Post a picture of your Mountain Bikes

ktm77man
Posts
35
Joined
12/18/2012
Location
Columbus, OH, USA
11/26/2014 10:51am
I just recently got into mountain biking.

A lot of you guys have some sick looking bikes.



11/26/2014 12:11pm
Nothing like a brand new bike is there man Smile

Moto or mtb I love the feeling
TailSoHard
Posts
1656
Joined
10/18/2014
Location
Beer City, MI, USA
11/26/2014 1:42pm
Hell yeah man! Those Triggers are great bikes, you're gonna love it
11/26/2014 2:06pm


Me racing last year on my Felt Nine 3. Snapped tib/fib at the bike park in March derailed plans of racing this year. Will be back at it in 2015

The Shop

dave489
Posts
28
Joined
4/14/2008
Location
Stoneham, CA
11/26/2014 5:00pm


new sled…. bicycle prices are a real joke…. if you don't get a deal they cost as much as motorbike
theToothPerry
Posts
538
Joined
11/23/2010
Location
Santa Clarita, CA, USA
11/26/2014 5:04pm


Dont have a picture of it by itself but I love riding this thing even though it costs almost as much as my RMZ haha
KGAspeed
Posts
576
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
11/26/2014 7:38pm
mx_563 wrote:
I apologize in advance if this isn't the right place for this question but there appear to be a lot of MTB experts chiming in so...
I apologize in advance if this isn't the right place for this question but there appear to be a lot of MTB experts chiming in so here it goes...

What seems to be the general consensus on the new Giant Reign 27.5 2 in terms of all mountain riding? For the money, is there anything similar worth considering? Seems like a good value for a 27.5. I think I'm over my 2011 26" Trek Remedy 9 XL. Don't want to break the bank on a 27.5 bike. The reign is in the lead right now but what else do you guys think I should be looking at in that price range? I don't shuttle so I need something that can climb but I'm definitely not a trail dude. Anyone care to offer some advice? Again, sorry if this is too OT.
Its not really OT. The Reign is all new this year and really impressive. But, if you don't shuttle and have intentions of putting in some good miles for the sake of cardio and training, the Reign is not ideal. The Trance 1 27.5 is impressive and I believe its a better do-it-all option. The Reign was built to be an Enduro race bike. Super fast on the DH and just good enough to climb up to the next stage.

I missed your last sentence where you said you're not into XC / trail riding. Then yeah, the Reign is a great option. Giant is a good value brand and this year I feel like their entire line really stepped it up.

Yeti has the new SB6 if you do want to break your bank account too - same category of bike and really awesome. 7k and its yours.

Can't go wrong with a Giant in my opinion, especially when you're really looking for a value-brand. I've had two Reigns and really liked them.
mx_563
Posts
2197
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
11/26/2014 8:01pm
KGAspeed wrote:
Its not really OT. The Reign is all new this year and really impressive. But, if you don't shuttle and have intentions of putting in some...
Its not really OT. The Reign is all new this year and really impressive. But, if you don't shuttle and have intentions of putting in some good miles for the sake of cardio and training, the Reign is not ideal. The Trance 1 27.5 is impressive and I believe its a better do-it-all option. The Reign was built to be an Enduro race bike. Super fast on the DH and just good enough to climb up to the next stage.

I missed your last sentence where you said you're not into XC / trail riding. Then yeah, the Reign is a great option. Giant is a good value brand and this year I feel like their entire line really stepped it up.

Yeti has the new SB6 if you do want to break your bank account too - same category of bike and really awesome. 7k and its yours.

Can't go wrong with a Giant in my opinion, especially when you're really looking for a value-brand. I've had two Reigns and really liked them.
I appreciate the input. Recently I realized what a disadvantage my 26" wheel size was when climbing as compared with my freinds' big-wheel bikes. I was thinking despite the slack head angle and whatnot, the Reign would be a step forward in terms of climbing just based on the larger wheel size. I'm not sure if that is really sound reasoning though. I'm not some hard core ramp jumping DH wannabe. But I do prefer flat pedals and like to catch some air whenever possible. I guess like most people I'm somewhere in between spandex and full face helmets.

