A New America

308 wrote:

What happened to the thread? Oh well. Ya'll better start eating healthy. [embed][/embed] This man with a lint roller is a legend 😂 pic.twitter.com/hqqLpzkZuh— Clown...

What happened to the thread?

Oh well. Ya'll better start eating healthy.

This man with a lint roller is a legend 😂 pic.twitter.com/hqqLpzkZuh

— Clown World ™ 🤡 (@ClownWorld_) October 20, 2022

One of the saddest videos you'll ever watch. pic.twitter.com/MIZMEugVRb

— Catch Up (@CatchUpNetwork) October 20, 2022

Same energy pic.twitter.com/WKsiZWwBzX

— Sam Parker 🇺🇲 (@SamParkerSenate) October 20, 2022

Meanwhile in NYC pic.twitter.com/uwk7kH2HKI

— Joel Fischer 🇺🇸 (@realJoelFischer) October 23, 2022

#Chicago shooting that left 5 people shot, 3 fatally.
pic.twitter.com/xGPcKybQp6

— The Daily Sneed™ (@Tr00peRR) October 24, 2022

People who wonder why Latinos are turning against Democrats might consider that, across California, working-class neighborhoods have been over-run with prostitution, drugs & gun violence since @GavinNewsom banned police from arresting sex workers in the name of transgender rights pic.twitter.com/7NWu0JE1QM

— Michael Shellenberger (@ShellenbergerMD) October 21, 2022

.@GovKathyHochul’s New York: pic.twitter.com/ZdSjTDxhSS

— Libs of TikTok (@libsoftiktok) October 23, 2022

TeamGreen wrote:

Ah, yes, the far left's agenda in America.

See you in November!

Bill_Carroll wrote:

Pretty Obvious what we are seeing, A person that can't speak on a debate. But he wins?!? John Fetterman is yet another puppet organized by the...

Pretty Obvious what we are seeing, A person that can't speak on a debate.
But he wins?!?
John Fetterman is yet another puppet organized by the left to hold a seat in the Senate.
And thats their best bet???!!..LOL.

And for what reason? It surely isn't for the "People".
I'd guess for an agenda to destroy the Constitutional rights amongst Americans.

Prove me wrong. The whole state is Red but eight counties.
Guess which Counties?

Bill_Carroll wrote:

Pretty Obvious what we are seeing, A person that can't speak on a debate. But he wins?!? John Fetterman is yet another puppet organized by the...

Pretty Obvious what we are seeing, A person that can't speak on a debate.
But he wins?!?
John Fetterman is yet another puppet organized by the left to hold a seat in the Senate.
And thats their best bet???!!..LOL.

And for what reason? It surely isn't for the "People".
I'd guess for an agenda to destroy the Constitutional rights amongst Americans.

Prove me wrong. The whole state is Red but eight counties.
Guess which Counties?

Bill_Carroll wrote:

Pretty Obvious what we are seeing, A person that can't speak on a debate. But he wins?!? John Fetterman is yet another puppet organized by the...

Pretty Obvious what we are seeing, A person that can't speak on a debate.
But he wins?!?
John Fetterman is yet another puppet organized by the left to hold a seat in the Senate.
And thats their best bet???!!..LOL.

And for what reason? It surely isn't for the "People".
I'd guess for an agenda to destroy the Constitutional rights amongst Americans.

Prove me wrong. The whole state is Red but eight counties.
Guess which Counties?

JAFO92 wrote:

There are no 'Blue States'. Not hardly any 'Blue Counties'. There are blue CITIES. Just shade any USA map in its entirety by county and see...

There are no 'Blue States'. Not hardly any 'Blue Counties'. There are blue CITIES. Just shade any USA map in its entirety by county and see the facts. Highly populated, dense urban cities chock fulla people who dont own anything and they vote for a living. Completely detached from what regular, tax paying, law abiding, hard working Americans are living day to day. They have no stake in the game other that getting. They were born and raised completely detached from hard times and are 21st Century, 1st World spoiled brats. They spend the vast majority of their waking hours staring at some kind of screen somewhere, large or small, their brains literally being trained/programmed, via dopamine, by whatever 'hip' or 'cool' talking head that is parroting some pop-culture blather through whatever is the cool new 'App Dejour' loaded with brain-dead 'Social Influencers' telling them how to think and how to act. No different than lab rats pushing the bar for a crack dose. Dopamine hits. Literally rewiring their brains. They are easily programmed and that is how we get AOCs and the newly minted hoody wearing Slingblade doppelganger. Mmm-hmm.

