A Nation of Enrons

volcati
Posts
1180
Joined
12/16/2006
Location
Dam Mam, QA
Edited Date/Time 1/26/2012 11:08pm
Good write up from The Motely Fool website--

An understatement: We are living through a time of considerable market and economic turmoil. Since we stand to see trillions of dollars' worth of assets vaporize in the ensuing mess, we ought to take a look at history to see how we got into it, and how investors can get out.

Half a decade ago, the entire nation was shocked when award-winning "innovator" Enron turned out to be little more than a cash-shredding pyramid scheme. The crucial failing for investors was Enron's use of opaque, "mark-to-market" accounting. The problem comes when the market is batty (or doesn't exist), so you instead mark your assets to a model, especially one that's wrong, either because you made an error or because you based it on exceedingly generous assumptions.

In the end, we learned that Enron's accounting was pretty much mark-to-fairy-tale, with the company booking enormous gains from assumed future profits on schemes (like bandwidth trading) that sounded great, but had little chance of producing anything besides headlines.

Andy Fastow, meet Fred and Ethel
You might think we'd learned our lessons about fantasy accounting after Enron, but you would be wrong. Things actually got worse. The infection moved to the comfy-sounding "homeownership" market. Against a star-spangled, feel-good backdrop touting the "American Dream," our recent mark-to-model mania tripped up a lot more than one big company. In fact, it swept through the entire banking world. (Bear Stearns (NYSE: BSC) is not the first to choke on lousy, poorly modeled mortgage-backed securities "income," and I'll eat a Miami condo if it's the last.)

But more dangerous yet was the way this mania also infected millions of aspiring real-estate moguls. The most widespread mark-to-model fantasies were actually committed not by some easy-to-blame Wall Street suit, but by Fred and Ethel down the street.

It was flawed models (and the habit of booking earnings on these models) that enabled financial companies to concoct the elaborate securities that funded the bubble. And yes, the bank CEOs who paid themselves handsome bonuses ahead of the hurricane deserve a public flogging. But they weren't the only ones making out like bandits. While Wall Street was booking fantasy profits on bad assumptions about real estate, Fred and Ethel down the street were operating under their own mark-to-model dreams.

Really ...
In their model, house prices always go up. In their model, you can pay any price for a home, so long as you can make the monthlies with a teaser-rate ARM, never mind the upcoming adjustment to 9%. In their model, you avoid that via a refinance down the line with an equity cash-out to boot. In their model, it's OK to buy on a less-than-forthcoming, Alt-A "liar's loan," because there's no real punishment for lying on a mortgage application -- particularly if everyone's doing it. With this model, it makes sense to buy three other homes, in order to flip them later. And it makes sense to extract HELOC cash from the home, based on fantasies about continually increasing "equity."

This is not so different from what Enron was doing. Fred and Ethel were marking up the value of their assets (the home) to a model (their belief that real estate prices always go up) and then spending the "income" immediately, on iPods, Hummers, $250 jeans, and fancy vacations. This happened all over the country, and millions of people behaved the same way. In fact, the American Fantasy of owning a home (for no money down) that would provide leveraged, 10% annual returns for a decade, is precisely what enabled those Wall Street suits to do what they did. It takes two to tango, folks. And this was the biggest dance party in economic history.

Last year's model got ugly
Alas, this dream's "income" wasn't actually matched by real cash flows, just bank loans -- precisely the problem at Enron. The "income" was all hot air. And now that the "income" from home appreciation has turned negative, it must be supported by cash mortgage payments. But many people can't pay those bills, the mortgages are defaulting in huge numbers, and now, we are all paying a price, even those of us who didn't throw our money into a flimsy, overpriced McMansion.
|
Dean (MD)
Posts
212
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
3/28/2008 10:24am
that sums it up nicely
3/28/2008 10:47am
Good article. But if you didn't already know this, you were asleep at the wheel.
3/28/2008 11:28am Edited Date/Time 3/28/2008 1:34pm
[b:2dzbpilc]Good morning. Owning a home lies at the heart of the American dream. A home is a foundation for families and a source of stability for communities. It serves as the foundation of many Americans' financial security. Yet today, while nearly three-quarters of all white Americans own their homes, less than half of all African Americans and Hispanic Americans are homeowners. We must begin to close this homeownership gap by dismantling the barriers that prevent minorities from owning a piece of the American dream.

The single greatest hurdle to first time homeownership is a high down payment requirement that can put a home out of reach. So my administration is proposing the American Dream Down Payment Fund. When a low-income family is qualified to buy a home, but comes up short on the down payment, the American Dream Down Payment Fund will help provide the needed funds. We estimate that this fund will open the door to homeownership for 40,000 low-income families annually.

A second obstacle to minority homeownership is a lack of affordable housing. To encourage the production of single-family homes for sale in neighborhoods where affordable housing is scarce, my administration is proposing a single-family affordable housing credit. Over the next five years, this will provide developers nearly $2.4 billion in tax credits for building affordable single-family housing in distressed areas. These credits will make 200,000 new homes available over its first five years to low-income purchasers.

A third major obstacle to minority homeownership is the complexity and difficulty of the purchasing process. So we're stepping up our efforts to better educate first-time home buyers. Consumers need to know their rights and responsibilities as home buyers. Education is the best protection for families against abusive and unscrupulous lenders. Financial education and housing counseling can help protect home buyers against abuses, greatly improve the loan terms they are offered, and help families get through tough times with their homes intact.

Through these important initiatives, we can help thousands of American families live the kinds of lives they had once only dreamed about. But government action isn't enough. We need to energize and engage the private sector, as well. That is why I have challenged the real estate industry leaders to join with the government, with non-profit organizations, and with private sector financial institutions in a major nationwide effort to increase minority homeownership.


