The Ukraine is in a tight spot

Chance1216
Posts
8781
Joined
4/1/2018
Location
Carson, CA, USA
2/22/2025 8:48pm

At the end of the day, this is the world we all live in. 

IMG 1830 2.jpeg?VersionId=oswHR.QgNRykXoir9jRY20wOTnTP1s
IMG 1624 4.jpeg?VersionId=h5bIGxmcrY7JuHJ

4
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
2/22/2025 9:05pm
early wrote:
You think if the US aligned our foreign policy with Russia and China who are basically already aligned we could rule the world?The only thing missing...

You think if the US aligned our foreign policy with Russia and China who are basically already aligned we could rule the world?

The only thing missing is discipline.

Russia and China - aligned? 

Really, you believe that?

By the way, we already had the Cold War, and the US and Russia basically did run the world. 

early wrote:

But if we joined forces think of the power.

Power over what? 

Didn't Russia once consider joining NATO? Seems like if they had that was the time to join forces. 

1
LoudLove
Posts
2929
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
2/23/2025 10:33am

The short-term gain of ending the conflict on Russia-friendly terms will eventually result in detrimental effects long-term. It always has.  

2
2
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
2/23/2025 10:47am Edited Date/Time 2/23/2025 11:36am

Edited to add:

Several folks here seem to be overly concerned about the war ending on terms beneficial to Russia, while forgetting the war was prolonged by the US under the prior administration as a proxy war. The US used Afghanistan to fight a proxy war against the Soviet Union, then abandoned them right after and didn't help with rebuilding their war torn country. The previous administration was more than willing to sacrifice young Ukrainian and Russian men (as well as civilians) for their own gain. This war should have been ended long ago, but leaving it for Trump's administration was also a planned outcome. 

2
1

The Shop

inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
2/23/2025 10:48am
LoudLove wrote:

The short-term gain of ending the conflict on Russia-friendly terms will eventually result in detrimental effects long-term. It always has.  

What other conflicts have been ended on Russia friendly terms for your basis of thought?

Miquon MX 28x
Posts
102
Joined
7/3/2020
Location
San Marino, CA, USA
2/23/2025 11:29am

Great New York Times photo essay on the 80th anniversary of Iwo Jima. 

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/23/world/asia/the-battle-of-iwo-jima-a-history.html?unlocked_article_code=1.zE4.EkLU.8eRtMiDpwAQ2&smid=url-share

As the Red Hats here in the States prepare to celebrate Trump's reprehensible abandonment of Ukraine--the greatest betrayal of an ally in the history of the United States--seeing these photos reminds me of the generation of Americans who sacrificed everything to preserve democracy. Not only do we no longer have the will to do the right thing--we don't even know what the right thing is. 

2
10
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
2/23/2025 11:36am Edited Date/Time 2/23/2025 11:40am
Great New York Times photo essay on the 80th anniversary of Iwo Jima. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/23/world/asia/the-battle-of-iwo-jima-a-history.html?unlocked_article_code=1.zE4.EkLU.8eRtMiDpwAQ2&smid=url-shareAs the Red Hats here in the States prepare to celebrate Trump's...

Great New York Times photo essay on the 80th anniversary of Iwo Jima. 

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/23/world/asia/the-battle-of-iwo-jima-a-history.html?unlocked_article_code=1.zE4.EkLU.8eRtMiDpwAQ2&smid=url-share

As the Red Hats here in the States prepare to celebrate Trump's reprehensible abandonment of Ukraine--the greatest betrayal of an ally in the history of the United States--seeing these photos reminds me of the generation of Americans who sacrificed everything to preserve democracy. Not only do we no longer have the will to do the right thing--we don't even know what the right thing is. 

Are you not aware of Afghanistan?

Perhaps you can remind us what the Obama administration response was when Russia took Crimea?

2
Spoonguy
Posts
3575
Joined
2/28/2022
Location
Mc Kean, PA, USA
2/23/2025 1:03pm
Great New York Times photo essay on the 80th anniversary of Iwo Jima. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/23/world/asia/the-battle-of-iwo-jima-a-history.html?unlocked_article_code=1.zE4.EkLU.8eRtMiDpwAQ2&smid=url-shareAs the Red Hats here in the States prepare to celebrate Trump's...

Great New York Times photo essay on the 80th anniversary of Iwo Jima. 

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/02/23/world/asia/the-battle-of-iwo-jima-a-history.html?unlocked_article_code=1.zE4.EkLU.8eRtMiDpwAQ2&smid=url-share

As the Red Hats here in the States prepare to celebrate Trump's reprehensible abandonment of Ukraine--the greatest betrayal of an ally in the history of the United States--seeing these photos reminds me of the generation of Americans who sacrificed everything to preserve democracy. Not only do we no longer have the will to do the right thing--we don't even know what the right thing is. 

