Trump indicted in Georgia

8/17/2023 6:10am
whyZ wrote:
Rallying your supporters is not unusual for a for a politician, nor is it a crime.  You seemingly keep forgetting to mention the events prior to...

Rallying your supporters is not unusual for a for a politician, nor is it a crime.  You seemingly keep forgetting to mention the events prior to the rally that were coordinated by the Speaker of the House.  You know, the one in charge of security for the house and its grounds.  She deliberately mismanaged, and knowingly collapsed any ability to keep the peaceful protest under control.  Why wasn't this part of the J6 commission investigation or brought to light.  Why wasn't Seaker Pelosi investigated for her part in the events of the J6, why wasn't she brought into testify.  Guess we'll never know because the commission felt it necessary to do a Hilliary of the records for this oh so important day.  

That's the really funny part, these people are pretty much saying it's illegal for Trump to think that he possibly got screwed out of a second...

That's the really funny part, these people are pretty much saying it's illegal for Trump to think that he possibly got screwed out of a second term. I've been meaning to rewatch his January 6th speeches. But he did not tell people to go into the Capitol, Ray Epps did. Trump tried to send a tweet out to let people know to be peaceful, but his Twitter was restricted before he could send that message out.

 

The whole ‘stolen election’ bullshit was a plan developed months prior. You have Steve Bannon, on tape, explaining what was going to happen. Trump (who cried...

The whole ‘stolen election’ bullshit was a plan developed months prior. You have Steve Bannon, on tape, explaining what was going to happen. Trump (who cried fraud when he lost to Ted Cruz in Iowa and later falsely claimed he’d won the popular vote instead of Clinton in ‘16) spent the best part of 6 months laying the groundwork to claim voter fraud should be lose in 2020.

Chris Wallace: "Are you suggesting that you might not accept the results of the election?"

Trump: "I have to see,"

Wallace: "Can you give a direct answer: Will you accept the election?

Trump replied: "I'm not going to just say yes. I'm not going to say no."

And from the latest Georgia Indictment;

“Approximately four days [before the 2020 election], on or about October 31, 2020, Donald John Trump discussed a draft speech with unindicted co-conspirator number 1, whose identity is known to the Grand Jury, that falsely declared victory and falsely claimed voter fraud.”

In Washington on January 6th, having invited his supporters on the basis that the protest would be ‘wild’, he told the crowd never to concede, to fight like hell or they wouldn’t have a country left. The he said "We're going to walk down to the Capitol and we're going to cheer on our brave senators and congressmen and women, and we're probably not going to be cheering so much for some of them."

His Twitter account was not restricted until after January 6th, when he called the people who stormed the Capitol "patriots”. 

Mitch McConnell said a trump bore responsibility for January 6th.

Kevin McCarthy said a trump bore responsibility for January 6th.

The only people who think he is innocent are  simpletons blinded by loyalty to a complete shyster.

And yet the same rhetoric from the dems, Hillary saying Biden should absolutely not concede if the results put Trump as the winner. So Hillary is also guilty of RICO violations? So everyone is concerned and is creating a plan "B" but for Trump's team it's illegal? 

4
10
LoudLove
Posts
2730
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
US
8/17/2023 6:16am
ToolMaker wrote:
Because you know him and his thoughts vs his actual words. Unlike Biden where the "official White House  transcript" has to be changed regularly because his...

Because you know him and his thoughts vs his actual words. Unlike Biden where the "official White House  transcript" has to be changed regularly because his words are from some brainless dementia riddled old man. According to Bidens actual words, we cured cancer.

Yadda yadda yadda...

ToolMaker wrote:

Yup, let's not listen to his actual words, let's hang him because of what you want to believe. Sounds about right.

TM, you previously noted that context matters. And I absolutely agree.  Trump’s language, when read in isolation, seem rather pedestrian. But the environment in which they were spoken made all the difference. 
 

Let’s be honest: opinions have been forged, and no Vital post or court decision will change them otherwise. Regardless, Trump is not the right person for the presidency. We need to coalesce as a nation, not drive the wedge deeper. A Trump-less campaign move us incrementally closer, but we all know there’s nothing keeping him out of the ring. 

5
3
LungButter
Posts
8684
Joined
1/9/2016
Location
Yellow Pine, ID US
8/17/2023 9:56am

So is this the one one where they are finally gonna get him?

Or was that the last one?

Or the next one?

