Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
Glad to know Speed can figure out what it means when someone lays on the track for that long without moving!
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Free shipping: VITALMX
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Hmmm...why would they do that?
And yes I know he is also the Medical Director of SX
Hint: Medical Director of SX
I had a friend break his ribs and collapse his lungs. We thought we could drive him to the hospital, but Bodnar refused to let us and made an ambulance take him. HE WOULD NOT LET US LEAVE THE RIG. If you think Bodnar would let a guy out of the rig that's not ok to leave you're on crack.
It seems like the only people that know and believe in Bodnar are people that have actually been at the highest level in one form or another and that's sad to me.
I wonder if an incident like Zach's had occurred during the main, would they invoke the assessment and consultation process?
It bugs me that people think a man who watched a young man pass away at San Diego and has given more to the sport than almost anyone wouldn't make a call if he felt a rider was unsafe. It's almost disrespectful to me, and it's not about me being right or wrong it's about protecting a man who cares more about this sport than almost anyone.
I guess that's about it for me.
If he calls the AMA and says this rider is unfit to ride or they ask him and he tells them NO. It's NO.
I wonder what the reaction would be? It's not really up to the Dr.
Pit Row
Are you referring to San Diego 2006?
!. Do you think Mike Larocco would go against what Bodnar, a guy who he's seen in the past and has respect for would say?
2. Do you Honestly think Geico would pull out of the series if they didn't let Bell ride after that crash, and do you think the AMA/Feld cares about other teams when they won't even mention MCR's sponsors on the broadcast?
Why would they bother tweeting that at this particular point in time?
Is it a possibility that in hindsight, someone realized a questionable decision may have been made. Now attempting to cover their asses while also muddying the waters on how that final determination is made.
Then again, it's all just a "technicality".
When did Larocco buy the team?
I guess theirs even a line in the sand drawn for the have's and have not's in this sport. 35smom, Regis, and GuyB seem to understand and know what the AMMC team means, so if anyone really wants to know they can get the correct information.
Anyways those are some of the most intelligent questions I've read in here by far. Hopefully EddieC or SXDoc can chime in and answer those questions. I'm interested in finding out the answers as well.
P
Post a reply to: Should Bell have been allowed to race?