I love the smell of napalm in the morning

Edited Date/Time 2/10/2026 10:51am

Especially when it destroys all these lefty memes that I have to sift through on every thread how Trump was Epstein's friend. Turns out Trump was the whistleblower on Epstein. So what's going to be the new faux outrage da jour?

We going to hear any mea culpas for all that false info?

🤣🤣🤣

TM

Per a link from the Miami Herald https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26904744-reiter-2019-fbi-interv…

11
20
|
2/10/2026 9:54am

 I don't get the obsession with posting a screen shot of a twitter post from a person nobody has ever heard of as if someone going by the twitter handle boobzilla has the keys to logic and reason.

 

5
3
byke
Posts
3083
Joined
8/12/2015
Location
Auburn, CA, USA
2/10/2026 11:07am
 I don't get the obsession with posting a screen shot of a twitter post from a person nobody has ever heard of as if someone going...

 I don't get the obsession with posting a screen shot of a twitter post from a person nobody has ever heard of as if someone going by the twitter handle boobzilla has the keys to logic and reason.

 

DO NOT QUESTION BOOBZILLA. PERMABANS FOR ALL WHO DENY THE AUTHORITY OF BOOBZILLA. 

3
2
TeamGreen
Posts
37262
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
2/10/2026 12:42pm
ToolMaker wrote:
Especially when it destroys all these lefty memes that I have to sift through on every thread how Trump was Epstein's friend. Turns out Trump was...

Especially when it destroys all these lefty memes that I have to sift through on every thread how Trump was Epstein's friend. Turns out Trump was the whistleblower on Epstein. So what's going to be the new faux outrage da jour?

We going to hear any mea culpas for all that false info?

🤣🤣🤣

TM

Per a link from the Miami Herald https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26904744-reiter-2019-fbi-interv…

As the usual-suspects have been simply Melting Down over the craziest gossip...and for how long, God only knows...with how many posts in that other thread...making the most unbelievable reaches and pointing their angry lil' fingers at -ANYONE- that shows any form of different opinion on ANY aspect of ANY of it...all the while...those of us that have seen this shit, before? 

Well...we've known that time will take a hammer to that stupidity.

Well, time is stepping in...and here it comes. 

That whore-friend-pimp-bitch-coconspirator of Epstein's taking The 5Th must have had some folks literally running a high-fever. 😆

Time...time and "sunlight".

It's gonna take time...

But, the truth will eventually get dragged out of the evil fucking dark shadows and into the sunlight. 

So many victims. So many lives hurt. So many privileged pieces of shit.  

No worries. As the Stones sand so eloquently...

Time, is on my side. Yes it is. 

7
11
soggy
Posts
8815
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
2/10/2026 12:46pm Edited Date/Time 2/10/2026 12:49pm
ToolMaker wrote:
Especially when it destroys all these lefty memes that I have to sift through on every thread how Trump was Epstein's friend. Turns out Trump was...

Especially when it destroys all these lefty memes that I have to sift through on every thread how Trump was Epstein's friend. Turns out Trump was the whistleblower on Epstein. So what's going to be the new faux outrage da jour?

We going to hear any mea culpas for all that false info?

🤣🤣🤣

TM

Per a link from the Miami Herald https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/26904744-reiter-2019-fbi-interv…

TeamGreen wrote:
As the usual-suspects have been simply Melting Down over the craziest gossip...and for how long, God only knows...with how many posts in that other thread...making the...

As the usual-suspects have been simply Melting Down over the craziest gossip...and for how long, God only knows...with how many posts in that other thread...making the most unbelievable reaches and pointing their angry lil' fingers at -ANYONE- that shows any form of different opinion on ANY aspect of ANY of it...all the while...those of us that have seen this shit, before? 

Well...we've known that time will take a hammer to that stupidity.

Well, time is stepping in...and here it comes. 

That whore-friend-pimp-bitch-coconspirator of Epstein's taking The 5Th must have had some folks literally running a high-fever. 😆

Time...time and "sunlight".

It's gonna take time...

But, the truth will eventually get dragged out of the evil fucking dark shadows and into the sunlight. 

So many victims. So many lives hurt. So many privileged pieces of shit.  

No worries. As the Stones sand so eloquently...

Time, is on my side. Yes it is. 

Explain again why Trump has said over and over it’s time to move on from this?


Edit to add it was nearly what his entire campaign ran on. 

7
6

The Shop

2/10/2026 2:50pm

The dates on those say the interviews were done in October of 2019. 

 If Trump was informing on Epstein why didn't he call the police when he saw him with teenage girls instead of getting "the hell out of there" and waiting to call the police when he heard Epstein was being investigated and wait to tell them then? 

Trump was already president when this interview took place, Epstein was dead 2 months or so before the interview took place. 

 

There was an indictment already to go back in 2005 . So if Trump was some informant , or " whistleblower" there should be something pointing to that  other than a single interview  that was done after Epstein's death while Trump was President.  

