1 month in: The Trump Administration Kicking Ass & Taking Names

byke
Posts
3088
Joined
8/12/2015
Location
Auburn, CA, USA
2/6/2025 5:29pm
If sex and gender are unrelated, then there should be no need for gender re-assignment or gender affirming surgery. 
Screenshot 20250206-152116-235.png?VersionId=IgUJ

If sex and gender are unrelated, then there should be no need for gender re-assignment or gender affirming surgery. 

byke wrote:

Unrelated? 

This was your comment right?If sex and gender are related, then the sports orgs making rules based on gender would essentially apply the same to making...

This was your comment right?

Screenshot 20250206-153917-816

If sex and gender are related, then the sports orgs making rules based on gender would essentially apply the same to making them based on sex. 

Gender theory disagrees:

Speaking from the position of recognizing the modern definition, gender is derived from sex, so gender can't exist without sex, though sex can exist without gender (and did for the vast majority of human history). Whether we use the old definition where sex/gender are basically the same, or whether we use the new definition where it's the social stuff (makeup, long hair, high/low pitched voice, or whatever characteristics associated with males/females) they are unquestionably related. I just wanted to clarify this part because no matter someone stands on this issue, they are very much related.

If we keep rolling with recognizing the modern definition, then I think sports orgs do themselves a favor by flipping from gender to sex. What do we think the ratio is of trans-gender athletes to trans-sexual athletes? How many have fully committed with downstairs surgery? I'd bet it's like a hundred trans-gender or more to every one trans-sexual. If that were true, then you'd remove 99% of the conflict in sports just by switching from gender to sex.

I think a lot of these sex/gender problems, especially in everyday conversations like we're having, is when people are talking past each other while having different definitions in mind. It's like a baseball team and a football team trying to play each other, it'd just lead to confusion and frustration and each side thinking that the other is an idiot. I recognize that you are using the definition of sex/gender as being the same and I understand why, from that position, it would seem like there's no point to changing the rules from gender to sex in sports, but making the change removes any ambiguity in a message specifically targeted to the category of people that are supporting transgender athletes. As far as I can tell, that would only help your position. 

4
M1000
Posts
594
Joined
10/21/2020
Location
CA
2/6/2025 5:30pm

Dodge Trucks needs to get behind this wrecking ball. Not DOGE, it’s DODGE. Tough trucks, that owners willing crack a few eggs to make a great omelette (MAGO), Approved by the Republican Party. 👍🇺🇸🇺🇸

1
byke
Posts
3088
Joined
8/12/2015
Location
Auburn, CA, USA
2/6/2025 5:31pm Edited Date/Time 2/6/2025 5:32pm

Listen to NPR sometime,  they have an amazing ability to link climate change, gender and racism together. 

It's delusional. 

Magoofan wrote:

Hard pass.       NPR needs to be shut down too....

 

Setting the constitutional-hatred part aside, if we shut down people's ability to say stupid stuff out loud, you can kiss 99% of the internet goodbye. 

1
1
Philo Beddoe
Posts
1215
Joined
11/26/2024
Location
Kennesaw, GA, USA
2/6/2025 5:33pm
byke wrote:
Speaking from the position of recognizing the modern definition, gender is derived from sex, so gender can't exist without sex, though sex can exist without gender...

Speaking from the position of recognizing the modern definition, gender is derived from sex, so gender can't exist without sex, though sex can exist without gender (and did for the vast majority of human history). Whether we use the old definition where sex/gender are basically the same, or whether we use the new definition where it's the social stuff (makeup, long hair, high/low pitched voice, or whatever characteristics associated with males/females) they are unquestionably related. I just wanted to clarify this part because no matter someone stands on this issue, they are very much related.

If we keep rolling with recognizing the modern definition, then I think sports orgs do themselves a favor by flipping from gender to sex. What do we think the ratio is of trans-gender athletes to trans-sexual athletes? How many have fully committed with downstairs surgery? I'd bet it's like a hundred trans-gender or more to every one trans-sexual. If that were true, then you'd remove 99% of the conflict in sports just by switching from gender to sex.

I think a lot of these sex/gender problems, especially in everyday conversations like we're having, is when people are talking past each other while having different definitions in mind. It's like a baseball team and a football team trying to play each other, it'd just lead to confusion and frustration and each side thinking that the other is an idiot. I recognize that you are using the definition of sex/gender as being the same and I understand why, from that position, it would seem like there's no point to changing the rules from gender to sex in sports, but making the change removes any ambiguity in a message specifically targeted to the category of people that are supporting transgender athletes. As far as I can tell, that would only help your position. 

IMG 2432 1
3

The Shop

SEEMEFIRST
Posts
13991
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Arlington, TX, USA
2/6/2025 5:47pm
TeamGreen wrote:

No worries…

$14,100,000 - to Support Gender Equality For Climate Change Opportunities in Tanzania.