Boy, that SB6 looks bitchen but 7k is too rich for my blood. I'm trying to find a way to justify the $3400 Alu Reign price tag Laughing

Thanks again for the input.
KGAspeed
Posts
576
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
11/26/2014 8:12pm Edited Date/Time 11/26/2014 8:21pm
mx_563 wrote:
I appreciate the input. Recently I realized what a disadvantage my 26" wheel size was when climbing as compared with my freinds' big-wheel bikes. I was...
I appreciate the input. Recently I realized what a disadvantage my 26" wheel size was when climbing as compared with my freinds' big-wheel bikes. I was thinking despite the slack head angle and whatnot, the Reign would be a step forward in terms of climbing just based on the larger wheel size. I'm not sure if that is really sound reasoning though. I'm not some hard core ramp jumping DH wannabe. But I do prefer flat pedals and like to catch some air whenever possible. I guess like most people I'm somewhere in between spandex and full face helmets.

Boy, that SB6 looks bitchen but 7k is too rich for my blood. I'm trying to find a way to justify the $3400 Alu Reign price tag Laughing

Thanks again for the input.
Well consider this: 27.5 isn't really that much different. I think you would have to ride a 26 and a 27.5 back-to-back on the same trail to really tell a difference. For the average rider. The 27.5 was a big industry push to pump life into a smaller wheel size, and it happened really, really fast.

Check out the Specialized Enduro 29. Serious. I ride a Yeti SB95 - it's a big-wheel ass-kicking machine, but still with a lot of travel. The bigger wheel totally plows through the rock gardens, and I honestly don't feel at a disadvantage downhill. And I love the downhill - with a moto background, it's my only shot to be "fast" around here.

I think people get too caught up in travel - unless you're shuttling or doing really gnarly rock drops, get a good RS Pike fork on any bike and you'll be set, big travel or not. For what its worth, guys on full XC carbon full-suspension bikes are at the top of the charts, both up and down. One of my last Fall rides, I was hauling ass down a nasty, rocky DH section after meeting up with a pro chic (yep, chic) at the top. She was on a carbon Scott Spark and was very, very close to me the whole way down (5 mile descent down the mountain). That thing has minimal travel and is all about speed on the climb, but she was seconds away from me, and kicks my ass anywhere else.

The Reign would be super fun - they look great. But 29 wheels are damn amazing if your area is rocky...or in a lot of other aspects too.

mx_563
Posts
2197
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
11/26/2014 8:36pm
KGAspeed wrote:
Well consider this: 27.5 isn't really that much different. I think you would have to ride a 26 and a 27.5 back-to-back on the same trail...
Well consider this: 27.5 isn't really that much different. I think you would have to ride a 26 and a 27.5 back-to-back on the same trail to really tell a difference. For the average rider. The 27.5 was a big industry push to pump life into a smaller wheel size, and it happened really, really fast.

Check out the Specialized Enduro 29. Serious. I ride a Yeti SB95 - it's a big-wheel ass-kicking machine, but still with a lot of travel. The bigger wheel totally plows through the rock gardens, and I honestly don't feel at a disadvantage downhill. And I love the downhill - with a moto background, it's my only shot to be "fast" around here.

I think people get too caught up in travel - unless you're shuttling or doing really gnarly rock drops, get a good RS Pike fork on any bike and you'll be set, big travel or not. For what its worth, guys on full XC carbon full-suspension bikes are at the top of the charts, both up and down. One of my last Fall rides, I was hauling ass down a nasty, rocky DH section after meeting up with a pro chic (yep, chic) at the top. She was on a carbon Scott Spark and was very, very close to me the whole way down (5 mile descent down the mountain). That thing has minimal travel and is all about speed on the climb, but she was seconds away from me, and kicks my ass anywhere else.

The Reign would be super fun - they look great. But 29 wheels are damn amazing if your area is rocky...or in a lot of other aspects too.

Wow! It's amazing that you mention the 29" Specialized because that's the bike I rode that made me consider an upgrade. I only rode it in the parking lot but man, it just fit me better and felt super comfortable. I'm 6'2".

I guess I need to grow up. For some reason I'm living in a paradigm wherein I associate 29" bikes with spandex, water bottles, climbing, and a strava obsession (no offense). Did you post a pic of your bike? What page of this thread is it on? I need to have a look. Let the healing begin... Smile

Canerat
Posts
780
Joined
4/7/2011
Location
ZA
11/26/2014 8:53pm
Just a question, I was having a debate with a friend about what pedals with cleats (clips for your shoe) vs flat pedals with grip.

I dont like the idea of having my feet locked in and certainly dont buy into the clips helping pedaling on the up stroke.