Funny that Trumps name being in the files thousands of other times is a wait and see what happens, too soon the make a judgement. But a single interview is supposed to be the proof of not only innocence , but that Trump was responsible for bringing Epstein down. 

I've heard that Trump's name is in the files as much as 38,000 times. So there should be at least one actual interview with Trump himself if he was informing on Epstein. Should be pages and pages that would clear his name right?  If it turns out that Trump was part of bringing Epstein down, I'll give him credit. It just seems like that's not the case. I heard that Trump likes to brag about what he does, and if he can't brag about doing it. He wouldn't do it. Should I infer that since he is not adding bringing Epstein down to his book of accomplishments and talking about it at every other time Epstein's name comes up that its not true?   

 

 It was funny to hear the guy that Was Epstein's neighbor, Howard Lutnick,  talk about bringing his wife and kids to Epstein's Island after saying he stopped all contact 7 years before that trip. And talk about other times he was with Jeffry in the recent congressional hearing.

 

I'm not saying that You or anybody should assume Trumps guilt yet , if You were waiting for more info to come out. But I do not think that You should assume his innocence yet either IF this is all of the proof You have seen.  

 

8
6
early
Posts
10008
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH, USA
2/10/2026 3:03pm

There's a sucker born every day.

5
4
Spooner
Posts
2467
Joined
1/8/2011
Location
Kansas City, MO, USA
2/10/2026 3:11pm
The dates on those say the interviews were done in October of 2019.  If Trump was informing on Epstein why didn't he call the police when he...

The dates on those say the interviews were done in October of 2019. 

 If Trump was informing on Epstein why didn't he call the police when he saw him with teenage girls instead of getting "the hell out of there" and waiting to call the police when he heard Epstein was being investigated and wait to tell them then? 

Trump was already president when this interview took place, Epstein was dead 2 months or so before the interview took place. 

 

There was an indictment already to go back in 2005 . So if Trump was some informant , or " whistleblower" there should be something pointing to that  other than a single interview  that was done after Epstein's death while Trump was President.  

Funny that Trumps name being in the files thousands of other times is a wait and see what happens, too soon the make a judgement. But a single interview is supposed to be the proof of not only innocence , but that Trump was responsible for bringing Epstein down. 

I've heard that Trump's name is in the files as much as 38,000 times. So there should be at least one actual interview with Trump himself if he was informing on Epstein. Should be pages and pages that would clear his name right?  If it turns out that Trump was part of bringing Epstein down, I'll give him credit. It just seems like that's not the case. I heard that Trump likes to brag about what he does, and if he can't brag about doing it. He wouldn't do it. Should I infer that since he is not adding bringing Epstein down to his book of accomplishments and talking about it at every other time Epstein's name comes up that its not true?   

 

 It was funny to hear the guy that Was Epstein's neighbor, Howard Lutnick,  talk about bringing his wife and kids to Epstein's Island after saying he stopped all contact 7 years before that trip. And talk about other times he was with Jeffry in the recent congressional hearing.

 

I'm not saying that You or anybody should assume Trumps guilt yet , if You were waiting for more info to come out. But I do not think that You should assume his innocence yet either IF this is all of the proof You have seen.  

 

He was too busy ending 17 wars to bother with Epstein. 

7
2
2/11/2026 1:20am
Spooner wrote:

He was too busy ending 17 wars to bother with Epstein. 

Should be 18 after he makes a deal with Iran which will be a mega blunder on his part. 

5
Vet57
Posts
2533
Joined
12/13/2010
Location
BRO Town, MA, USA
2/11/2026 1:53am

I blame Al Gore...after all he created the internet

3
1
Joey Bridges
Posts
9801
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN, USA
2/11/2026 4:00am

“The fact that you hate him now more than ever means that he is fulfilling his promises!”

That’s the tell. The rage. The meltdowns. The nonstop attacks.

GG

 

I would expect no less than the idiotic hatred, that they proudly wear as a merit badge, from the usual's around here.

2
16
Joey Bridges
Posts
9801
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN, USA
2/11/2026 4:01am
TeamGreen wrote:
As the usual-suspects have been simply Melting Down over the craziest gossip...and for how long, God only knows...with how many posts in that other thread...making the...

As the usual-suspects have been simply Melting Down over the craziest gossip...and for how long, God only knows...with how many posts in that other thread...making the most unbelievable reaches and pointing their angry lil' fingers at -ANYONE- that shows any form of different opinion on ANY aspect of ANY of it...all the while...those of us that have seen this shit, before? 

Well...we've known that time will take a hammer to that stupidity.

Well, time is stepping in...and here it comes. 

That whore-friend-pimp-bitch-coconspirator of Epstein's taking The 5Th must have had some folks literally running a high-fever. 😆

Time...time and "sunlight".

It's gonna take time...

But, the truth will eventually get dragged out of the evil fucking dark shadows and into the sunlight. 

So many victims. So many lives hurt. So many privileged pieces of shit.  

No worries. As the Stones sand so eloquently...