Differences between the two conflicts too numerous to even start to get into here. I would recommend not using the basics of a public school education in any discussion on history.

2
ThatOneMXGuy
Posts
1073
Joined
12/28/2023
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
2/23/2025 3:07pm

If you guys think that the country who invaded the other and has support from Iran and North Korea are the good guys then really there’s no debate to be had.

2
7
bonseff
Posts
2087
Joined
3/29/2011
Location
Frisco, TX, USA
2/23/2025 3:16pm

Silver lining, n. korean soldiers discovered porn.

3
1
Spoonguy
Posts
3575
Joined
2/28/2022
Location
Mc Kean, PA, USA
2/23/2025 3:49pm
If you guys think that the country who invaded the other and has support from Iran and North Korea are the good guys then really there’s...

If you guys think that the country who invaded the other and has support from Iran and North Korea are the good guys then really there’s no debate to be had.

Nobody is stating who are the "good guys". Trump is negotiating with the the combatant that can end the war. What would be the point of negotiating with Ukraine, of course they want the war over. Trump needs to negotiate with Russia to pull out, not with Ukraine to have Russia pull out. 

2
3
LoudLove
Posts
2929
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
2/23/2025 4:13pm
LoudLove wrote:

The short-term gain of ending the conflict on Russia-friendly terms will eventually result in detrimental effects long-term. It always has.  

What other conflicts have been ended on Russia friendly terms for your basis of thought?

My bad. “It” is a historical context of appeasing aggressors in the name of peace.  That peace is inevitably short-lived as the aggressor is now emboldened and relived of serious responsibility. Let’s hope Trump is a better negotiator than that. 

2
2/23/2025 4:33pm

There was literally zero communication between Biden, Blinken and Russia the last administration. We need grown ups in the room who can actually show maturity and keep relations or at least discussions with a country like Russia. And so we see the results of no communication and arrogance from one super power to another. 

4
3
2/23/2025 4:37pm
LoudLove wrote:

The short-term gain of ending the conflict on Russia-friendly terms will eventually result in detrimental effects long-term. It always has.  

What other conflicts have been ended on Russia friendly terms for your basis of thought?

LoudLove wrote:
My bad. “It” is a historical context of appeasing aggressors in the name of peace.  That peace is inevitably short-lived as the aggressor is now emboldened...

My bad. “It” is a historical context of appeasing aggressors in the name of peace.  That peace is inevitably short-lived as the aggressor is now emboldened and relived of serious responsibility. Let’s hope Trump is a better negotiator than that. 

Pouring billions of dollars worth of military support that directly lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of Russians is appeasement? This isn’t Hitler in 1939 bro. And even Chamberlin knew Britain was not ready for war and needed time to build up its strength. 

inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
2/23/2025 4:46pm
If you guys think that the country who invaded the other and has support from Iran and North Korea are the good guys then really there’s...

If you guys think that the country who invaded the other and has support from Iran and North Korea are the good guys then really there’s no debate to be had.

It's a very childish notion to try and frame this as good guys versus bad guys. 

1
2
LoudLove
Posts
2929
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
2/23/2025 6:25pm

What other conflicts have been ended on Russia friendly terms for your basis of thought?

LoudLove wrote:
My bad. “It” is a historical context of appeasing aggressors in the name of peace.  That peace is inevitably short-lived as the aggressor is now emboldened...

My bad. “It” is a historical context of appeasing aggressors in the name of peace.  That peace is inevitably short-lived as the aggressor is now emboldened and relived of serious responsibility. Let’s hope Trump is a better negotiator than that. 

Pouring billions of dollars worth of military support that directly lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of Russians is appeasement? This isn’t Hitler in...

Pouring billions of dollars worth of military support that directly lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of Russians is appeasement? This isn’t Hitler in 1939 bro. And even Chamberlin knew Britain was not ready for war and needed time to build up its strength. 

I know, it’s an insane perspective. But “appeasement” had nothing to do with Russians, dead or alive. This is strictly a negotiation with Putin, the Russian people’s worst enemy.  And we are giving him the leverage to negotiate withdrawal terms.  It’s a terrible starting point for any negotiation, regardless of topic or consequences.  

1
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
2/23/2025 6:41pm
LoudLove wrote:
My bad. “It” is a historical context of appeasing aggressors in the name of peace.  That peace is inevitably short-lived as the aggressor is now emboldened...

