Chad Sanner's side of the story

Xeno
Posts
3740
Joined
12/30/2010
Location
San Clemente, CA, USA
1/7/2016 7:25am
Mechanics are, "in most cases is a glorified pressure washer".

That's not very nice.

JBlain619
Posts
1847
Joined
6/10/2010
Location
Severna Park, MD, USA
1/7/2016 7:29am
BSmooth13 wrote:
I won't dispute the argument that they mechanics wouldn't be where they are now, that was kind of what I was saying - that fact was...
I won't dispute the argument that they mechanics wouldn't be where they are now, that was kind of what I was saying - that fact was apparent to me from the first story. I was more speaking to how he felt the need to point that out on a couple of occasions, and say "they wouldn't be there if it weren't for me," which while true, just comes off as odd IMO.

However, I would disagree with you calling the first story a "mess." Furthermore, as the head of RacerX, I would think that DC would love if every article got as much buzz/discussion as the Eleven10th Hour story did. From what was said after the fact, it seems Chad was upset with Steve and unwilling to go through him for the story, and I wouldn't be surprised if Chad agreed to it with stipulation that DC was the interviewer. That last bit is pure speculation, but regardless, I'm not sure how the original story was a "mess," I think it was just a compelling story.

Again, just my thoughts...
Has nothing to do with "what was said after the fact." Sanner and Matthes do not like each other. Let's just say there was a text from Matthes to Sanner that said he would ruin Chad and Eleven 10. Essentially thats what the first article attempted to do.
1/7/2016 7:33am
I'm slightly confused. Could you explain a little more please?
Nate don't even waste your time with people who don't understand what they're reading...
It is a waste of time isn't it. Hmmm...
BSmooth13
Posts
796
Joined
1/31/2015
Location
Knoxville, TN, USA
1/7/2016 7:50am
JBlain619 wrote:
Has nothing to do with "what was said after the fact." Sanner and Matthes do not like each other. Let's just say there was a text...
Has nothing to do with "what was said after the fact." Sanner and Matthes do not like each other. Let's just say there was a text from Matthes to Sanner that said he would ruin Chad and Eleven 10. Essentially thats what the first article attempted to do.
I think the dislike between those two was/is apparent, for whatever the reasons may be. If that text is true, it definitely puts a different spin on things that what I gathered from the article and what Steve said publicly, but that's some inside info I'm not privy to. I can see your side of it having been told about that text, though.

The Shop

newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
1/7/2016 7:52am
BSmooth13 wrote:
I won't dispute the argument that they mechanics wouldn't be where they are now, that was kind of what I was saying - that fact was...
I won't dispute the argument that they mechanics wouldn't be where they are now, that was kind of what I was saying - that fact was apparent to me from the first story. I was more speaking to how he felt the need to point that out on a couple of occasions, and say "they wouldn't be there if it weren't for me," which while true, just comes off as odd IMO.

However, I would disagree with you calling the first story a "mess." Furthermore, as the head of RacerX, I would think that DC would love if every article got as much buzz/discussion as the Eleven10th Hour story did. From what was said after the fact, it seems Chad was upset with Steve and unwilling to go through him for the story, and I wouldn't be surprised if Chad agreed to it with stipulation that DC was the interviewer. That last bit is pure speculation, but regardless, I'm not sure how the original story was a "mess," I think it was just a compelling story.

Again, just my thoughts...
JBlain619 wrote:
Has nothing to do with "what was said after the fact." Sanner and Matthes do not like each other. Let's just say there was a text...
Has nothing to do with "what was said after the fact." Sanner and Matthes do not like each other. Let's just say there was a text from Matthes to Sanner that said he would ruin Chad and Eleven 10. Essentially thats what the first article attempted to do.
Let's just say there was a text from Matthes to Sanner that said he would ruin Chad and Eleven 10

mb60
Posts
5666
Joined
3/7/2010
Location
GRAPEVINE, TX, USA
1/7/2016 7:57am
Xeno wrote:
Mechanics are, "in most cases is a glorified pressure washer".

That's not very nice.