Time, is on my side. Yes it is. 

Around here...

They see a RED door and they want to paint it black.

2
9
vet323
Posts
3607
Joined
7/31/2010
Location
Lead, SD, USA
2/11/2026 6:26am
The dates on those say the interviews were done in October of 2019.  If Trump was informing on Epstein why didn't he call the police when he...

The dates on those say the interviews were done in October of 2019. 

 If Trump was informing on Epstein why didn't he call the police when he saw him with teenage girls instead of getting "the hell out of there" and waiting to call the police when he heard Epstein was being investigated and wait to tell them then? 

Trump was already president when this interview took place, Epstein was dead 2 months or so before the interview took place. 

 

There was an indictment already to go back in 2005 . So if Trump was some informant , or " whistleblower" there should be something pointing to that  other than a single interview  that was done after Epstein's death while Trump was President.  

Funny that Trumps name being in the files thousands of other times is a wait and see what happens, too soon the make a judgement. But a single interview is supposed to be the proof of not only innocence , but that Trump was responsible for bringing Epstein down. 

I've heard that Trump's name is in the files as much as 38,000 times. So there should be at least one actual interview with Trump himself if he was informing on Epstein. Should be pages and pages that would clear his name right?  If it turns out that Trump was part of bringing Epstein down, I'll give him credit. It just seems like that's not the case. I heard that Trump likes to brag about what he does, and if he can't brag about doing it. He wouldn't do it. Should I infer that since he is not adding bringing Epstein down to his book of accomplishments and talking about it at every other time Epstein's name comes up that its not true?   

 

 It was funny to hear the guy that Was Epstein's neighbor, Howard Lutnick,  talk about bringing his wife and kids to Epstein's Island after saying he stopped all contact 7 years before that trip. And talk about other times he was with Jeffry in the recent congressional hearing.

 

I'm not saying that You or anybody should assume Trumps guilt yet , if You were waiting for more info to come out. But I do not think that You should assume his innocence yet either IF this is all of the proof You have seen.  

 

You have a tendency to say what you want to say in a single sentence, then you restate the same point several more times. 

 

2
2/11/2026 6:39am
The dates on those say the interviews were done in October of 2019.  If Trump was informing on Epstein why didn't he call the police when he...

The dates on those say the interviews were done in October of 2019. 

 If Trump was informing on Epstein why didn't he call the police when he saw him with teenage girls instead of getting "the hell out of there" and waiting to call the police when he heard Epstein was being investigated and wait to tell them then? 

Trump was already president when this interview took place, Epstein was dead 2 months or so before the interview took place. 

 

There was an indictment already to go back in 2005 . So if Trump was some informant , or " whistleblower" there should be something pointing to that  other than a single interview  that was done after Epstein's death while Trump was President.  

Funny that Trumps name being in the files thousands of other times is a wait and see what happens, too soon the make a judgement. But a single interview is supposed to be the proof of not only innocence , but that Trump was responsible for bringing Epstein down. 

I've heard that Trump's name is in the files as much as 38,000 times. So there should be at least one actual interview with Trump himself if he was informing on Epstein. Should be pages and pages that would clear his name right?  If it turns out that Trump was part of bringing Epstein down, I'll give him credit. It just seems like that's not the case. I heard that Trump likes to brag about what he does, and if he can't brag about doing it. He wouldn't do it. Should I infer that since he is not adding bringing Epstein down to his book of accomplishments and talking about it at every other time Epstein's name comes up that its not true?   

 

 It was funny to hear the guy that Was Epstein's neighbor, Howard Lutnick,  talk about bringing his wife and kids to Epstein's Island after saying he stopped all contact 7 years before that trip. And talk about other times he was with Jeffry in the recent congressional hearing.

 

I'm not saying that You or anybody should assume Trumps guilt yet , if You were waiting for more info to come out. But I do not think that You should assume his innocence yet either IF this is all of the proof You have seen.  

 

So just about every news site that throws out Trump's name is in the Epstein files xxx times, follows with "although no wrong doing is alleged". So when I didn't jump on your band wagon right away, I was the biggest piece of shit to walk the earth. But now it's ok to question information that comes up? Is that your stance?

TM

2
9
2/11/2026 8:37am
The dates on those say the interviews were done in October of 2019.  If Trump was informing on Epstein why didn't he call the police when he...

The dates on those say the interviews were done in October of 2019. 

 If Trump was informing on Epstein why didn't he call the police when he saw him with teenage girls instead of getting "the hell out of there" and waiting to call the police when he heard Epstein was being investigated and wait to tell them then? 

Trump was already president when this interview took place, Epstein was dead 2 months or so before the interview took place. 

 

There was an indictment already to go back in 2005 . So if Trump was some informant , or " whistleblower" there should be something pointing to that  other than a single interview  that was done after Epstein's death while Trump was President.  

Funny that Trumps name being in the files thousands of other times is a wait and see what happens, too soon the make a judgement. But a single interview is supposed to be the proof of not only innocence , but that Trump was responsible for bringing Epstein down. 