Dems have went after him and said "he's fucked now" so many times that I can't keep up....it's almost like the little boy that cried wolf....

 

1
10
whyZ
Posts
1158
Joined
4/15/2009
Location
Phoenix, AZ US
8/17/2023 11:38am
LoudLove wrote:
You’re burying the lead:  Trump still instructed  a highly agitated group of supporters to take their message to the Capitol. After all that fiery rhetoric, slipping...

You’re burying the lead:  Trump still instructed  a highly agitated group of supporters to take their message to the Capitol. After all that fiery rhetoric, slipping in the word “peacefully” accomplished nothing.
 

Trump wanted a newsworthy demonstration for his own ego. I doubt he gave serious thought to the consequences. 

whyZ wrote:
That's just laughable...and here's the punch line.  The democrats and assorted henchman are doing all they can to charge Trump with election interference, when they're the...

That's just laughable...and here's the punch line.  The democrats and assorted henchman are doing all they can to charge Trump with election interference, when they're the ones filing multiple charges for cases to be brought to court during next year's election cycle...and provoking election interference. 

**insert Manny's line here**    

You know Father Christmas and the Easter Bunny are not real right?

Lol....with all the fairy tales you post around here, if anyone would know about the Easter Bunny it'd be you. 

7

The Shop

3 Tres
Posts
386
Joined
4/2/2023
Location
Albany, OR US
8/17/2023 12:31pm
LoudLove wrote:

They went full RICO. You don’t go full RICO!

Yeah, no shit. They're going after Trump with the same act they enacted to take down the mob families with back in the day. Over the years since it was enacted, it's now become the justice departments preferred carte blanche of unconstitutional overreach. 

The crazy thing is we now have a straight up crime family in the white house, and the "big guys" administration is using it to try and take out a political opponent. No shortage of irony there.

4
11
8/18/2023 6:02am

Newt has now said (prefaced it with this is hear say, but from a very reliable source) there was a call on the previous Friday from the White House that they "have to issue the indictment on Monday to counteract the Hunter news". Which would explain the "leaked" indictment, and late night presser. Shocking right?

1
10
R66
Posts
1176
Joined
4/16/2021
Location
Atlanta, GA US
8/18/2023 6:48am

If I am not mistaken, Donald Trump has been indicted in 4 states. 
In Fulton county Ga, they released copies of the indictment before the grand jury convened. The case should be thrown out. In the Mar a Lago documents case, he was president and had the right to possess the documents just like all the presidents before him. The case should be thrown out. In the Jan.6 trial, loads of evidence has been destroyed by the prosecution. It is impossible to have fair trial without all the evidence. The case should be thrown out. I do not know about the alvin bragg case in NY. I am sure it is a sham too. 

3
14
philG
Posts
10831
Joined
5/12/2012
Location
GB
8/18/2023 11:45am
R66 wrote:
If I am not mistaken, Donald Trump has been indicted in 4 states.  In Fulton county Ga, they released copies of the indictment before the grand...

If I am not mistaken, Donald Trump has been indicted in 4 states. 
In Fulton county Ga, they released copies of the indictment before the grand jury convened. The case should be thrown out. In the Mar a Lago documents case, he was president and had the right to possess the documents just like all the presidents before him. The case should be thrown out. In the Jan.6 trial, loads of evidence has been destroyed by the prosecution. It is impossible to have fair trial without all the evidence. The case should be thrown out. I do not know about the alvin bragg case in NY. I am sure it is a sham too. 

If you cant see it for what it is now, you are never going to. 

Just remember which side of it you were on. 

And dont say you weren't told. 

1
13
indy_maico
Posts
5102
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Indianapolis, IN US
8/18/2023 11:54am
R66 wrote:
If I am not mistaken, Donald Trump has been indicted in 4 states.  In Fulton county Ga, they released copies of the indictment before the grand...

If I am not mistaken, Donald Trump has been indicted in 4 states. 
In Fulton county Ga, they released copies of the indictment before the grand jury convened. The case should be thrown out. In the Mar a Lago documents case, he was president and had the right to possess the documents just like all the presidents before him. The case should be thrown out. In the Jan.6 trial, loads of evidence has been destroyed by the prosecution. It is impossible to have fair trial without all the evidence. The case should be thrown out. I do not know about the alvin bragg case in NY. I am sure it is a sham too. 

Where did you get your law degree?

Trump University?

 

6
3
8/18/2023 6:32pm
R66 wrote:
If I am not mistaken, Donald Trump has been indicted in 4 states.  In Fulton county Ga, they released copies of the indictment before the grand...

