Posts
756
Joined
11/3/2014
Location
Chantilly, VA
US
Edited Date/Time
7/23/2015 1:56pm
I just don't understand why they were used? I get why they use them today as the 4 strokes run so much hotter, but this was not even on anyone's radar as far as i know back in the 70s, 80s & early 90s? Would love to here the reasoning since plastic is lighter…but alloy does have the coolnest factor, but was the added weight worth it?
Then of course, the other reason is simply the exclusivity factor.
Most all early model prototype units came with aluminum fuel tanks and they were not made from plastic until later into the prototype testing stages when the design was finalized.
From a racing prespective they built aluminum tanks because the tank sizes were either decreased or increased (more fuel of less fuel) or the shape was slightly changed..design change..etc..
In one race application a very small aluminum tank was built and put inside the plastic tank..
Too expensive to make a plastic mold for a handful of one off tanks.
The Shop
Free shipping: VITALMX
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
I remember wear marks from knees rubbing a 77 RM metal tank were something riders tried to prevent with tape and covers. Now i think its cool looking
The 77 RM tank is very light, but I don't think they ever made a plastic replacement for it so I have no idea of the weight differences (plastic vs aluminum). I do know that Clarke makes a plastic replacement for the 76-78 RM250/370 but not for the 125. I purchased an aluminum tank for my 1990 RM125, which is why I am asking all the questions because the tank of this bike is much bigger than the 77 tank. I should have some pics up on it shortly. Mike
My 1980 YZ125 plastic tank weighs #3.2, the aluminum tank tops the scale at #4.6. The alloy tank also has just over 3 pints more capacity.
Sure would be nice if Honda just popped out new 1979 or 1984 (etc.) CR fenders, shrouds and tanks.
Maxpower: "DC or whoever makes plastic for DC replicates body work for some pretty uncommon bikes. Is there a cheaper way they are making them? I dont see too many 80/81 KXs or 76 Pentons around and cant see them breaking even with those models. "
Yes, they use a different process which is why the result is a matte or dull finish, and not as smooth or shiny as the OEM injection molded plastic.
Pit Row
Things that make you go hmmm.
The factory bikes that run aluminium when the stockers are plastic, might be different underneath , coils in different places and stuff done just to make it easy to work on , not built down to a $$ price.
Once you got to production , plastic is the way to go , cheap clean and really easy to automate.
Where can I find yellow vinyl in large enough sheets?
http://www.ebay.com/itm/N-Style-Cut-To-Fit-Background-Yellow-12in-x-14i…
Would love to see the photos. The sort of good and bad thing about Suzuki was there budget (or lack there of). Suzuki seemed to have budget issues and yes, back in the early to mid 80s they had bonafide works bikes, but by the late 80s they were production bikes with a lot works parts. That was the bad, the good is that it's easier to build a true works replica because they were based on production motorcycles.
Iv got 5 bikes with polished alloy tanks on
Inc a 1997 TM, a 1990 Husaberg, a 1998 YZF400, a 2003 Vertemati 500 mx and my 1989 EML KX500 sidecarcross outfit in my avatar pic.
Post a reply to: Why did factory teams use aluminum tanks back in the day?