I've heard that Trump's name is in the files as much as 38,000 times. So there should be at least one actual interview with Trump himself if he was informing on Epstein. Should be pages and pages that would clear his name right?  If it turns out that Trump was part of bringing Epstein down, I'll give him credit. It just seems like that's not the case. I heard that Trump likes to brag about what he does, and if he can't brag about doing it. He wouldn't do it. Should I infer that since he is not adding bringing Epstein down to his book of accomplishments and talking about it at every other time Epstein's name comes up that its not true?   

 

 It was funny to hear the guy that Was Epstein's neighbor, Howard Lutnick,  talk about bringing his wife and kids to Epstein's Island after saying he stopped all contact 7 years before that trip. And talk about other times he was with Jeffry in the recent congressional hearing.

 

I'm not saying that You or anybody should assume Trumps guilt yet , if You were waiting for more info to come out. But I do not think that You should assume his innocence yet either IF this is all of the proof You have seen.  

 

ToolMaker wrote:
So just about every news site that throws out Trump's name is in the Epstein files xxx times, follows with "although no wrong doing is alleged"...

So just about every news site that throws out Trump's name is in the Epstein files xxx times, follows with "although no wrong doing is alleged". So when I didn't jump on your band wagon right away, I was the biggest piece of shit to walk the earth. But now it's ok to question information that comes up? Is that your stance?

TM

I just think its funny how there is a lot pointing to him being involved in shady stuff. And at best being friends with a lot of the people who did shady stuff and helping them hide it. 

But you need to wait and take time to see how things turn out. 

Which i do think is reasonable .

 And how little it took to totally nullify all of that other stuff and make him the hero . 

And that to me is a much less reasonable conclusion. To make based off of such limited info. 

There should be at the very least a record of that call trump made and the date  he called along with what he told them .  

 

5
2/11/2026 9:00am
The dates on those say the interviews were done in October of 2019.  If Trump was informing on Epstein why didn't he call the police when he...

The dates on those say the interviews were done in October of 2019. 

 If Trump was informing on Epstein why didn't he call the police when he saw him with teenage girls instead of getting "the hell out of there" and waiting to call the police when he heard Epstein was being investigated and wait to tell them then? 

Trump was already president when this interview took place, Epstein was dead 2 months or so before the interview took place. 

 

There was an indictment already to go back in 2005 . So if Trump was some informant , or " whistleblower" there should be something pointing to that  other than a single interview  that was done after Epstein's death while Trump was President.  

Funny that Trumps name being in the files thousands of other times is a wait and see what happens, too soon the make a judgement. But a single interview is supposed to be the proof of not only innocence , but that Trump was responsible for bringing Epstein down. 

I've heard that Trump's name is in the files as much as 38,000 times. So there should be at least one actual interview with Trump himself if he was informing on Epstein. Should be pages and pages that would clear his name right?  If it turns out that Trump was part of bringing Epstein down, I'll give him credit. It just seems like that's not the case. I heard that Trump likes to brag about what he does, and if he can't brag about doing it. He wouldn't do it. Should I infer that since he is not adding bringing Epstein down to his book of accomplishments and talking about it at every other time Epstein's name comes up that its not true?   

 

 It was funny to hear the guy that Was Epstein's neighbor, Howard Lutnick,  talk about bringing his wife and kids to Epstein's Island after saying he stopped all contact 7 years before that trip. And talk about other times he was with Jeffry in the recent congressional hearing.

 

I'm not saying that You or anybody should assume Trumps guilt yet , if You were waiting for more info to come out. But I do not think that You should assume his innocence yet either IF this is all of the proof You have seen.  

 

vet323 wrote:

You have a tendency to say what you want to say in a single sentence, then you restate the same point several more times. 

 

I geuss so. I just know that if I say something without some sort of example of what im saying that it is just me a random person giving an opinion with nothing to back it up. 

And the default response is almost always asking to give an example. And if I only give one. Well thats only one and people will often claim there are not any other examples. 

In my opinion giving multiple reasons and examples of something gives more credibility to what im claiming by providing multiple examples of why or how I came to the points im trying to express .

 

And personally I find it intresting to understand the thought process of how and why people come to the conclusion they come to. 

So I assume there could be other people that wonder why and would like to see why. 

 

5
2/11/2026 9:11am
The dates on those say the interviews were done in October of 2019.  If Trump was informing on Epstein why didn't he call the police when he...

The dates on those say the interviews were done in October of 2019. 

 If Trump was informing on Epstein why didn't he call the police when he saw him with teenage girls instead of getting "the hell out of there" and waiting to call the police when he heard Epstein was being investigated and wait to tell them then? 

Trump was already president when this interview took place, Epstein was dead 2 months or so before the interview took place. 

 

There was an indictment already to go back in 2005 . So if Trump was some informant , or " whistleblower" there should be something pointing to that  other than a single interview  that was done after Epstein's death while Trump was President.  