What are your guys thoughts....clips or no clips?

seth505
Posts
10204
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
SD, CA, USA
11/26/2014 9:20pm
mx_563 wrote:
Wow! It's amazing that you mention the 29" Specialized because that's the bike I rode that made me consider an upgrade. I only rode it in...
Wow! It's amazing that you mention the 29" Specialized because that's the bike I rode that made me consider an upgrade. I only rode it in the parking lot but man, it just fit me better and felt super comfortable. I'm 6'2".

I guess I need to grow up. For some reason I'm living in a paradigm wherein I associate 29" bikes with spandex, water bottles, climbing, and a strava obsession (no offense). Did you post a pic of your bike? What page of this thread is it on? I need to have a look. Let the healing begin... Smile

That is accurate. Haha
Beast666
Posts
682
Joined
8/13/2013
Location
Englewood, CO, USA
11/27/2014 7:05am
Canerat wrote:
Just a question, I was having a debate with a friend about what pedals with cleats (clips for your shoe) vs flat pedals with grip. I...
Just a question, I was having a debate with a friend about what pedals with cleats (clips for your shoe) vs flat pedals with grip.

I dont like the idea of having my feet locked in and certainly dont buy into the clips helping pedaling on the up stroke.

What are your guys thoughts....clips or no clips?

I like both worlds If i am riding technical trails i prefer being on flats but when i need to bust out a hard sprint or on flat ground i like being clipped in as i feel like a superman and average a higher speed with what feels like putting in less effort. I Ride with the Crank Brothers Mallet pedals as they are flats with there eggbeater clips in the middle. The nice thing is while you are learning to ride clipped in you can have one foot clipped with the other free so you dont come to a stop with out forgetting to clip out.



Gabriel J
Posts
367
Joined
11/15/2011
Location
USA
11/27/2014 7:13am
mx_563 wrote:
Wow! It's amazing that you mention the 29" Specialized because that's the bike I rode that made me consider an upgrade. I only rode it in...
Wow! It's amazing that you mention the 29" Specialized because that's the bike I rode that made me consider an upgrade. I only rode it in the parking lot but man, it just fit me better and felt super comfortable. I'm 6'2".

I guess I need to grow up. For some reason I'm living in a paradigm wherein I associate 29" bikes with spandex, water bottles, climbing, and a strava obsession (no offense). Did you post a pic of your bike? What page of this thread is it on? I need to have a look. Let the healing begin... Smile

It's ok, that's where 29" gives the bigger advantage (XC riding/racing)..I am guilty of 29" and most of what's written above, but hey, I'm an XC rider and not ashamed...

I second that you give an Enduro 29 a shot. It's a great bike, if you aren't planning on doing downhill competition but still want to have a good time on descents, it's the one. Climbs very well for a longer travel bike. I say it's a better bike than the Specialized 650b Stumpumper FSR which just seems like a complete afterthought..The Enduro was a hit, and the Stumpy 650b a miss.
11/27/2014 7:19am
KGAspeed wrote:
Well consider this: 27.5 isn't really that much different. I think you would have to ride a 26 and a 27.5 back-to-back on the same trail...
Well consider this: 27.5 isn't really that much different. I think you would have to ride a 26 and a 27.5 back-to-back on the same trail to really tell a difference. For the average rider. The 27.5 was a big industry push to pump life into a smaller wheel size, and it happened really, really fast.

Check out the Specialized Enduro 29. Serious. I ride a Yeti SB95 - it's a big-wheel ass-kicking machine, but still with a lot of travel. The bigger wheel totally plows through the rock gardens, and I honestly don't feel at a disadvantage downhill. And I love the downhill - with a moto background, it's my only shot to be "fast" around here.

I think people get too caught up in travel - unless you're shuttling or doing really gnarly rock drops, get a good RS Pike fork on any bike and you'll be set, big travel or not. For what its worth, guys on full XC carbon full-suspension bikes are at the top of the charts, both up and down. One of my last Fall rides, I was hauling ass down a nasty, rocky DH section after meeting up with a pro chic (yep, chic) at the top. She was on a carbon Scott Spark and was very, very close to me the whole way down (5 mile descent down the mountain). That thing has minimal travel and is all about speed on the climb, but she was seconds away from me, and kicks my ass anywhere else.

