Hunter pardoned

early
Posts
9872
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH US
6/20/2026 7:44pm
ToolMaker wrote:
While the law was definitely broad i it's coverage, Hunter would not have been the role model to overturn it.Hunter would have been the role model...

While the law was definitely broad i it's coverage, Hunter would not have been the role model to overturn it.

Hunter would have been the role model to strengthen it even more.

TM

early wrote:

What part of shall not be infringed don't you understand?

ToolMaker wrote:
The part where the Supreme Court validated road side sobriety stops because the safety of the public out weighed the individual's rights. Things only ever mean...

The part where the Supreme Court validated road side sobriety stops because the safety of the public out weighed the individual's rights. Things only ever mean what the court tells us. No matter what we think the words are.

Getting drunk doesn't preclude you from owning a car and driving it when you are not drunk. 

3
6/20/2026 7:53pm
early wrote:

What part of shall not be infringed don't you understand?

ToolMaker wrote:
The part where the Supreme Court validated road side sobriety stops because the safety of the public out weighed the individual's rights. Things only ever mean...

The part where the Supreme Court validated road side sobriety stops because the safety of the public out weighed the individual's rights. Things only ever mean what the court tells us. No matter what we think the words are.

early wrote:

Getting drunk doesn't preclude you from owning a car and driving it when you are not drunk. 

Are you claiming Hunter was not high when he had the weapon?

3
early
Posts
9872
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH US
6/20/2026 8:13pm
ToolMaker wrote:
The part where the Supreme Court validated road side sobriety stops because the safety of the public out weighed the individual's rights. Things only ever mean...

The part where the Supreme Court validated road side sobriety stops because the safety of the public out weighed the individual's rights. Things only ever mean what the court tells us. No matter what we think the words are.

early wrote:

Getting drunk doesn't preclude you from owning a car and driving it when you are not drunk. 

ToolMaker wrote:

Are you claiming Hunter was not high when he had the weapon?

Was it loaded in public at the time?

2
OldTech
Posts
1262
Joined
1/13/2024
Location
Decatur , AL US
6/20/2026 9:09pm
early wrote:

Getting drunk doesn't preclude you from owning a car and driving it when you are not drunk. 

ToolMaker wrote:

Are you claiming Hunter was not high when he had the weapon?

early wrote:

Was it loaded in public at the time?

It was found in a dumpster close to a school and his brother's wife who he was sleeping with admitted that she took it from him? 

1
1

The Shop

6/20/2026 9:27pm
early wrote:

Getting drunk doesn't preclude you from owning a car and driving it when you are not drunk. 

ToolMaker wrote:

Are you claiming Hunter was not high when he had the weapon?

early wrote:

Was it loaded in public at the time?

Do people drive their car in their living room with hookers there?

2
1
Zacka 161
Posts
1661
Joined
7/30/2009
Location
Mount Waverley, VIC AU
6/21/2026 1:28am

2 years into by far the most corrupt and incompetent presidency in history you dork are still worried about Hunter Biden. 

What A bunch cucked dorks.

5
10
early
Posts
9872
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH US
6/21/2026 5:53am
ToolMaker wrote:

Are you claiming Hunter was not high when he had the weapon?

early wrote:

Was it loaded in public at the time?

OldTech wrote:

It was found in a dumpster close to a school and his brother's wife who he was sleeping with admitted that she took it from him? 

Sir that is a stolen gun.

1
early
Posts
9872
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH US
6/21/2026 5:54am
ToolMaker wrote:

Are you claiming Hunter was not high when he had the weapon?

early wrote:

Was it loaded in public at the time?

ToolMaker wrote:

Do people drive their car in their living room with hookers there?

Was the gun used to perform a criminal act at that time?

2
LoudLove
Posts
2860
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
US
6/21/2026 6:12am
early wrote:

Getting drunk doesn't preclude you from owning a car and driving it when you are not drunk. 