Funny that Trumps name being in the files thousands of other times is a wait and see what happens, too soon the make a judgement. But a single interview is supposed to be the proof of not only innocence , but that Trump was responsible for bringing Epstein down. 

I've heard that Trump's name is in the files as much as 38,000 times. So there should be at least one actual interview with Trump himself if he was informing on Epstein. Should be pages and pages that would clear his name right?  If it turns out that Trump was part of bringing Epstein down, I'll give him credit. It just seems like that's not the case. I heard that Trump likes to brag about what he does, and if he can't brag about doing it. He wouldn't do it. Should I infer that since he is not adding bringing Epstein down to his book of accomplishments and talking about it at every other time Epstein's name comes up that its not true?   

 

 It was funny to hear the guy that Was Epstein's neighbor, Howard Lutnick,  talk about bringing his wife and kids to Epstein's Island after saying he stopped all contact 7 years before that trip. And talk about other times he was with Jeffry in the recent congressional hearing.

 

I'm not saying that You or anybody should assume Trumps guilt yet , if You were waiting for more info to come out. But I do not think that You should assume his innocence yet either IF this is all of the proof You have seen.  

 

ToolMaker wrote:
So just about every news site that throws out Trump's name is in the Epstein files xxx times, follows with "although no wrong doing is alleged"...

So just about every news site that throws out Trump's name is in the Epstein files xxx times, follows with "although no wrong doing is alleged". So when I didn't jump on your band wagon right away, I was the biggest piece of shit to walk the earth. But now it's ok to question information that comes up? Is that your stance?

TM

I just think its funny how there is a lot pointing to him being involved in shady stuff. And at best being friends with a lot...

I just think its funny how there is a lot pointing to him being involved in shady stuff. And at best being friends with a lot of the people who did shady stuff and helping them hide it. 

But you need to wait and take time to see how things turn out. 

Which i do think is reasonable .

 And how little it took to totally nullify all of that other stuff and make him the hero . 

And that to me is a much less reasonable conclusion. To make based off of such limited info. 

There should be at the very least a record of that call trump made and the date  he called along with what he told them .  

 

No, you don't get to back track like that, shady stuff is not what you all claimed. Shady stuff is finding a $20 on the bar floor and not giving it back. You all were claiming he's sticking his digits up little kids. And because I didn't bring a pitch fork to your "let's get Trump" party, I was in different words called the biggest piece of shit to walk the earth. And now you think it's reasonable to wait for more info. Do you read and believe what you post before you hit send?

TM

1
6
mvd61
Posts
1303
Joined
10/15/2021
Location
Brandon, SD, USA
2/11/2026 10:07am

Through the napalm smell I love reading about how the tech giants tax liability has plummeted this year. There’s that Big Beautiful Bill hard at work! I also love opening my fucking mail and getting an irs letter about $22.54 in interest I owe from 2024 taxes. The government can suck a fart out of my dead uncles asshole. I love reading about all the unpaid taxes IRS employees own. The worthless fucking government can’t even hold their own employees accountable but somehow I must pay this $22 immediately. Make America more gooder again! It sure seems like trickle down economics is just big business/government pissing on my face. 

3
3
2/11/2026 10:16am
ToolMaker wrote:
So just about every news site that throws out Trump's name is in the Epstein files xxx times, follows with "although no wrong doing is alleged"...

So just about every news site that throws out Trump's name is in the Epstein files xxx times, follows with "although no wrong doing is alleged". So when I didn't jump on your band wagon right away, I was the biggest piece of shit to walk the earth. But now it's ok to question information that comes up? Is that your stance?

TM

I just think its funny how there is a lot pointing to him being involved in shady stuff. And at best being friends with a lot...

I just think its funny how there is a lot pointing to him being involved in shady stuff. And at best being friends with a lot of the people who did shady stuff and helping them hide it. 

But you need to wait and take time to see how things turn out. 

Which i do think is reasonable .

 And how little it took to totally nullify all of that other stuff and make him the hero . 

And that to me is a much less reasonable conclusion. To make based off of such limited info. 

There should be at the very least a record of that call trump made and the date  he called along with what he told them .  

 

ToolMaker wrote:
No, you don't get to back track like that, shady stuff is not what you all claimed. Shady stuff is finding a $20 on the bar...

No, you don't get to back track like that, shady stuff is not what you all claimed. Shady stuff is finding a $20 on the bar floor and not giving it back. You all were claiming he's sticking his digits up little kids. And because I didn't bring a pitch fork to your "let's get Trump" party, I was in different words called the biggest piece of shit to walk the earth. And now you think it's reasonable to wait for more info. Do you read and believe what you post before you hit send?

TM

OK,Not falling for more trolling, or willful misrepresentation of what I've said to distract me from my point. 

  You know I never said that. 

  I've said that  he is at best guilty of helping hide the crimes, and at worst guilty of doing some himself.  

 

 I used Shady as an attempt shorten my reply and  satisfy the people who dislike my wordy replies instead of listing those same things over again. No backpedaling. 

