terrible tragedies over the weekend

Torco1
Posts
6585
Joined
4/27/2007
Location
Corona, CA US
3/30/2010 11:05am
flarider wrote:
At least even road racing has done something and taken some step with things like air fences, heart protectors and back protectors. Let's break down MX...
At least even road racing has done something and taken some step with things like air fences, heart protectors and back protectors.

Let's break down MX rules and what is technically legal

army boots (that cover the ankle)
Jeans
Long sleeve T
Helmet (DOT) full or open face
Goggles
Garden gloves

That's it!

Track....Umm.....No jumps before first turn, supposed to be 20 feet wide
Uhh...I think that's it!

LET'S RACE!!
I'm not opposed to mandatory safety gear (chest protectors, neck brace, proper boots, etc....) for kids under 18 or maybe 16. But it would be pretty unrealistic to think ALL adults would follow these rules, but kids should be protected at the tracks as best as possible.
adamdf
Posts
2129
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
St. Michael BB
3/30/2010 11:20am
On the 4 stroke, 2 stroke thing - the only defense i have for four strokes is that they are easier to keep in the meat of the power than two strokes and for that reason one can argue that they might even be safer on certain jumps where a two stroke might bog for an amateur, a 4 stroke will likely pull them through, plus they are much lighter now. On the negative side, they are faster, so who is really to say?

450s though, are a tough bike for anyone not in shape to control, and let's face it probably more than half of weekend warriors are out of shape and don't need to be on a 450 anyway.

IntenseRider
Posts
320
Joined
12/4/2007
Location
Mc Donald, PA US
3/30/2010 11:23am
flarider wrote:
At least even road racing has done something and taken some step with things like air fences, heart protectors and back protectors. Let's break down MX...
At least even road racing has done something and taken some step with things like air fences, heart protectors and back protectors.

Let's break down MX rules and what is technically legal

army boots (that cover the ankle)
Jeans
Long sleeve T
Helmet (DOT) full or open face
Goggles
Garden gloves

That's it!

Track....Umm.....No jumps before first turn, supposed to be 20 feet wide
Uhh...I think that's it!

LET'S RACE!!
Torco1 wrote:
I'm not opposed to mandatory safety gear (chest protectors, neck brace, proper boots, etc....) for kids under 18 or maybe 16. But it would be pretty...
I'm not opposed to mandatory safety gear (chest protectors, neck brace, proper boots, etc....) for kids under 18 or maybe 16. But it would be pretty unrealistic to think ALL adults would follow these rules, but kids should be protected at the tracks as best as possible.
The "adults" seem to be able to comply to the safety rules fairly well in the NFL, NHL, F1, NASCAR, etc. It might be difficult to manage this at some practice facilities, but it could be mandatory in competition.

With regard to MX requirements, Dave nailed it in his post above. There really are no strict requirements around the mandatory gear and the requirements for tracks are even less. My biggest concern is that, if we don't find a way to regulate ourselves, there are plenty of government and special interest groups that would be more than happy to "protect us from ourselves."

Our sport may ignore the injury data, but I'm fairly confident that someone, somewhere is tabulating this information.

rocrac
Posts
2454
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Indianapolis, IN US
3/30/2010 11:31am
adamdf wrote:
On the 4 stroke, 2 stroke thing - the only defense i have for four strokes is that they are easier to keep in the meat...
On the 4 stroke, 2 stroke thing - the only defense i have for four strokes is that they are easier to keep in the meat of the power than two strokes and for that reason one can argue that they might even be safer on certain jumps where a two stroke might bog for an amateur, a 4 stroke will likely pull them through, plus they are much lighter now. On the negative side, they are faster, so who is really to say?

450s though, are a tough bike for anyone not in shape to control, and let's face it probably more than half of weekend warriors are out of shape and don't need to be on a 450 anyway.

This is part of the problem IMO. Lesser skilled riders wouldn't attempt some of the bigger jumps, whoops Ect. on late model bikes namely the two strokes.

The 4 stroke era has instilled a lot of confidence into those who shouldn't have any.

C riders are hitting jumps that 10 years ago only the A riders would do.