If I am not mistaken, Donald Trump has been indicted in 4 states. 
In Fulton county Ga, they released copies of the indictment before the grand jury convened. The case should be thrown out. In the Mar a Lago documents case, he was president and had the right to possess the documents just like all the presidents before him. The case should be thrown out. In the Jan.6 trial, loads of evidence has been destroyed by the prosecution. It is impossible to have fair trial without all the evidence. The case should be thrown out. I do not know about the alvin bragg case in NY. I am sure it is a sham too. 

Your post is wishful thinking...

"In Fulton county Ga, they released copies of the indictment before the grand jury convened. The case should be thrown out."

A Draft copy of the indictment was posted before the Grand Jury voted, a Clerk stuffed up, the draft was not signed, so was not a official document. Lawyers could partition the court for the case to be dismissed only if the document contained information which may influence a jury. The actual indictment contained the same information so this argument is not valid.

Read the indictment...

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23909553/read-trump-indictment-in-fulton-county-georgia-probe.pdf

"In the Mar a Lago documents case, he was president and had the right to possess the documents just like all the presidents before him. The case should be thrown out."

He did not have a right to possess the documents, read the Presidential Records Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 22), Presidential records are the property of the United States...

image-20230819110245-1

Presidential Records are handed over to the Archivist at the end of a Presidents term...

image-20230819110439-2

Other Presidents have retained Presidential records, but have returned them when they became aware of their possession.

Trump was asked multiple times by the Archivist to return documents, including by subpoena, his lawyers certified there were no more documents, but more were found when the FBI used a search warrant to search Mar-A-Lago.

Read the indictment...

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23839647/govuscourtsflsd64865330.pdf

"In the Jan.6 trial, loads of evidence has been destroyed by the prosecution. It is impossible to have fair trial without all the evidence. The case should be thrown out."

Is this the evidence Trump was going to present on Monday?

Read the indictment...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/8a7503af-fde7-4061-818c-7d7e0ee06036.pdf

 

5
5
R66
Posts
1176
Joined
4/16/2021
Location
Atlanta, GA US
8/23/2023 7:00am
R66 wrote:
If I am not mistaken, Donald Trump has been indicted in 4 states.  In Fulton county Ga, they released copies of the indictment before the grand...

If I am not mistaken, Donald Trump has been indicted in 4 states. 
In Fulton county Ga, they released copies of the indictment before the grand jury convened. The case should be thrown out. In the Mar a Lago documents case, he was president and had the right to possess the documents just like all the presidents before him. The case should be thrown out. In the Jan.6 trial, loads of evidence has been destroyed by the prosecution. It is impossible to have fair trial without all the evidence. The case should be thrown out. I do not know about the alvin bragg case in NY. I am sure it is a sham too. 

Your post is wishful thinking... "In Fulton county Ga, they released copies of the indictment before the grand jury convened. The case should be thrown out."...

Your post is wishful thinking...

"In Fulton county Ga, they released copies of the indictment before the grand jury convened. The case should be thrown out."

A Draft copy of the indictment was posted before the Grand Jury voted, a Clerk stuffed up, the draft was not signed, so was not a official document. Lawyers could partition the court for the case to be dismissed only if the document contained information which may influence a jury. The actual indictment contained the same information so this argument is not valid.

Read the indictment...

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23909553/read-trump-indictment-in-fulton-county-georgia-probe.pdf

"In the Mar a Lago documents case, he was president and had the right to possess the documents just like all the presidents before him. The case should be thrown out."

He did not have a right to possess the documents, read the Presidential Records Act (44 U.S.C. Chapter 22), Presidential records are the property of the United States...

image-20230819110245-1

Presidential Records are handed over to the Archivist at the end of a Presidents term...

image-20230819110439-2

Other Presidents have retained Presidential records, but have returned them when they became aware of their possession.

Trump was asked multiple times by the Archivist to return documents, including by subpoena, his lawyers certified there were no more documents, but more were found when the FBI used a search warrant to search Mar-A-Lago.

Read the indictment...

https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23839647/govuscourtsflsd64865330.pdf

"In the Jan.6 trial, loads of evidence has been destroyed by the prosecution. It is impossible to have fair trial without all the evidence. The case should be thrown out."

Is this the evidence Trump was going to present on Monday?

Read the indictment...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/documents/8a7503af-fde7-4061-818c-7d7e0ee06036.pdf

 

What are you going to do when Trump wins the presidency? 

