Trump says "Iran agreed to everything"

MXMattii wrote:

Anybody heard this? Was Donald Trump 'blocked' from using the nuclear codes against Iran? Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson alleged on a podcast this week that...

Anybody heard this? Was Donald Trump 'blocked' from using the nuclear codes against Iran?

 Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson alleged on a podcast this week that US President Donald Trump wanted to use the nuclear codes against Iran during an emergency White House meeting, but that he was stopped by General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Johnson described the interaction as "quite the blow up." It comes as concern mounts over the US president's unpredictable behaviour, as many lawmakers voice doubts about his mental state.

On an appearance on the Judging Freedom podcast hosted by former Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, ex-CIA officer Larry Johnson claimed an emergency briefing evolved into a confrontation, after General Dan Caine stood his ground after Donald Trump sought to invoke the nuclear codes. He said Caine "stood up and said 'No.' He invoked his privilege as the head of the military."

CNN reported that Caine, Pete Hegesth and other top officials arrived at the White House on April 18, and footage of Caine "storming out" of the building was shown on the podcast by Johnson. But the idea of Caine "blocking" Trump goes against the reality of the command chain, as technically nobody can overrule the president's command.

However, what has been reported is conflicting ideas between Caine and Trump. Though the US president said online in February that Caine believed military action against Iran could be "easily won", that's not what Caine advised at the time, according to The Washington Post.

The Wall Street Journal also reports that Trump was "intentionally excluded from the Situation Room" during Washington's recent operation to rescue US airmen in Iran. Sources revealed that he was in such a volatile state that he was screaming at his aides "for hours" and military officials made the choice to limit his access, "believing his impatience wouldn't be helpful".

Though it's difficult to verify proof of nuclear strike intent, the gap between Trump's recent war rhetoric and the stance by his Joint Chiefs of Staff has fanned the flames of this viral claim.

Source: France24

MXMattii wrote:

Anybody heard this? Was Donald Trump 'blocked' from using the nuclear codes against Iran? Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson alleged on a podcast this week that...

Anybody heard this? Was Donald Trump 'blocked' from using the nuclear codes against Iran?

 Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson alleged on a podcast this week that US President Donald Trump wanted to use the nuclear codes against Iran during an emergency White House meeting, but that he was stopped by General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Johnson described the interaction as "quite the blow up." It comes as concern mounts over the US president's unpredictable behaviour, as many lawmakers voice doubts about his mental state.

On an appearance on the Judging Freedom podcast hosted by former Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, ex-CIA officer Larry Johnson claimed an emergency briefing evolved into a confrontation, after General Dan Caine stood his ground after Donald Trump sought to invoke the nuclear codes. He said Caine "stood up and said 'No.' He invoked his privilege as the head of the military."

CNN reported that Caine, Pete Hegesth and other top officials arrived at the White House on April 18, and footage of Caine "storming out" of the building was shown on the podcast by Johnson. But the idea of Caine "blocking" Trump goes against the reality of the command chain, as technically nobody can overrule the president's command.

However, what has been reported is conflicting ideas between Caine and Trump. Though the US president said online in February that Caine believed military action against Iran could be "easily won", that's not what Caine advised at the time, according to The Washington Post.

The Wall Street Journal also reports that Trump was "intentionally excluded from the Situation Room" during Washington's recent operation to rescue US airmen in Iran. Sources revealed that he was in such a volatile state that he was screaming at his aides "for hours" and military officials made the choice to limit his access, "believing his impatience wouldn't be helpful".

Though it's difficult to verify proof of nuclear strike intent, the gap between Trump's recent war rhetoric and the stance by his Joint Chiefs of Staff has fanned the flames of this viral claim.

Source: France24

Kenny Banyan wrote:

Basically to take Iran down to where they are no longer a threat to their neighbors or the rest of the world. And probably poach their...

Basically to take Iran down to where they are no longer a threat to their neighbors or the rest of the world. And probably poach their oil. 

Twigster wrote:

You aren't going to do that without boots on the ground. That should be crystal clear by now.

Kenny Banyan wrote:

I can’t say I disagree with you on that. At this point it’s hard to say how this all ends. Soon I hope.