 

 But regardless I still think it's rather comical that a single paragraph from somebody who You don't even know was enough for You to feel he is totally innocent of everything and a hero.  

 

2
1
2/11/2026 10:51am
I just think its funny how there is a lot pointing to him being involved in shady stuff. And at best being friends with a lot...

I just think its funny how there is a lot pointing to him being involved in shady stuff. And at best being friends with a lot of the people who did shady stuff and helping them hide it. 

But you need to wait and take time to see how things turn out. 

Which i do think is reasonable .

 And how little it took to totally nullify all of that other stuff and make him the hero . 

And that to me is a much less reasonable conclusion. To make based off of such limited info. 

There should be at the very least a record of that call trump made and the date  he called along with what he told them .  

 

ToolMaker wrote:
No, you don't get to back track like that, shady stuff is not what you all claimed. Shady stuff is finding a $20 on the bar...

No, you don't get to back track like that, shady stuff is not what you all claimed. Shady stuff is finding a $20 on the bar floor and not giving it back. You all were claiming he's sticking his digits up little kids. And because I didn't bring a pitch fork to your "let's get Trump" party, I was in different words called the biggest piece of shit to walk the earth. And now you think it's reasonable to wait for more info. Do you read and believe what you post before you hit send?

TM

OK,Not falling for more trolling, or willful misrepresentation of what I've said to distract me from my point.   You know I never said that.   I've said...

OK,Not falling for more trolling, or willful misrepresentation of what I've said to distract me from my point. 

  You know I never said that. 

  I've said that  he is at best guilty of helping hide the crimes, and at worst guilty of doing some himself.  

 

 I used Shady as an attempt shorten my reply and  satisfy the people who dislike my wordy replies instead of listing those same things over again. No backpedaling. 

 

 But regardless I still think it's rather comical that a single paragraph from somebody who You don't even know was enough for You to feel he is totally innocent of everything and a hero.  

 

Actually, I believe the story is far from over. However, I also believe your story got short circuited quite a bit. It's funny how your side is all pitch forks for anyone that doesn't believe what you want them to believe. And more funny that I'm not trying to change anyone's mind on things. I gave a perfectly valid reason why I was skeptical of your story and you guys just lose your shit. And I still maintain that I don't think that's what motivates him. That's the funny part. Instead of having a conversation like adults, your side thinks if they just scream loud enough (like typical little kids) you'll get your way. Now you're in a pretzel and I'm not.

TM

11
2/11/2026 11:06am

todays word of the day, "Gunperson"

1
1
2/11/2026 11:16am

todays word of the day, "Gunperson"

What the fuck does that even mean? Well I know what it means but that's another topic, and I feel real bad for our Canuk neighbors.

TM

4
2/11/2026 11:19am
ToolMaker wrote:
No, you don't get to back track like that, shady stuff is not what you all claimed. Shady stuff is finding a $20 on the bar...

No, you don't get to back track like that, shady stuff is not what you all claimed. Shady stuff is finding a $20 on the bar floor and not giving it back. You all were claiming he's sticking his digits up little kids. And because I didn't bring a pitch fork to your "let's get Trump" party, I was in different words called the biggest piece of shit to walk the earth. And now you think it's reasonable to wait for more info. Do you read and believe what you post before you hit send?

TM

OK,Not falling for more trolling, or willful misrepresentation of what I've said to distract me from my point.   You know I never said that.   I've said...

OK,Not falling for more trolling, or willful misrepresentation of what I've said to distract me from my point. 

  You know I never said that. 

  I've said that  he is at best guilty of helping hide the crimes, and at worst guilty of doing some himself.  

 

 I used Shady as an attempt shorten my reply and  satisfy the people who dislike my wordy replies instead of listing those same things over again. No backpedaling. 

 

 But regardless I still think it's rather comical that a single paragraph from somebody who You don't even know was enough for You to feel he is totally innocent of everything and a hero.  

 

ToolMaker wrote:
Actually, I believe the story is far from over. However, I also believe your story got short circuited quite a bit. It's funny how your side...

Actually, I believe the story is far from over. However, I also believe your story got short circuited quite a bit. It's funny how your side is all pitch forks for anyone that doesn't believe what you want them to believe. And more funny that I'm not trying to change anyone's mind on things. I gave a perfectly valid reason why I was skeptical of your story and you guys just lose your shit. And I still maintain that I don't think that's what motivates him. That's the funny part. Instead of having a conversation like adults, your side thinks if they just scream loud enough (like typical little kids) you'll get your way. Now you're in a pretzel and I'm not.

TM

   I'm happy that You found a small kernel that helps You feel better.  

1
2/11/2026 12:14pm
OK,Not falling for more trolling, or willful misrepresentation of what I've said to distract me from my point.   You know I never said that.   I've said...

OK,Not falling for more trolling, or willful misrepresentation of what I've said to distract me from my point. 

  You know I never said that. 