Try working with one that can barely change handlebars. LOL
D_L118
Posts
489
Joined
7/3/2008
Location
Ghent, BE
1/7/2016 8:14am
Nice read.I was hoping to read something about the Yamaha support the team had.Why that didn't work out, etc,..
MT MX
Posts
1551
Joined
3/5/2011
Location
Great Falls, MT, USA
1/7/2016 8:45am
So, does anyone know who the 'sponsor' was that wasn't paying up for Nicoletti?
Great read.
Xeno
Posts
3740
Joined
12/30/2010
Location
San Clemente, CA, USA
1/7/2016 8:51am
mb60 wrote:
Try working with one that can barely change handlebars. LOL
The bike will still work if the handlebars are backwards. Get over it Silly
peelout
Posts
18390
Joined
1/6/2011
Location
Ogden, UT, USA
1/7/2016 9:01am
i will say that having gone back and reading the first story again, the Matthes piece, there sure was a lot of finger pointing and trash talking from the guys about Sanner so to speak. it almost comes off as a disgruntled employee with a medium to put the employer down.

like Hvaughn said, not sure how i feel having read both sides but i do think the DC/Sanner piece came across a lot more like a civil explanation of the lack of money but the over-abundance of TRY.
DC
Posts
3889
Joined
5/1/2009
Location
Morgantown, WV, USA
1/7/2016 9:10am Edited Date/Time 1/8/2016 8:19am
Gang, I did the interview with Chad because Steve could not get hold of him to do the original story, and when it came out we decided he should at least have his say in the matters. He did not ask for me to do it, I asked him. I have known since he was racing 80s in District 5, he lives twenty minutes away and it was a lot easier for me to do it that Steve or Chase or EJ or anyone else. I still write a whole bunch of stories, both online and in the mag, and enjoy doing interview with people who have compelling stories, for better or for worse.

Matthes' original story Eleven-10ths was excellent, but it didn't have Chad's voice, and he deserved a chance to explain what he went through, just like the riders ad mechanics. He still has a deep passion for motocross, he just doesn't have the money to run a team at the level he tried to.

DC

DC
Posts
3889
Joined
5/1/2009
Location
Morgantown, WV, USA
1/7/2016 9:14am
DL wrote:
To compete against the factories on the level Chad has done is nearly impossible. He did it and better than any other aftermarket company and for that I give him big respect. As for the day to day drama they all endured all I can say is they got it done, most of the time. Great story!
It's kinda nice to see one of his direct competitors show such huge respect.

Nice, indeed.

Agreed. Don would know better than anyone. Thanks for chipping in and see you Saturday at the Big A.

DC
526
Posts
1731
Joined
5/4/2009
Location
Colgate, WI, USA
1/7/2016 9:16am
BSmooth13 wrote:
Interesting read, though a little "puffed up" IMO. Regardless, always nice and fair to hear both sides of a story, though I'm not sure the original...
Interesting read, though a little "puffed up" IMO. Regardless, always nice and fair to hear both sides of a story, though I'm not sure the original article set out to create a 2-sided argument/story that required a response...but nevertheless, good read.

One thing that stuck out to me, beyond what some of you have already mentioned, were the comments along the lines of "...if it weren't for me, those guys wouldn't be where they are" - especially when speaking about the mechanics. It seems clear that this was the thing that displeased him about the original article. I'm not necessarily suggesting it is an incorrect statement, just comes off a bit petty and self-aggrandising. I guess he gets some satisfaction in making it known that he is responsible for those guys having the careers they do (at least in large part), but I think that was already pretty obvious - that's how careers work, the person who gives you your first "big-break" into any profession always is an important factor in your future successes. Maybe it was just me, but those types of comments definitely jumped off the page.

Anyhow, just my thoughts, but again a good read.
These are the same guys that didn't check the oil in the box van ultimately expiring the engine correct?

"We had to hurry up and get back to Pennsylvania from that race, but the box van blew up because going to the races the mechanics never checked the oil or whatever, and that just added a pile of stress for us going to St. Louis. Stuff just started coming unwound already"
Matthes
Posts
2755
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
1/7/2016 9:35am Edited Date/Time 1/7/2016 10:04am
JBlain619 wrote:
Has nothing to do with "what was said after the fact." Sanner and Matthes do not like each other. Let's just say there was a text...
Has nothing to do with "what was said after the fact." Sanner and Matthes do not like each other. Let's just say there was a text from Matthes to Sanner that said he would ruin Chad and Eleven 10. Essentially thats what the first article attempted to do.
This is not true. Whoever you got this info from is lying. Is Chad even still doing motors?

I contacted Chad to be in the story (to be fair he wasn't going to be featured in it as much as the four guys but I needed some words from him) and he never got back to me. Told DC he thought I didn't like him...which I'm not sure where that came from.

It was a good move by Chad to not get back to me as DC gave him a two-part interview which was great for him. Phil's pissed because he lied about Phil's sponsor but that's between them.

The story came about because Alex, Phil, Billy and Nate had things happen to them at 11-10 that has never happened to any other team in the sport and they all never quit. I can't think of a team that just didn't show up at two to three races, blew up the number of bikes they did and lived on this tightrope.