ToolMaker wrote:

Are you claiming Hunter was not high when he had the weapon?

early wrote:

Was it loaded in public at the time?

LoudLove
Posts
2860
Joined
7/16/2010
Location
US
6/21/2026 6:13am
ToolMaker wrote:

Are you claiming Hunter was not high when he had the weapon?

early wrote:

Was it loaded in public at the time?

ToolMaker wrote:

Do people drive their car in their living room with hookers there?

This week?  No…

6/21/2026 6:19am Edited Date/Time 6/21/2026 6:19am
early wrote:

Was it loaded in public at the time?

ToolMaker wrote:

Do people drive their car in their living room with hookers there?

LoudLove wrote:

This week?  No…

Me either, this week. But once I get the hookers there, I usually stop driving anyway. So there is that.

TM

3
Flatliner
Posts
4189
Joined
11/3/2009
Location
CA
6/21/2026 8:05am
Zacka 161 wrote:

2 years into by far the most corrupt and incompetent presidency in history you dork are still worried about Hunter Biden. 

What A bunch cucked dorks.

Really?  You think Biden was making ANY decisions his last year in office? 

I don't agree with all things Trump,  but c'mon now.

4
2
byke
Posts
3028
Joined
8/12/2015
Location
Auburn, CA US
6/21/2026 8:38am

I don't doubt that he delegated a lot....A LOT.  That's not really the definition of corruption though, more of a competence issue.

2
2
R66
Posts
1324
Joined
4/16/2021
Location
Atlanta, GA US
6/21/2026 9:02am

Sure, he delegated. Ok. Sounds good. Or maybe that sounds like left wing propaganda. I am not sure yet. 

4
5
OldTech
Posts
1262
Joined
1/13/2024
Location
Decatur , AL US
6/21/2026 9:15am
early wrote:

Was it loaded in public at the time?

ToolMaker wrote:

Do people drive their car in their living room with hookers there?

early wrote:

Was the gun used to perform a criminal act at that time?

The lying on the federal forms to purchase the gun was a criminal act.

4
1
early
Posts
9872
Joined
2/13/2013
Location
University Heights, OH US
6/21/2026 10:28am Edited Date/Time 6/21/2026 10:28am
ToolMaker wrote:

Do people drive their car in their living room with hookers there?

early wrote:

Was the gun used to perform a criminal act at that time?

OldTech wrote:

The lying on the federal forms to purchase the gun was a criminal act.

It's a bullshit form that violates the second amendment 

2
2
byke
Posts
3028
Joined
8/12/2015
Location
Auburn, CA US
6/21/2026 10:53am
R66 wrote:

Sure, he delegated. Ok. Sounds good. Or maybe that sounds like left wing propaganda. I am not sure yet. 

I don't doubt that it is, but it's irrelevant to whats true. For example, cnn and fox are left and right propaganda puke machines, but today fox posted an article about a cop in the uk that was fired for questioning islam in his dei training. Theyre weaponizing the story into propaganda to stoke fear and division, but ultimately it doesnt matter, because the story is true.

1
Zacka 161
Posts
1661
Joined
7/30/2009
Location
Mount Waverley, VIC AU
6/21/2026 4:14pm
Zacka 161 wrote:

2 years into by far the most corrupt and incompetent presidency in history you dork are still worried about Hunter Biden. 

What A bunch cucked dorks.

Flatliner wrote:

Really?  You think Biden was making ANY decisions his last year in office? 

I don't agree with all things Trump,  but c'mon now.

Biden was a walking corpse,  and yet This is by far the most incompetent and corrupt presidency in history.

It is an absolute disgrace. 

Saying ‘I don’t agree with all things Trump’ is such a cucked take. Take your head out the sand mate or just don’t bother. if you are actually interested in taking said head out of said sand understanding the ongoing depth of the on going corruption…

Drey Dossier does some great research, the White House has literally set up a fake passport website to port people’s data onto private servers.   wtf… like what the actual fuck…  


https://youtube.com/@thedreydossier?si=nR3kWCbe3Iy5aNLT

 

4
6/22/2026 10:01am
early wrote:

Was the gun used to perform a criminal act at that time?