6
plowboy
Posts
14032
Joined
1/3/2010
Location
Norwich, KS US
8/23/2023 9:57am
R66 wrote:

What are you going to do when Trump wins the presidency? 

Hope that 4 years is enough time for EITHER party to find a decent human for the position.  Silly

1
1
inflammable
Posts
2219
Joined
10/2/2009
Location
Abilene, TX US
8/23/2023 10:32am

I'd say we need a string of very good leaders as President, but I get where you're coming from. 

Jimmy Carter was probably one of the most decent people we've ever had as President, but you don't hear him brought up as one of our country's great leaders. 

2
Magoofan
Posts
10401
Joined
5/4/2021
Location
Shadow Glen (for those who remember), CA US
8/23/2023 2:44pm

I just love Jenna Ellis...

Nice smile.

image-20230823144244-1

After her mugshot she took to Twitty: 

“'But I say unto you, love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them that despitefully use you and persecute you…' Matt 5:44,”

2
7
8/23/2023 3:18pm

Yadda yadda yadda...

ToolMaker wrote:

Yup, let's not listen to his actual words, let's hang him because of what you want to believe. Sounds about right.

LoudLove wrote:
TM, you previously noted that context matters. And I absolutely agree.  Trump’s language, when read in isolation, seem rather pedestrian. But the environment in which they...

TM, you previously noted that context matters. And I absolutely agree.  Trump’s language, when read in isolation, seem rather pedestrian. But the environment in which they were spoken made all the difference. 
 

Let’s be honest: opinions have been forged, and no Vital post or court decision will change them otherwise. Regardless, Trump is not the right person for the presidency. We need to coalesce as a nation, not drive the wedge deeper. A Trump-less campaign move us incrementally closer, but we all know there’s nothing keeping him out of the ring. 

I didn't see this earlier, sorry. Yes context matters. So one would have to admit that ANY time Trump made a public speech, there were 10s of thousands that attended. And I'm pretty sure, in not 1 speech did Trump advocate for violence or illegal acts. Even when Antifa was beating up his supporters as they left rallies. He talked about how Antifa should face justice. So now in this speech, again he states "peacefully" and the media pretends it's some super secret code. It's not it's consistent with every other speech. Do things legally.

3
5
APLMAN99
Posts
12147
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR US
Fantasy
8/23/2023 5:23pm
ToolMaker wrote:

Yup, let's not listen to his actual words, let's hang him because of what you want to believe. Sounds about right.

LoudLove wrote:
TM, you previously noted that context matters. And I absolutely agree.  Trump’s language, when read in isolation, seem rather pedestrian. But the environment in which they...

TM, you previously noted that context matters. And I absolutely agree.  Trump’s language, when read in isolation, seem rather pedestrian. But the environment in which they were spoken made all the difference. 
 

Let’s be honest: opinions have been forged, and no Vital post or court decision will change them otherwise. Regardless, Trump is not the right person for the presidency. We need to coalesce as a nation, not drive the wedge deeper. A Trump-less campaign move us incrementally closer, but we all know there’s nothing keeping him out of the ring. 

ToolMaker wrote:
I didn't see this earlier, sorry. Yes context matters. So one would have to admit that ANY time Trump made a public speech, there were 10s...

I didn't see this earlier, sorry. Yes context matters. So one would have to admit that ANY time Trump made a public speech, there were 10s of thousands that attended. And I'm pretty sure, in not 1 speech did Trump advocate for violence or illegal acts. Even when Antifa was beating up his supporters as they left rallies. He talked about how Antifa should face justice. So now in this speech, again he states "peacefully" and the media pretends it's some super secret code. It's not it's consistent with every other speech. Do things legally.

Just to be clear, I feel like you have been one of those that has said that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement. I could be wrong.
 

But it should be very easy to state that Obama never came close to encouraging such violence if you are claiming that Trump had zero violent intention’s from his words, correct?  

2
4
8/23/2023 5:29pm
LoudLove wrote:
TM, you previously noted that context matters. And I absolutely agree.  Trump’s language, when read in isolation, seem rather pedestrian. But the environment in which they...

TM, you previously noted that context matters. And I absolutely agree.  Trump’s language, when read in isolation, seem rather pedestrian. But the environment in which they were spoken made all the difference. 
 

