Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
Is it , that there is not enough land to feed the world's population a healthy diet?
I think I showed you how
Is it, that people groups haven't adjusted to their environments?
Who cares, I don't. but some folks have lived on Islands for millennia without much red met, but a lot of them were cannibals so maybe they found a way I think my example of Japanese and Scandinavians holds water. If you have an issue try to refute it. Singapore, and Iceland are considered on the healthiest countries as well
is it that we are not under a system of artificial scarcity?
Because I think we are and my main reason in this thread
Is it, that you believe every person in the world should eat a red meat diet?
I think the vast majority of the world would if they could, just go look at the "Home Cooking" thread and most is red meat mixed with various other animal proteins, or the supermarket and menus prices. When it comes to dogs, every person I know who competes at a high level use a raw diet of various meats, but red meat along with tripe, bones and more cartilage than you think possible is what they feed them. If you fed a competitive dog kibble it would get blown out of the water. I don't even disagree with you, but people in India (which is a lot) aren't going to need a red meat diet and what is optimal and what is doable are not the same.
Help me out so we can move on
The point of Bison is primarily their efficiency and particularly their ability to thrive in the large amounts of the unused land in the world. Bison can live wherever cows do but cows can't live on much of the land where Bison can The north plains is where these animals thrive. The same places that are unused for general public purpose minus oil, minerals etc
Asians have been eating soy for thousands of years, their bodies are more adapted to use it. perhaps that explains less disparity of the sexes. That doesn't mean it is better for them than a red met diet it simply means it has bee used and will continue to be used by a huge portion of the population. (not important to this discussion)
Same as chicken in India. Regardless of what North Americans are eating Asia will eat soy and India will not eat beef. Maybe we can get them into Bison I am not sure how that would work with their faith though.
Japanese diet is what are talking about not their sustainability. For 1000's of years people have lived in Japan all eating a similar, very good diet. They are an Island and don't have the ability to raise much grazing animals, they do make sure the beef they do have is the is the best. It is a delicacy. Islands are not comparable to North America and Siberia. The time frame it would take for North America to get where Japan is population density / resource wise is light years different. Even the land they do have much of it is Mountains.
South of the border will continue to predominately eat beans and rice regardless of what else is available in North America and Siberia, because that is the diet they are accustomed to. Again it doesn't mean it is their optimal diet just that they can handle that diet better than most and regardless will continue to maintain it.
Now don't get hung up on soy and beans and rice. They may not be ideal food sources but they are a major food source and will continue to be regardless. You take Asia, India, South of the Border that is a huge portion of the world's population that wouldn't necessarily need to eat the bison. As long as they have soy, beans and rice and various other protein sources like those gerbils they eat in S America and all the stuff in Asia they will be happy. Put some camels in Australia and the deserts of South America and then those areas have a significant red meat source suited for their environments.
So if there are 10's of millions of Bison in North America and Siberia, probably Mongolia too, Camels in Australia, South America, what are we missing? Africa, once we have bison and camels everywhere they can export resources and import the food they can not produce.
The only thing we need is the ability to use the land which is controlled by the stinking rich they keep to maintain false scarcity.
Again all of this would be a huge undertaking but still less than what it would take to get the world population down to what the stinking rich want.