MXMattii wrote:

Anybody heard this? Was Donald Trump 'blocked' from using the nuclear codes against Iran? Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson alleged on a podcast this week that...

Anybody heard this? Was Donald Trump 'blocked' from using the nuclear codes against Iran?

 Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson alleged on a podcast this week that US President Donald Trump wanted to use the nuclear codes against Iran during an emergency White House meeting, but that he was stopped by General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Johnson described the interaction as "quite the blow up." It comes as concern mounts over the US president's unpredictable behaviour, as many lawmakers voice doubts about his mental state.

On an appearance on the Judging Freedom podcast hosted by former Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, ex-CIA officer Larry Johnson claimed an emergency briefing evolved into a confrontation, after General Dan Caine stood his ground after Donald Trump sought to invoke the nuclear codes. He said Caine "stood up and said 'No.' He invoked his privilege as the head of the military."

CNN reported that Caine, Pete Hegesth and other top officials arrived at the White House on April 18, and footage of Caine "storming out" of the building was shown on the podcast by Johnson. But the idea of Caine "blocking" Trump goes against the reality of the command chain, as technically nobody can overrule the president's command.

However, what has been reported is conflicting ideas between Caine and Trump. Though the US president said online in February that Caine believed military action against Iran could be "easily won", that's not what Caine advised at the time, according to The Washington Post.

The Wall Street Journal also reports that Trump was "intentionally excluded from the Situation Room" during Washington's recent operation to rescue US airmen in Iran. Sources revealed that he was in such a volatile state that he was screaming at his aides "for hours" and military officials made the choice to limit his access, "believing his impatience wouldn't be helpful".

Though it's difficult to verify proof of nuclear strike intent, the gap between Trump's recent war rhetoric and the stance by his Joint Chiefs of Staff has fanned the flames of this viral claim.

Source: France24

Kenny Banyan wrote:

I don’t believe one word of that.

MXMattii wrote:

Anybody heard this? Was Donald Trump 'blocked' from using the nuclear codes against Iran? Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson alleged on a podcast this week that...

Anybody heard this? Was Donald Trump 'blocked' from using the nuclear codes against Iran?

 Former CIA analyst Larry Johnson alleged on a podcast this week that US President Donald Trump wanted to use the nuclear codes against Iran during an emergency White House meeting, but that he was stopped by General Dan Caine, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Johnson described the interaction as "quite the blow up." It comes as concern mounts over the US president's unpredictable behaviour, as many lawmakers voice doubts about his mental state.

On an appearance on the Judging Freedom podcast hosted by former Fox News analyst Andrew Napolitano, ex-CIA officer Larry Johnson claimed an emergency briefing evolved into a confrontation, after General Dan Caine stood his ground after Donald Trump sought to invoke the nuclear codes. He said Caine "stood up and said 'No.' He invoked his privilege as the head of the military."

CNN reported that Caine, Pete Hegesth and other top officials arrived at the White House on April 18, and footage of Caine "storming out" of the building was shown on the podcast by Johnson. But the idea of Caine "blocking" Trump goes against the reality of the command chain, as technically nobody can overrule the president's command.

However, what has been reported is conflicting ideas between Caine and Trump. Though the US president said online in February that Caine believed military action against Iran could be "easily won", that's not what Caine advised at the time, according to The Washington Post.

The Wall Street Journal also reports that Trump was "intentionally excluded from the Situation Room" during Washington's recent operation to rescue US airmen in Iran. Sources revealed that he was in such a volatile state that he was screaming at his aides "for hours" and military officials made the choice to limit his access, "believing his impatience wouldn't be helpful".

Though it's difficult to verify proof of nuclear strike intent, the gap between Trump's recent war rhetoric and the stance by his Joint Chiefs of Staff has fanned the flames of this viral claim.

Source: France24

Kenny Banyan wrote:

I don’t believe one word of that.

APLMAN99 wrote:

Yet I’m fairly certain that if this was said about Biden or Obama, you’d treat it as gospel!  😎I think it sounds a bit over the...

Yet I’m fairly certain that if this was said about Biden or Obama, you’d treat it as gospel!  

