Oh just another SX points idea

RJMX834
Posts
378
Joined
1/17/2014
Location
Marietta, OH, USA
Edited Date/Time 8/25/2015 2:04pm
So i was thinking. Some of these ideas are coming from some of the guys on here from previous threads, some entirely new. What if we would leave the main events points system alone. Keep the points per position as they are because I don't have a problem with that. BUT for extra motive and to make main events more interesting, have the second timed practice reward points. Maybe for the top 3 qualifying spots in practice. 1st- 3pts, 2nd- 2 pts, 3rd-1 point. A lot of times riders that may have a mechanical, off night or just a crash can lesson the damage if they might have the fastest time practice. For example, Pourcel.
Moving on to the main events. Keep the points the same. I do believe they have the best points system possible for rewarding the riders for positions. But we often see guys like RV, dungey or Stewart in the past run away with a title with 4 races left and sometimes even have it under control by round 10. What if they changed the gate picks around? The guys that make the main have the gate pick according to the points standings. So 1st in points would start far outside then so on and so fourth. The last few guys (thinking privateers here) that may not be in the standings yet have them line up according to practice times. This will have the top guys battling and trying to make moves to still get the points. Also this may get some privateers and other riders some TV time and publicity. This would only be used for the 450 class not the 250s. I know this is gonna get some criticism but oh well. I also know having the guys line up on the gate as my idea entails, might be a risk for injury for the top guys. But the sport is in general. Just thinking or another way to make SX more interesting and not be over by round 12 or 13. Thoughts?
|
kkawboy14
Posts
11486
Joined
6/5/2015
Location
USA
8/24/2015 7:04pm
Sounds good!
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
8/24/2015 7:05pm
#herewegoagain

If there is a new points system (and I did hear that the gang at Feld had done some polling with teams about a new system), I'm guessing they'll have run through various scenarios to examine how it'd potentially work.

While I'm not a huge fan of the idea, I am for something that keeps interest up throughout the season. Good racing does that. Injury-free seasons do that. But very often we get individual riders who are dominant throughout a season.

This might also encourage riders who'd sit out the bulk of the season (or not come back before the end) to come back.

If we're going to see something? I'd guess we'll hear all about it at the Monster Energy Cup.
RJMX834
Posts
378
Joined
1/17/2014
Location
Marietta, OH, USA
8/24/2015 7:15pm
GuyB wrote:
#herewegoagain If there is a new points system (and I did hear that the gang at Feld had done some polling with teams about a new...
#herewegoagain

If there is a new points system (and I did hear that the gang at Feld had done some polling with teams about a new system), I'm guessing they'll have run through various scenarios to examine how it'd potentially work.

While I'm not a huge fan of the idea, I am for something that keeps interest up throughout the season. Good racing does that. Injury-free seasons do that. But very often we get individual riders who are dominant throughout a season.

This might also encourage riders who'd sit out the bulk of the season (or not come back before the end) to come back.

If we're going to see something? I'd guess we'll hear all about it at the Monster Energy Cup.
Thanks for the info GuyB. It'd be nice I think to just start something fresh. Like you said, anything that may keep interest up throughout the season. If Feld is thinking of something that'd be awesome. Just another idea, hopefully no #herewegoagain stuff haha.
8/24/2015 7:15pm
...the only way to keep the points tighter...is to pay less points...

The Shop

SPYGUY
Posts
2174
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
8/24/2015 7:32pm Edited Date/Time 8/24/2015 7:32pm
Manipulating the points does nothing to help the actual racing.

Tell me, which race has the most potential to turn into a great battle:

A: Dungey holeshots while Roczen is back in 6th, Canard 8th, Stewart 11th and Tomac is 14th, etc....

or

B: Dungey holeshots with Roczen, Stewart and Tomac all right behind him

How do we increase the odds off all the contenders starting up front? Simple: Fewer riders in the main event. Throw the rest into a B-Main.