Keep your head on a swivel and your powder dry folks, its gonna get much worse before it gets better.

Titan1 wrote:

Nailed it! If there was ever an argument for an extremely limited federal government it’s a map of red counties and blue counties…this entire country, except...

Nailed it!

If there was ever an argument for an extremely limited federal government it’s a map of red counties and blue counties…this entire country, except for large cities, is red….but those large cities largely control the federal government…urban americas want/need different things from their government than the rest of America…yet those urban areas control a federal government with in has far to much control on rural America.

Time to start drastically limiting the size, scope, and influence of the federal government in our lives…the states should have far more control and influence than they do….it’s the only way to prevent some spoiled, screen addicted, brat in New York City from having control over what a rural farmer in Wyoming does….

Titan1 wrote:

Nailed it! If there was ever an argument for an extremely limited federal government it’s a map of red counties and blue counties…this entire country, except...

Nailed it!

If there was ever an argument for an extremely limited federal government it’s a map of red counties and blue counties…this entire country, except for large cities, is red….but those large cities largely control the federal government…urban americas want/need different things from their government than the rest of America…yet those urban areas control a federal government with in has far to much control on rural America.

Time to start drastically limiting the size, scope, and influence of the federal government in our lives…the states should have far more control and influence than they do….it’s the only way to prevent some spoiled, screen addicted, brat in New York City from having control over what a rural farmer in Wyoming does….

early wrote:

What specific federal government policies do you (or rural America in general) have the biggest problems with?

Bill_Carroll wrote:

Pretty Obvious what we are seeing, A person that can't speak on a debate. But he wins?!? John Fetterman is yet another puppet organized by the...

Pretty Obvious what we are seeing, A person that can't speak on a debate.
But he wins?!?
John Fetterman is yet another puppet organized by the left to hold a seat in the Senate.
And thats their best bet???!!..LOL.

And for what reason? It surely isn't for the "People".
I'd guess for an agenda to destroy the Constitutional rights amongst Americans.

Prove me wrong. The whole state is Red but eight counties.
Guess which Counties?

JAFO92 wrote:

There are no 'Blue States'. Not hardly any 'Blue Counties'. There are blue CITIES. Just shade any USA map in its entirety by county and see...

There are no 'Blue States'. Not hardly any 'Blue Counties'. There are blue CITIES. Just shade any USA map in its entirety by county and see the facts. Highly populated, dense urban cities chock fulla people who dont own anything and they vote for a living. Completely detached from what regular, tax paying, law abiding, hard working Americans are living day to day. They have no stake in the game other that getting. They were born and raised completely detached from hard times and are 21st Century, 1st World spoiled brats. They spend the vast majority of their waking hours staring at some kind of screen somewhere, large or small, their brains literally being trained/programmed, via dopamine, by whatever 'hip' or 'cool' talking head that is parroting some pop-culture blather through whatever is the cool new 'App Dejour' loaded with brain-dead 'Social Influencers' telling them how to think and how to act. No different than lab rats pushing the bar for a crack dose. Dopamine hits. Literally rewiring their brains. They are easily programmed and that is how we get AOCs and the newly minted hoody wearing Slingblade doppelganger. Mmm-hmm.

Keep your head on a swivel and your powder dry folks, its gonna get much worse before it gets better.

Titan1 wrote:

Nailed it! If there was ever an argument for an extremely limited federal government it’s a map of red counties and blue counties…this entire country, except...

Nailed it!

If there was ever an argument for an extremely limited federal government it’s a map of red counties and blue counties…this entire country, except for large cities, is red….but those large cities largely control the federal government…urban americas want/need different things from their government than the rest of America…yet those urban areas control a federal government with in has far to much control on rural America.

