime. Maybe it's just another distraction from something else, and another bluff, I'm sure somebody can explain it. I don't see how it would stop what happened recently. Somebody could do the same thing with the same outcome. A crazy charges the first line of defence and gets stopped. Anybody else see the clip of the Fox news guys cracking jokes about the lack of security?
I've watched documentaries on the Secret Service before and in the past, they have tried to blend in and make the security measures harder to see. So those gaps they were laughing at and pointing out, were likely not there at all and the true measures were hiding in plain sight. They do it so it's harder for somebody to evade them. If You can not see the cameras, people, etc. You will either wrongly assume there is nothing there or assume Your just unable to see it and they hope that makes people less likely to try something. If You don't know where something is, You have to assume its everyplace. You can't hide from a camera You don't know the location of.
“Murder by Death” is a classic.
Well maybe now You can see how the way Trump demonizing the press could be taken as a call to action by some crazy person that supports him ? But I know You don't want to agree with me on anything, so even if You do see that Trump's disdain and disrespect of the media is bad, You'll defend it or just avoid the subject.
I'm telling You that You are getting it wrong with how You interpret my posts. I have realized that I really waste time trying to make sure I'm not misunderstood. I need to stop focusing on the people who miss it, and just be happy that some people get it.
We’ve got an Internet Bad Ass up in here. 🤣
Are these the best examples you can find? A Trump tweet, a 5 year old Boebert comment, and a tweet from a state senator? Maybe you’re too attenuated from this being that you live in the UK, but I don’t think you realize how prevalent and pervasive the anti Trump rhetoric is in this country. It’s simply unequivocal.
You also need to recognize that the anti Trump rhetoric and assassination innuendo has trickled down to the average democrat. It’s not just high profile people making these comments; you can see the same phrases on signs at no kings rallies as you do scribbled in the most recent wannabe hitman’s manifesto.
If you want to make a “both sides” argument about the abandoned middle class or overly adventurous foreign policy, I think you could make a strong case. But this “both sides say mean things” argument can’t be taken seriously.
This thread delivers.
If he agreed with you, you’d both be wrong.
We understand perfectly what your intentions are.
TM
Can I ask You what You think of MSNBC/MSnow and the on air people?
This thread embodies the “definition of insanity” aphorism…
Don't sell us short, it's every thread! 🤣
TM
No you don’t, TM. He means that Trump’s rhetoric could, hypothetically, maybe someday, be a call to violence. So it’s bad.
But three assassination attempts, that actually happened, recently, as in the past two years, one of which rambled a bunch of tired anti Trump bullshit, were in fact not answers to calls for violence. That’s because Trump is bad, and being anti bad guy makes you automatically good guy. So saying bad stuff about bad guy means you are good guy. And calls to violence are not good guy.
If you're not well read like me, Aphorism:
--a concise statement of a principle
I'm not trying to insult Your intelligence here . This is not what You think it is, there is no hidden agenda or message.
"I have this piece of glass here, but all we have really over here is the fake news. And to get me, somebody would have to shoot through the fake news. And I don't mind that so much,"
Interpret this for me .
Pit Row
They were just a few examples I found after a quick Google search. They may be extreme but goes to show such rhetoric is not new and equally there appears to be a genuine Republican hatred of Democrats or anyone deemed a threat to Trump - I see it regularly on this forum - let alone social media, Conservative TV and Trump rallies where his supporters proudly wear their T-shirts calling for the imprisonment of Hillary Clinton, Fauci, Biden, Comey etc - or erecting gallows for Mike Pence.
The political animosity in the US has obviously been festering over many years. I’m sure you all have your own opinions about why and what started it, but you’d hope that whoever the President was they would work hard to bridge that divide instead of exploiting it. Maybe I’m naive but I cannot think of a more deliberately antagonistic and divisive US President than Donald Trump.
So it’s hardly surprising that someone like him, a corrupt, lying, cheating megalomaniac who has only ever known a life of privilege and immense wealth and who revels in bullying and insulting people, attracts such a deep feeling of resentment.
And believe me, the anti-Trump rhetoric is not limited the US. The rest of the world can’t stand him either.
I need another drink
Sorry, got the first part close, but off on the second. I never said that it wasn't bad that BOTH sides are doing and saying things that are dividing us more and more. And increasing the threats that each receive.
Never said ANYBODY was the good guys in all of this.
Trump has contributed to the rise in threats against the media.
I think its horrible that people are making attempts on Trump's life, on anybody's life, I didn't realize that needed to be said . I'm against all of it.
If you want to argue that both sides suck and say vile things, that's fair, but the extent to which the vile things on the left have been normalized and institutionalized has no comparison on the right. Fox News doesn't carry the same weight as every other media company combined, universities, big business, etc etc etc......
And if you want to say both sides have gotten too comfortable with talking about political violence, OK....
But the reality is that the current president has had multiple very real attempts on his life now. As a lefty, after that happens, if you're still playing the whataboutism game and arguing the both sides thing instead of saying hey maybe me and my side should tone it down a little before this guy is actually assassinated, you're a piece of shit and there's just no way around it. Someone was literally shot and some of you want to argue well actually maybe it was just shrapnel and the other side says mean things too, instead of just personally committing to not sharing or endorsing the vile comments. Doesn't seem like a big ask but here we are. So yeah, the level of discourse is all trump's fault.... he's totally the cause and not just a reflection of us.....
Have a 7 minute listen from 23 min-30 min. Pay attention after the 25 min mark. Now this is funny because this aired after I was telling you it made no sense, there was no basis for you bringing up "shooter could have been there to shoot the press". I just had to laugh my ass off during this segment. Because it's just so predictable watching libs try to divert the attention away from the real answer with unrelated bs alternatives.
https://rumble.com/v7940b0-the-real-insider-threat-ep.-2504-04282026.html?start=1376
Violence like this is a reality of America, you can get shot at any time of any day, doesn't matter if you are the president. We should absolutely not treat this any more seriously than a school shooting.
If only dan bongino had a job that he could investigate these threats in an official government role and not just talk shit for clicks.
Truck, I’m good with condemning assassination attempts on Trump. Easy call. Anyone laughing it off or playing the 'well actually, shrapnel' game is most probably being a piece of shit.
But here’s the part you keep skipping: that standard has to work both ways.
Melissa Hortman and her husband Mark were murdered in what federal prosecutors called targeted political assassinations. The indictment says the shooter went to the homes of Democratic elected officials intending to intimidate and murder them.
So if minimizing violence against Trump makes someone a piece of shit, then still running the 'leftists are the violent ones' script after the Hortman murders should make you one too, correct?. Same standard? Or is actually being killed somehow not as violent?
Political violence is bad when Trump is the target. It is bad when Democratic lawmakers are the target. It is bad when a lunatic goes after Pelosi’s husband. It is bad when a mob attacks the Capitol and beats cops while hunting politicians.
The difference is, some of us can say all of that without needing to check the jersey first.
If only he had the creds that while he was doing that job you speak of, ALL crime stats went down because they actually did the job.
Hmmm
I got one for ya.
How about the DNC orchestrated this to take media pressure off a new subject?
Has anyone heard anything about the SPLC since the correspondence dinner?
I didn't think so!
Hahahaha!
Post a reply to: Trump unharmed after security incident at White House correspondents' dinner