They worked hard despite numerous obstacles, low pay, no pay in some cases and they're all at the factory level in this sport. Good for them for sticking it out. I've been there a bit with sleeping on an office building floor on an air mattress, living out of a box van, etc, etc and I wanted to capture what these guys had to do. I'm impressed with all of them...many other people would have quit.

I fact checked all the stories with all four guys, they never wavered, they never made anything up and as a matter of fact, I left out some things that were a bit gnarly because I didn't want the story to go there

yak651
Posts
8881
Joined
8/26/2006
Location
Appleton, WI, USA
Fantasy
1/7/2016 10:00am
Did anyone in this mess have a contract? Did Phil have one to say 11-10 would give him "X" amount of cash or "X" amount of bikes? Did Chad have any contracts from sponsors to get anything? If all everyone did was say "yeah, I'll race your bike" or "I'll give you a bike to race", well no surprise if peoples expectations were higher than what they received in return.
1/8/2016 12:30am Edited Date/Time 1/8/2016 12:57am
DC wrote:
Gang, I did the interview with Chad because Steve could not get hold of him to do the original story, and when it came out we...
Gang, I did the interview with Chad because Steve could not get hold of him to do the original story, and when it came out we decided he should at least have his say in the matters. He did not ask for me to do it, I asked him. I have known since he was racing 80s in District 5, he lives twenty minutes away and it was a lot easier for me to do it that Steve or Chase or EJ or anyone else. I still write a whole bunch of stories, both online and in the mag, and enjoy doing interview with people who have compelling stories, for better or for worse.

Matthes' original story Eleven-10ths was excellent, but it didn't have Chad's voice, and he deserved a chance to explain what he went through, just like the riders ad mechanics. He still has a deep passion for motocross, he just doesn't have the money to run a team at the level he tried to.

DC

Let's be real, you asked Sanner to do it because you know as well as I do that the original interview was pretty irresponsible.

I think the world of you DC. As a person & businessman. So I have no business critiquing you in any way. I have a lot of respect for you. I simply dont agree with your assertion that Matthes' article was "excellent" journalism.

1. Any time a journalist has a agenda, he's no longer a journalist. Had anyone else been assigned to do the original Eleven10 Mods story (a great story that fans surely wanted to know) it wouldve came across completely different. That speaks volumes. If Sanner & Matthes have issues, Steve shouldve been the LAST person to write that story.

That doesnt mean the interviewee's couldnt have been as candid about their thoughts as they were, but Sanner needed the chance to bring context and the interviewee's deserved a chance to reflect on what they didnt know about what he was going thru WITH them.

I dont blame the riders in the interview that didnt understand what was going on. And Sanner even gave them the benefit of the doubt on this in his interview with you which was mature on his part. Just as Peelout says, the first interview came across as "disgruntled employees" bitter they were only given a place to sleep on someone's floor and "just a slice of pizza a day to eat". These employees had no idea what Sanner was experiencing and trying to protect them from and that was exploited in the first article on this matter. A actual journalist doesnt just exploit this without getting all sides of the story first.

2. The only thing unusual about the Eleven10 saga is the fact that this little team somehow was battling and taking it to the big boys. But the drama of budget issues, trouble making it to the races, and unfulfilled promises is NOTHING new in this industry for even well funded teams. In fact, you and I both know that there have been much worse stories of poorly run teams.

There have been a lot of shitty team owners and/or team managers to come and go in this sport. Sanner isnt one of them. Not even close. That guy poured his heart into a racing project and it went belly up - again, not a new story to tell. Sanner was guilty of trying to put on a smiling face to his team/riders in the midst of unbearable stress. And the fact that he never tried to let on about what he was dealing with behind the scenes is something I applaud him for. He comes across as a genuine dude who cared a lot about his riders and tried (and failed) to insulate them from the stress he was under. Some teams dont even try, Ive seen well funded team owners or managers actually create the unnecessary drama and sabotage their own program.

The Eleven10 Mods story isnt some cautionary tale. It's a very cool story. The reasons it's unique are positive ones, and the reasons it went sour arent unique. Had anyone else done the original interview the story still couldve been told, and at the same time fences couldve been mended. I for one wouldve loved to hear Phil & Alex's responses to the context your interview with Sanner brought.

Chad Sanner is one of the good guys this sport has seen. Thanks for making that interview with him happen. And please dont take my commentary the wrong way. It's probably not even necessary on my part considering if you didnt feel somewhat the same way, you wouldnt have stepped in to "clean up the mess".



