Posts
12246
Joined
4/16/2010
Location
bossier city, LA, USA
Edited Date/Time
5/9/2025 4:19pm
Question. Who would be better at handling the $38 Trillion debt, stopping the war in Rus/ Ukr, handling Israel/ Hamas, assigning competent cabinet members, and handling the Southern border? (Keep in mind, he/ she would have all of the liberal msm, but would it be enough?)
AOC
Jasmine Crockett
Tim Walz
Kamala Harris
Adam Schiff
Poll
Waiting for “None of the Above” 🤣
I added it
Democrats are not good at handling anything. True story.
So retarded
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
All of those people are utter fuckwits, Schiff should be behind bars and AOC should have stayed behind one, Crockett and Harris are DEI hires that no amount of corruption and lies could get near the White House.
HeJacksOffPlumbers, so that makes their proven ineptness ok with you?
White guy playin’ the race card.
You Can Not…well…you know. 🤣
I'm sure there's a smart, capable Dem out there... that list isn't it.
IIhan omar can be added to the list so she can send all of our money to Somalia.
STAY OUT OF AMERICAN POLITICS
where’s the usual group who tells last2stroke to stay out of it, we’ve got another foreigner chimming in, stop him fellas!!!!
AOC HAS ZERO VOTES!😂😂😂
HeJacksOffPlumbers sounds a lot like Dave only dumber.
Like a white Obama
they've got the pronoun thing down
Of these options, Walz
I’m curious why you chose him?
Because he can identify with him.
Lol
Pit Row
He is the best of the options you gave in my opinion.
Fair enough. IMO no one right now has the acumen to handle any of the issues going on atm. The last admin did a lot of damage by being loose, and having absolutely no restraint.
Of course, we need to look at who would run these nominees. Obviously the DNC, and the powers behind the DNC, which have their own agendas.
It would be difficult for them to be much more incompetent than they are, some would say.
“They” as in the Democrats listed?
Yes. How else can you describe a party that, per public polling and how people vote when directly voting on issues, have the overwhelming majority of the popular policy positions but still lose all the time?
Walz may have been taking back-shots in combat but it wasn't from a rifle.
Year old dog shit would be better.
He’s probably married to a Karen😂
Post a reply to: Who would be better