The Shop

BobbyM
Posts
21439
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
AZ US
3/30/2010 11:33am
flarider wrote:
Nice to see you at least agree somewhat. In my disagreement with Regis on this issue, I have never disagreed that MX is inherently dangerous. That...
Nice to see you at least agree somewhat.

In my disagreement with Regis on this issue, I have never disagreed that MX is inherently dangerous. That is obvious. We wear helmets.

However, I maintain that the rate of instance has increased, significantly, over the last few years.
The responsible thing is for the sport's leadership (in amateur racing that is the AMA) to fund a study on the rate of instance, the why there is a real or perceived increase in rate of instance and how to fix or reduce this issue.

If we are not proactive, the government is going to get proactive for us.
and we're not going to like their way of being proactive
bikes are higher off the ground and faster, people are dumber and think they know more, simple in/cross/focused breeding dictates the outcome. it's a small sport...an even smaller breeding ground

simple as that....
Torco1
Posts
6585
Joined
4/27/2007
Location
Corona, CA US
3/30/2010 11:38am
mxman wrote:
Tracks have changed big time....... This has to be a huge cause. Every thrack now wants to resemble a SX track. The biggest part however in...
Tracks have changed big time....... This has to be a huge cause. Every thrack now wants to resemble a SX track. The biggest part however in my worthless opinion are people that ride above there heads. I learned after breaking my back, 5 ribs, collar bone and puncturing my lung that it's best to ride at 85%.
Do you still have problems from that? I had pretty much the same injuries about 2 years ago and I still deal with pain every day.
P-LO80
Posts
5
Joined
3/30/2010
Location
Huntington Beach, CA US
3/30/2010 12:14pm
Regis wrote:
I have stated many times that the Internet and the ability to reach everyone has a large responsibility of making us more aware of the dangers...
I have stated many times that the Internet and the ability to reach everyone has a large responsibility of making us more aware of the dangers of this sport.

However, many people are completely RIGHT that we need to know someway if we are just more aware or if the sport is more dangerous with 4 strokes / tracks / safety equipment. I argued until I was blue in the face with EIDave about this very topic and have thought a lot about it since, anyways that argument is water under the bridge however, I do believe the ability to post on message boards, send out information and reach a lot more people does make it appear the sport has increased in danger.

Dave is right though, we need to know the answers before the feds catch on and we are in a whole heap of trouble then.
I'm not a noob just had issues with the profile today but anyway......

I thikn the best example to date would be the TWMX comparison of the 250f against the 250 2-stroke with J-Law and T Bake. The 250 2-stroke, which was obviously our bike bike(minus the 500 of course) was barely seating out the 250f in lap times thus making our "Little-Bike" clearly as fast as our old "big bike". Now toss in the 450 and we're now moving along a little quick than we did in the past! Plus going just a quick on our "little bikes" as we were on our "big bikes" before. Our 125' were kinda slow and didn't have the decompression braking that causes a fair share of nasty, nasty highsides which knock quite a few people out bad.
Truespode
Posts
127
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Greer, SC US
3/30/2010 1:16pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 9:46pm
flarider wrote:
Nice to see you at least agree somewhat. In my disagreement with Regis on this issue, I have never disagreed that MX is inherently dangerous. That...
Nice to see you at least agree somewhat.

In my disagreement with Regis on this issue, I have never disagreed that MX is inherently dangerous. That is obvious. We wear helmets.

However, I maintain that the rate of instance has increased, significantly, over the last few years.
The responsible thing is for the sport's leadership (in amateur racing that is the AMA) to fund a study on the rate of instance, the why there is a real or perceived increase in rate of instance and how to fix or reduce this issue.

If we are not proactive, the government is going to get proactive for us.
and we're not going to like their way of being proactive
Looks like the Mayo Clinic is already studying MX injuries. If we don't start studies of our own we will be at the mercy of whatever data those organizations outside the sport bring to the table...




http://newsblog.mayoclinic.org/2010/03/10/mayo-clinic-study-explores-se…



ROCHESTER, Minn. — Mayo Clinic researchers today presented findings about significant instances of hospitalization and surgery following motocross injuries to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' 2010 Annual Meeting.


The presentation is based on a December 2009 article entitled "Motocross Morbidity: Economic Cost and Injury Distribution in Children," published in the December 2009 Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. The retrospective study of 299 cases revealed nearly one-half of the patients required hospitalization, and an additional one-third required surgery.


