Posts
2334
Joined
7/31/2010
Location
Merritt Island, FL, USA
Edited Date/Time
1/27/2012 12:08pm
I'm looking for an '04 (maybe older) or later YZ, KX or RM 250 2 stroke.
I'm leaning toward the '04 YZ 250 as I'm not sold on the aluminum frames.
I'm not considering the Honda CR250s.. while they may be great bikes, they are not what I'm looking for...
I'd like personal experiences on the other three...
Any significant mechanical or handling issues?
I'd appreciate any engine/suspension info to help in the decision.
Thanks!
I'm leaning toward the '04 YZ 250 as I'm not sold on the aluminum frames.
I'm not considering the Honda CR250s.. while they may be great bikes, they are not what I'm looking for...
I'd like personal experiences on the other three...
Any significant mechanical or handling issues?
I'd appreciate any engine/suspension info to help in the decision.
Thanks!
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
If you can borrow a copy of Eric Gorr's Motocross & Off-Road Performance Handbook he does a pretty good job of going over the different model years and their strengths and weaknesses
engine: RM felt like it had a stronger hit when it came on the pipe. The YZ was much smoother. I liked the hit. but the YZ engine was easier to ride.
handling: the YZ is narrow and felt more flickable to me. But the RM's radiator shrouds are shaped such that you can almost rest your leg on them in a deep rutted corner whereas on the YZ you had to rely on your muscles to hold your leg up.
suspension: despite all the praise that MXA gave the SSS forks and "works" style YZ shock, I think the RM was much plusher. The RM was not as good on big impacts and flat landings, but on acceleration bumps the RM was smoother than the YZ, hands down. I ended up getting the YZ suspension revalved and I had new springs installed. But it was never how I wanted it. I suppose the aluminum frame could have played a part in what I was feeling.
BTW: I'm about 205 - 210 lbs, 6' 2" vet novice.
The 99-02 gen. bikes feel quite bulky and turdy compared to '03 and onward gen. in my opinion. Also, as you might now, they updated the motor on the '05 Kawis, very noticable difference if you ask me.
Thanks...
The YZ's and RM's are very similiar in performance, but the RM handles alot better so I would nod towards an RM. The YZ has a little bit more power, but the RM features a very smooth and predictable powerband that's strong and pulls far.
The KX and CR were just not on par in stock condition with the 04-05+ RM and YZ models.
I do not have a title for this bike so it would be a bill of sale only. If that presents any issues for your decision making I'm just letting you know up front.
My zip is 77707 and it would ship from a business address, not residential.
http://www.thumpertalk.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-918504.html
I semi-retired it last year and replaced it with a 2011 KTM 250 XC. The KTM is a great bike but I prefered the handling on the KX. I have a tendency to steer from the back of the bike...I'm old and a litle lazy...the KX seems to work well if you ride it from the back. If you ride the way you are supposed to and slide your weight forward entering turns the KTM works better.
The person I ride with the most had a 2007 RM250 that handled great but in my opinion the motor didn't feel as strong as the KX.
I think you really need to take a look at how you personally ride when you choose your bike. Take a look at Chad Reed...his riding style was not suited to the Kawi but RV has tremendous success on the same basic bike.
Post a reply to: Adding a new (used) bike to the stable...need your helpful opinions please...