Guy like Kyle Partridge and Nicholas Schmidt would get way more exposure battling it out for a win in the B-Main than they ever will riding around outside the top 15 in the main event format we have now.
RangerLee
Posts
946
Joined
7/23/2013
Location
Spring City, PA, USA
8/24/2015 7:40pm
Adding a B main wont happen as they have to keep the show to a certain time, so adding another main along with the 250 class, means shorter races. Doubt we will see that.


That said for OUTDOORS, I wonder what it would be like to invert the gate picks for MOTO 2 based on the finish on Moto 1. So winning moto 1 gives the last gate pick for Moto 2.

Now that I type it...perhaps that would be better in the MEC....
Johnny Depp
Posts
6433
Joined
10/16/2014
Location
Buda, TX, USA
8/24/2015 8:18pm
The top 5 points should be like the rest. Only 1 point different. It will naturally encourage consistency.
Motocross has a gate unlike other motorsports so everyone has a chance. When you line up like Nascar you get no passing.
cwtoyota
Posts
2413
Joined
3/11/2013
Location
Tacoma, WA, USA
8/25/2015 12:07am
SPYGUY wrote:
Manipulating the points does nothing to help the actual racing. Tell me, which race has the most potential to turn into a great battle: A: Dungey...
Manipulating the points does nothing to help the actual racing.

Tell me, which race has the most potential to turn into a great battle:

A: Dungey holeshots while Roczen is back in 6th, Canard 8th, Stewart 11th and Tomac is 14th, etc....

or

B: Dungey holeshots with Roczen, Stewart and Tomac all right behind him

How do we increase the odds off all the contenders starting up front? Simple: Fewer riders in the main event. Throw the rest into a B-Main.

Guy like Kyle Partridge and Nicholas Schmidt would get way more exposure battling it out for a win in the B-Main than they ever will riding around outside the top 15 in the main event format we have now.
You had me until you said B-Main.

I don't think it would make the TV program and the majority wouldn't go out of their way to watch it.



Zracer
Posts
1479
Joined
2/17/2013
Location
Saint Clair, MI, USA
8/25/2015 12:18am
GuyB wrote:
#herewegoagain If there is a new points system (and I did hear that the gang at Feld had done some polling with teams about a new...
#herewegoagain

If there is a new points system (and I did hear that the gang at Feld had done some polling with teams about a new system), I'm guessing they'll have run through various scenarios to examine how it'd potentially work.

While I'm not a huge fan of the idea, I am for something that keeps interest up throughout the season. Good racing does that. Injury-free seasons do that. But very often we get individual riders who are dominant throughout a season.

This might also encourage riders who'd sit out the bulk of the season (or not come back before the end) to come back.

If we're going to see something? I'd guess we'll hear all about it at the Monster Energy Cup.
Polling the teams is a sure fire way of making sure nothing will get changed.
8/25/2015 12:46am
Giving the guys that are falling behind advantages might get closer racing...
But it is highly unfair to the guy at the top, he earned that top spot, and the comfort of a points cushion.

Cripple him by giving him the unfair disadvantage of a bad gate pick? No thanks.
8/25/2015 4:42am
Want to make the racing better?

Only offer one year contracts. Boom. Done.
Ramrod
Posts
4996
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Ontario, CA
8/25/2015 4:49am Edited Date/Time 8/25/2015 4:49am
Want to make the racing better?

Only offer one year contracts. Boom. Done.
I like this idea plus making the top 3 points riders pull an anchor. Boom. Now done.

#herewegoagain
WhipMeister
Posts
5268
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Big D, TX, USA
8/25/2015 5:33am Edited Date/Time 8/25/2015 5:34am
GuyB wrote:
#herewegoagain If there is a new points system (and I did hear that the gang at Feld had done some polling with teams about a new...
#herewegoagain

If there is a new points system (and I did hear that the gang at Feld had done some polling with teams about a new system), I'm guessing they'll have run through various scenarios to examine how it'd potentially work.

While I'm not a huge fan of the idea, I am for something that keeps interest up throughout the season. Good racing does that. Injury-free seasons do that. But very often we get individual riders who are dominant throughout a season.