"When reviewing these cases, we saw very high levels of hospitalization and surgery, and we believe this is just the tip of the iceberg when looking at motocross-related injuries," says Amy McIntosh, M.D., Mayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery. "In a situation where half of the patients are hospitalized and another third require surgical intervention, we know we have a problem on our hands. We need to learn more about this issue — to find out how many motocross athletes are suffering injury, why they are being injured, and what we can do to prevent the injuries."


Motocross is an organized sport that is growing in popularity nationwide. The study reviewed patients 17 years old or younger with injuries sustained while using off-road, two-wheeled motorcycles. The investigators reviewed type, severity and mechanism of injury as well as charges billed for medical care. Both recreational and competitive motocross activities were included. Of the 299 cases reviewed, hospital admission was required in 141 instances, 20 patients required intensive care unit admission, and surgery was performed in 91 cases. The average medical bill for these patients was $14,947.


"When football or hockey players suffer multiple losses of consciousness, there are 'return to play' guidelines in place. We don't yet see that in motocross," says Dr. McIntosh. "As more people, including kids, become involved with motocross, it's important for families to understand how to properly use safety equipment, and to understand the significant medical care costs if an injury occurs. We're not discouraging people from participating in motocross, but we want participants and families to do what they can to avoid injury," she adds.


The researchers will next conduct a prospective study to learn more about the prevalence of injuries, including those not requiring transport to a Level I Trauma Center, such as Mayo Clinic. Other study investigators include Anthony Stans, M.D.; William Shaughnessy, M.D.; Mark Dekutoski, M.D.; Michael Quinn; and Annalise Larson, M.D., all from Mayo Clinic.
yzvet426
Posts
864
Joined
5/12/2008
Location
Lake Zurich, IL US
3/30/2010 1:22pm
Hey steve a local guy was killed here Saturday at our local track. It makes you think. Either way don't tell ma Wink
Regis
Posts
2767
Joined
6/17/2008
Location
Gonzales, LA US
Fantasy
3/30/2010 1:28pm
flarider wrote:
Nice to see you at least agree somewhat. In my disagreement with Regis on this issue, I have never disagreed that MX is inherently dangerous. That...
Nice to see you at least agree somewhat.

In my disagreement with Regis on this issue, I have never disagreed that MX is inherently dangerous. That is obvious. We wear helmets.

However, I maintain that the rate of instance has increased, significantly, over the last few years.
The responsible thing is for the sport's leadership (in amateur racing that is the AMA) to fund a study on the rate of instance, the why there is a real or perceived increase in rate of instance and how to fix or reduce this issue.

If we are not proactive, the government is going to get proactive for us.
and we're not going to like their way of being proactive
Truespode wrote:
Looks like the Mayo Clinic is already studying MX injuries. If we don't start studies of our own we will be at the mercy of whatever...
Looks like the Mayo Clinic is already studying MX injuries. If we don't start studies of our own we will be at the mercy of whatever data those organizations outside the sport bring to the table...




http://newsblog.mayoclinic.org/2010/03/10/mayo-clinic-study-explores-se…



ROCHESTER, Minn. — Mayo Clinic researchers today presented findings about significant instances of hospitalization and surgery following motocross injuries to the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons' 2010 Annual Meeting.


The presentation is based on a December 2009 article entitled "Motocross Morbidity: Economic Cost and Injury Distribution in Children," published in the December 2009 Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics. The retrospective study of 299 cases revealed nearly one-half of the patients required hospitalization, and an additional one-third required surgery.


"When reviewing these cases, we saw very high levels of hospitalization and surgery, and we believe this is just the tip of the iceberg when looking at motocross-related injuries," says Amy McIntosh, M.D., Mayo Clinic Department of Orthopedic Surgery. "In a situation where half of the patients are hospitalized and another third require surgical intervention, we know we have a problem on our hands. We need to learn more about this issue — to find out how many motocross athletes are suffering injury, why they are being injured, and what we can do to prevent the injuries."


