Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
Probably because there’s already 30 page's of this stuff and probably 25% of it is yours! 💯😂
25%?
Probably 75%!
On second thought, your estimation is more than likely closer than mine.😂
But you guysssssss, just move onnnnnnn. look at the dowwwwwwwwwwww
The Shop
Free shipping: VITALMX
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
This shit is infuriating. There’s no way they’re human. Yeah just move on. It’s a matter of national security. Too many innocent lives will be ruined if we prosecute everyone. What a crock of fucking shit. They’ve had this shit for two decades and nothing has been done. Fuck the entire past, current, and future government. All you fuckin boomers still covering for Trump are so full of shit it’s coming out of your noses. The most powerful man in the world is sitting on his hands like a fucking pussy. “No one is above the law except my child stealing, raping, and eating friends. They’re all good people. Some say the best ever.” What a fucking knob.
"Having been good friends with Epstein and having knowledge of what Epstein did ( according to the interview You posted)"
This is exactly what you wrote. That's the problem with your side, you just make shit up. So if there is a nugget of truth, we can't believe it because it's polluted with lies.
TM
I told you what I meant. I should have put a coma. A slight mistake typing . Your picking that appart when You have taken parts of sentences I write to form a different question, and accuse me of saying things I've never said? I'm not asking You to trust what I write, I always will provide links to back up anything I state as a fact.
I'm going to go back and make an edit to that post just to make You happy. Try and find some proof that the phone call to that police chief ever happened other than the statement the chief made in 2019. Gee what would somebody have to gain for saying something nice about the president? You have said that Yourself right?
I'm happy to be on the side of whoever is for punishing anybody who has been proven to be touching little kids. Republicans, Democrats, whoever they are, I'll agree with them on that.
I've never said that Trump has , or hasn't. Just that there is a lot pointing towards him having done some stuff . And he is only making himself look worse the more he tries to stop info from coming out . And the best case is that he is PROTECTING the people that did do some bad stuff by blocking stuff and having Pam Bondi act like a bad B movie actress playing an angry teenage girl, in that hearing.
I know You won't address this part , but should we listen to Trump and just forget all things Epstein and just focus on how the stock markets doing great? And let all of " His friends" get away with everything?
Since we believe the FBI report about him being a whistleblower, do we believe this as well?
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01867496.pdf
I went back and fixed it. So its like I never did anything bad right? And it doesn't matter that You had to call me out on it either right? No big deal since it was fixed, like it never happened.
I dislike it when people intentionally word stuff to make it misleading and I'm glad You pointed it out for me .
Just like Senators pointed out what the DOJ did with names that were redacted. They went back and unredacted after being called out on it for protecting the person named. In that case they had redacted his name were it named him as a possible coconspiriter , and their defense was that his name was in there a bunch of other times .
So what if they redacted his name when it clearly pointed to him as a possible coconspiriter . If that was the only time that the FBI was saying he was a possible coconspirite that single redaction would make the difference between there being no evidence of wrongdoing in the files and him being a part of the people responsible for the entire operation. As far as what the public was able to see.
" I told you what I meant. I should have put a coma. A slight mistake typing . Your picking that appart when You have taken parts of sentences I write to form a different question, and accuse me of saying things I've never said? I'm not asking You to trust what I write, I always will provide links to back up anything I state as a fact. "
How in the world did I twist what you said? Please explain the context that was missing, I'd love to hear it. If what you mean and what you write are 2 different things, why would you blame me? And for the record, I don't trust what you write or the links you post. Why? Because anyone can find links to support their position. I'm not trying to change your mind on things. Why does it bother you so much that I think different than you?
TM
I mean, if you really think about it, how do we even know he is the real sasquatch? Maybe he is not a sasquatch at all, or just a fake sasquatch?
Things to ponder.... (:
In other posts, other times You have taken pieces of what I've said. I don't care what You think. I've from the start been trying to just understand HOW You think. I've said it everytime You say I'm trying to change Your mind.
I post things that counter what You say because to me, they make me come to a different conclusion and I am honestly trying to get into the frame of mind You are in. I like to understand why people think something. No matter if I agree or disagree , how people get there and what info they take into account and what they do not are interesting.
When I look for links, I first try and prove my thought wrong. I don't just look for confirmation. I look for the truth. And filter out opinion based info. There have been many points I'll think of that I research and find out I was not 100% accurate on what I thought or remembered.
I have come to the conclusion that You think with how You feel about something more than what facts might point towards. Right or wrong, that is what the answers I've gotten from you tell me.
@ToolMaker, when people say something about Trump and the Epstein list...
Okay, I’ll admit it… that's funny.
Gutless weak men defending Trump. Guy is a sub-human maggot who has sold out practically the whole of earth for sadistic megalomanic motives. The whole fucking swamp, and yet hammerheads in here still defend it…. Those guilty of it are deranged! Gutless
https://x.com/AnnieForTruth/status/2023770454239199512
Pit Row
Thought this was another fake at first, but turns out it's not. Sadly..
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet%2010/EFTA01641070.pdf - Page 92 [NSFW]
@ToolMaker - any interest answering the previous questions, or just sticking to grammatical debates for now?
I wonder why the ones that are clearly professional porn video screen shots (like the ones that say Reality Kings in the corners) blurred out the female pornstar faces but not the male pornstar faces? This whole situation is so fucked. I trust no one involved in this. Democrat, republican, it doesn’t matter.
Tried multiple times to put the link to the file and page 92, but each time I clicked submit and then clicked the link it said page not found.
I watched a video earlier and they showed some redacted images that you could tell they were underage. Nothing like the image posted in the Twitter/X post, but still.
Another one had a description of a redacted image. The description said: the photo shows a girl, her face visible, who looks prepubescent with medium length dark hair. Several Caucasian men are holding the girl's leg spread open. Her vagina is visible and gashed, and there is blood coming out. In the photo's foreground, a man with a white shirt appears to be inserting his hand or something into her vagina. A round imprinted symbol of some kind is visible on the girl's leg on the underside of her left thigh. In the photo's right hand corner there is an arm with a green shirt visible. An arm holds the girls knee in the air in the photo's left foreground.
Another video mentioned that the DoJ removed 630 some pages that had Trump's name attached to them. It showed proof the files were deleted. The DoJ had X amount of total pages before those pages were deleted. New amount of total pages was 630 some less than before.
This whole thing is fucked.
I've been noticing a ton of fakes spread around X lately, presumably to muddy the waters. Guess we'll have to rely on France to dig into things now that our crew says all is good to go, nothing left to review.
On the scrubbing topic, these guys are trying to track the specifics. My guess is some stem back to the failed victim/CSAM redactions, but the rest who knows, they haven't been terribly transparent with their decision making.
https://epsteinexposed.com/blog/doj-deleted-892-documents
Sick to my stomach. And we are all being asked to just move on….. Fuck that.
The system needs to fail.
Sometimes need to go backwards to go forwards…
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has been arrested for misconduct in public office and police are searching his properties. That'll be for handing Epstein classified trade information.
Nothing to see here in Merica tho eh? The entire govt needs to burn. They’re good for absolutely nothing. We have 38,000,000,000,000 reasons why they are not fit to serve.
The brother of the king of England has been arrested based on a Democratic hoax.
Screenshot from a 3 second video in the files. There's a man offscreen, presumably Epstein himself, and the voice says something like "That's right" or "I'm right."
The child's head isn't moving and she doesn't say anything.
There's plenty of short little clips in the files. What's the purpose of filming little snippets like that?
No clue why it wasn't redacted either.
This didn’t age well.