Dunzo! No more! 

Titan1 wrote:
What does “Gender Equality For Climate Change Opportunities” even mean?  🤦‍♂️How are gender equality and climate change related?  And what climate change opportunities does gender equality...

What does “Gender Equality For Climate Change Opportunities” even mean?  🤦‍♂️

How are gender equality and climate change related?  And what climate change opportunities does gender equality need? 


This is the kind of garbage that EVERY American ought to be cheering coming to an end…this kind of financial ineptness is inexcusable…no wonder we are so massively in debt…

Listen to NPR sometime,  they have an amazing ability to link climate change, gender and racism together. 

It's delusional. 

I just heard that cocoa prices have risen due to climate change. 

I'd love to peruse that data.

1
Philo Beddoe
Posts
1215
Joined
11/26/2024
Location
Kennesaw, GA, USA
2/6/2025 6:12pm
SEEMEFIRST wrote:

I just heard that cocoa prices have risen due to climate change. 

I'd love to peruse that data.

Cocoa beans thrive in an environment of 72-94 degrees farenheit. While temperatures have remained moderate for the past 80 years and have yet to affect the crops in any negative way, prices have increased just in case.

TXDirt
Posts
7786
Joined
7/29/2015
Location
Plano, TX, USA
2/6/2025 7:23pm
byke wrote:
Speaking from the position of recognizing the modern definition, gender is derived from sex, so gender can't exist without sex, though sex can exist without gender...

Speaking from the position of recognizing the modern definition, gender is derived from sex, so gender can't exist without sex, though sex can exist without gender (and did for the vast majority of human history). Whether we use the old definition where sex/gender are basically the same, or whether we use the new definition where it's the social stuff (makeup, long hair, high/low pitched voice, or whatever characteristics associated with males/females) they are unquestionably related. I just wanted to clarify this part because no matter someone stands on this issue, they are very much related.

If we keep rolling with recognizing the modern definition, then I think sports orgs do themselves a favor by flipping from gender to sex. What do we think the ratio is of trans-gender athletes to trans-sexual athletes? How many have fully committed with downstairs surgery? I'd bet it's like a hundred trans-gender or more to every one trans-sexual. If that were true, then you'd remove 99% of the conflict in sports just by switching from gender to sex.

I think a lot of these sex/gender problems, especially in everyday conversations like we're having, is when people are talking past each other while having different definitions in mind. It's like a baseball team and a football team trying to play each other, it'd just lead to confusion and frustration and each side thinking that the other is an idiot. I recognize that you are using the definition of sex/gender as being the same and I understand why, from that position, it would seem like there's no point to changing the rules from gender to sex in sports, but making the change removes any ambiguity in a message specifically targeted to the category of people that are supporting transgender athletes. As far as I can tell, that would only help your position. 

Your entire argument is a pathetic, incoherent attempt to distract from the real issue: the blatant destruction of women’s sports in the name of ideology. You ramble about definitions and semantics as if this is some abstract debate when, in reality, it’s about whether women and girls should have to compete against physically superior male-born athletes who never should have been allowed in their divisions in the first place. This isn’t a discussion about “different definitions” or “messaging.” It’s about fairness, science, and protecting women from the absolute insanity you’re trying to justify.  

Let’s be crystal clear: sports are divided by sex, not gender, because sex determines athletic ability. That’s why women’s sports exist—to give female athletes a fair playing field against other females. Male puberty results in permanent physiological advantages—greater bone density, larger hearts and lungs, stronger muscle fibers, superior tendon strength—that no amount of hormone therapy or surgery can fully erase. That’s why elite women, no matter how hard they train, cannot compete with mid-tier men. That’s why the best high school boys routinely outperform the most elite female athletes in the world. That’s why this issue isn’t up for debate.  

And yet, here you are, acting like the problem is just a matter of poor communication. No. The problem is that people like you are either too ignorant or too spineless to acknowledge biological reality. You hide behind convoluted nonsense about “sex and gender” while ignoring the fact that this insanity is actively stealing opportunities from women and girls who have trained their entire lives to compete. You don’t care that female athletes are being robbed of scholarships, records, titles, and even basic safety in the locker room. You don’t care that young girls are watching their hard work mean nothing because a male athlete can waltz in, claim an identity, and dominate their division. You don’t care that the future of women’s sports is being destroyed because cowards are too afraid to tell the truth.  

Let me make it easy for you: this nonsense stops here. We are not debating basic biology. We are not sacrificing fairness in the name of delusion. We are not going to sit by while radical ideologues erase everything women have fought for. Women’s sports are for women. If you can’t understand why that matters, then you have no place in this conversation.

10
SEEMEFIRST
Posts
13991
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Arlington, TX, USA
2/6/2025 7:30pm

TLDR.