Let’s be honest: opinions have been forged, and no Vital post or court decision will change them otherwise. Regardless, Trump is not the right person for the presidency. We need to coalesce as a nation, not drive the wedge deeper. A Trump-less campaign move us incrementally closer, but we all know there’s nothing keeping him out of the ring. 

ToolMaker wrote:
I didn't see this earlier, sorry. Yes context matters. So one would have to admit that ANY time Trump made a public speech, there were 10s...

I didn't see this earlier, sorry. Yes context matters. So one would have to admit that ANY time Trump made a public speech, there were 10s of thousands that attended. And I'm pretty sure, in not 1 speech did Trump advocate for violence or illegal acts. Even when Antifa was beating up his supporters as they left rallies. He talked about how Antifa should face justice. So now in this speech, again he states "peacefully" and the media pretends it's some super secret code. It's not it's consistent with every other speech. Do things legally.

APLMAN99 wrote:
Just to be clear, I feel like you have been one of those that has said that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement. I could be...

Just to be clear, I feel like you have been one of those that has said that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement. I could be wrong.
 

But it should be very easy to state that Obama never came close to encouraging such violence if you are claiming that Trump had zero violent intention’s from his words, correct?  

"Just to be clear, I feel like you have been one of those that has said that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement."

Truth be told, I have no recollection of that. If that happened, you'd have to show me and the context of the situation.

TM

1
APLMAN99
Posts
12147
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR US
Fantasy
8/23/2023 5:32pm
ToolMaker wrote:
I didn't see this earlier, sorry. Yes context matters. So one would have to admit that ANY time Trump made a public speech, there were 10s...

I didn't see this earlier, sorry. Yes context matters. So one would have to admit that ANY time Trump made a public speech, there were 10s of thousands that attended. And I'm pretty sure, in not 1 speech did Trump advocate for violence or illegal acts. Even when Antifa was beating up his supporters as they left rallies. He talked about how Antifa should face justice. So now in this speech, again he states "peacefully" and the media pretends it's some super secret code. It's not it's consistent with every other speech. Do things legally.

APLMAN99 wrote:
Just to be clear, I feel like you have been one of those that has said that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement. I could be...

Just to be clear, I feel like you have been one of those that has said that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement. I could be wrong.
 

But it should be very easy to state that Obama never came close to encouraging such violence if you are claiming that Trump had zero violent intention’s from his words, correct?  

ToolMaker wrote:
"Just to be clear, I feel like you have been one of those that has said that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement." Truth be told...

"Just to be clear, I feel like you have been one of those that has said that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement."

Truth be told, I have no recollection of that. If that happened, you'd have to show me and the context of the situation.

TM

Okay, could have confused it with someone else. But obviously you’d agree that anyone who claimed that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement would be bat shit crazy, right?  

😎

 

 

2
8/23/2023 6:00pm
APLMAN99 wrote:
Just to be clear, I feel like you have been one of those that has said that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement. I could be...

Just to be clear, I feel like you have been one of those that has said that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement. I could be wrong.
 

But it should be very easy to state that Obama never came close to encouraging such violence if you are claiming that Trump had zero violent intention’s from his words, correct?  

ToolMaker wrote:
"Just to be clear, I feel like you have been one of those that has said that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement." Truth be told...

"Just to be clear, I feel like you have been one of those that has said that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement."

Truth be told, I have no recollection of that. If that happened, you'd have to show me and the context of the situation.

TM

APLMAN99 wrote:
Okay, could have confused it with someone else. But obviously you’d agree that anyone who claimed that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement would be bat...

Okay, could have confused it with someone else. But obviously you’d agree that anyone who claimed that Obama encouraged violence against law enforcement would be bat shit crazy, right?  

😎

 

 

I'm unprepared to say either way. I have no recollection of it happening or not happening at this point. If you threw up an event with surrounding lead up why I might form an opinion? But as a blanket statement, I'll pass. And you might be right that it never happened, I'm just saying I have no recollection to make a blanket statement. 

TM

1
Yeti831
Posts
1348
Joined
1/30/2020
Location
UT US
8/23/2023 9:00pm
indy_maico wrote:

Can't wait to see the Orange Man's mugshot tomorrow, along with Rudy's.

Here's John Eastman from yesterday.

https://www.newsweek.com/john-eastman-mugshot-fulton-county-donald-trum…

 

Half the class photos have been posted...

Half the class photos have been posted...

image-20230824112615-1

Okay, I’m not gonna lie:

 

This has to be the most trailer park ass photos of politicians I’ve seen in a long time.