1. John Malone
2. Emmerson Family [Up 76,500 Acres]
3. Reed Family [Up 291,000 Acres]
4. Ted Turner
5. Stan Kroenke
6. Irving Family [Up 19,912 Acres]
7. Peter Buck
8. Brad Kelley
9. Singleton Family
10. King Ranch Inc.
11. Pingree Heirs
12. Wilks Brothers
13. Briscoe Family [Up 46,000 Acres]
14. Lykes Heirs
15. Ford Family
16. O’Connor Heirs
17. Thomas Peterffy
18. Stimson Family
19. Martin Family
20. Westervelt Heirs
21. Don Horton
22. Simplot Family
23. Fisher Family
24. Philip Anschutz
25. Jeff Bezos
26. Holding Family
27. Hughes Family
28. Cullen Heirs
29. Shannon Kizer [Up 78,000 Acres]
30. Zane & Tanya Kiehne [Up 12,362 Acres]
31. Stefan Soloviev [Up 15,006 Acres]
32. Robinson & Freed [Up 13,841 Acres]
33. Collins Family
34. Mike Smith
35. Barta Family
36. Bass Family
37. Llano Partners
38. Fasken Family
39. Benjy Griffith III [Up 149,000 Acres]
40. Collier Family
41. Kokernot Heirs
42. Killam Family
43. Babbitt Heirs
43. Jones Family [Up 20,000 Acres]
43. Lee Family
43. Anne Marion
47. Malone Mitchell 3rd [Down 63,000 Acres]
48. True Family
49. Bill & Melinda Gates [NEW TO LR100]
50. Galt Family
51. D.K. Boyd [Down 648 Acres]
52. Lyda Family
53. Hadley Family
54. T.R. Miller Family [Up 40,510 Acres]
55. Reynolds Family
56. Sanders Family
57. Coffee Family
58. Riggs Family
59. Koch Family
60. Kenedy Memorial Foundation
61. Louis Bacon
62. Brophy Family
63. Bidegain Family
64. Yates Family
65. Cassidy Heirs
66. Scott Family
67. Kennedy Family
68. Eugene Gabrych
69. Bridwell Heirs [Up 37,785 Acres]
70. Hearst Family
71. East Foundation [Up 570 Acres]
72. Gage Heirs
73. Russell Gordy
74. Cunningham Sheep Co.
75. Bobby Patton & Mark Walter [New to LR100]
76. Cocanougher Family
77. Anthony Family
77. Hunt Family
77. Langdale Family
77. Holland M. Ware Charitable Foundation
81. Stewart & Lynda Resnick
82. Skiles Family
83. Nunley Family
84. Offutt Family
85. Brask Family [New to LR100]
86. Williams Family
87. Durrett Family
88. Haynes Family
89. Mike Mechenbeir
90. JA Ranch Heirs [Up 13,485 Acres]
91. Broadbent Family
91. Irwin Heirs
93. The Jones Girls [Up 3,000 Acres]
94. Sugg Family
95. McDonald Family
96. Reese Family
97. Codgell Family
98. Fanjul Family
99. Iberlin Family [New to LR100]
100. Ellison Family
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
• Land area: 2.2 million acres
• Roughly equal to: Half the size of Lake Ontario
John Malone is the largest private landowner in the United States. Malone made his fortune as a media tycoon, building the company Tele-Communications, Inc, or TCI, and acting as its CEO before selling it to AT&T for $50 billion in 1999. Malone's 2.2 million acres are largely located in Maine, New Mexico, Colorado, and Wyoming and include profitable cattle ranches.
2. Ted Turner
• Land area: 2.0 million acres
• Roughly equal to: Twice as large as Rhode Island
CNN founder Ted Turner owns 2 million acres of land largely in New Mexico, South Dakota, Nebraska, and Georgia. Much of Turner's land is used as grazing land for over 50,000 head of buffalo – the largest private herd of bison in the world.
3. Emmerson family
• Land area: 2.0 million acres
• Roughly equal to: A third of the size of New Hampshire
The Emmerson family owns and operates Sierra Pacific Industries, a company that logs usable lumber after forest fires and sells it to lumber retailers. Through Sierra Pacific, the family owns some 2 million acres in California and Washington.
4. Reed family
• Land area: 1.7 million acres
• Roughly equal to: Half the size of Connecticut
For five generations, the Reed Family has owned and operated the logging company Green Diamond Resource Co. The family's 1.7 million acres of land are primarily spread across Washington, Oregon, and California.
5. Stan Kroenke
• Land area: 1.4 million acres
• Roughly equal to: The size of Prince Edward Island
Real estate mogul and owner of the Los Angeles Rams, Stan Kroenke, owns 1.4 million acres of land in the United States, including a 124,000 acre ranch in Montana and additional land in Wyoming. Kroenke is married to Ann Walkton Kroenke, an heiress to the Wal-Mart fortune.
ill Gates, the fourth richest person in the world and a self-described nerd who is known for his early programming skills rather than his love of the outdoors, has been quietly snatching up 242,000 acres of farmland across the U.S. — enough to make him the top private farmland owner in America.
After years of reports that he was purchasing agricultural land in places like Florida and Washington, The Land Report revealed that Gates, who has a net worth of nearly $121 billion according to Forbes, has built up a massive farmland portfolio spanning 18 states. His largest holdings are in Louisiana (69,071 acres), Arkansas (47,927 acres) and Nebraska (20,588 acres). Additionally, he has a stake in 25,750 acres of transitional land on the west side of Phoenix, Arizona, which is being developed as a new suburb.
According to The Land Report’s research, the land is held directly and through third-party entities by Cascade Investments, Gates’ personal investment vehicle. Cascade’s other investments include food-safety company Ecolab, used-car retailer Vroom and Canadian National Railway.
nearly 30 million acres of U.S. farmland are held by foreign investors. That number has doubled in the past two decades, which is raising alarm bells in farming communities.
https://www.npr.org/2019/05/27/723501793/american-soil-is-increasingly-…
For those who are into this idea of depopulating the world it is important to understand
Their goal is a return to Feudalism and most Westerners will not fit into their plans
https://www.cia.gov/library/abbottabad-compound/FC/FC2F5371043C48FDD95A…
I am pleased & honored to present this book to those in the world who love the truth. This is a book for lovers of the Truth. This is a book for those who are already familiar with my past writings. An Illuminati Grand Master once said that the world is a stage and we are all actors. Of course this was not an original thought, but it certainly is a way of describing the Illuminati view of how the world works.