On a more positive note: Im still waiting for you to do your "tell all" behind the scenes story of FREZNO SMOOTH. And if you could somehow dig up a original directors cut of that film we'd all be better off for it. But I demand that you do the story yourself. Youre as good a story teller as there is and the Frezno Smooth story deserves only the best writing it.
BSmooth13
Posts
796
Joined
1/31/2015
Location
Knoxville, TN, USA
1/8/2016 5:59am
There is a lot in your post that presents a perspective on the topic that differs from mine, but in the interest of keeping this from becoming the usual Vital pissing match, I'm just picking this small one:

Jabroni wrote:


I for one wouldve loved to hear Phil & Alex's responses to the context your interview with Sanner brought.


I don't think the Sanner interview brought any new context which wasn't already assumed, at least not to me. Don't get me wrong, it was a good read and nice to see he had to opportunity to have his voice included within the greater narrative, but there wasn't anything that made me say "Wow, I had no clue that was going on!" It was obvious that the team worked on no budget, that he cared greatly about the guys on his team, and that he put everything he had into it. After reading the original story and knowing the minimal amount about Eleven10, those things and the other similar comments from Chad were already part of the equation.

You are obviously entitled to your opinion and perspective, and seemingly have an inside connection to the story that - by definition - I can't identify with. That being said, while there are certainly great things that have happened to the riders/mechanics involved with Eleven10 which are directly attributable to the efforts of Chad Sanner, that doesn't remove the possibility of him being at fault for at least some of the odd things that took place over those years.

As you said to DC, don't take my comments the wrong way. I am not trying to start a hissy fight, just want to present a different perspective that the one you hold.

Matthes wrote:


...response...


Thanks for chiming in Steve, was hoping you would address that claim and give a little more insight.
Renner153
Posts
1648
Joined
12/10/2008
Location
Mulberry, FL, USA
1/8/2016 6:26am
After reading Sanners side of the story, to me, it just seemed like he was trying to clean up his name from what the riders/mechanics said. Having known one or two of those guys back then, and hearing the stories they would tell me at that time and then reading it again as if the story was wrote the same day is crazy. I personally dont think Sanner is a bad guy. Actually, he hooked me up with one of their race tuned maps for my bike because I knew one of the guys that were on the team. It would have been a way better read if Sanner was part of the original story instead of trying to clean up his name. How would it have looked if he came back at the riders/mechanics and trashed them? He had no choice but to come off and say the things he said in the way he said it. I personally think this whole ELEVEN-10 story is great. It's definitely not your everyday MX/SX story.

JBlain619: Nate Alexander did not get a factory team only because of ELEVEN-10. Nate would be in a factory rig with or without ELEVEN-10. Sure the team may (or may not) have helped him get to the next level. But to say they are only there because of ELEVEN-10 is stupid. He was just picked up off the streets by Sanner and taught how to turn a wrench. He had been working on other teams (mainly arenacross) long before he ended up on ELEVEN-10.
newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
1/8/2016 6:52am Edited Date/Time 1/8/2016 6:53am
Now that we've read all about the little team that could, and couldn't, how about some of the high rollers who shit on teams and vendors when they made their escape? In like a lion, out like a lamb.
ktm212
Posts
608
Joined
11/30/2009
Location
Lafayette, NJ, USA
1/8/2016 7:11am Edited Date/Time 1/8/2016 7:15am
Having dealt with Chad on the business side of things, and being long time friends with half of the guys from the first interview, as well as working in a shop and knowing how the industry works I have mixed feelings about these articles. First off, Chad isn't a bad guy, he's absolutely incredible on a motor bench and in the dyno room and after talking to him for 5 minutes you realize he has more knowledge and know-how than 95% of the guys in the business but he also has terrible business ethics and ZERO time management skills. He's a guy you always want to pull for but in the back of your mind you know its not going anywhere. I definitely felt his interview was just him doing damage control from the first story because I've never talked to Chad where he can put together full ideas in a string like he did, it was pretty obvious to me that he was just trying to cover his bases because I know 98% of the stuff from the Nicoletti, Martin, Mechanics interview was very true and very real. Also it's kind of a bummer about how he kind of bullshitted Phil's sponsor, who has been backing Phil for years and years and is the reason Phil is where he is today. You will see some of his sponsors stickers on the JGR bikes at A1 just like they have been on every team bike Phil has ever been apart of. 11-10 was always the underdog and most of the racing world pulled for them and you could see the passion and all that on their sleeves at the races. Either way I love the story and there's that old saying there's two sides to every story and then there's the truth and I definitely felt this story will leave people with mixed emotions and not knowing what to believe. I dont know if there's a story between mathes and sanner, but I cant fault Mathes because getting a hold of Sanner is like trying to ride a bicycle on a tight rope with a blindfold over a pit of frustration and disconnected phone numbers. I like the way Mathes did the interview and I felt that it was very candid and told some great stories and just what it was like to be part of the team, I've gotten many of the stories first hand; and I applaud DC for actually getting a hold of Chad for his side because it was the responsible thing to do and we got that side of things as well but it was definitely skewed in my opinion.
GrapeApe
Posts
8931
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX, USA
1/8/2016 8:53am
I don't get why people think you have to pick one side or the other? Sanner sounds like a technical genius capable of making race bikes that are competitive with or even better than factory bikes. He also sounds like a personal train wreck with absolutely no business acumen. The riders want to ride the bikes that could potentially give them the exposure they need to get picked up by a team, but that comes at a price which is no team structure. I didn't read Matthes's piece as a personal attack on Sanner, just stories about the struggles of a very unique team.
Matthes
Posts
2755
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
1/8/2016 9:15am
I think some people that are obviously biased are taking their story as "my" story. It's not, nowhere in there am I quoted or offering up an opinion. I just arranged the words to make sense and cut some out for clarity purposes. As to why I did it, read my response above. Judging by the great response by people, it was an interesting read and something that was enjoyed. Not that me posting this is going to change some peoples minds.