Time to start drastically limiting the size, scope, and influence of the federal government in our lives…the states should have far more control and influence than they do….it’s the only way to prevent some spoiled, screen addicted, brat in New York City from having control over what a rural farmer in Wyoming does….

ns503 wrote:

The puppet on the left defeated the puppet on the right. That proves diddly. Except, maybe, that all the people in the middle, and maybe finally...

The puppet on the left defeated the puppet on the right.

That proves diddly.

Except, maybe, that all the people in the middle, and maybe finally some on the right, have a growing distaste for the guy still pull strings on the right. Who, coincidentally (or maybe not), also ran the biggest assault in the Constitution in modern times.

JAFO92 wrote:

There are no 'Blue States'. Not hardly any 'Blue Counties'. There are blue CITIES. Just shade any USA map in its entirety by county and see...

There are no 'Blue States'. Not hardly any 'Blue Counties'. There are blue CITIES. Just shade any USA map in its entirety by county and see the facts. Highly populated, dense urban cities chock fulla people who dont own anything and they vote for a living. Completely detached from what regular, tax paying, law abiding, hard working Americans are living day to day. They have no stake in the game other that getting. They were born and raised completely detached from hard times and are 21st Century, 1st World spoiled brats. They spend the vast majority of their waking hours staring at some kind of screen somewhere, large or small, their brains literally being trained/programmed, via dopamine, by whatever 'hip' or 'cool' talking head that is parroting some pop-culture blather through whatever is the cool new 'App Dejour' loaded with brain-dead 'Social Influencers' telling them how to think and how to act. No different than lab rats pushing the bar for a crack dose. Dopamine hits. Literally rewiring their brains. They are easily programmed and that is how we get AOCs and the newly minted hoody wearing Slingblade doppelganger. Mmm-hmm.

Keep your head on a swivel and your powder dry folks, its gonna get much worse before it gets better.

Titan1 wrote:

Nailed it! If there was ever an argument for an extremely limited federal government it’s a map of red counties and blue counties…this entire country, except...

Nailed it!

If there was ever an argument for an extremely limited federal government it’s a map of red counties and blue counties…this entire country, except for large cities, is red….but those large cities largely control the federal government…urban americas want/need different things from their government than the rest of America…yet those urban areas control a federal government with in has far to much control on rural America.

Time to start drastically limiting the size, scope, and influence of the federal government in our lives…the states should have far more control and influence than they do….it’s the only way to prevent some spoiled, screen addicted, brat in New York City from having control over what a rural farmer in Wyoming does….

APLMAN99 wrote:

You understand that those vast amounts of ‘red counties’ simply represent far less people, correct? Those maps really are meaningless because our country isn’t designed to...

You understand that those vast amounts of ‘red counties’ simply represent far less people, correct? Those maps really are meaningless because our country isn’t designed to ‘vote by the acre’.

However, thanks to the way that the Senate is designed the the spoiled, screen addicted person from Wyoming already has more power over the rural farmer in New York than vice versa.

Titan1 wrote:

Most all federal taxes, social programs, creating massive national monuments, ObamaCare, pretty much the far left agenda, and a lot of the right wing agenda…read the...

Most all federal taxes, social programs, creating massive national monuments, ObamaCare, pretty much the far left agenda, and a lot of the right wing agenda…read the 10th amendment…the federal government has drastically overstepped. I wish the Supreme Court would hand more and more federal programs and laws and regulations down to the states (like they did abortion).

Titan1 wrote:

Most all federal taxes, social programs, creating massive national monuments, ObamaCare, pretty much the far left agenda, and a lot of the right wing agenda…read the...

Most all federal taxes, social programs, creating massive national monuments, ObamaCare, pretty much the far left agenda, and a lot of the right wing agenda…read the 10th amendment…the federal government has drastically overstepped. I wish the Supreme Court would hand more and more federal programs and laws and regulations down to the states (like they did abortion).

early wrote:

I think that facilitating smooth intestate and international commerce is one of the most important jobs of the federal government, look at the shit show Brexit...

I think that facilitating smooth intestate and international commerce is one of the most important jobs of the federal government, look at the shit show Brexit has caused.