1
2/6/2025 7:43pm

Listen to NPR sometime,  they have an amazing ability to link climate change, gender and racism together. 

It's delusional. 

Magoofan wrote:

Hard pass.       NPR needs to be shut down too....

 

byke wrote:

Setting the constitutional-hatred part aside, if we shut down people's ability to say stupid stuff out loud, you can kiss 99% of the internet goodbye. 

How about 99% of VitalMX? LOL

inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
2/6/2025 8:37pm
byke wrote:

Unrelated? 

This was your comment right?If sex and gender are related, then the sports orgs making rules based on gender would essentially apply the same to making...

This was your comment right?

Screenshot 20250206-153917-816

If sex and gender are related, then the sports orgs making rules based on gender would essentially apply the same to making them based on sex. 

Gender theory disagrees:

byke wrote:
Speaking from the position of recognizing the modern definition, gender is derived from sex, so gender can't exist without sex, though sex can exist without gender...

Speaking from the position of recognizing the modern definition, gender is derived from sex, so gender can't exist without sex, though sex can exist without gender (and did for the vast majority of human history). Whether we use the old definition where sex/gender are basically the same, or whether we use the new definition where it's the social stuff (makeup, long hair, high/low pitched voice, or whatever characteristics associated with males/females) they are unquestionably related. I just wanted to clarify this part because no matter someone stands on this issue, they are very much related.

If we keep rolling with recognizing the modern definition, then I think sports orgs do themselves a favor by flipping from gender to sex. What do we think the ratio is of trans-gender athletes to trans-sexual athletes? How many have fully committed with downstairs surgery? I'd bet it's like a hundred trans-gender or more to every one trans-sexual. If that were true, then you'd remove 99% of the conflict in sports just by switching from gender to sex.

I think a lot of these sex/gender problems, especially in everyday conversations like we're having, is when people are talking past each other while having different definitions in mind. It's like a baseball team and a football team trying to play each other, it'd just lead to confusion and frustration and each side thinking that the other is an idiot. I recognize that you are using the definition of sex/gender as being the same and I understand why, from that position, it would seem like there's no point to changing the rules from gender to sex in sports, but making the change removes any ambiguity in a message specifically targeted to the category of people that are supporting transgender athletes. As far as I can tell, that would only help your position. 

For some reason this pic didn't post in my comment. I did add it later as another comment though, but it shows the idea pushed by gender theory is they are distinct concepts.

Screenshot 20250206-154131-122.png?VersionId=IagCg

However, I think we'd best let this be and allow the thread to return to its intent. 

Joey Bridges
Posts
9830
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN, USA
2/7/2025 2:43am

Bike and flamer, get a damn room somewhere, continue your sexual foreplay in private.

Nobody wants to see youronline courtship. 

2
4
TeamGreen
Posts
37281
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
2/7/2025 5:36am

Bike and flamer, get a damn room somewhere, continue your sexual foreplay in private.

Nobody wants to see youronline courtship. 

…not that there’s anything wrong with that! 

1
3
2/7/2025 6:33am

Did egg prices go down yet? Inflation go down? Those seemed to be the top things voters wanted addressed. Oh and did he end the war?

You people been conned and you're too dumb to realize it.

11
mvd61
Posts
1306
Joined
10/15/2021
Location
Brandon, SD, USA
2/7/2025 7:03am
Did egg prices go down yet? Inflation go down? Those seemed to be the top things voters wanted addressed. Oh and did he end the war?You...

Did egg prices go down yet? Inflation go down? Those seemed to be the top things voters wanted addressed. Oh and did he end the war?

You people been conned and you're too dumb to realize it.

I wonder if shutting off the money faucet for retarded shit will help at all? 

5
2
2/7/2025 7:07am

While everybody here is all for shutting off the money going to poor people around the world, they are perfectly fine with more money going to Trump's 3 new billionaire buddies. Did you guys get your Trump and Melania meme coins and your gold tennis shoes? Motocrossers are borderline r-tarded.

14
disbanded
Posts
6947
Joined
8/26/2007
Location
Evergreen, CO, USA
2/7/2025 7:29am
While everybody here is all for shutting off the money going to poor people around the world, they are perfectly fine with more money going to...

While everybody here is all for shutting off the money going to poor people around the world, they are perfectly fine with more money going to Trump's 3 new billionaire buddies. Did you guys get your Trump and Melania meme coins and your gold tennis shoes? Motocrossers are borderline r-tarded.

And you are no better 

4
1
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX, USA
2/7/2025 7:31am

Bike and flamer, get a damn room somewhere, continue your sexual foreplay in private.

Nobody wants to see youronline courtship. 

What's the matter Joey JoJo Jr. Shabadoo? Scared to see what a decent discussion looks like?