 

Except that gal in the lower right, that’s the Rodney D. look of, “Hey everybody, we’re all gettin’ laid.”

3
8/23/2023 9:14pm
indy_maico wrote:

Can't wait to see the Orange Man's mugshot tomorrow, along with Rudy's.

Here's John Eastman from yesterday.

https://www.newsweek.com/john-eastman-mugshot-fulton-county-donald-trum…

 

Half the class photos have been posted...

Half the class photos have been posted...

image-20230824112615-1

Yeti831 wrote:
Okay, I’m not gonna lie:   This has to be the most trailer park ass photos of politicians I’ve seen in a long time.   Except...

Okay, I’m not gonna lie:

 

This has to be the most trailer park ass photos of politicians I’ve seen in a long time.

 

Except that gal in the lower right, that’s the Rodney D. look of, “Hey everybody, we’re all gettin’ laid.”

From the look on Ray Smith's face he may have had the full medical examination!

1
G-man
Posts
8899
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ US
8/24/2023 12:12am

I Luv this picture....Laughing

Screenshot 20230811-165611 Facebook 0.jpg?VersionId=ojiLyL1Qipl4inn8cj0dKQTwik

6
8
Joey Bridges
Posts
9189
Joined
1/19/2022
Location
Kingston, TN US
8/24/2023 2:42am

These endless indictments are on the same path as the WSX fiasco.

 

11
whyZ
Posts
1158
Joined
4/15/2009
Location
Phoenix, AZ US
8/25/2023 10:24am

Derangement, the actual ailment identified in TDS.  Syndrome, a group of symptoms that occur together and characterize a particular abnormality or condition.  And what we're watching now couldn't better define this disorder.  Like an alcoholic or chronic drug user relapsing after numerous attempts to get the monkey off their back, it's hopeless.  And while all the other facets of their life are crumbling around them, they can't help themselves.  All they can talk about, all they can think about, all they want is more.  

Unfortunately, sufferers of TDS have become so entranced in this zombie like focus of an inconsequential victory, that the real purveyors of evil are slowly robbing them of their fortunes, and futures.  But it matters not, the economy, energy, crime, natural disasters must be set aside in order to put more emphasis on Trump.  Anything to get their next fix of TDS.   

2
11
G-man
Posts
8899
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ US
8/25/2023 12:37pm

I hate political talk in the first place but here's my opinion and I'm sure most of you will not agree.

It's not so much that I like Trump. yes I know he's an obnoxious, loud mouth asshole.

But the Country was running much smoother and everything was much cheaper especially stuff like gas and groceries.

I understand if you do not like him but can you honestly look in the mirror and say you're perfectly happy with the way Sleepy Joe who can barely talk is running the country? He's a total embarrassment to the USA stumbling around when he walks and barely coherent in his speeches. He's one foot away from a Dementia home! 

If you like him and vote him in again then you must like getting ass raped at the gas pump and buying groceries....

FB IMG 1692913692644

10
13
G-man
Posts
8899
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Mesa, AZ US
8/25/2023 2:34pm Edited Date/Time 8/26/2023 12:49am

Here's for the 5 Biden Luvers that downvoted.....Laughing

Edit: make that 10+. 🙄🤣

 

 

4
12
8/25/2023 7:02pm
G-man wrote:
I hate political talk in the first place but here's my opinion and I'm sure most of you will not agree. It's not so much that...

I hate political talk in the first place but here's my opinion and I'm sure most of you will not agree.

It's not so much that I like Trump. yes I know he's an obnoxious, loud mouth asshole.

But the Country was running much smoother and everything was much cheaper especially stuff like gas and groceries.

I understand if you do not like him but can you honestly look in the mirror and say you're perfectly happy with the way Sleepy Joe who can barely talk is running the country? He's a total embarrassment to the USA stumbling around when he walks and barely coherent in his speeches. He's one foot away from a Dementia home! 

If you like him and vote him in again then you must like getting ass raped at the gas pump and buying groceries....

FB IMG 1692913692644

"He's a total embarrassment to the USA"

US Allies don't see Biden as an embarrassment, he is seen as a stabilizing influence, unlike his predecessor.

The US's global political power and it's economic prosperity comes from it's influence with it's Allies, Britain was the previous world power, it's global political power and it's economic prosperity declined when it lost it's empire.

 

1
8

Post a reply to: Trump indicted in Georgia

The Latest