I think that maintaining a relatively healthy populace is beneficial to society.

I think that the model of tying medical care to your job is broken when many jobs especially low paying do not provide that option.

I think that establishing and maintaining public land is one of the best uses of government.

Theres a real question of how much assistance to give to the old and the poor. The thing is that the less assistance you provide to those people doesn't make the problem go away, it just moves the problem to other burden bearers.

Titan1 wrote:

Most all federal taxes, social programs, creating massive national monuments, ObamaCare, pretty much the far left agenda, and a lot of the right wing agenda…read the...

Most all federal taxes, social programs, creating massive national monuments, ObamaCare, pretty much the far left agenda, and a lot of the right wing agenda…read the 10th amendment…the federal government has drastically overstepped. I wish the Supreme Court would hand more and more federal programs and laws and regulations down to the states (like they did abortion).

early wrote:

I think that facilitating smooth intestate and international commerce is one of the most important jobs of the federal government, look at the shit show Brexit...

I think that facilitating smooth intestate and international commerce is one of the most important jobs of the federal government, look at the shit show Brexit has caused.

I think that maintaining a relatively healthy populace is beneficial to society.

I think that the model of tying medical care to your job is broken when many jobs especially low paying do not provide that option.

I think that establishing and maintaining public land is one of the best uses of government.

Theres a real question of how much assistance to give to the old and the poor. The thing is that the less assistance you provide to those people doesn't make the problem go away, it just moves the problem to other burden bearers.

JAFO92 wrote:

There are no 'Blue States'. Not hardly any 'Blue Counties'. There are blue CITIES. Just shade any USA map in its entirety by county and see...

There are no 'Blue States'. Not hardly any 'Blue Counties'. There are blue CITIES. Just shade any USA map in its entirety by county and see the facts. Highly populated, dense urban cities chock fulla people who dont own anything and they vote for a living. Completely detached from what regular, tax paying, law abiding, hard working Americans are living day to day. They have no stake in the game other that getting. They were born and raised completely detached from hard times and are 21st Century, 1st World spoiled brats. They spend the vast majority of their waking hours staring at some kind of screen somewhere, large or small, their brains literally being trained/programmed, via dopamine, by whatever 'hip' or 'cool' talking head that is parroting some pop-culture blather through whatever is the cool new 'App Dejour' loaded with brain-dead 'Social Influencers' telling them how to think and how to act. No different than lab rats pushing the bar for a crack dose. Dopamine hits. Literally rewiring their brains. They are easily programmed and that is how we get AOCs and the newly minted hoody wearing Slingblade doppelganger. Mmm-hmm.

Keep your head on a swivel and your powder dry folks, its gonna get much worse before it gets better.

Titan1 wrote:

Nailed it! If there was ever an argument for an extremely limited federal government it’s a map of red counties and blue counties…this entire country, except...

Nailed it!

If there was ever an argument for an extremely limited federal government it’s a map of red counties and blue counties…this entire country, except for large cities, is red….but those large cities largely control the federal government…urban americas want/need different things from their government than the rest of America…yet those urban areas control a federal government with in has far to much control on rural America.

Time to start drastically limiting the size, scope, and influence of the federal government in our lives…the states should have far more control and influence than they do….it’s the only way to prevent some spoiled, screen addicted, brat in New York City from having control over what a rural farmer in Wyoming does….

APLMAN99 wrote:

You understand that those vast amounts of ‘red counties’ simply represent far less people, correct? Those maps really are meaningless because our country isn’t designed to...

You understand that those vast amounts of ‘red counties’ simply represent far less people, correct? Those maps really are meaningless because our country isn’t designed to ‘vote by the acre’.

However, thanks to the way that the Senate is designed the the spoiled, screen addicted person from Wyoming already has more power over the rural farmer in New York than vice versa.

Titan1 wrote:

Most all federal taxes, social programs, creating massive national monuments, ObamaCare, pretty much the far left agenda, and a lot of the right wing agenda…read the...