  I've said that  he is at best guilty of helping hide the crimes, and at worst guilty of doing some himself.  

 

 I used Shady as an attempt shorten my reply and  satisfy the people who dislike my wordy replies instead of listing those same things over again. No backpedaling. 

 

 But regardless I still think it's rather comical that a single paragraph from somebody who You don't even know was enough for You to feel he is totally innocent of everything and a hero.  

 

ToolMaker wrote:
Actually, I believe the story is far from over. However, I also believe your story got short circuited quite a bit. It's funny how your side...

Actually, I believe the story is far from over. However, I also believe your story got short circuited quite a bit. It's funny how your side is all pitch forks for anyone that doesn't believe what you want them to believe. And more funny that I'm not trying to change anyone's mind on things. I gave a perfectly valid reason why I was skeptical of your story and you guys just lose your shit. And I still maintain that I don't think that's what motivates him. That's the funny part. Instead of having a conversation like adults, your side thinks if they just scream loud enough (like typical little kids) you'll get your way. Now you're in a pretzel and I'm not.

TM

   I'm happy that You found a small kernel that helps You feel better.  

Condescending posts only work if it comes from a superior position. To this I 🤣🤣🤣 my 🫏 off!

1
10
2/11/2026 12:52pm
ToolMaker wrote:
Actually, I believe the story is far from over. However, I also believe your story got short circuited quite a bit. It's funny how your side...

Actually, I believe the story is far from over. However, I also believe your story got short circuited quite a bit. It's funny how your side is all pitch forks for anyone that doesn't believe what you want them to believe. And more funny that I'm not trying to change anyone's mind on things. I gave a perfectly valid reason why I was skeptical of your story and you guys just lose your shit. And I still maintain that I don't think that's what motivates him. That's the funny part. Instead of having a conversation like adults, your side thinks if they just scream loud enough (like typical little kids) you'll get your way. Now you're in a pretzel and I'm not.

TM

   I'm happy that You found a small kernel that helps You feel better.  

ToolMaker wrote:

Condescending posts only work if it comes from a superior position. To this I 🤣🤣🤣 my 🫏 off!

Awesome.   I'm sorry that I said I found Your way of seeing things funny.  I didn't mean it as an insult.  I really do not find any pleasure in making people feel frustrated or whatever emotion you want to use.  

 

I literally laughed when I read the link. And Only described it in that way to display how I was surprised at how little it took to convince You he was cleared and everybody was wrong.  I clearly misunderstood Your original post if that's not how You intended it.   

 

1
3
TeamGreen
Posts
37262
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
2/11/2026 12:57pm
TeamGreen wrote:
As the usual-suspects have been simply Melting Down over the craziest gossip...and for how long, God only knows...with how many posts in that other thread...making the...

As the usual-suspects have been simply Melting Down over the craziest gossip...and for how long, God only knows...with how many posts in that other thread...making the most unbelievable reaches and pointing their angry lil' fingers at -ANYONE- that shows any form of different opinion on ANY aspect of ANY of it...all the while...those of us that have seen this shit, before? 

Well...we've known that time will take a hammer to that stupidity.

Well, time is stepping in...and here it comes. 

That whore-friend-pimp-bitch-coconspirator of Epstein's taking The 5Th must have had some folks literally running a high-fever. 😆

Time...time and "sunlight".

It's gonna take time...

But, the truth will eventually get dragged out of the evil fucking dark shadows and into the sunlight. 

So many victims. So many lives hurt. So many privileged pieces of shit.  

No worries. As the Stones sand so eloquently...

Time, is on my side. Yes it is. 

Around here...

They see a RED door and they want to paint it black.

Aren't you supposed to acknowledge the copyright or something? 🤣

You do realize that NONE of The Usual Suspects gets the simple fact that we laugh our asses of at the majority of our posts...and most ALL of theirs...you do know this, right? 

☺️

2
4
Joey Bridges
Posts
9801
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN, USA
2/11/2026 1:51pm Edited Date/Time 2/11/2026 1:52pm
TeamGreen wrote:
Aren't you supposed to acknowledge the copyright or something? 🤣You do realize that NONE of The Usual Suspects gets the simple fact that we laugh our...

Aren't you supposed to acknowledge the copyright or something? 🤣

You do realize that NONE of The Usual Suspects gets the simple fact that we laugh our asses of at the majority of our posts...and most ALL of theirs...you do know this, right? 

☺️

They always starts my morning off with a laugh.

Especially these new kids.

Always having to have a YouTube vid, or Instagram post or three to bolster their opinions. 

It is funny watching them e-flail after my morning comments.

 

That's "The nature of my game"

🤣😂🤣

1
10
TeamGreen
Posts
37262
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
2/11/2026 4:51pm
TeamGreen wrote:
Aren't you supposed to acknowledge the copyright or something? 🤣You do realize that NONE of The Usual Suspects gets the simple fact that we laugh our...

Aren't you supposed to acknowledge the copyright or something? 🤣

You do realize that NONE of The Usual Suspects gets the simple fact that we laugh our asses of at the majority of our posts...and most ALL of theirs...you do know this, right? 