My bad. “It” is a historical context of appeasing aggressors in the name of peace.  That peace is inevitably short-lived as the aggressor is now emboldened and relived of serious responsibility. Let’s hope Trump is a better negotiator than that. 

Pouring billions of dollars worth of military support that directly lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of Russians is appeasement? This isn’t Hitler in...

Pouring billions of dollars worth of military support that directly lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of Russians is appeasement? This isn’t Hitler in 1939 bro. And even Chamberlin knew Britain was not ready for war and needed time to build up its strength. 

LoudLove wrote:
I know, it’s an insane perspective. But “appeasement” had nothing to do with Russians, dead or alive. This is strictly a negotiation with Putin, the Russian...

I know, it’s an insane perspective. But “appeasement” had nothing to do with Russians, dead or alive. This is strictly a negotiation with Putin, the Russian people’s worst enemy.  And we are giving him the leverage to negotiate withdrawal terms.  It’s a terrible starting point for any negotiation, regardless of topic or consequences.  

Screenshot 20250223-203939-845Screenshot 20250223-203959-003
1
2/23/2025 6:59pm
LoudLove wrote:
My bad. “It” is a historical context of appeasing aggressors in the name of peace.  That peace is inevitably short-lived as the aggressor is now emboldened...

My bad. “It” is a historical context of appeasing aggressors in the name of peace.  That peace is inevitably short-lived as the aggressor is now emboldened and relived of serious responsibility. Let’s hope Trump is a better negotiator than that. 

Pouring billions of dollars worth of military support that directly lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of Russians is appeasement? This isn’t Hitler in...

Pouring billions of dollars worth of military support that directly lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of Russians is appeasement? This isn’t Hitler in 1939 bro. And even Chamberlin knew Britain was not ready for war and needed time to build up its strength. 

LoudLove wrote:
I know, it’s an insane perspective. But “appeasement” had nothing to do with Russians, dead or alive. This is strictly a negotiation with Putin, the Russian...

I know, it’s an insane perspective. But “appeasement” had nothing to do with Russians, dead or alive. This is strictly a negotiation with Putin, the Russian people’s worst enemy.  And we are giving him the leverage to negotiate withdrawal terms.  It’s a terrible starting point for any negotiation, regardless of topic or consequences.  

I know a lot of Russians and while some have some complaints and bitch like any other citizen of a country, none of them consider him the enemy’s biggest enemy. I know way more Westerners who have that sentiment about their current or previous leaders. 

2/23/2025 7:03pm Edited Date/Time 2/23/2025 7:04pm
LoudLove wrote:
My bad. “It” is a historical context of appeasing aggressors in the name of peace.  That peace is inevitably short-lived as the aggressor is now emboldened...

My bad. “It” is a historical context of appeasing aggressors in the name of peace.  That peace is inevitably short-lived as the aggressor is now emboldened and relived of serious responsibility. Let’s hope Trump is a better negotiator than that. 

Pouring billions of dollars worth of military support that directly lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of Russians is appeasement? This isn’t Hitler in...

Pouring billions of dollars worth of military support that directly lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of Russians is appeasement? This isn’t Hitler in 1939 bro. And even Chamberlin knew Britain was not ready for war and needed time to build up its strength. 

LoudLove wrote:
I know, it’s an insane perspective. But “appeasement” had nothing to do with Russians, dead or alive. This is strictly a negotiation with Putin, the Russian...

I know, it’s an insane perspective. But “appeasement” had nothing to do with Russians, dead or alive. This is strictly a negotiation with Putin, the Russian people’s worst enemy.  And we are giving him the leverage to negotiate withdrawal terms.  It’s a terrible starting point for any negotiation, regardless of topic or consequences.  

Russia already has all the leverage, nobody needs to hand them anything. What does Ukraine have to negotiate? They are gonna lose their country and identity eventually if they don’t sue for peace. Ukraine is done. 

1
2
LoudLove
Posts
2929
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
2/23/2025 8:15pm
Pouring billions of dollars worth of military support that directly lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of Russians is appeasement? This isn’t Hitler in...

Pouring billions of dollars worth of military support that directly lead to the death of hundreds of thousands of Russians is appeasement? This isn’t Hitler in 1939 bro. And even Chamberlin knew Britain was not ready for war and needed time to build up its strength. 

LoudLove wrote:
I know, it’s an insane perspective. But “appeasement” had nothing to do with Russians, dead or alive. This is strictly a negotiation with Putin, the Russian...