Motocross is an organized sport that is growing in popularity nationwide. The study reviewed patients 17 years old or younger with injuries sustained while using off-road, two-wheeled motorcycles. The investigators reviewed type, severity and mechanism of injury as well as charges billed for medical care. Both recreational and competitive motocross activities were included. Of the 299 cases reviewed, hospital admission was required in 141 instances, 20 patients required intensive care unit admission, and surgery was performed in 91 cases. The average medical bill for these patients was $14,947.


"When football or hockey players suffer multiple losses of consciousness, there are 'return to play' guidelines in place. We don't yet see that in motocross," says Dr. McIntosh. "As more people, including kids, become involved with motocross, it's important for families to understand how to properly use safety equipment, and to understand the significant medical care costs if an injury occurs. We're not discouraging people from participating in motocross, but we want participants and families to do what they can to avoid injury," she adds.


The researchers will next conduct a prospective study to learn more about the prevalence of injuries, including those not requiring transport to a Level I Trauma Center, such as Mayo Clinic. Other study investigators include Anthony Stans, M.D.; William Shaughnessy, M.D.; Mark Dekutoski, M.D.; Michael Quinn; and Annalise Larson, M.D., all from Mayo Clinic.
uh oh.
txmxer
Posts
9770
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Weatherford, TX US
3/30/2010 1:35pm
flarider wrote:
At least even road racing has done something and taken some step with things like air fences, heart protectors and back protectors. Let's break down MX...
At least even road racing has done something and taken some step with things like air fences, heart protectors and back protectors.

Let's break down MX rules and what is technically legal

army boots (that cover the ankle)
Jeans
Long sleeve T
Helmet (DOT) full or open face
Goggles
Garden gloves

That's it!

Track....Umm.....No jumps before first turn, supposed to be 20 feet wide
Uhh...I think that's it!

LET'S RACE!!
Torco1 wrote:
I'm not opposed to mandatory safety gear (chest protectors, neck brace, proper boots, etc....) for kids under 18 or maybe 16. But it would be pretty...
I'm not opposed to mandatory safety gear (chest protectors, neck brace, proper boots, etc....) for kids under 18 or maybe 16. But it would be pretty unrealistic to think ALL adults would follow these rules, but kids should be protected at the tracks as best as possible.
the issue with mandatory gear is that you have to be able to justify it's use. You have to prove that it does something if you are going to make someone wear it.

Then you have to be able to prove that it's the best available.

In MX, that's very hard to do. There's no money for testing and testing will always be questionable.
Regis
Posts
2767
Joined
6/17/2008
Location
Gonzales, LA US
Fantasy
3/30/2010 2:16pm Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 9:46pm
If you start mandating gear is there laibility issues?

Here is why i ask. -

I did some off road driving a year or so ago and they required a certain head and neck restraint system at the first round of the series. A lot of the guys had another kind but it was not allowed as they required this certain one (politics). As soon as it was mentioned about the possibilities of a lawsuit if a driver who originally wore the "other" head nad neck restraint was hurt with the now required one, they quickly changed their tune of what was required and what wasn't.

If you require a Leatt or other neck system, and someone who normally doesn't wear one breaks a collorbone in a crash are the track owners going to be liable for making you wear one? I guess that is kind of a special circumstance but that same argument could be for chestprotectors and other safety items.
That is one of the things I really hate about this great country of ours I truly love to live in. Common sense in the way of lawsuits.
MIKEY755
Posts
293
Joined
9/18/2008
Location
Montreal CA
3/30/2010 2:19pm
There was a guy that died last year at a track not to far from where I live, there wasn't very much info released about the incident but from what I remember it was along the line of this.

The track in known for it's deep sand and larger jumps. Apparently the guy used to race the local "pro" class, he was on a crf250 at the time. he tried the biggest jump on the track which was about 100' on the first or second lap he was out, it's a really huge table top, like way bigger than it needs to be for 100'. The take off often gets rutted up and forms kickers on it and from what I heard the guy landed on his head, apparently he hit a kicker and was thrown over the bars. Needless to say it was a very sad tragedy since he was 35 years old and had a wife and kids.

I don't think it was anything other than human error, you can't really blame the bike or the track because you felt the need to hit a huge jump that was in less than stellar condition. I understand that if you\re not pushing it you wont get faster but there is a limit and when you're that age and have those responsibilities you should know your limits and not push it, especially if you have nothing to gain.

Here's a "translate / cut and paste" from a french site.