OldTech wrote:

The lying on the federal forms to purchase the gun was a criminal act.

early wrote:

It's a bullshit form that violates the second amendment 

Well, possibly, but I don't want every homeless drug addict carrying a gun. So what do you propose?

TM

1
2
6/22/2026 10:03am
OldTech wrote:

The lying on the federal forms to purchase the gun was a criminal act.

early wrote:

It's a bullshit form that violates the second amendment 

ToolMaker wrote:

Well, possibly, but I don't want every homeless drug addict carrying a gun. So what do you propose?

TM

Just because you don’t want them to, does not mean it is not their inalienable God-given right.
 

“Shall Not Be Infringed”! 

6/22/2026 10:07am
early wrote:

It's a bullshit form that violates the second amendment 

ToolMaker wrote:

Well, possibly, but I don't want every homeless drug addict carrying a gun. So what do you propose?

TM

MoogenKen wrote:

Just because you don’t want them to, does not mean it is not their inalienable God-given right.
 

“Shall Not Be Infringed”! 

Was there an answer in your post or just sour grapes?

1
1
6/22/2026 10:12am
ToolMaker wrote:

Well, possibly, but I don't want every homeless drug addict carrying a gun. So what do you propose?

TM

MoogenKen wrote:

Just because you don’t want them to, does not mean it is not their inalienable God-given right.
 

“Shall Not Be Infringed”! 

ToolMaker wrote:

Was there an answer in your post or just sour grapes?

No Sour Grapes. Every single last firearm prohibition is unconstitutional. “Shall Not Be Infringed”.

Infringed= It means to actively break, violate, or encroach upon a law, rule, agreement, or someone's fundamental rights.

Each and every single last firearm prohibition is Unconstitutional. 
 

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” ~Ben Franklin 
 

1
6/22/2026 10:28am
MoogenKen wrote:

Just because you don’t want them to, does not mean it is not their inalienable God-given right.
 

“Shall Not Be Infringed”! 

ToolMaker wrote:

Was there an answer in your post or just sour grapes?

MoogenKen wrote:
No Sour Grapes. Every single last firearm prohibition is unconstitutional. “Shall Not Be Infringed”.Infringed= It means to actively break, violate, or encroach upon a law...

No Sour Grapes. Every single last firearm prohibition is unconstitutional. “Shall Not Be Infringed”.

Infringed= It means to actively break, violate, or encroach upon a law, rule, agreement, or someone's fundamental rights.

Each and every single last firearm prohibition is Unconstitutional. 
 

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” ~Ben Franklin 
 

Yeah, NO. IF the court has allowed us to take away that right of a felon, now it's just an issue of where the line is. And drug addict homeless people are definitely on the NO side.

TM

6/22/2026 10:34am
ToolMaker wrote:

Was there an answer in your post or just sour grapes?

MoogenKen wrote:
No Sour Grapes. Every single last firearm prohibition is unconstitutional. “Shall Not Be Infringed”.Infringed= It means to actively break, violate, or encroach upon a law...

No Sour Grapes. Every single last firearm prohibition is unconstitutional. “Shall Not Be Infringed”.

Infringed= It means to actively break, violate, or encroach upon a law, rule, agreement, or someone's fundamental rights.

Each and every single last firearm prohibition is Unconstitutional. 
 

"They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.” ~Ben Franklin 
 

ToolMaker wrote:
Yeah, NO. IF the court has allowed us to take away that right of a felon, now it's just an issue of where the line is...

Yeah, NO. IF the court has allowed us to take away that right of a felon, now it's just an issue of where the line is. And drug addict homeless people are definitely on the NO side.

TM

I look at the constitution like the Bible, either you believe all of it or you don’t believe in any of it. You can’t pick and choose which parts you like and dislike.