Chapter 1: THE ASTOR FAMILY
Chapter 2 The Bundy Bloodline
Chapter 3 THE COLLINS BLOODLINE
Chapter 4 THE DuPONTS
Chapter 5 The Freeman Bloodline
Chapter 6 THE KENNEDY FAMILY
Chapter 7 The Li Family
Chapter 8 THE ONASSIS BLOODLINE
Chapter 9 The Rockefeller Bloodline
Chapter 10 The Rothschild Bloodline
Chapter 11 The Russell Bloodline
Chapter 12 THE VAN DUYN BLOODLINE
Chapter 13 The Merovingian Bloodline
Chapter 14 The Disney Bloodline
Chapter 15 The Reynolds Bloodline
Chapter 15 McDonald Family
Chapter 16 THE KRUPPS
When my brother bought his Bison, first day they broke through his fence, ran down the hill and wound up at the local high school. This was in the upscale hills of the East Bay Area. I believe they had to kill one or two on the spot. After several months of it, his wife made him butcher all of them.
My argument is that it is more practical, ethical and less of an undertakingl than depopulating the world to the levels the stinking rich want. They are talking about eliminating billions of people, how do we suppose they are going to do it? What would that look like?
Jabroni is the one that insists everyone has to eat a predominately red meat diet. That makes replacing beef even far more impractical because currently the vast majority of the people in the world do not eat red meat or have no access to it. That is a tangent.
All I'm saying is,
We don't have to worry about providing the peoples who are not currently eating a red meat diet (which is a huge portion of the world's population) we will leave their diet for them to figure out themselves.
As far as scarcity goes. There were, nearly as many bison in N America before colonization as there are cattle today. Imagine what that was like. North America are the Bison's natural habitat, not cattle's. This incredible red meat food source was intentionally eliminated for the purpose of displacing the Native population. (displacement is always one of there primary tactics)
This is important, because what I am proposing as a solution is a return to what nature had already accomplished. Couple that with other types wild game and our red meat supply in North America will be more than adequate and we would be able to export massive amounts. Canada would be best served by this. They could have more red meat than they know what to do with, but choose not to. Ostrich, Emu and game like that are also a prospective meat source and I don't know what their nutrients are , but they look and taste like red meat.
Date Number of Bison
< 1800 60 million
1830 40 million
1840 35,650,000
1870 5,500,000
1880 395,000
1889 541
1900 300
1944-47 5,000
2016 400,000
The main advantage of Bison besides health, is their independence and especially the environments they can thrive in where cows can't.
ie artificial scarcity, displacement etc "eat your plant based burger, and like it"
It’s definitely intellectually dishonest to infer that the content’s veracity is enhanced by being part of the documents catalogued by the CIA
Pit Row
The URL address alone explains why it is there.
The fact that you attempted to infer that it was something that the CIA “believes” is extremely dishonest at best.
Don’t even try to say that you weren’t inferring that because it was catalogued by the CIA it was legitimate info.
Should I stop citing the info I post? I link every thing I take info from.
It is a book that is for sale on Amazon. https://www.amazon.com/Bloodlines-Illuminati-Fritz-Springmeier/dp/09727…
It isn't a report or even resembling a report. It is a freaking book
This was made available to the public on their website in November 2017. It wasn't released earlier with some of the other documents, I wonder why? There's your inference
But yeah , you are right, I didn't even bother to look why it was there, because I wasn't inferring any credibility.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-32816412
Stop denying your obvious inference. At least be honest in your arguments.
You are just looking to discredit me because you don't like what I have to say , ever. You obviously down vote almost every post I make. You have a weird complex
You can't deal with the info so you try to discredit my citations
I’m definitely guilty of that.
And I hate liars.
You are accusing me of being a liar because I didn't research why something was on a website
You are projecting that I would infer that because I cited a document on the CIA website that makes it accurate and credible
You are the liar
I have no idea when or why this was posted but it is your entire schtick
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/ad%20hominem
ad hominem adjective
appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect
an ad hominem argument
:marked by or being an attack on an opponent's character rather than by an answer to the contentions made
made an ad hominem personal attack on his rival
Post a reply to: Club of Rome limits of growth