Originally posted by ORS on motocrossquebec.ca
"It's really uncool to listen ....

I know who has picked up on the track ... it was not a pretty
see. I know the guys at SRA have really done everything to save him ...

Yes, the guy had experience, but it happened early in his
day (like first or second round) and he was trying to enlighten the
large jump. He hit a kicker and then flies forward on his
motorcycle ... the criss kicker ...

So pilot error pure and simple. You can not Balmer SRA, he
would repeat the track and have always had a safe jump. The kicker, he
has always been and there will unfortunately always have.

Personnellent, I always had a phobia of kicker ... I just
understand why.

Note that if it affects us all at this level, because ca
not happen often and happily. There are car accidents all
day and we still contions to take our car!

We tend to feel invincible again on our machines ... I think
he must really respect our sport.

My condolence to his family and everyone who was present at SRA
Monday ..."

flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL US
3/30/2010 2:27pm
Regis wrote:
If you start mandating gear is there laibility issues? Here is why i ask. - I did some off road driving a year or so ago...
If you start mandating gear is there laibility issues?

Here is why i ask. -

I did some off road driving a year or so ago and they required a certain head and neck restraint system at the first round of the series. A lot of the guys had another kind but it was not allowed as they required this certain one (politics). As soon as it was mentioned about the possibilities of a lawsuit if a driver who originally wore the "other" head nad neck restraint was hurt with the now required one, they quickly changed their tune of what was required and what wasn't.

If you require a Leatt or other neck system, and someone who normally doesn't wear one breaks a collorbone in a crash are the track owners going to be liable for making you wear one? I guess that is kind of a special circumstance but that same argument could be for chestprotectors and other safety items.
That is one of the things I really hate about this great country of ours I truly love to live in. Common sense in the way of lawsuits.
That's why none of it is mandated to any specifics, except the helmet, because there are testing standards and certifications.

There is none of which for any other safety item in MX, not even Leatt
Chest protectors aren't even called "chest protectors" any longer, they are now "roost deflectors"

WhipMeister
Posts
5238
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Big D, TX US
3/30/2010 3:11pm
1). Correct. (In general maybe not taking into account our recent economic slip the last few years.) But over the last 20 years in our country...
1). Correct.
(In general maybe not taking into account our recent economic slip the last few years.) But over the last 20 years in our country the HOBBY of ing and racing have many more people than ever before. And I can prove it.



http://www.webbikeworld.com/motorcycle-news/motorcycle-sales-growth.htm
Wrong. Pull the MIC industry shipment figures since 1972.
WhipMeister
Posts
5238
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Big D, TX US
3/30/2010 3:13pm
txmxer wrote:
RIP. It sucks when folks get hurt. We do need to know something about real statistics. Unfortunately, the place these come from typically is insurance and...
RIP.

It sucks when folks get hurt. We do need to know something about real statistics. Unfortunately, the place these come from typically is insurance and nobody that rides a dirt bike wants to admit they got hurt riding. So, there are no real statistics. The AMA certainly isn't going to make a serious effort at getting the numbers (or they already would have).

Moving on. Assume injuries are more frequent and more severe. Basic logic tells us that if you hit the ground harder, the injury is more severe. There are also the freak accidents that have always happened. A low speed crash landing in a way or on a part that is very vulnerable. That probably hasn't changed much IMO.

I remember seeing a pic from Mosier in the '80s on here once. They caught air back then. It probably was a lot more pounding when they landed, but they caught air. But, I don't think beginner's and novices were taking those bigger hits.

The bikes are undeniably faster. The tracks definitely have bigger hits and more of them. I think all that is undeniable. I doubt you can put the genie back in the bottle.

Getting a real database going of injuries would be useful. Otherwise it's just speculation.