I know, it’s an insane perspective. But “appeasement” had nothing to do with Russians, dead or alive. This is strictly a negotiation with Putin, the Russian people’s worst enemy.  And we are giving him the leverage to negotiate withdrawal terms.  It’s a terrible starting point for any negotiation, regardless of topic or consequences.  

I know a lot of Russians and while some have some complaints and bitch like any other citizen of a country, none of them consider him...

I know a lot of Russians and while some have some complaints and bitch like any other citizen of a country, none of them consider him the enemy’s biggest enemy. I know way more Westerners who have that sentiment about their current or previous leaders. 

And I believe you. But it’s not about a person vocalizing their position; it’s about reality. Putin rules Russia with an iron fist and is willing to sacrifice hundreds of thousands over a paranoid delusion.  Any semblance of opposition is struck down with impunity, with many meeting their end in very suspect ways. Your friends know this and perhaps have come to accept Russia’s fate. But they also know life in Russia will not improve with Putin at the helm. 

1
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
2/23/2025 8:18pm
LoudLove wrote:
I know, it’s an insane perspective. But “appeasement” had nothing to do with Russians, dead or alive. This is strictly a negotiation with Putin, the Russian...

I know, it’s an insane perspective. But “appeasement” had nothing to do with Russians, dead or alive. This is strictly a negotiation with Putin, the Russian people’s worst enemy.  And we are giving him the leverage to negotiate withdrawal terms.  It’s a terrible starting point for any negotiation, regardless of topic or consequences.  

I know a lot of Russians and while some have some complaints and bitch like any other citizen of a country, none of them consider him...

I know a lot of Russians and while some have some complaints and bitch like any other citizen of a country, none of them consider him the enemy’s biggest enemy. I know way more Westerners who have that sentiment about their current or previous leaders. 

LoudLove wrote:
And I believe you. But it’s not about a person vocalizing their position; it’s about reality. Putin rules Russia with an iron fist and is willing...

And I believe you. But it’s not about a person vocalizing their position; it’s about reality. Putin rules Russia with an iron fist and is willing to sacrifice hundreds of thousands over a paranoid delusion.  Any semblance of opposition is struck down with impunity, with many meeting their end in very suspect ways. Your friends know this and perhaps have come to accept Russia’s fate. But they also know life in Russia will not improve with Putin at the helm. 

Wonder if they would rather go back to the way it was before Putin but after the fall of the Soviet Union, when the Western world was failing spectacularly at implementing democracy there?

2/23/2025 8:46pm
Trump playbook...- Make crazy promises you know you can't come through on, but you know your base will lap it up and believe every word you...

Trump playbook...

- Make crazy promises you know you can't come through on, but you know your base will lap it up and believe every word you say

- Once you figure out  you can't come through on said promises, start blaming others for it

He's done this with his "ending the war in 1 day", that's now Ukraine's fault because they started the war and they're run by a dictator.   

He hasn't done anything about inflation, even though he said it would be a simple fix.  That's now Bidens fault.

If the stock market tanks, he'll blame that on Hillary Clinton.

 

Church of Brap playbook:

-cry like a bitch

-repeat

5
1
LoudLove
Posts
2929
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
USA
2/24/2025 3:49am
I know a lot of Russians and while some have some complaints and bitch like any other citizen of a country, none of them consider him...

I know a lot of Russians and while some have some complaints and bitch like any other citizen of a country, none of them consider him the enemy’s biggest enemy. I know way more Westerners who have that sentiment about their current or previous leaders. 

LoudLove wrote:
And I believe you. But it’s not about a person vocalizing their position; it’s about reality. Putin rules Russia with an iron fist and is willing...

And I believe you. But it’s not about a person vocalizing their position; it’s about reality. Putin rules Russia with an iron fist and is willing to sacrifice hundreds of thousands over a paranoid delusion.  Any semblance of opposition is struck down with impunity, with many meeting their end in very suspect ways. Your friends know this and perhaps have come to accept Russia’s fate. But they also know life in Russia will not improve with Putin at the helm. 

Wonder if they would rather go back to the way it was before Putin but after the fall of the Soviet Union, when the Western world...

Wonder if they would rather go back to the way it was before Putin but after the fall of the Soviet Union, when the Western world was failing spectacularly at implementing democracy there?

Democracy takes time and effort.  Russia had never truly been a democracy before Gorby, and when it didn’t succeed immediately, the resulting power vacuum led to what we have today. Countries, like people, often accept the security of the known over the fear of the unknown. 

The United States was not an immediate success, either, and many power brokers preferred existing under the king’s rule.  But the core architects stuck to the plan, even though it remains a work in progress for us and democracies around the world. 