😎

I think it sounds a bit over the top also. It mostly sounds like someone wants to draw viewers to their blog, podcast, or whatever sort of infotainment they are peddling. 

I have no doubt that most presidents in the type of situation either ask or are briefed on the potential use and effects of tactical nuclear weapon use. But that’s a hell of a long way from asking to launch the missiles. 

OriginMX wrote:

You magats want to put your money on your felon?  

OriginMX wrote:

You magats want to put your money on your felon?  

Kenny Banyan wrote:

You seem more agitated more than normal. Are you doing ok?

OriginMX wrote:

You magats want to put your money on your felon?  

OriginMX wrote:

You magats want to put your money on your felon?  

Kenny Banyan wrote:

I think it’s Maggots…. Just say’n.

OriginMX wrote:

You magats want to put your money on your felon?  

Kenny Banyan wrote:

I think it’s Maggots…. Just say’n.

Last2Stroke wrote:

Are you sure?

Are you sure?

OriginMX wrote:

You magats want to put your money on your felon?  

Kenny Banyan wrote:

I think it’s Maggots…. Just say’n.

Last2Stroke wrote:

Are you sure?

Are you sure?

Ob917 wrote:

MAGAts. Are you guys joking or confused? Pretty sure he was referencing the mAGa retards 

Ob917 wrote:

MAGAts. Are you guys joking or confused? Pretty sure he was referencing the mAGa retards 

Freddy99 wrote:

magats are perpetually confused.  kind of a prerequisite for being one at this point. 

Ob917 wrote:

MAGAts. Are you guys joking or confused? Pretty sure he was referencing the mAGa retards 

Freddy99 wrote:

magats are perpetually confused.  kind of a prerequisite for being one at this point. 

Chance1216 wrote:

In other words, Vital will be your emotional outlet for how many more years? 

OriginMX wrote:

You magats want to put your money on your felon?  

Freddy99 wrote:

magats are perpetually confused.  kind of a prerequisite for being one at this point. 

Chance1216 wrote:

In other words, Vital will be your emotional outlet for how many more years? 

TeamGreen wrote:

Or, as I say…

Kooks are gonna Kook.

Btw, did he make our coffees, yet? I asked for a Kona…dbl shot…

WHERE’S MY DAMN COFFEE?!

Freddy99 wrote:

magats are perpetually confused.  kind of a prerequisite for being one at this point. 

Chance1216 wrote:

In other words, Vital will be your emotional outlet for how many more years? 

TeamGreen wrote:

Or, as I say…

Kooks are gonna Kook.

Btw, did he make our coffees, yet? I asked for a Kona…dbl shot…

WHERE’S MY DAMN COFFEE?!

OriginMX wrote:

You magats want to put your money on your felon?  

TeamGreen wrote:

Wow. Perfect example of…Kooks are gonna Kook.Here’s the funny thing, those of you calling others your pet names:How is it that YOU think you’re smart enough...

Wow. Perfect example of…

Kooks are gonna Kook.

Here’s the funny thing, those of you calling others your pet names:

How is it that YOU think you’re smart enough to call ANYONE…anything…?

Especially when we simply look at the things you post. 🤣

Chance1216 wrote:

In other words, Vital will be your emotional outlet for how many more years? 

TeamGreen wrote:

Or, as I say…

Kooks are gonna Kook.

Btw, did he make our coffees, yet? I asked for a Kona…dbl shot…

WHERE’S MY DAMN COFFEE?!

Ob917 wrote:

TeamGreen wrote:

TeamGreen wrote:

Kenny Banyan wrote:

It appears to be normal to people like Freddy. I wouldn’t want to be in a public bathroom with this thing , let alone my wife...

It appears to be normal to people like Freddy. I wouldn’t want to be in a public bathroom with this thing , let alone my wife , my daughter or grandchildren……. 

Freddy99 wrote:

hey look, another magat obsessed with other people shitting again. 

the branding you guys have given yourself is.. something 

 

Freddy99 wrote:

yes, we know you hate lots of people based on how they dress, the color of their skin, who they love, etc. ironic how far the self...

yes, we know you hate lots of people based on how they dress, the color of their skin, who they love, etc. 

ironic how far the self proclaimed party of "small government" has fallen