The Reign would be super fun - they look great. But 29 wheels are damn amazing if your area is rocky...or in a lot of other aspects too.

mx_563 wrote:
Wow! It's amazing that you mention the 29" Specialized because that's the bike I rode that made me consider an upgrade. I only rode it in...
Wow! It's amazing that you mention the 29" Specialized because that's the bike I rode that made me consider an upgrade. I only rode it in the parking lot but man, it just fit me better and felt super comfortable. I'm 6'2".

I guess I need to grow up. For some reason I'm living in a paradigm wherein I associate 29" bikes with spandex, water bottles, climbing, and a strava obsession (no offense). Did you post a pic of your bike? What page of this thread is it on? I need to have a look. Let the healing begin... Smile

since riding the stumpy evo 29 and enduro 29 last year I am sold.

spent my money straight away and it would take a very very good bike to sway me away from my choice, speed in the rough (all that matters imo) and in corners is insane and grip.......wow.

don't believe the hype about big wheels being shit to manoeuvre either, ride one yourself on a trail and decide that way - my money says you will be converted.

11/27/2014 7:22am
Gabriel J wrote:
It's ok, that's where 29" gives the bigger advantage (XC riding/racing)..I am guilty of 29" and most of what's written above, but hey, I'm an XC...
It's ok, that's where 29" gives the bigger advantage (XC riding/racing)..I am guilty of 29" and most of what's written above, but hey, I'm an XC rider and not ashamed...

I second that you give an Enduro 29 a shot. It's a great bike, if you aren't planning on doing downhill competition but still want to have a good time on descents, it's the one. Climbs very well for a longer travel bike. I say it's a better bike than the Specialized 650b Stumpumper FSR which just seems like a complete afterthought..The Enduro was a hit, and the Stumpy 650b a miss.
mate just bought the 650 stumpy, like you say it seems like an afterthought for the masses, doesn't quite look right, rides a bit meh in comparison to both 26 and 29....weird as 26 and 29 are lightening bolts
KGAspeed
Posts
576
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
11/27/2014 7:28am
Gabriel J wrote:
It's ok, that's where 29" gives the bigger advantage (XC riding/racing)..I am guilty of 29" and most of what's written above, but hey, I'm an XC...
It's ok, that's where 29" gives the bigger advantage (XC riding/racing)..I am guilty of 29" and most of what's written above, but hey, I'm an XC rider and not ashamed...

I second that you give an Enduro 29 a shot. It's a great bike, if you aren't planning on doing downhill competition but still want to have a good time on descents, it's the one. Climbs very well for a longer travel bike. I say it's a better bike than the Specialized 650b Stumpumper FSR which just seems like a complete afterthought..The Enduro was a hit, and the Stumpy 650b a miss.
mate just bought the 650 stumpy, like you say it seems like an afterthought for the masses, doesn't quite look right, rides a bit meh in...
mate just bought the 650 stumpy, like you say it seems like an afterthought for the masses, doesn't quite look right, rides a bit meh in comparison to both 26 and 29....weird as 26 and 29 are lightening bolts
Specialized went on record saying they did not want to bother with 27.5, but "here you go - here is our 27.5 line, even though we don't want to go this route". Their press release about the 27.5 Specialized line was the worst PR I've ever read from a company trying to release a new model line.
KGAspeed
Posts
576
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
11/27/2014 7:33am
KGAspeed wrote:
Well consider this: 27.5 isn't really that much different. I think you would have to ride a 26 and a 27.5 back-to-back on the same trail...
Well consider this: 27.5 isn't really that much different. I think you would have to ride a 26 and a 27.5 back-to-back on the same trail to really tell a difference. For the average rider. The 27.5 was a big industry push to pump life into a smaller wheel size, and it happened really, really fast.

Check out the Specialized Enduro 29. Serious. I ride a Yeti SB95 - it's a big-wheel ass-kicking machine, but still with a lot of travel. The bigger wheel totally plows through the rock gardens, and I honestly don't feel at a disadvantage downhill. And I love the downhill - with a moto background, it's my only shot to be "fast" around here.

I think people get too caught up in travel - unless you're shuttling or doing really gnarly rock drops, get a good RS Pike fork on any bike and you'll be set, big travel or not. For what its worth, guys on full XC carbon full-suspension bikes are at the top of the charts, both up and down. One of my last Fall rides, I was hauling ass down a nasty, rocky DH section after meeting up with a pro chic (yep, chic) at the top. She was on a carbon Scott Spark and was very, very close to me the whole way down (5 mile descent down the mountain). That thing has minimal travel and is all about speed on the climb, but she was seconds away from me, and kicks my ass anywhere else.