Most all federal taxes, social programs, creating massive national monuments, ObamaCare, pretty much the far left agenda, and a lot of the right wing agenda…read the 10th amendment…the federal government has drastically overstepped. I wish the Supreme Court would hand more and more federal programs and laws and regulations down to the states (like they did abortion).

early wrote:

I think that facilitating smooth intestate and international commerce is one of the most important jobs of the federal government, look at the shit show Brexit...

I think that facilitating smooth intestate and international commerce is one of the most important jobs of the federal government, look at the shit show Brexit has caused.

I think that maintaining a relatively healthy populace is beneficial to society.

I think that the model of tying medical care to your job is broken when many jobs especially low paying do not provide that option.

I think that establishing and maintaining public land is one of the best uses of government.

Theres a real question of how much assistance to give to the old and the poor. The thing is that the less assistance you provide to those people doesn't make the problem go away, it just moves the problem to other burden bearers.

Titan1 wrote:

The need/benefit/value of each of those can be debated…but to assume the federal government will be better, and more efficient at those things than the states...

The need/benefit/value of each of those can be debated…but to assume the federal government will be better, and more efficient at those things than the states could be, based on the performance of the federal government at pretty much anything but war, is a bit off the mark in my opinion.

Titan1 wrote:

Nailed it! If there was ever an argument for an extremely limited federal government it’s a map of red counties and blue counties…this entire country, except...

Nailed it!

If there was ever an argument for an extremely limited federal government it’s a map of red counties and blue counties…this entire country, except for large cities, is red….but those large cities largely control the federal government…urban americas want/need different things from their government than the rest of America…yet those urban areas control a federal government with in has far to much control on rural America.

Time to start drastically limiting the size, scope, and influence of the federal government in our lives…the states should have far more control and influence than they do….it’s the only way to prevent some spoiled, screen addicted, brat in New York City from having control over what a rural farmer in Wyoming does….

APLMAN99 wrote:

You understand that those vast amounts of ‘red counties’ simply represent far less people, correct? Those maps really are meaningless because our country isn’t designed to...

You understand that those vast amounts of ‘red counties’ simply represent far less people, correct? Those maps really are meaningless because our country isn’t designed to ‘vote by the acre’.

However, thanks to the way that the Senate is designed the the spoiled, screen addicted person from Wyoming already has more power over the rural farmer in New York than vice versa.

Titan1 wrote:

The point is that a rural American in Wyoming needs and wants different things from government than the urban American in New York….so reducing the size...

The point is that a rural American in Wyoming needs and wants different things from government than the urban American in New York….so reducing the size, scope, influence, and power of the federal government and delegating more power to the states is the best way to do that.

The urban Americans get their way in America because, as you said, there are more of them…and that does a disservice to rural Americans.

Trying to govern a diverse America with a blanket approach from the federal level is part of the problem…more power to the states, and a smaller less powerful and intrusive federal government solves a lot of problems.

APLMAN99 wrote:

You understand that those vast amounts of ‘red counties’ simply represent far less people, correct? Those maps really are meaningless because our country isn’t designed to...

You understand that those vast amounts of ‘red counties’ simply represent far less people, correct? Those maps really are meaningless because our country isn’t designed to ‘vote by the acre’.

However, thanks to the way that the Senate is designed the the spoiled, screen addicted person from Wyoming already has more power over the rural farmer in New York than vice versa.

Titan1 wrote:

The point is that a rural American in Wyoming needs and wants different things from government than the urban American in New York….so reducing the size...

The point is that a rural American in Wyoming needs and wants different things from government than the urban American in New York….so reducing the size, scope, influence, and power of the federal government and delegating more power to the states is the best way to do that.

The urban Americans get their way in America because, as you said, there are more of them…and that does a disservice to rural Americans.

Trying to govern a diverse America with a blanket approach from the federal level is part of the problem…more power to the states, and a smaller less powerful and intrusive federal government solves a lot of problems.

APLMAN99 wrote:

What things does an urban American from New York vote on that directly affects a rural American from Wyoming? Currently, that rural American from Wyoming already...

What things does an urban American from New York vote on that directly affects a rural American from Wyoming?

Currently, that rural American from Wyoming already has a greater voice in the federal government because of the static makeup of the Senate.

