Gerrymandering Question

mx617
Posts
1604
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Trail CA

Can someone explain to me how this works?  And I guess how/why it came to be?

From what I've read, it seems like each party can set the electoral boundaries, and of course does so in their own favour. Is that right? 

In Canada we have an impartial elections organization that sets the boundaries and reviews on a regular basis, so the party in power has no say over what they are.  Which to me seems like a much better way of doing it. 

Thanks!

|
TeamGreen
Posts
36606
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
4/22/2026 10:04am Edited Date/Time 4/22/2026 10:05am

Look up the meaning…the person for which “gerrymandering” was named…it explains it pretty damn well. 

Great post, great question…oh, and, don’t go believing that your “impartial organizations” are actually impartial. 

3
4
bonseff
Posts
1989
Joined
3/29/2011
Location
Frisco, TX US
4/22/2026 10:05am

from what i have understood, is that every 10 years or so, districts are re-evaluated due to demographics shifting one way or another. so, for instance, it might take one group 68% of the vote to get 50% representation, so maps are redrawn to level the field. 
again, just my understanding

TeamGreen
Posts
36606
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
4/22/2026 10:06am
bonseff wrote:
from what i have understood, is that every 10 years or so, districts are re-evaluated due to demographics shifting one way or another. so, for instance...

from what i have understood, is that every 10 years or so, districts are re-evaluated due to demographics shifting one way or another. so, for instance, it might take one group 68% of the vote to get 50% representation, so maps are redrawn to level the field. 
again, just my understanding

Good point…

It’s implied…that this takes place due to changes brought about by a census. 

early
Posts
9800
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH US
4/22/2026 10:11am
bonseff wrote:
from what i have understood, is that every 10 years or so, districts are re-evaluated due to demographics shifting one way or another. so, for instance...

from what i have understood, is that every 10 years or so, districts are re-evaluated due to demographics shifting one way or another. so, for instance, it might take one group 68% of the vote to get 50% representation, so maps are redrawn to level the field. 
again, just my understanding

Historically that's how it was done. This recent push for mid-decade redistricting is one of the fun new political games they've decided to introduce.

2
2

The Shop

AZ35
Posts
2910
Joined
6/1/2008
Location
Peoria, AZ US
Fantasy
4/22/2026 10:17am

Both sides do it, but it is crazy how some of the districts are configured. 

I think it was Wisconsin that had one Dem district just running a thin line on both sides of a major freeway all the way down the state. Most of the lower income people live near the freeway in the high density housing, whereas most of the suburban people away from the freeway were more affluent. 

Some of the district maps are so blatantly Gerrymandering it is almost laughable, to see how specific neighborhoods are included but then exclude an area adjacent with a different demographic. Completely non-sensical boundaries other than to target a specific voter segment. 

But it has become a game of they did it first, that has been going on for decades. They just don't even try to hide it anymore. 

11
R66
Posts
1208
Joined
4/16/2021
Location
Atlanta, GA US
4/22/2026 11:17am

Redistricting is the representatives choosing who they want to represent instead of the people choosing who represents them. 

7
borg
Posts
6663
Joined
12/7/2009
Location
Long Beach, CA US
4/22/2026 11:23am
bonseff wrote:
from what i have understood, is that every 10 years or so, districts are re-evaluated due to demographics shifting one way or another. so, for instance...

from what i have understood, is that every 10 years or so, districts are re-evaluated due to demographics shifting one way or another. so, for instance, it might take one group 68% of the vote to get 50% representation, so maps are redrawn to level the field. 
again, just my understanding

TeamGreen wrote:

Good point…

It’s implied…that this takes place due to changes brought about by a census. 

As far as I know, the census triggers re apportionment where the federal govt re distributes the 435 house members by state according to their population. Redistricting is a state thing and has been highly politicized for a long time. 

2
TeamGreen
Posts
36606
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA US
4/22/2026 11:28am
bonseff wrote:
from what i have understood, is that every 10 years or so, districts are re-evaluated due to demographics shifting one way or another. so, for instance...

from what i have understood, is that every 10 years or so, districts are re-evaluated due to demographics shifting one way or another. so, for instance, it might take one group 68% of the vote to get 50% representation, so maps are redrawn to level the field. 
again, just my understanding

TeamGreen wrote:

Good point…

It’s implied…that this takes place due to changes brought about by a census. 

borg wrote:
As far as I know, the census triggers re apportionment where the federal govt re distributes the 435 house members by state according to their population...

