Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
Where's Judge Roy Bean when you need him?
Honneur et Fidelite!
It’s a loaded question. It’s like asking someone if they still beat their wife. To answer the question to your satisfaction, one must agree with your premise.
Nothing loaded about it. Are you claiming that the administration withholding funding because of the voting record of the state’s citizens is a ‘premise’?
The Shop
Free shipping: VITALMX
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
A lesser person would probably say, “Told you so all along”, but I would never do that…..!
I see what you did there! 😉
Are you proud to belong to a political party that has members embracing communism and socialism?
Not by my standard by the Federal courts. The presidency has limits, meaning that he can’t just claim something he has to show the proof. Even if you want to use LA violent riots as your example it doesn’t mean he can just federalize the National guard, he would have to show that the state and local law enforcement couldn’t deal with it.
Insurrection has to be proven and since he didn’t deploy the National Guard on Washington DC on. Jan 6th when there was an insurrection creates another problem for Trump because in Washington he does control the National Guard. Then when he try’s to use it in Liberal states, it then causes an issue with the courts. But that a whole nothing issue.
In your mind it’s not peaceful protest , nor redress of grievances.
Well said. Patel is a fucking moron.
Sorry, little fella. Not a member of any political party.
Not going to answer the question about the actual topic? Your cognitive dissonance just a little too much right now?
Damn, I was really trying to be subtle too!!!!
Well it’s pretty obvious who you are aligned with politically, and that party has communists and socialists in it. I bet your dad is proud of you.
I don't align with any one party politically.
Why aren't you answering the question?
It's pretty obvious he's a Red Delicious fan, you can't expect much from them.
Lmfao 🤣🤣🤣🤣
I know, I named 3 that you align with.
Just take the L and move on.
To put in “I bet your bad is proud of you” is pretty pathetic. Even the trolling is incompetent. Socialism and Communism is now people who think everyone should have healthcare that doesn’t cost a future or wanting a good education that doesn’t put them in debt or actually caring about the welfare of others. We do seem to have Socialism for billionaires and corporations though but just not for everyone.
Pit Row
Yep.
Where? Did I miss it?
Why is it so difficult for you to answer the question that is actually about the topic of the thread? Is it absolutely impossible for you to be honest about your cult’s behavior? Seriously?
The answer to your question is yes. R66 will posture and pivot and label you a lib so he can feel good about himself.
Now I know Lib means Democrat Communist Socialist.
Thanks!
for their next trick they post a bunch of memes and photos from their highly curated spank bank.
The Tenth amendment makes it unconstitutional to force states into enforcing federal law. So wouldn't it be unconstitutional to hold funding back because of it? That would be forcing states to enforce federal laws ,wouldn't it?
That is how states are able to legalize pot for recreational use. Same concept. It's still illegal federally, but the federal government cannot force the states to enforce those penalties.
Being open about it being for political reasons gives them a win with their supporters even if its changed and the grants are funded. They can say how they punished those evil Dem states. And there are Trump supporters who will think that it's great. There are trump supporters who support him because he's owning the libs. Should be more of a wakeup call to established politicians in both parties, than it has been. Writing it off as a cult or whatever. So many people wouldn't have been so receptive to being a Trump supporter if they were not so fed up with how things have been going. People knowing that the elected officials are going to lie , enrich themselves,etc. can look at Trump say that that at least he's saying what we would like to say to those other politicians, even if he's doing all of the same other stuff we hated.
No. You're thinking of commandeering. Withholding federal moneys from a state is a valid exercise of the federal government's spending power under South Dakota v. Dole, 483 U.S. 203 (1987). In 1987, Congress passed a bill to withhold 10% of federal money to states if those states did not enforce a 21 year old drinking age. Went to Scotus. Feds won.
I think a tool in the tool box, for a president to be able to get his policy's through can be a good thing.
The President generally cannot unilaterally impose new conditions or use unrelated federal funds to pressure states into adopting policies Congress did not require.
Congress has the power of the purse not the President/ The executive just facilitates what Congress has given it and has to comply with the laws and constitution
Congress also can’t impose conditions to bills/funds that are unlawful and unconstitutional
Are you referring to the original situation in this thread? That the President should have that tool to use for that reason?
The main point is that the President can’t just redirect or even no spend money that Congress has allocated. The executive is to use the funds in compliance with the laws, bill and constitution.
He started it when he called me “little fella.” Was that a pathetic response from him? He took a dig at me so I gave him one back. Have a great day!
Post a reply to: Court filing: 284 DOE grants canceled, all but one were in states Trump lost. Fair or political?