Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
A lot of those ladies have that very same approach and it is beyond obvious. 😂
I'd have to agree, but at nearly 60 years old, what blows my mind is that Dems now openly support crime and illegal immigration.
Nick Shirley comes to California and exposes hundreds of millions of dollars in fraud, and the Governor attacks him on social media and the Legislature writes a bill to stymy his investigative journalism. They truly are nuts. Instead of doing something about the fraud, they try to make it continue.
To be clear when I say spreading hate and lies . I mean both Democrats and Republicans.
Liberal views = Democrats and Republicans both dividing us all and destroying the country?
I jumped on the division when I saw the big assumptions being made by other posters that fit into that narrative of keeping us all arguing and distracted.
It will be interesting to see how this plays out. Here's a link to the indictment.
https://www.justice.gov/opa/media/1437146/dl
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Free shipping: VITALMX
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
This post laughably ironic. Your first paragraph is a platitude. Of course nobody is going to disagree with that statement. Then your second paragraph basically says you’re not going to jump to conclusions.
Then the final paragraph is about how both sides are bad and you are not automatically far left just because you disagree with Trump. But the issue is that you’ll come into a thread like this and say “corruption is bad, but let’s not jump to conclusions,” meanwhile you will readily accept the worst possible conclusion about a Trump statement or action without giving it the same level of scrutiny.
So while disagreeing with Trump may not make you an extreme leftist, your eagerness to mitigate or reconcile negative stories about the left shows that you’re amenable to their positions and causes. Perhaps you’re not a champion of far left, but you’ve made it clear you don’t mind being a passenger to it.
100%-and again, a similar approach that many of the idiots on that side use😂
I never said anybody else shouldn't make up their minds. I just said that I literally only had the info in this thread. I see what is reported from single sources of news and how biased it often is so that's why I said what I said. And that I wasn't going to say anything else on that subject. The other stuff I wrote was replying to the big jump to connect it to Jan 6th and other leaps to make connections that sounded like they had not even been reported .
As far as condemning Trump goes I go into those statements with much more knowledge of the subject . I do not jump to conclusions in either direction. I'm not sure where You are taking Your samples from as far as my statements about Trump go . But You are wrong on that 100% I literally couldn't know less about the subject of this thread and don't know where accurate reporting stops and opinion starts. With the line blurred so badly even with real "reporters". I should have just stayed away until I had a chance to learn more .
I have things that I am left thinking and things I'm more aligned with on the right. AND things that I dislike about both, the far ends of both being crazy is one of my turnoffs.
It would be great if people would call out all politicians when they are exposed as doing bad stuff instead of calling it fake news when their guy is accused. Instead everybody is eager to claim moral high ground when the other sides exposed and deny when Their side is. One big difference I do see with this thread VS the ones when Trump is accused of something. I don't see anybody defending the accused or saying Fake news like is so often the case when the tables are turned.
Democrats are the ones that try to label everyone and then demonize or champion the group they have put them in depending on where that group fits into their anti American agenda
Not going to disagree with your premise, but I wouldn't paint it with such a wide brush.
It's not necessarily "Democrats", but it is Democrat leaders.
There are only a handful of politicians that I can tolerate, on either side, but it never ceases to amaze me that people keep electing complete morons to important positions on the left.
Another weak case born out of political retribution that will likely go nowhere like so many already have including the case against Jerome Powell. DOJ dropped that one like they most likely will this one.
Pirro needs to get her resume in order.
Again, it should be interesting to see what happens. To he honest, I haven't even thought about the legality of a private entity paying informants quite like this, so listening to the legal experts talk about it should at least be somewhat informative. I can see the argument that paying someone for reporting on crime that they are involved in should be close to abetting, but that doesn't actually seem to be the main thrust of the indictment. The indictment seems to be more aimed at the allegations of fraud committed on the donors to the SPLC rather than their payments being illegal.
Either way, I'd say that the notion that the SPLC 'supported' terrorist activities to be specious at best, but not unexpected that some would try to spin it that way. However, if they broke the law they should be held accountable just like any other organization and/or individuals. We live in a world where we apply a 'the ends justify the means' philosophy way too often and arbitrarily, based upon whether we agree with the 'ends' or not.
So, since Charlottesville, how many white supremacy rallies have their been?
I'm not entirely sure, but I think it's zero.
How did these 2 groups organically find themselves at the same place? If I had to plop down a 10 spot on how, I'd put it on it being organized by 1 entity. While there's nothing illegal about paying people to rally, it's pretty shitty for the donors of said entity.
You’ve never been much for common sense. And the faux pseudo intelligence you try so desperately to display is laughable..😂
"The organization’s financial scale is striking. According to its most recent IRS Form 990, the SPLC posted $129 million in total revenue in fiscal year 2024 and held nearly $800 million in total assets, down from a record $169.8 million in revenue the prior year."
Wouldn't it be awesome if like drug busts the government could keep the assets?
TM
Was the Torrance shooter from last night funded by these jokers? You Lib/Dems are just nuts.
They certainly put a charge in this guy's depends...
Pit Row
Post a reply to: Southern Poverty Law Center