This might also encourage riders who'd sit out the bulk of the season (or not come back before the end) to come back.

If we're going to see something? I'd guess we'll hear all about it at the Monster Energy Cup.
I like the idea of anything that creates incentives for keeping guys healthy. A bonus point per main event start (or lap completed) or something along those lines.
ProMotoFan
Posts
23
Joined
6/16/2009
Location
Bennett, CO, USA
8/25/2015 8:07am
As GuyB stated, it's about keeping interest throughout the season, and the RACING is what truly does that in my opinion. Therefore, let's focus on improving that aspect first. With that, we all know the "key to the race" is the start! When the top riders get the start, they pull away and thus the battles are often nonexistent and leads to races that aren't very exciting to watch.
I believe there are two components to this. 1. gate pick and 2. start straight/first corner (holeshot) design. Timed qualifying to determine the fast 40 still works, and the idea of awarding some points based on qualifying is pretty cool, but let's drop the earned gate pick! The whole point of qualifying should be just that....to qualify! Not further give an advantage for the main event. Simply use the old school clothes pin approach and let each rider draw for their gate pick. You draw based on your fast 40 position, and may the best rider get the holeshot!
On the second point, the holeshot design should be the same spec at all tracks, and this means width, length and degree of turn. I believe by using the far outside of the stadium/track as the start would allow for a longer more uniform and wider sweeping holeshot. Allow more room for each rider to make the turn instead of a bottleneck we always see.

Just thoughts.....
WhipMeister
Posts
5268
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Big D, TX, USA
8/25/2015 8:18am
The thing that has the most negative effect on the racing, ROI on sponsorship $ and fan experience is the high number of absent racers.
Silliker269
Posts
1040
Joined
4/25/2014
Location
Calgary, CA
8/25/2015 8:31am
More then one gate drop, the start is to important with only one drop
mauidex
Posts
2069
Joined
9/12/2011
Location
Haiku, HI, USA
8/25/2015 8:46am
good thing no one came up with this during mcGraths reign...................

there needs to be 3 10 lap mains....................it's SX not moto so forget about endurance............racing and lappers usually gets bad after halfway..........someone checks out

even if guys get hurt this would keep things tight each "main".............even a guy like Alessi can hang tight for 10 laps
TailSoHard
Posts
1656
Joined
10/18/2014
Location
Beer City, MI, USA
8/25/2015 9:25am Edited Date/Time 8/25/2015 9:25am
GuyB wrote:
#herewegoagain If there is a new points system (and I did hear that the gang at Feld had done some polling with teams about a new...
#herewegoagain

If there is a new points system (and I did hear that the gang at Feld had done some polling with teams about a new system), I'm guessing they'll have run through various scenarios to examine how it'd potentially work.

While I'm not a huge fan of the idea, I am for something that keeps interest up throughout the season. Good racing does that. Injury-free seasons do that. But very often we get individual riders who are dominant throughout a season.

This might also encourage riders who'd sit out the bulk of the season (or not come back before the end) to come back.

If we're going to see something? I'd guess we'll hear all about it at the Monster Energy Cup.
I'd like to see less emphasis placed on practice/qualifying lap times in order to lessen the chance that riders are getting hurt before the race even starts. It always sucks finding out before the race starts that someone crashed in practice and isn't going to race that night. Maybe instead of basing gate picks on lap times in practice/qualifying, they can pick gates based on their results from last week or their current points standing.

Gotta be careful how far we take it, but it's a start...

I'm not old enough to remember this race, and maybe one of our elder-members can elaborate, but I believe there was a race back in the day where the guys who finished qualifying in the top five had to start on a row behind the rest of the field in the main event. This led to the leaders waiting to cross the finish line till they were outside the top five, in order to be able to start on the front row Silly Laughing
Johnny Depp
Posts
6433
Joined
10/16/2014
Location
Buda, TX, USA
8/25/2015 10:28am
GuyB wrote:
#herewegoagain If there is a new points system (and I did hear that the gang at Feld had done some polling with teams about a new...
#herewegoagain

If there is a new points system (and I did hear that the gang at Feld had done some polling with teams about a new system), I'm guessing they'll have run through various scenarios to examine how it'd potentially work.

