Stewart V Reed Texas tangle video

carlosmacho wrote:

What would you say to someone that cut across the track to take you out on purpose like chad did to bubba. A screw up is...

What would you say to someone that cut across the track to take you out on purpose like chad did to bubba. A screw up is one thing but when it is intentional it is just racing?

DownSouth wrote:

edit: On second thought it is not worth arguing with you.

carlosmacho wrote:

What would you say to someone that cut across the track to take you out on purpose like chad did to bubba. A screw up is...

What would you say to someone that cut across the track to take you out on purpose like chad did to bubba. A screw up is one thing but when it is intentional it is just racing?

DownSouth wrote:

edit: On second thought it is not worth arguing with you.

carlosmacho wrote:

What would you say to someone that cut across the track to take you out on purpose like chad did to bubba. A screw up is...

What would you say to someone that cut across the track to take you out on purpose like chad did to bubba. A screw up is one thing but when it is intentional it is just racing?

DownSouth wrote:

edit: On second thought it is not worth arguing with you.

carlosmacho wrote:

Of course, you got nothing in the tank. LOL

carlosmacho wrote:

What would you say to someone that cut across the track to take you out on purpose like chad did to bubba. A screw up is...

What would you say to someone that cut across the track to take you out on purpose like chad did to bubba. A screw up is one thing but when it is intentional it is just racing?

DownSouth wrote:

edit: On second thought it is not worth arguing with you.

carlosmacho wrote:

Of course, you got nothing in the tank. LOL

Underground wrote:

Both of the crashes with Reed and Stewart have been unintentional and people just need to take off the blinkers and let go off some nuts...

Both of the crashes with Reed and Stewart have been unintentional and people just need to take off the blinkers and let go off some nuts. There's obviously a few people on here, who it seems have never executed a front wheel "take out" or a even a block pass for that matter, so have no idea when they don't see one. You man whores need to back up some and watch some of the first west rounds and see a master at work in a boys class. I'm talkin bout Hansen ya fools.

Note to gsx r-racer - you may want to change your avatar picture to one with some style, taken on a motocross track. People might respect you more. I used to jump bigger doubles on my Kuwahara and PK's!

Least he had tank lost macho

DownSouth wrote:

edit: On second thought it is not worth arguing with you.

carlosmacho wrote:

Of course, you got nothing in the tank. LOL

wow123 wrote:

Why do you think taking the inside line is cutting across the track? lets see: Whats the crash/take out tally of the top 5 this year...

Why do you think taking the inside line is cutting across the track?

lets see:

Whats the crash/take out tally of the top 5 this year?
(without actually working out)
probably goes like this
1 or 2 each for CR,RV,TC,RD
and
6 or more for JS

notice a pattern?

Underground wrote:

Both of the crashes with Reed and Stewart have been unintentional and people just need to take off the blinkers and let go off some nuts...

Both of the crashes with Reed and Stewart have been unintentional and people just need to take off the blinkers and let go off some nuts. There's obviously a few people on here, who it seems have never executed a front wheel "take out" or a even a block pass for that matter, so have no idea when they don't see one. You man whores need to back up some and watch some of the first west rounds and see a master at work in a boys class. I'm talkin bout Hansen ya fools.

Note to gsx r-racer - you may want to change your avatar picture to one with some style, taken on a motocross track. People might respect you more. I used to jump bigger doubles on my Kuwahara and PK's!

Least he had tank lost macho

Roorda085 wrote:

What could of happened without Reeds bike reminds me of the bike that flew over the berm a couple years ago in Indianapolis and landed about...

What could of happened without Reeds bike reminds me of the bike that flew over the berm a couple years ago in Indianapolis and landed about 10 rows up. (can think of the rider)

Underground wrote:

Both of the crashes with Reed and Stewart have been unintentional and people just need to take off the blinkers and let go off some nuts...

Both of the crashes with Reed and Stewart have been unintentional and people just need to take off the blinkers and let go off some nuts. There's obviously a few people on here, who it seems have never executed a front wheel "take out" or a even a block pass for that matter, so have no idea when they don't see one. You man whores need to back up some and watch some of the first west rounds and see a master at work in a boys class. I'm talkin bout Hansen ya fools.

Note to gsx r-racer - you may want to change your avatar picture to one with some style, taken on a motocross track. People might respect you more. I used to jump bigger doubles on my Kuwahara and PK's!

Least he had tank lost macho

gsxrcr28 wrote:

As usual most of people who talk shit will not even post a picture of themselves sitting on a dirt bike much less riding one. Figures.

miikex2 wrote:

[img]http://a8.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/200649_1861937275709_1459266284_32066973_2238319_n.jpg[/img]

FreshTopEnd wrote:

What happened to Stewart there has happened to every rider. It wasn't unlike Windham at Houston. The bike got away on a technical section. Sometimes it...

What happened to Stewart there has happened to every rider. It wasn't unlike Windham at Houston. The bike got away on a technical section. Sometimes it involves another rider, sometimes not.