The Reign would be super fun - they look great. But 29 wheels are damn amazing if your area is rocky...or in a lot of other aspects too.

mx_563 wrote:
Wow! It's amazing that you mention the 29" Specialized because that's the bike I rode that made me consider an upgrade. I only rode it in...
Wow! It's amazing that you mention the 29" Specialized because that's the bike I rode that made me consider an upgrade. I only rode it in the parking lot but man, it just fit me better and felt super comfortable. I'm 6'2".

I guess I need to grow up. For some reason I'm living in a paradigm wherein I associate 29" bikes with spandex, water bottles, climbing, and a strava obsession (no offense). Did you post a pic of your bike? What page of this thread is it on? I need to have a look. Let the healing begin... Smile

If you're 6'2" I would, without question, ride a 29 and give it a very hard consideration. I had that perception too, but the reality isn't there.

Put a drop post on it, big tires, wide bars, 50mm stem and its a total rip machine.

My Yeti is on Page 8 at the top. I've since switched suspension (went to a RockShox Pike fork and a Rockshox Monarch Plus), but close enough. Like I said above (I think), next year I want to switch to a 25 lb. XC-oriented carbon machine to give that a try. I like to climb and get obsessed with my times. I'm one of those.
11/27/2014 7:39am


I like to talk about your kind at the pub after my rides hahaaa
11/27/2014 7:42am
Gabriel J wrote:
It's ok, that's where 29" gives the bigger advantage (XC riding/racing)..I am guilty of 29" and most of what's written above, but hey, I'm an XC...
It's ok, that's where 29" gives the bigger advantage (XC riding/racing)..I am guilty of 29" and most of what's written above, but hey, I'm an XC rider and not ashamed...

I second that you give an Enduro 29 a shot. It's a great bike, if you aren't planning on doing downhill competition but still want to have a good time on descents, it's the one. Climbs very well for a longer travel bike. I say it's a better bike than the Specialized 650b Stumpumper FSR which just seems like a complete afterthought..The Enduro was a hit, and the Stumpy 650b a miss.
mate just bought the 650 stumpy, like you say it seems like an afterthought for the masses, doesn't quite look right, rides a bit meh in...
mate just bought the 650 stumpy, like you say it seems like an afterthought for the masses, doesn't quite look right, rides a bit meh in comparison to both 26 and 29....weird as 26 and 29 are lightening bolts
KGAspeed wrote:
Specialized went on record saying they did not want to bother with 27.5, but "here you go - here is our 27.5 line, even though we...
Specialized went on record saying they did not want to bother with 27.5, but "here you go - here is our 27.5 line, even though we don't want to go this route". Their press release about the 27.5 Specialized line was the worst PR I've ever read from a company trying to release a new model line.
yeah I know, serious about turn by a huge player but there you go, the power of the markets, and the ignorance/hatred toward the 29.

so glad I bought the 29
Gabriel J
Posts
367
Joined
11/15/2011
Location
USA
11/27/2014 7:53am
I can understand wanting to offer 650b customers an option sooner than later, and making it happen ASAP..But what was the result. A polished turd.

I see 650b replacing the 26" dowhill/long travel bikes, not so much for the trail/xc crowd. At lot of effort went into making 29ers with 5" of travel handle well, and I personally don't see the advantage of stepping down for a smaller size. Carbon rims helped destroy the "slow and flexy" issues people would claim the 29ers suffered from. For smaller people the 650b is a great option that allows a better bike geometry.
11/27/2014 8:10am
exactly my point, done for the immediate trending market

a lot of my mates have Orange 5 and Santa Ccruz in 27.5 and they look and work great - the stumpy mid range is just weird.
ayearinmx
Posts
2760
Joined
3/5/2007
Location
GB
11/27/2014 8:11am
brought this Yeti SB66 this summer and I love it, gets me up the hill well enough and is awesome down it. I didn't want to go the 29er route but would have been open to the 650b if the bike was right.... however I got this for a steal and couldn't be happier


11/27/2014 8:30am
very nice ! fun bike the 66, had one in neon yellow for a short time
Beast666
Posts
682
Joined
8/13/2013
Location
Englewood, CO, USA
11/27/2014 9:05am
Took my new Fezzari Alta 27.5 out for the first time just to bed in the brakes and check out that everything was working. After coming off of a Giant Trance X29er I can honestly say that the differences between a 29 and 27.5 are minimal at best.