While I'm not a huge fan of the idea, I am for something that keeps interest up throughout the season. Good racing does that. Injury-free seasons do that. But very often we get individual riders who are dominant throughout a season.

This might also encourage riders who'd sit out the bulk of the season (or not come back before the end) to come back.

If we're going to see something? I'd guess we'll hear all about it at the Monster Energy Cup.
(and I did hear that the gang at Feld had done some polling with teams about a new system)

The power brokers are Feld and the Teams. Not the AMA, FIM or TV networks or fans.

Here is what Feld does:

RINGLING BROS. AND BARNUM & BAILEY®

RINGLING BROS. AND BARNUM & BAILEY CENTER FOR ELEPHANT CONSERVATION®

DISNEY ON ICE

DISNEY LIVE!

FELD MOTOR SPORTS®
Monster Jam®, Monster Energy Supercross, AMSOIL Arenacross and Nuclear Cowboyz®

MONSTER JAM®

MONSTER ENERGY AMA SUPERCROSS

AMSOIL ARENACROSS

NUCLEAR COWBOYZ®

MARVEL UNIVERSE LIVE!

TDeath21
Posts
6515
Joined
2/22/2011
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
8/25/2015 10:32am
I love the points system the way it is. I hope they never change it.
8/25/2015 10:33am
TDeath21 wrote:
I love the points system the way it is. I hope they never change it.
...yep...
8/25/2015 11:01am
Don't need a B main. Just a B gate. (The 'b' stand for Behind the A gate.)
SPYGUY
Posts
2174
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
8/25/2015 11:01am
...the only way to keep the points tighter...is to pay less points...
What tightening the points would do is make it more important than ever to stay consistent because it would be much much harder to gain points after a bad weekend.

If 2015 SX points were paid as follows:

1st - 20 Points
2nd - 19 Points
3rd - 18 Points
...and so on...
20th - 1 Point

Then the 2015 points chase would have ended Dungey 327 and Tomac 268. Still not a close title fight.

And remember the 2009 Anaheim opener when Stewart DNF'd (Erin Bates: "What happened?"; JS7: "I crashed")?

Well he reeled off a lot of wins after that and was able to take the title by a few points over Reed. If the points had been as mentioned above, he'd have lost the title to Reed by 9 points because Reed's consistency (and lack of a DNF) would be more important than wins.
SPYGUY
Posts
2174
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
USA
8/25/2015 11:31am
Don't need a B main. Just a B gate. (The 'b' stand for Behind the A gate.)
Possibly, but I still feel like 22 riders is too many. I absolutely hate lappers potentially affecting the outcome of races.

I just know that with the current format, the entire day revolves around a single 18 minute main where the outcome is oftentimes decided by what happens in the first 10 seconds. If one contender gets a holeshot while the rest are mired in the back of the pack, you can pretty much head for the exits knowing who's going to win.

For consistently better racing, all of the race win contenders need to start together, period.


Lightning78
Posts
6353
Joined
12/12/2007
Location
Huntington Beach, CA, USA
8/25/2015 2:04pm
Here is an idea I came up with that may allow for a 3rd (125cc) class and still be televised

How about this yes I agree three classes there are so many writers flooding the ranks now it seems they're all being left without rides so why not a regional 125 series where they do all the qualifying and everything during the day practice program or something to that effect at night have the 250 and 450 qualifying during the downtime where they would usually have the KTM sideshow or fan shooting t-shirts and running and fat suits they could have the 125 Main Event Race the night program only shows the main event Race and then went right into the 250 and 450 main events the 125 Race should be no more than 10 laps and you would have still fit into the TV package it would also give a lot of up and coming rookies a place to go for max 2 years in the Class one year if you win the title you're out well I just solved it! I'm a goddamn genius

Post a reply to: Oh just another SX points idea

The Latest