It's those four guys telling a sometimes unbelievable story of their time at 11-10. All backed up by the other three. Chad had a chance to respond and be in the story and he chose not to for whatever reason.
diesellands
Posts
14
Joined
3/22/2015
Location
Vandergrift, PA, USA
1/8/2016 9:41am
The the people who think it was an "attack" on 11/10 trying to shut the shop down or what have you... You can't shut down a shop that's already pretty much closed. If you walked around the pits at any east coast national and took a survey, I'd say 9 out of 10 guys that have delt with the shop will have some bad story to tell you (not getting parts back/bikes blowing up on the stand at idle/etc). Chad isn't a bad person, but he has bad business practices that have left a lot of people in bad spots. I personally think that the original story was to let some fans of the sport hear about the craziness behind the scenes and show how the riders and mechs never give up. For a lot of people, you see these riders, these "teams" out on the track and think "man these guys have it made". The truth is that if there are 70 entry's to an outdoor race, 52+ of them are paying their own entry fees, buying fuel in the pits the morning of the race, hoping to qualify for the motos just to cover the fuel to get to the race. It's not all glitz and glam and the story was to show that. With that being said, don't post your assumptions online where people who know nothing will believe you like they were in the situation themselves. There's a reason why they have gates and fences around the pro pits and you never hear the real story - this thread is showing us why
1/8/2016 9:47am
GrapeApe wrote:
I don't get why people think you have to pick one side or the other? Sanner sounds like a technical genius capable of making race bikes...
I don't get why people think you have to pick one side or the other? Sanner sounds like a technical genius capable of making race bikes that are competitive with or even better than factory bikes. He also sounds like a personal train wreck with absolutely no business acumen. The riders want to ride the bikes that could potentially give them the exposure they need to get picked up by a team, but that comes at a price which is no team structure. I didn't read Matthes's piece as a personal attack on Sanner, just stories about the struggles of a very unique team.
Yeah, exactly this, GrapeApe.

It's great that Chad had a heart and wanted to help these kids out. But once you say you're going to do something you have to do it. No one in business should be working during the week so they could barely go racing on the weekend. No one should drive across country and be promised a hotel room only to sleep in the foyer of the hotel. No rider should ever show up to the races to find out the bike didn't make it. Again.

If Phil's sponsor really didn't come through, then he should have parked Phil and not skimped on Alex. It would have been a breach of contract (if what he says is true and assuming he had a contract). But in the same way, he didn't come through for his team because he didn't provide the promised resources. Period.

It's nice that he has a heart but that's no way to run a business and it sounds like customers got burned for all this too. I feel for him but the original story stands and it doesn't matter if the riders and mechanics didn't know about his struggles. The riders were training and the mechanics were wrenching: only one party didn't live up to their end of the deal.

No doubt the dude could build some wicked 250s when they were spinning, though.

I realize Phil contests that his sponsor balked, but if we're accepting such excuses for business deals then maybe they had some hardships too that Sanner should accept as legitimate.
1/8/2016 1:23pm
I think if you put all these posts together with the stories in a pot and mixed them together you'd end up with reality. If there's any screen writers out there, I'm seeing the makings of a good script that would be sure to finally knock "Winners take all" off the top spot of moto movies.
NOTE: Bit of tongue in cheek in the last bit.

Post a reply to: Chad Sanner's side of the story

The Latest