I raced Mosier both back in the 70s and 80s and in the mid 90s. There's absolutely no comparison between the magnitude of air time of the two eras.
mxman
Posts
169
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Armpit, TX US
3/30/2010 3:35pm
mxman wrote:
Tracks have changed big time....... This has to be a huge cause. Every thrack now wants to resemble a SX track. The biggest part however in...
Tracks have changed big time....... This has to be a huge cause. Every thrack now wants to resemble a SX track. The biggest part however in my worthless opinion are people that ride above there heads. I learned after breaking my back, 5 ribs, collar bone and puncturing my lung that it's best to ride at 85%.
Torco1 wrote:
Do you still have problems from that? I had pretty much the same injuries about 2 years ago and I still deal with pain every day.
Nope I'm pretty good but i'm at the gym 5 days a week which is the only reason i'm still walking. That said I do have back pain when I walk a lot.
mxman
Posts
169
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Armpit, TX US
3/30/2010 3:40pm
yzvet426 wrote:
Hey steve a local guy was killed here Saturday at our local track. It makes you think. Either way don't tell ma Wink
Jeff I sent you an email about it....... Some is a good read, some is grizzly.
IntenseRider
Posts
320
Joined
12/4/2007
Location
Mc Donald, PA US
3/30/2010 3:47pm
txmxer wrote:
the issue with mandatory gear is that you have to be able to justify it's use. You have to prove that it does something if you...
the issue with mandatory gear is that you have to be able to justify it's use. You have to prove that it does something if you are going to make someone wear it.

Then you have to be able to prove that it's the best available.

In MX, that's very hard to do. There's no money for testing and testing will always be questionable.
I'm curious about that as well. What does the NFL, MLB, etc. do with regard to gear and liability? Although Riddell seems to have a lot of helmet contracts, there are other manufacturers in the game as well. I would assume that the leagues make general "safety" requirements and manufacturers that meet those requirements can be allowed to provide gear for the participants.

With regard to the Mayo Clinic study, mentioned above I found the following excerpt to be interesting:

"When football or hockey players suffer multiple losses of consciousness, there are 'return to play' guidelines in place. We don't yet see that in motocross," says Dr. McIntosh. "As more people, including kids, become involved with motocross, it's important for families to understand how to properly use safety equipment, and to understand the significant medical care costs if an injury occurs. We're not discouraging people from participating in motocross, but we want participants and families to do what they can to avoid injury," she adds.

The "return to play" guidelines are something else that needs to be addressed on a global level in MX. Broc Hepler and UPMC have done a fair amount of baseline testing and subsequent follow up following his concussions, and he has still not returned to racing. Makes you wonder what would be an acceptable "return to play" threshold.
Regis
Posts
2767
Joined
6/17/2008
Location
Gonzales, LA US
Fantasy
3/30/2010 3:53pm
Regis wrote:
If you start mandating gear is there laibility issues? Here is why i ask. - I did some off road driving a year or so ago...
If you start mandating gear is there laibility issues?

Here is why i ask. -

I did some off road driving a year or so ago and they required a certain head and neck restraint system at the first round of the series. A lot of the guys had another kind but it was not allowed as they required this certain one (politics). As soon as it was mentioned about the possibilities of a lawsuit if a driver who originally wore the "other" head nad neck restraint was hurt with the now required one, they quickly changed their tune of what was required and what wasn't.

If you require a Leatt or other neck system, and someone who normally doesn't wear one breaks a collorbone in a crash are the track owners going to be liable for making you wear one? I guess that is kind of a special circumstance but that same argument could be for chestprotectors and other safety items.
That is one of the things I really hate about this great country of ours I truly love to live in. Common sense in the way of lawsuits.
flarider wrote:
That's why none of it is mandated to any specifics, except the helmet, because there are testing standards and certifications. There is none of which for...
That's why none of it is mandated to any specifics, except the helmet, because there are testing standards and certifications.

There is none of which for any other safety item in MX, not even Leatt
Chest protectors aren't even called "chest protectors" any longer, they are now "roost deflectors"