2
1
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
2/24/2025 7:13am
LoudLove wrote:
And I believe you. But it’s not about a person vocalizing their position; it’s about reality. Putin rules Russia with an iron fist and is willing...

And I believe you. But it’s not about a person vocalizing their position; it’s about reality. Putin rules Russia with an iron fist and is willing to sacrifice hundreds of thousands over a paranoid delusion.  Any semblance of opposition is struck down with impunity, with many meeting their end in very suspect ways. Your friends know this and perhaps have come to accept Russia’s fate. But they also know life in Russia will not improve with Putin at the helm. 

Wonder if they would rather go back to the way it was before Putin but after the fall of the Soviet Union, when the Western world...

Wonder if they would rather go back to the way it was before Putin but after the fall of the Soviet Union, when the Western world was failing spectacularly at implementing democracy there?

LoudLove wrote:
Democracy takes time and effort.  Russia had never truly been a democracy before Gorby, and when it didn’t succeed immediately, the resulting power vacuum led to...

Democracy takes time and effort.  Russia had never truly been a democracy before Gorby, and when it didn’t succeed immediately, the resulting power vacuum led to what we have today. Countries, like people, often accept the security of the known over the fear of the unknown. 

The United States was not an immediate success, either, and many power brokers preferred existing under the king’s rule.  But the core architects stuck to the plan, even though it remains a work in progress for us and democracies around the world. 

Very, very, very different scenarios you have shared. Not even a shred of similarity between the two. 

FastEddy
Posts
14815
Joined
8/3/2008
Location
💀, FL, USA
2/24/2025 10:53am

 Scott Bessent just said that the US and Ukraine are "on the one yard line" in terms of closing a minerals deal.

Spurdo
Posts
443
Joined
12/26/2016
Location
FI
2/24/2025 2:57pm
17404274354026961740325092348693.png?VersionId=6bbhyUCoYt4E1euWK VrIFV2y

Sounds like some hefty sanctions are in order. Hopefully there is some restitution for the U.S. taxpayer here. 

5
OldTech
Posts
1297
Joined
1/13/2024
Location
Decatur, AL, USA
2/24/2025 5:23pm
Spurdo wrote:
Sounds like some hefty sanctions are in order. Hopefully there is some restitution for the U.S. taxpayer here. 
17404274354026961740325092348693.png?VersionId=6bbhyUCoYt4E1euWK VrIFV2y

Sounds like some hefty sanctions are in order. Hopefully there is some restitution for the U.S. taxpayer here. 

What a damn mess Joe created. There is no good guy in this.

1
3
MXMattii
Posts
5105
Joined
3/6/2010
Location
BE
2/24/2025 5:26pm Edited Date/Time 2/24/2025 5:28pm
If you guys think that the country who invaded the other and has support from Iran and North Korea are the good guys then really there’s...

If you guys think that the country who invaded the other and has support from Iran and North Korea are the good guys then really there’s no debate to be had.

It's a very childish notion to try and frame this as good guys versus bad guys. 

It is worrying that the ten maybe even hundred thousands of lives that got lost in the wars to prevent the Russian involvement (Asian wars, Gulf War 1...) all gets thrown away because Trump is a fan from the Russian man and his followers defend what Trump says. It is indeed childish to frame this as a good and bad battle it is more like a cult. You can also ask yourself if he understands the Geo-politician game. If he goes "in bed" with Russia or Putin, you can't keep bashing China. Because that is an ally of Russia and they won't let Trump walk if he keeps them smothering with taxes and his "they are our economic enemy" story. This makes it a very interesting story. Will President Trump, the leader from a country that is so liberal and open market focused that, they called Barack Obama a communist and socialist for his effort in realizing affordable medical care, go to bed with Russia and China. Both countries can hardly be called communist, but they do not have a free market. Russia still bears most resemblance to the old communism, although it is in fact just a right-wing oriented dictatorship where residents have no say and are poorly paid by mostly state-owned companies. The Chinese government in turn has a stake in every Chinese multinational and foreign companies can only start working in China if they have found a Chinese partner company.

Trump calls Reagan the best President ever, but he's shitting on his legacy. because On the world stage, he escalated the arms race, increased military spending, transitioned Cold War policy away from the policies of chillax with the Soviet Union. But team Orange, wants to be bro's with Putin and while we all look at Israel and Ukrain is China and Russia gaining more and more influence in Africa, and South America. If it isn't with the smart BRICS alliance than with mercenaries who fight for the more interesting country who owns the sources of nature as cobalt, copper, tin, ... 

2
5

Post a reply to: The Ukraine is in a tight spot

The Latest