 Just because we have allowed the courts to violate our constitutional rights, doesn’t make it right.

6/22/2026 10:40am
Zacka 161 wrote:

2 years into by far the most corrupt and incompetent presidency in history you dork are still worried about Hunter Biden. 

What A bunch cucked dorks.

What I don’t understand is why a Koala cares so much about United States affairs. Not a one of us gives a shit about what’s happening in Australia.

 The most incompetent and corrupt presidency? No sir, Joe Biden is no longer in office.

PS, I have no respect for a society that ceded their gun rights to the government. 

3
3
byke
Posts
3028
Joined
8/12/2015
Location
Auburn, CA US
6/22/2026 10:43am

I mean....we've unquestionably done that too.

3
6/22/2026 10:48am
byke wrote:

I mean....we've unquestionably done that too.

That’s a nice try, but “No”. 

  • May 10, 1996: Prime Minister John Howard’s government organized sweeping reforms and agreed to the landmark National Firearms Agreement (NFA). [1, 2]
  • July 1996 - August 1998: The laws and the corresponding mandatory buyback scheme were phased in across the states and territories. Over 650,000 previously legal firearms were turned in and destroyed.[1, 2]
 
Key Prohibitions and Restrictions
  • Banned Firearms: Fully automatic and semi-automatic rifles and shotguns are prohibited for civilians. Restrictions are also placed on concealable weapons like handguns. [1, 2]
  • No Self-Defense: Citizens cannot claim personal protection as a "genuine reason" to own a firearm. Acceptable reasons are limited to primary production (farming), hunting, professional pest control, or sport/target shooting. [1, 2]
  • Licensing & Registration: Every gun must be registered to its owner, and shooters must pass background checks and undergo strict safety training. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
  • State & Territory Variations: While the NFA established a baseline, exact laws and caps on firearm ownership vary by state. For instance, Western Australia enacted some of the nation's strictest individual gun ownership caps and prohibitions.
2
byke
Posts
3028
Joined
8/12/2015
Location
Auburn, CA US
6/22/2026 10:55am

You're using gun laws which represent an erosion of gun rights as examples of how we're not ceding those rights...? Interesting. 

Also....there might be more than six gun laws.

2
6/22/2026 11:12am Edited Date/Time 6/22/2026 11:13am
byke wrote:
You're using gun laws which represent an erosion of gun rights as examples of how we're not ceding those rights...? Interesting. Also....there might be more than six...

You're using gun laws which represent an erosion of gun rights as examples of how we're not ceding those rights...? Interesting. 

Also....there might be more than six gun laws.

You are predictable if nothing else. That’s not an erosion, that is a collapse. 

I’ve already stated all firearm laws are unconstitutional. Our government would never get away with the shit that the Australian government pulled. 

 Again, I go back to temporary safety and liberty. Those who are  scared and would give up liberty don’t deserve it.

byke
Posts
3028
Joined
8/12/2015
Location
Auburn, CA US
6/22/2026 11:27am
byke wrote:
You're using gun laws which represent an erosion of gun rights as examples of how we're not ceding those rights...? Interesting. Also....there might be more than six...

You're using gun laws which represent an erosion of gun rights as examples of how we're not ceding those rights...? Interesting. 

Also....there might be more than six gun laws.

MoogenKen wrote:
You are predictable if nothing else. That’s not an erosion, that is a collapse. I’ve already stated all firearm laws are unconstitutional. Our government would never get...

You are predictable if nothing else. That’s not an erosion, that is a collapse. 

I’ve already stated all firearm laws are unconstitutional. Our government would never get away with the shit that the Australian government pulled. 

 Again, I go back to temporary safety and liberty. Those who are  scared and would give up liberty don’t deserve it.

Agree that they're all unconstitutional,  just not with how you think we're somehow better for it.

Post a reply to: Hunter pardoned

The Latest