Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but paid users have great benefits. Paid member benefits:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2024 SX, MX, and SMX series (regularly $30).
The Shop
Everyone that went seemed to enjoy it.
Im not a 'Trekkie' but I did grow up watching the orignal cast/series and do not like any of the other incarnations of Star Trek other than Kirk et. al. - and I thought the movie was good. They did not disrespect the original characters and storyline but put a 21st century flavor to it that Roddenberry couldnt do 40+ years ago.
Kids wont get it, they werent around when the first series made its mark.
Like Racer said, since the actors had to follow the original cast and as actors had huge shoes to fill, I feel they did an Excellent job! Each character, Kirk, Dr. McCoy, Scotty did an unreal job of filling those shoes. Spock whose character is bland, the actor did a good job and Uhura was Dead Sexy! Id for sure hit it. More personality but it is 2009 and not 1969.
Eric Bana (Black Hawk Down) played an excellent villain. JJ Abrams - who I really couldn't get behind, due to his past, 'Lost' and all those other TV shows I personally didn't like has impressed the hell out of me. I enjoyed Cloverfield, I loved Star Trek. I would see it again.
My son and I thought it was awesome. My Dad was less than impressed.
I am a sci fi guy and have passed it on to my son, we watch Next Generation, Voyager and Enterprise reruns almost every night.
I didn't like how they played with the "formula" so much. Those Romulans didn't look like Romulans. Blowing up the planet they blew up kinda messed up the storyline for subsequent episodes and series.
Pit Row
Post a reply to: Star Trek