What specifically does the guy from NY do that hurts the guy in Wyoming? I mean that coming from a rural, farming area.

ns503 wrote:

The puppet on the left defeated the puppet on the right. That proves diddly. Except, maybe, that all the people in the middle, and maybe finally...

The puppet on the left defeated the puppet on the right.

That proves diddly.

Except, maybe, that all the people in the middle, and maybe finally some on the right, have a growing distaste for the guy still pull strings on the right. Who, coincidentally (or maybe not), also ran the biggest assault in the Constitution in modern times.

freeh wrote:

Please provide one example of Trump "assaulting the constitution". Everything democrats feared from Trump, none of which ended up happening of course, was then enacted or...

Please provide one example of Trump "assaulting the constitution". Everything democrats feared from Trump, none of which ended up happening of course, was then enacted or conducted by biden. Democrat hypocrisy knows no bounds.

Titan1 wrote:

I’m not about to go down your hair splitting rabbit hole again…I’ve done that too many times with you already… But I will say the most...

I’m not about to go down your hair splitting rabbit hole again…I’ve done that too many times with you already…

But I will say the most top of mind one for me….Some senator from New York keeps sponsoring a Wilderness bill that would designate 40% of the public land in utah as a wilderness area (that’s a landmass the size of Massachusetts and Connecticut combines). Wilderness areas are the most restrictive land designation…No machines allowed (not just motors, no machines-no bicycles), no human structures….It is opposed by the entire Utah congressional delegation, the extreme majority of Utahans…so the environmental group (SUWA) goes across the country to find someone that will sponsor it….and outside of just being entirely unnecessary, the bill limits rural Americans access to jobs, and recreation….and they are the mercy of voters on the other side of the country who will most likely never see it, and whose lives will never be affected by it one way or the other. Why? To much federal power.

JAFO92 wrote:

There are no 'Blue States'. Not hardly any 'Blue Counties'. There are blue CITIES. Just shade any USA map in its entirety by county and see...

There are no 'Blue States'. Not hardly any 'Blue Counties'. There are blue CITIES. Just shade any USA map in its entirety by county and see the facts. Highly populated, dense urban cities chock fulla people who dont own anything and they vote for a living. Completely detached from what regular, tax paying, law abiding, hard working Americans are living day to day. They have no stake in the game other that getting. They were born and raised completely detached from hard times and are 21st Century, 1st World spoiled brats. They spend the vast majority of their waking hours staring at some kind of screen somewhere, large or small, their brains literally being trained/programmed, via dopamine, by whatever 'hip' or 'cool' talking head that is parroting some pop-culture blather through whatever is the cool new 'App Dejour' loaded with brain-dead 'Social Influencers' telling them how to think and how to act. No different than lab rats pushing the bar for a crack dose. Dopamine hits. Literally rewiring their brains. They are easily programmed and that is how we get AOCs and the newly minted hoody wearing Slingblade doppelganger. Mmm-hmm.

Keep your head on a swivel and your powder dry folks, its gonna get much worse before it gets better.

ns503 wrote:

The puppet on the left defeated the puppet on the right. That proves diddly. Except, maybe, that all the people in the middle, and maybe finally...

The puppet on the left defeated the puppet on the right.

That proves diddly.

Except, maybe, that all the people in the middle, and maybe finally some on the right, have a growing distaste for the guy still pull strings on the right. Who, coincidentally (or maybe not), also ran the biggest assault in the Constitution in modern times.

freeh wrote:

Please provide one example of Trump "assaulting the constitution". Everything democrats feared from Trump, none of which ended up happening of course, was then enacted or...

Please provide one example of Trump "assaulting the constitution". Everything democrats feared from Trump, none of which ended up happening of course, was then enacted or conducted by biden. Democrat hypocrisy knows no bounds.

ns503 wrote:

Well, there was that time he rallied his supporters to storm the Capitol and stop the peaceful transfer of power. They were even trying to find...