thanks Dave, just wondering......
The Rock
Posts
8758
Joined
3/21/2007
Location
HAIKU, HI US
3/30/2010 4:16pm Edited Date/Time 3/30/2010 4:19pm
mxman wrote:
Tracks have changed big time....... This has to be a huge cause. Every thrack now wants to resemble a SX track. The biggest part however in...
Tracks have changed big time....... This has to be a huge cause. Every thrack now wants to resemble a SX track. The biggest part however in my worthless opinion are people that ride above there heads. I learned after breaking my back, 5 ribs, collar bone and puncturing my lung that it's best to ride at 85%.
Tracks have more to do with the injury rate than any other factor IMO. The absence of common sense is appalling. MX has become a hybrid sport of SX/MX, open practice, no flaggers in some cases, watering during the moto instead of before or after, parking vehicles next to the track, etc all just blow my mind.
Torco1
Posts
6585
Joined
4/27/2007
Location
Corona, CA US
3/30/2010 4:21pm
mxman wrote:
Tracks have changed big time....... This has to be a huge cause. Every thrack now wants to resemble a SX track. The biggest part however in...
Tracks have changed big time....... This has to be a huge cause. Every thrack now wants to resemble a SX track. The biggest part however in my worthless opinion are people that ride above there heads. I learned after breaking my back, 5 ribs, collar bone and puncturing my lung that it's best to ride at 85%.
The Rock wrote:
Tracks have more to do with the injury rate than any other factor IMO. The absence of common sense is appalling. MX has become a hybrid...
Tracks have more to do with the injury rate than any other factor IMO. The absence of common sense is appalling. MX has become a hybrid sport of SX/MX, open practice, no flaggers in some cases, watering during the moto instead of before or after, parking vehicles next to the track, etc all just blow my mind.
Not to mention letting beginners on the track at the same time as pros. I know a lot of people dont like it, but I think practices should be seperated.
creed
Posts
171
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
3/30/2010 4:43pm
I still find it hard to beleive in 2010 with ALL this great helmet testing we still have foam, surely there is something better. I still don't beleive having the DOT test means a whole lot, except it is passed to race with.

I also feel comparing 5 years ago to now with racers especially Juniors is hard as they get faster and jump more every year. So to compare racers from 70/ 80 era to now is not a fair comparison.

Most of the same guys saying we jumped and got as much air back then etc etc are the same ones saying today's tracks are not REAL MX tracks more super X.

Watching the old SX and MX videos and comparing the riders to today is like saying the old footballers would still be stars today. Runners get faster, jumpers jump higher and longer. Just because it worked in the 70's doesn't make it right for today.
mx317
Posts
5294
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
TN US
3/30/2010 4:54pm
It's not just the internet letting people know. I have watched 3 people get killed in the last 3 years. I saw them. This is at local tracks and 2 were at the same track. I have been racing over 30 years and something has to change. My friends 12 year old son was killed Saturday on a local track (I wasn't there thank goodness). He was wearing a Leatt and from what I was told by someone who went to the hospital and stayed with the Dad that his spine was stretched or pulled apart at the base of the brain. Could the neck brace have caused this, I don't know. One of my best friends, Robert Patterson, was killed 2 years ago. I think track designs need to change to start with, slow them down and build jumps that are not do or get hurt, or worse. There is nothing wrong with big air if the landings are built right. I don't want the sport to be pussified, but look at the injury list on RacerX and it looks like a pre entry list for A1.
86honda
Posts
908
Joined
12/23/2008
Location
Sickofit, AR US
3/30/2010 5:54pm
One thing I fight about with track owners (builders) is watering before jumps and in between doubles and whoops. Ruts are for turns not before jumps.
Suns_PSD
Posts
989
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Austin, TX US
3/31/2010 9:05am Edited Date/Time 4/17/2016 9:47pm
People always want to blame large doubles and triples for the injuries but I never see anyone get really hurt on those obstacles.

Honestly, everyone I see that gets really hurt, it always comes down to ruts, primarily on the faces of table tops. Also whoops hurt a lot of people.

I spend time w/ a family that trains and rides w/ the Masterpool family and I was told the jump he crashed on is a rutty, wet, and slippery table top most days. Those are the worst but if you are going to win you have to be willing to pin it thru those sections and take your chances.

Stay safe guys. I don't think about it when I ride but these injuries really scare me when I get on these forums or speak to friends. I don't want anyone to get hurt of get hurt (again) myself.
YZKEN250
Posts
547
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Lodi, CA US
3/31/2010 10:48am
A guy here from my town of Lodi got killed on Saturday at Carnagie. He was riding on the lower part of the hill with his 8 year old daughter behind him on her PW50 and way up on the hill a 16 year old kid got off his quad to help a friend and the quad rolled down the hill hitting the father on his bike, killing him. Very sad that his daughter had to see it.

Post a reply to: terrible tragedies over the weekend

The Latest