The people crapping on Stewart here is a great example of confirmation bias: they've made up their minds about him, too often for reasons unrelated to racing on the track, and then bring that disposition to magnify every incident that could possibly be construed to against Stewart. Shit happens for other rider, but for Stewart somehow it's more about him.

spop wrote:

Total times on the ground. Villopoto 9, Stewart 8, Reed 6, Canard 5, and Dungey 1. If you don’t conceder slide outs crashes. Stewart 6, Reed...

Total times on the ground.

Villopoto 9, Stewart 8, Reed 6, Canard 5, and Dungey 1.


If you don’t conceder slide outs crashes.

Stewart 6, Reed 6, Canard 3, Villopoto 1, and Dungey 1.


Without other riders involved and slide outs.

Villopoto 7, Canard 4, Reed 3, Stewart 3. Dungey 1.


Without other riders involved and no slide outs.

Reed 3, Canard 2, Stewart 1, Dungey 0. Villopoto 0.


Crashes involving other riders. (first turns not included)

Stewart 3. Reed x2, both down. Villopoto, both down.

Reed 2. Stewart x2, both down. Dungey, Dungey down.

Dungey 2. Reed, Dungey down. Canard, Canard down.

Viliopoto 2. Stewart, both down. Unknown rider. (first turn?)

Canard 1. Dungey, Canard down.

jmx281 wrote:

Im not a fan of Stewart at all.. Not at all... but this is hilarious.. Now while some of his crashes with people are dangerous this...

Im not a fan of Stewart at all.. Not at all... but this is hilarious.. Now while some of his crashes with people are dangerous this one isn't at all if you ask me.. Read what you guys are saying he got whiskey throttle in whoops.. He didnts scrub under someone or jump on someone he got whiskey throttle and if you sit there and say in all your years of riding youve never gotten whiskey throttle not even once your lieing

FreshTopEnd wrote:

What happened to Stewart there has happened to every rider. It wasn't unlike Windham at Houston. The bike got away on a technical section. Sometimes it...

What happened to Stewart there has happened to every rider. It wasn't unlike Windham at Houston. The bike got away on a technical section. Sometimes it involves another rider, sometimes not.

The people crapping on Stewart here is a great example of confirmation bias: they've made up their minds about him, too often for reasons unrelated to racing on the track, and then bring that disposition to magnify every incident that could possibly be construed to against Stewart. Shit happens for other rider, but for Stewart somehow it's more about him.

Outsider wrote:

[b]The people crapping on Stewart here is a great example of confirmation bias: they've made up their minds about him,[/b] This might be true of some...

The people crapping on Stewart here is a great example of confirmation bias: they've made up their minds about him,

This might be true of some guys, but, most definitely untrue of most.

I realized the magnitude of the "hating" last year, and made an effort to back off on the negativity towards James at that time. But, I personally can't continue to ignore the sheer volume of mistakes made by him resulting in injuries, or close calls, to other riders.

Honestly, I can't fathom how you, or any other intelligent person could ignore it either. This isn't bashing, although I'm sure it will continue to be called that. I don't want to see him, or anyone else, end up on a backboard.

FreshTopEnd wrote:

What happened to Stewart there has happened to every rider. It wasn't unlike Windham at Houston. The bike got away on a technical section. Sometimes it...

What happened to Stewart there has happened to every rider. It wasn't unlike Windham at Houston. The bike got away on a technical section. Sometimes it involves another rider, sometimes not.

The people crapping on Stewart here is a great example of confirmation bias: they've made up their minds about him, too often for reasons unrelated to racing on the track, and then bring that disposition to magnify every incident that could possibly be construed to against Stewart. Shit happens for other rider, but for Stewart somehow it's more about him.

Outsider wrote:

[b]The people crapping on Stewart here is a great example of confirmation bias: they've made up their minds about him,[/b] This might be true of some...

The people crapping on Stewart here is a great example of confirmation bias: they've made up their minds about him,

This might be true of some guys, but, most definitely untrue of most.

I realized the magnitude of the "hating" last year, and made an effort to back off on the negativity towards James at that time. But, I personally can't continue to ignore the sheer volume of mistakes made by him resulting in injuries, or close calls, to other riders.

Honestly, I can't fathom how you, or any other intelligent person could ignore it either. This isn't bashing, although I'm sure it will continue to be called that. I don't want to see him, or anyone else, end up on a backboard.

cheapsmack wrote:

Thats awfully big of you to try to make an effort to back off on the negativity .That statement really validates FTE's confirmation bias theory.

Outsider wrote:

How so? What I meant was that I chose not to comment when James did something "questionable", as there are generally enough comments already made. BTW...

How so? What I meant was that I chose not to comment when James did something "questionable", as there are generally enough comments already made. BTW, people gang up on lots of riders when they make mistakes... James just has more caped crusaders in his corner than most.

Outsider wrote:

How so? What I meant was that I chose not to comment when James did something "questionable", as there are generally enough comments already made. BTW...

How so? What I meant was that I chose not to comment when James did something "questionable", as there are generally enough comments already made. BTW, people gang up on lots of riders when they make mistakes... James just has more caped crusaders in his corner than most.

kongols wrote:

RV just went down in a hoops. What a manace.