☺️

They always starts my morning off with a laugh.Especially these new kids.Always having to have a YouTube vid, or Instagram post or three to bolster their...

They always starts my morning off with a laugh.

Especially these new kids.

Always having to have a YouTube vid, or Instagram post or three to bolster their opinions. 

It is funny watching them e-flail after my morning comments.

 

That's "The nature of my game"

🤣😂🤣

They need a Dr. Dre reckoning. 🤣

1
3
Bearuno
Posts
5479
Joined
6/28/2014
Location
AU
2/12/2026 12:40am
Vet57 wrote:

I blame Al Gore...after all he created the internet

I attended an interview with Tim Berners-Lee at Sydney Opera House a few weeks ago.

A remarkable man, who is , predominantly, responsible for the World Web Web.

Somewhat different to that bull shifting wanker Gore,  that's for sure

soggy
Posts
8815
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
2/12/2026 6:04am
ToolMaker wrote:
No, you don't get to back track like that, shady stuff is not what you all claimed. Shady stuff is finding a $20 on the bar...

No, you don't get to back track like that, shady stuff is not what you all claimed. Shady stuff is finding a $20 on the bar floor and not giving it back. You all were claiming he's sticking his digits up little kids. And because I didn't bring a pitch fork to your "let's get Trump" party, I was in different words called the biggest piece of shit to walk the earth. And now you think it's reasonable to wait for more info. Do you read and believe what you post before you hit send?

TM

OK,Not falling for more trolling, or willful misrepresentation of what I've said to distract me from my point.   You know I never said that.   I've said...

OK,Not falling for more trolling, or willful misrepresentation of what I've said to distract me from my point. 

  You know I never said that. 

  I've said that  he is at best guilty of helping hide the crimes, and at worst guilty of doing some himself.  

 

 I used Shady as an attempt shorten my reply and  satisfy the people who dislike my wordy replies instead of listing those same things over again. No backpedaling. 

 

 But regardless I still think it's rather comical that a single paragraph from somebody who You don't even know was enough for You to feel he is totally innocent of everything and a hero.  

 

ToolMaker wrote:
Actually, I believe the story is far from over. However, I also believe your story got short circuited quite a bit. It's funny how your side...

Actually, I believe the story is far from over. However, I also believe your story got short circuited quite a bit. It's funny how your side is all pitch forks for anyone that doesn't believe what you want them to believe. And more funny that I'm not trying to change anyone's mind on things. I gave a perfectly valid reason why I was skeptical of your story and you guys just lose your shit. And I still maintain that I don't think that's what motivates him. That's the funny part. Instead of having a conversation like adults, your side thinks if they just scream loud enough (like typical little kids) you'll get your way. Now you're in a pretzel and I'm not.

TM

You guys had a full blown stop the world from turning meltdown over Cracker Barrel trying to change their logo. Spare us the pitchforks analogy. 

Speaking of screaming loud and wanting there way how about that Pam Bondi performance?  You know she should just smile more, such a nasty woman. 

8
2
2/12/2026 11:01am
OK,Not falling for more trolling, or willful misrepresentation of what I've said to distract me from my point.   You know I never said that.   I've said...

OK,Not falling for more trolling, or willful misrepresentation of what I've said to distract me from my point. 

  You know I never said that. 

  I've said that  he is at best guilty of helping hide the crimes, and at worst guilty of doing some himself.  

 

 I used Shady as an attempt shorten my reply and  satisfy the people who dislike my wordy replies instead of listing those same things over again. No backpedaling. 

 

 But regardless I still think it's rather comical that a single paragraph from somebody who You don't even know was enough for You to feel he is totally innocent of everything and a hero.  

 

ToolMaker wrote:
Actually, I believe the story is far from over. However, I also believe your story got short circuited quite a bit. It's funny how your side...

Actually, I believe the story is far from over. However, I also believe your story got short circuited quite a bit. It's funny how your side is all pitch forks for anyone that doesn't believe what you want them to believe. And more funny that I'm not trying to change anyone's mind on things. I gave a perfectly valid reason why I was skeptical of your story and you guys just lose your shit. And I still maintain that I don't think that's what motivates him. That's the funny part. Instead of having a conversation like adults, your side thinks if they just scream loud enough (like typical little kids) you'll get your way. Now you're in a pretzel and I'm not.

TM

soggy wrote:
You guys had a full blown stop the world from turning meltdown over Cracker Barrel trying to change their logo. Spare us the pitchforks analogy. Speaking of...

You guys had a full blown stop the world from turning meltdown over Cracker Barrel trying to change their logo. Spare us the pitchforks analogy. 

Speaking of screaming loud and wanting there way how about that Pam Bondi performance?  You know she should just smile more, such a nasty woman. 

Were you on the wrong end of someone's pitch fork? Do you need a hug?

TM

6

Post a reply to: I love the smell of napalm in the morning

The Latest