Posts
196
Joined
2/24/2008
Location
Lutz, FL
US
Anyone else think he was more than a little lucky to win this years MX1 title?? After watching the SMX Cup it got me thinking, I've followed the mxgp's all year and hes had more than his fair share of big crashes at a lot of races, and was lucky to survive serious injury from more than a couple of them. Also basically every other single, serious competitor for the title this year ended up leaving the series at some point prematurely with an injury. So he basically won this years title through attrition, he wasnt the fastest or best but the rider to be able to make it to the end of the championship. Also Take into consideration last year the same exact thing, he only won the mx2 title because of Herlings injury and you have to wonder how good really is this very young kid? Does he actually deserve these 2 championships and the status and reputation that goes along with them?? Will he be great or has he literally almost lucked into those 2 titles through others misfortunes?? Not saying he isn't good, but 2 titles already good idk? Flame away vital community...
This years MXGP title was legit though, he was the fastest and most dominant rider. Yeah he had a few big moments were he could have been injured but he managed to stay healthy. Almost all riders have one or two big ones per season.
There I summed up your thread for those who dont want to read all that.
The Shop
Free shipping: VITALMX
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Perhaps all his bad luck came out at the SMX...
Early in the season Febvre was suffering from bad starts more than anything and Cairoli was definitely still recuperating with his arm.
It's not taking anything away from Gasjer, he got it done, but his main comp wasn't there all year either. Part and parcel of MX.
Pit Row
The only two names who were capable of taking this championship were Cairoli and Febvre. Gasjer beat them straight up more often than not. How big was his points lead over Febvre before he got hurt?
(Yes Gajser was as dominate as Roczen in alot of races this year)
http://results.mxgp.com/mxgp/standings.aspx
Edit: well you cant link the standings, but Gajser lead with 482, febvre with 408, cairoli with 405, Nagl 378,
Everyone was racing round 11. Febvre got injured that race.
Febvre for example always had to work from the back while gajser was already gone. That goes with more risks and (possible) crashes. For sure Gajser had some wild crashes, but most of the time he would holeshot or he made 5 moves in 2 laps to get to the lead.
Dungey crashed this year in the Nationals (prior to that KR was kicking his backside, like TG was)...does that mean KR doesnt deserve his title either? No it doesnt.
you need this:
I think that he has the raw speed to win in the states in mx, and sx with some training. He flat out rips and has amazing style on a bike - reminds me of Kenny.
I know there has been and will always be this talk that rider X won a championship because rider Z got hurt or whatnot. Reed and Dungey come to mind as guys that have heard many times that they only won when RC, Stewart or RV were hurt. There will always be someone hurt, but it's a part of the sport. You have to be in it to win it.
Post a reply to: Tim Gajser??