As far as I know, the census triggers re apportionment where the federal govt re distributes the 435 house members by state according to their population. Redistricting is a state thing and has been highly politicized for a long time. 

Yup, & If you look at the history…they (states) also seemed to jump on the issue after a census. 

1
borg
Posts
6663
Joined
12/7/2009
Location
Long Beach, CA US
4/22/2026 11:35am
TeamGreen wrote:

Good point…

It’s implied…that this takes place due to changes brought about by a census. 

borg wrote:
As far as I know, the census triggers re apportionment where the federal govt re distributes the 435 house members by state according to their population...

As far as I know, the census triggers re apportionment where the federal govt re distributes the 435 house members by state according to their population. Redistricting is a state thing and has been highly politicized for a long time. 

TeamGreen wrote:

Yup, & If you look at the history…they (states) also seemed to jump on the issue after a census. 

States that gain or lose seats pretty much have to redistrict. Other states can stand pat if they want but many can redistrict whenever they want. Each state has it's own rules.

4/22/2026 12:34pm

If they also had a rule something like, a district can have no more than 5 straight lines (and no arcs) in the interior or 3 straight lines (and no arcs) if you're on a border of the state, to define the perimeter of the district. That might help.

 

1
mx617
Posts
1604
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Trail CA
4/22/2026 12:46pm
AZ35 wrote:
Both sides do it, but it is crazy how some of the districts are configured. I think it was Wisconsin that had one Dem district just running...

Both sides do it, but it is crazy how some of the districts are configured. 

I think it was Wisconsin that had one Dem district just running a thin line on both sides of a major freeway all the way down the state. Most of the lower income people live near the freeway in the high density housing, whereas most of the suburban people away from the freeway were more affluent. 

Some of the district maps are so blatantly Gerrymandering it is almost laughable, to see how specific neighborhoods are included but then exclude an area adjacent with a different demographic. Completely non-sensical boundaries other than to target a specific voter segment. 

But it has become a game of they did it first, that has been going on for decades. They just don't even try to hide it anymore. 

"They just don't even try to hide it anymore"

I didn't realize they ever tried to hide it, I thought it was an accepted/normal part of US politics.

mx617
Posts
1604
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Trail CA
4/22/2026 12:46pm Edited Date/Time 4/22/2026 12:50pm
TeamGreen wrote:
Look up the meaning…the person for which “gerrymandering” was named…it explains it pretty damn well. Great post, great question…oh, and, don’t go believing that your “impartial organizations”...

Look up the meaning…the person for which “gerrymandering” was named…it explains it pretty damn well. 

Great post, great question…oh, and, don’t go believing that your “impartial organizations” are actually impartial. 

Good call, Wikipedia was an interesting read about it.

I guess clarifying my question, rather than about gerrymandering itself, I don't understand why the parties would even be involved in the redistricting process?  Was it just not addressed in the constitution?

SEEMEFIRST
Posts
13527
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Arlington, TX US
4/22/2026 12:54pm
TeamGreen wrote:
Look up the meaning…the person for which “gerrymandering” was named…it explains it pretty damn well. Great post, great question…oh, and, don’t go believing that your “impartial organizations”...

Look up the meaning…the person for which “gerrymandering” was named…it explains it pretty damn well. 

Great post, great question…oh, and, don’t go believing that your “impartial organizations” are actually impartial. 

mx617 wrote:
Good call, Wikipedia was an interesting read about it.I guess clarifying my question, rather than about gerrymandering itself, I don't understand why the parties would even...

Good call, Wikipedia was an interesting read about it.

I guess clarifying my question, rather than about gerrymandering itself, I don't understand why the parties would even be involved in the redistricting process?  Was it just not addressed in the constitution?

It's an individual state thing. The founders thought some things were better off left to the states to decide.

1
early
Posts
9800
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH US
4/22/2026 12:58pm
ToolMaker wrote:
If they also had a rule something like, a district can have no more than 5 straight lines (and no arcs) in the interior or 3...

If they also had a rule something like, a district can have no more than 5 straight lines (and no arcs) in the interior or 3 straight lines (and no arcs) if you're on a border of the state, to define the perimeter of the district. That might help.

 

You could add to this limiting the number of districts a county is split into and the number of county splits per district.