1
4
2/7/2025 7:34am
disbanded wrote:

And you are no better 

If you think a bunch of billionaires are out to help you, you deserve that Trump sign in your front yard. Ya been conned. Might as well have a diploma from Trump University 😂.

12
mvd61
Posts
1306
Joined
10/15/2021
Location
Brandon, SD, USA
2/7/2025 7:36am
disbanded wrote:

And you are no better 

If you think a bunch of billionaires are out to help you, you deserve that Trump sign in your front yard. Ya been conned. Might as...

If you think a bunch of billionaires are out to help you, you deserve that Trump sign in your front yard. Ya been conned. Might as well have a diploma from Trump University 😂.

So don’t continue to audit the three letter govt agencies and let the money fucking away continue? Cmon dawg tell me how this is bad. I really fucking want to hear someone explain to me why these programs and spending are necessary. I mean damn “we” are $37,000,000,000,000 in debt. I don’t remember ever voting for any of this wreckless stupid fucking spending. 

8
1
2/7/2025 7:38am
Did egg prices go down yet? Inflation go down? Those seemed to be the top things voters wanted addressed. Oh and did he end the war?You...

Did egg prices go down yet? Inflation go down? Those seemed to be the top things voters wanted addressed. Oh and did he end the war?

You people been conned and you're too dumb to realize it.

1
3
2/7/2025 7:40am
disbanded wrote:

And you are no better 

If you think a bunch of billionaires are out to help you, you deserve that Trump sign in your front yard. Ya been conned. Might as...

If you think a bunch of billionaires are out to help you, you deserve that Trump sign in your front yard. Ya been conned. Might as well have a diploma from Trump University 😂.

billionaires backed kamala at a higher rate than trump. you thinking it is a partisan issue shows you have been conned.

4
disbanded
Posts
6947
Joined
8/26/2007
Location
Evergreen, CO, USA
2/7/2025 7:48am
disbanded wrote:

And you are no better 

If you think a bunch of billionaires are out to help you, you deserve that Trump sign in your front yard. Ya been conned. Might as...

If you think a bunch of billionaires are out to help you, you deserve that Trump sign in your front yard. Ya been conned. Might as well have a diploma from Trump University 😂.

Holy shit, you did it!  You have come up with such a compelling argument that you have changed my mind.  Please put me down for 2 Kamala votes!  

You think your billionaire Soros is so different?  You think he and his cronies are out to help you?  Fucking ponderous!

3
2/7/2025 7:50am
2
2
2/7/2025 7:53am

billionaires backed kamala at a higher rate than trump. you thinking it is a partisan issue shows you have been conned.

The 3 guys sitting behind Trump at inauguration are worth over $900 billion. If u think these guys are there to help you, we're all screwed. Motocrossers are low IQ when it comes to politics. This is the cla sic Trump voter, more than eager to drink the Kool aid.

9
mvd61
Posts
1306
Joined
10/15/2021
Location
Brandon, SD, USA
2/7/2025 7:57am

billionaires backed kamala at a higher rate than trump. you thinking it is a partisan issue shows you have been conned.

The 3 guys sitting behind Trump at inauguration are worth over $900 billion. If u think these guys are there to help you, we're all screwed...

The 3 guys sitting behind Trump at inauguration are worth over $900 billion. If u think these guys are there to help you, we're all screwed. Motocrossers are low IQ when it comes to politics. This is the cla sic Trump voter, more than eager to drink the Kool aid.

Yo churchoftard let’s hear it. Still waiting for your explanation. 

1
3
2/7/2025 8:00am Edited Date/Time 2/7/2025 8:02am

billionaires backed kamala at a higher rate than trump. you thinking it is a partisan issue shows you have been conned.

The 3 guys sitting behind Trump at inauguration are worth over $900 billion. If u think these guys are there to help you, we're all screwed...

The 3 guys sitting behind Trump at inauguration are worth over $900 billion. If u think these guys are there to help you, we're all screwed. Motocrossers are low IQ when it comes to politics. This is the cla sic Trump voter, more than eager to drink the Kool aid.

^^ Low IQ response

4
lappedrider
Posts
1560
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Tooele, UT, USA
2/7/2025 8:04am

Do we think DOGE is going to look into the 20 billion going to Space X? Or the 465 million dollar low interest loan from the DOE that started Tesla? Or the billions in subsidies?

My point being let’s not just have blind faith.  This administration needs to be held accountable just like the last one.  

6
5
2/7/2025 8:11am
mvd61 wrote:

Yo churchoftard let’s hear it. Still waiting for your explanation. 

I'm not going to debate the intricate and complex parts of our government on a motocross forum where most are uneducated, yet think they are very smart. 

My only point was that Trump has 3 of the richest guys in the world behind him, he could give a shit about you. They're there to get richer and become more powerful.

1
7

Post a reply to: 1 month in: The Trump Administration Kicking Ass & Taking Names

The Latest