The 27.5 feels lake it wants to accelerate faster than a 29er I was able to ride down the street make a 180 turn at about 4 MPH and went back up the hill and accelerated back up to 10MPH with minimal effort.

As for top speed I did manage to see 19MPH while not being in top gear on a slight downhill.

While the 27.has weaker brakes than the 29 they seemed to stop just as well elixer 3 vs elixer 5 Still planning on upgrading to SRAM Guide RS

I do miss the dropper seat post that the Giant came with as well as wider bars.

As for turning and such will have to hold off until i can put in more miles on trails that i am familiar with.

It felt good to get back out on the bike after being off of one since my Giant was stolen. Currently I am nursing a sore knee and quad on my right leg also my butt needs to get use to the new saddle.
KGAspeed
Posts
576
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
11/27/2014 12:15pm Edited Date/Time 11/28/2014 8:31am


I like to talk about your kind at the pub after my rides hahaaa
Well at least I'm not a spandex'r. So not really. I just like to push it and try to get, and be faster. Up and down. Strava is good and bad for sure.
11/28/2014 2:46am
it was a joke.

you said you liked racing uphill, you referred to yourself as "one of those"





FGR01
Posts
6107
Joined
10/1/2006
Location
USA
Fantasy
11/28/2014 7:26am Edited Date/Time 11/28/2014 8:36am
The endless wheel size debate/discussion cracks me up. Just get on a bike and ride it and don't think twice. I am only 5'7" and ride medium frames and I freakin shred my 29'ers. There is no "slow handling" or too big for the frame....hahaa

Being clipped in is a huge advantage everywhere, right up to the point where it suddenly is a disadvantage...LOL Seriously though, it absolutely is a benefit to be able to pull on the upstroke. Not so much from a performance or pure speed advantage but for gaining traction on steep, slippery climbs. We have a lot of hills around here that are hardpack with loose granite gravel on top. If you use flats and only push on the downstroke you get 2 huge pulses of power that break the tire loose. As you are pushing down it is raising your weight off the seat and making it worse. Clipped in you get a smooth steady flow of power and as you pull up it pulls your weight into the seat and increases traction even more. Clips also help maneuver the bike through technical sections and keep you attached to the bike on rough downhills.

For those of you that like Crank brothers mallets and their other pedals, they have a factory upgrade program. Get a nice discount for sending them any junk pair of clip pedals.

http://www.crankbrothers.com/upgrade/

Oh yeah, I usually wear spandex just because it is cooler and more comfortable. I don't give a crap what anywhere wears. Ride your bike and have fun. Don't get caught up in the particulars.

And strava is great. Again, as long as you don't take it too seriously and are still having fun. Join the Vital Team!!!

http://www.strava.com/clubs/vitalmx

KGAspeed
Posts
576
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Salt Lake City, UT, USA
11/28/2014 8:13am
it was a joke.

you said you liked racing uphill, you referred to yourself as "one of those"





Yes I know. It was the same tone on my side as well. All good. I just feel funny running bare spandex and don't want the ladies chasing me down the trail once they get a good look.

Totally agree on the wheel debate - its about as pointless, and ironically very similar to the 4-stroke / 2-stroke thing. Same with flats VS clipless; I don't think any "science experiment" will really determine anything. I dig them; 'used to hate them. Now I won't ride without 'em.

Some a-hole tied me for my one and only DH KOM yesterday. Have to go hit that again to keep my "title" and the checks from Strava to keep rolling in.
three9zero
Posts
1454
Joined
9/26/2010
Location
Kamloops B.C, CA
11/28/2014 12:35pm Edited Date/Time 11/28/2014 12:38pm
Any of you guys have little groms who ride...My little guy is loving riding and keeping up pretty good on the green lift accesed runs @ C.O.P here in Calgary. He needs suspension and good brakes, I have him on a Spawn Furi and he loves it, but he gets tossed arround pretty good. My wife is gonna kill me, but @ 4 years old he needs a $ 2000 bike...lol

I'm ordering one of these for him in the spring. They are just sick.
16' inch wheels btw.....
http://lilshredder.com/


Post a reply to: Post a picture of your Mountain Bikes

The Latest