Well, there was that time he rallied his supporters to storm the Capitol and stop the peaceful transfer of power. They were even trying to find the VP so they could hang him. 'Stop the steal' was the biggest rallying cry against the Constitution yet.

freeh wrote:

Please provide one example of Trump "assaulting the constitution". Everything democrats feared from Trump, none of which ended up happening of course, was then enacted or...

Please provide one example of Trump "assaulting the constitution". Everything democrats feared from Trump, none of which ended up happening of course, was then enacted or conducted by biden. Democrat hypocrisy knows no bounds.

ns503 wrote:

Well, there was that time he rallied his supporters to storm the Capitol and stop the peaceful transfer of power. They were even trying to find...

Well, there was that time he rallied his supporters to storm the Capitol and stop the peaceful transfer of power. They were even trying to find the VP so they could hang him. 'Stop the steal' was the biggest rallying cry against the Constitution yet.

freeh wrote:

Damn, if only there could have been a formal proceeding to ultimately bring charges against someone who would do such a thing. Wait, there were proceedings...

Damn, if only there could have been a formal proceeding to ultimately bring charges against someone who would do such a thing. Wait, there were proceedings and nothing happened to Trump, because the proceedings actually vindicated him. Got anything else? Yeah, didn't think so. Try focusing on your own country's wannabe authoritarian for a change.

ns503 wrote:

Well, there was that time he rallied his supporters to storm the Capitol and stop the peaceful transfer of power. They were even trying to find...

Well, there was that time he rallied his supporters to storm the Capitol and stop the peaceful transfer of power. They were even trying to find the VP so they could hang him. 'Stop the steal' was the biggest rallying cry against the Constitution yet.

freeh wrote:

Damn, if only there could have been a formal proceeding to ultimately bring charges against someone who would do such a thing. Wait, there were proceedings...

Damn, if only there could have been a formal proceeding to ultimately bring charges against someone who would do such a thing. Wait, there were proceedings and nothing happened to Trump, because the proceedings actually vindicated him. Got anything else? Yeah, didn't think so. Try focusing on your own country's wannabe authoritarian for a change.

swordfish wrote:

We got it all under control up here😂
https://www.ctvnews.ca/entertainment/justin-trudeau-to-appear-on-canada…

Titan1 wrote:

I’m not about to go down your hair splitting rabbit hole again…I’ve done that too many times with you already… But I will say the most...

I’m not about to go down your hair splitting rabbit hole again…I’ve done that too many times with you already…

But I will say the most top of mind one for me….Some senator from New York keeps sponsoring a Wilderness bill that would designate 40% of the public land in utah as a wilderness area (that’s a landmass the size of Massachusetts and Connecticut combines). Wilderness areas are the most restrictive land designation…No machines allowed (not just motors, no machines-no bicycles), no human structures….It is opposed by the entire Utah congressional delegation, the extreme majority of Utahans…so the environmental group (SUWA) goes across the country to find someone that will sponsor it….and outside of just being entirely unnecessary, the bill limits rural Americans access to jobs, and recreation….and they are the mercy of voters on the other side of the country who will most likely never see it, and whose lives will never be affected by it one way or the other. Why? To much federal power.

freeh wrote:

Please provide one example of Trump "assaulting the constitution". Everything democrats feared from Trump, none of which ended up happening of course, was then enacted or...

Please provide one example of Trump "assaulting the constitution". Everything democrats feared from Trump, none of which ended up happening of course, was then enacted or conducted by biden. Democrat hypocrisy knows no bounds.

ns503 wrote:

Well, there was that time he rallied his supporters to storm the Capitol and stop the peaceful transfer of power. They were even trying to find...

Well, there was that time he rallied his supporters to storm the Capitol and stop the peaceful transfer of power. They were even trying to find the VP so they could hang him. 'Stop the steal' was the biggest rallying cry against the Constitution yet.

freeh wrote:

Damn, if only there could have been a formal proceeding to ultimately bring charges against someone who would do such a thing. Wait, there were proceedings...

Damn, if only there could have been a formal proceeding to ultimately bring charges against someone who would do such a thing. Wait, there were proceedings and nothing happened to Trump, because the proceedings actually vindicated him. Got anything else? Yeah, didn't think so. Try focusing on your own country's wannabe authoritarian for a change.