1
Joey Bridges
Posts
9278
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN US
4/22/2026 2:52pm

The Virginia courts have put the brakes on this.

Temporarily at least.

3
1
Joey Bridges
Posts
9278
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN US
4/22/2026 2:56pm
TeamGreen wrote:

Yup, & If you look at the history…they (states) also seemed to jump on the issue after a census. 

Much like annexation. 

City sees an unincorporated area, growing, and making money and...

Just like that you're suddenly back in the city you deliberately moved out of, and paying their taxes again.

3
SEEMEFIRST
Posts
13527
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Arlington, TX US
4/22/2026 3:19pm
TeamGreen wrote:

Yup, & If you look at the history…they (states) also seemed to jump on the issue after a census. 

Much like annexation. City sees an unincorporated area, growing, and making money and...Just like that you're suddenly back in the city you deliberately moved out of, and...

Much like annexation. 

City sees an unincorporated area, growing, and making money and...

Just like that you're suddenly back in the city you deliberately moved out of, and paying their taxes again.

Preach, brother. 

I used to be surrounded by pastures and woods, now I'm in the thick of it, too tired to start the process over.

3
4/22/2026 4:38pm
TeamGreen wrote:

Yup, & If you look at the history…they (states) also seemed to jump on the issue after a census. 

Much like annexation. City sees an unincorporated area, growing, and making money and...Just like that you're suddenly back in the city you deliberately moved out of, and...

Much like annexation. 

City sees an unincorporated area, growing, and making money and...

Just like that you're suddenly back in the city you deliberately moved out of, and paying their taxes again.

SEEMEFIRST wrote:

Preach, brother. 

I used to be surrounded by pastures and woods, now I'm in the thick of it, too tired to start the process over.

I wonder if you can preemptively add something to your grant deed that the property can never be part of an HOA?

TM

olds cool
Posts
4157
Joined
1/17/2010
Location
Claremont, NC US
4/22/2026 5:55pm

I thought the avg IQ in Virginia was relatively high but yesterday proved me wrong.

3
4
SEEMEFIRST
Posts
13527
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Arlington, TX US
4/22/2026 6:50pm
Much like annexation. City sees an unincorporated area, growing, and making money and...Just like that you're suddenly back in the city you deliberately moved out of, and...

Much like annexation. 

City sees an unincorporated area, growing, and making money and...

Just like that you're suddenly back in the city you deliberately moved out of, and paying their taxes again.

SEEMEFIRST wrote:

Preach, brother. 

I used to be surrounded by pastures and woods, now I'm in the thick of it, too tired to start the process over.

ToolMaker wrote:

I wonder if you can preemptively add something to your grant deed that the property can never be part of an HOA?

TM

I have a few. It's a matter of how far away they are when I decide to use them.

1
4/23/2026 4:50am

You should check out the map for Illinois on this subject. It is insane how much our useless state politicians fight against gerrymandering but do it often. 😒

1
LoudLove
Posts
2769
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
US
4/23/2026 6:48am
AZ35 wrote:
Both sides do it, but it is crazy how some of the districts are configured. I think it was Wisconsin that had one Dem district just running...

Both sides do it, but it is crazy how some of the districts are configured. 

I think it was Wisconsin that had one Dem district just running a thin line on both sides of a major freeway all the way down the state. Most of the lower income people live near the freeway in the high density housing, whereas most of the suburban people away from the freeway were more affluent. 

Some of the district maps are so blatantly Gerrymandering it is almost laughable, to see how specific neighborhoods are included but then exclude an area adjacent with a different demographic. Completely non-sensical boundaries other than to target a specific voter segment. 

But it has become a game of they did it first, that has been going on for decades. They just don't even try to hide it anymore. 

The Wisconsin example could benefit conservatives close to urban areas, as the number of D voters would overwhelm Rs in every election. But I don’t know the facts and am simply postulating.  

1
Alex814
Posts
1192
Joined
12/18/2014
Location
IL US
4/24/2026 7:20am

There's one way to hit back on this gerrymandering and that's to GO VOTE in the midterms. Democrats are pushing a lot of their districts into swing status in order to gain more of them. This opens up the opportunity to FLIP previously blue districts red, if Republicans get a decent turnout. 

The SAVE America act is also crucial. Many of these gerrymandered districts rely on non-citizen voting to hold their advantage.

1
3

Post a reply to: Gerrymandering Question

The Latest