G.W. Bush June 15, 2002[/b:2dzbpilc]


He got what he wanted.
volcati
Posts
1180
Joined
12/16/2006
Location
Dam Mam, QA
3/28/2008 11:35am Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 6:29pm
[quote="Twizzler":2fets8xz]Good article. But if you didn't already know this, you were asleep at the wheel.[/quote:2fets8xz]

Problem is...the people who this effects most...rarely read. Shoot...this was being talked about 2 years ago when all the loands were adjusting.

The next one is going to be school loans.

The Shop

WhKnuckle
Posts
7327
Joined
7/17/2007
Location
USA
3/28/2008 5:47pm
Looking at the big picture, we've been a nation of Enrons for 15 years or so - and I know what I'm talking about, because I worked for Enron from the time it was born until it died. Enron was a great company as long as it made profits from operating assets and providing goods and services. It died as a result of rampant greed that compelled it to start trying to make profits that have nothing to do with goods and services. America is going exactly the same direction - we want to make profits that aren't attached to any kind of asset or service - we want to make profits because we just say we made them. Bear Stearns is the tip of the iceberg on all of that stuff. If you look at it like that, then either Enron was 15 years ahead of its time or else America is going the same way Enron did.
race
Posts
3480
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
USA
3/28/2008 9:59pm Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 6:29pm
[quote="WhKnuckle":1fqbhu28]Looking at the big picture, we've been a nation of Enrons for 15 years or so - and I know what I'm talking about, because I worked for Enron from the time it was born until it died. Enron was a great company as long as it made profits from operating assets and providing goods and services. It died as a result of rampant greed that compelled it to start trying to make profits that have nothing to do with goods and services. America is going exactly the same direction - we want to make profits that aren't attached to any kind of asset or service - we want to make profits because we just say we made them. Bear Stearns is the tip of the iceberg on all of that stuff. If you look at it like that, then either Enron was 15 years ahead of its time or else America is going the same way Enron did.[/quote:1fqbhu28]

Enron can burn in hell. The criminal acts they committed blantantly manipulating states' power supplies and the grid in general should never be forgotten. No one would believe it at the time ... and then guess what ... it turned out to be true. In fact it turned out to be far, far worse than anyone had suspected.

The fact that it took a lowly cub reporter making the most basic, simple inquiry to undo Enron ... is almost just as scary.

I suspect we'll be saying the same about oil companies at some point.

Something else that got lost in the well-earned collapse of Enron, is the utter disintegration and disappearance of Arthur Andersen. Once a proud, respected "Big Five" accounting firm ( Big Two at one point depending on how you count ) founded in 1913 and at their peak they had over 85,000 employees worldwide.

It's like they vanished overnight. You couldn't even pay someone to take the name Arthur Andersen now.
txmxer
Posts
9770
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Weatherford, TX, USA
3/28/2008 11:21pm Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 6:29pm
[quote="race":2bcm3brt][quote="WhKnuckle":2bcm3brt]Looking at the big picture, we've been a nation of Enrons for 15 years or so - and I know what I'm talking about, because I worked for Enron from the time it was born until it died. Enron was a great company as long as it made profits from operating assets and providing goods and services. It died as a result of rampant greed that compelled it to start trying to make profits that have nothing to do with goods and services. America is going exactly the same direction - we want to make profits that aren't attached to any kind of asset or service - we want to make profits because we just say we made them. Bear Stearns is the tip of the iceberg on all of that stuff. If you look at it like that, then either Enron was 15 years ahead of its time or else America is going the same way Enron did.[/quote:2bcm3brt]

Enron can burn in hell. The criminal acts they committed blantantly manipulating states' power supplies and the grid in general should never be forgotten. No one would believe it at the time ... and then guess what ... it turned out to be true. In fact it turned out to be far, far worse than anyone had suspected.

The fact that it took a lowly cub reporter making the most basic, simple inquiry to undo Enron ... is almost just as scary.

I suspect we'll be saying the same about oil companies at some point.

Something else that got lost in the well-earned collapse of Enron, is the utter disintegration and disappearance of Arthur Andersen. Once a proud, respected "Big Five" accounting firm ( Big Two at one point depending on how you count ) founded in 1913 and at their peak they had over 85,000 employees worldwide.

It's like they vanished overnight. You couldn't even pay someone to take the name Arthur Andersen now.[/quote:2bcm3brt]

[url:2bcm3brt]http://www.arthurandersen.com/[/url:2bcm3brt]

pretty pathetic.
3/29/2008 9:22am Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 6:29pm
[quote="BMSOB":3g13ue8u][b:3g13ue8u]Good morning. Owning a home lies at the heart of the American dream. A home is a foundation for families and a source of stability for communities. It serves as the foundation of many Americans' financial security. Yet today, while nearly three-quarters of all white Americans own their homes, less than half of all African Americans and Hispanic Americans are homeowners. We must begin to close this homeownership gap by dismantling the barriers that prevent minorities from owning a piece of the American dream. ...

G.W. Bush June 15, 2002[/b:3g13ue8u]


He got what he wanted.[/quote:3g13ue8u]


Not just to get on Bush (like I don't do enough of that already), but the idea of putting everybody into their own personal home makes us all pay for it. Do you know that the price per square foot of the average home increased by a factor of 6 over the past 25 years? So, what used to cost $20 per square foot is now about $120 per square foot.

It appears that as we try to "force" more families into owning homes, it makes owning the home harder for all of us. By destroying our country's manufacturing base, we've come to rely on the home market as our source of jobs. That has pushed the prices of homes skyward, and we're now shooting ourselves in the foot by taking this strategy.

Dumb, dumb, dumb.

Post a reply to: A Nation of Enrons

The Latest