Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
I couldn't tell you what the left thinks. Wiping out civilizations is a crime.
It's fine, the left still doesn't get it either and that's why they lost elections too.
Trying hard to look tough, is weak. Kind of like respect, or being a man, if you have to talk about it....you ain't it.
Sunny Beach, did you guys all receive the same script in an e-mail or just listening to the looney liberals on MSDNC? Now it's all about the language when the left has been dropping the F-bomb against Trump for years.
No, it's not different.... he is wishing to use time as his weapon to kill off the Greatest generation instead of actual weapons.
We can't hold our representatives to a higher standard if we don't hold ourselves to that same standard.
Nobody wiped out any civilization.
The Shop
Free shipping: VITALMX
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Who wiped out a civilization?
I posted before I read to the end of the thread, guess you got the hole shot on that one
TM
I didn't say that his words were a crime, I said he was using a declaration of a crime. It's like telling the world that you're going to murder someone, the public messaging is the declaration, and murder is a crime of both man's law and God's law. And then having people defend it and cheer for it, is terrible. That's not a crime for him and those that enjoy hearing it, it's just a reflection of poor morals. Morality under the president's watch is not improving, it's worsening. America is not being restored to any era of greatness, it's being pushed further from it.
If they are empty threats its only a matter of time before he gets called on his bluffs. It may have already happened multiple times since we do not see what the real negotiations look like. Only the made for TV tweets and truths. I suspect they already know he's full of it and that is why he escalated to saying he would wipe them all out. A single tanker got through and things are already falling apart.
Call me crazy but making a threat that he will follow through on would be more effective because then he could follow through instead of moving the deadlines every time. And then when he goes back to talks he can raise the consequences and have them really worry that its a true threat and not just another lie. If everybody has figured out that his maximum position is BS, how is that effective for negotiating? If I'm negotiating with somebody its gonna be easier to make a deal if both of use can trust the others word. If not how do either people know they other will keep their side of the deal.
Are you sure,? I know you like your pooch , but you did vote for Don Don 3 times……🔥
You're confusing agreeing to a deal and negotiating. You're obviously a terrible negotiator.
I guess I am. I thought the purpose of negotiating was so that You could agree on a deal. If there's no deal made than what are the negotiations for?
I should read the art of the deal to see how not making a deal makes it a successful negotiation because I feel like I'm either missing something ...
The entire time I thought is was called The Art of the Deal.
If someone says I’m going to kill you, your kids, your pets and your family and has the means to do it but chickens out the words meant nothing? Bullshit. Hold the loser accountable.
They’ve had control of our politics since the 80’s. Time to move on. I’m talking both sides of the aisle.
Look at you, getting in your talking points like a good little useful ......
TM
Like little Chuckie Schumer, the grill master, he'd rather have had Trump keep his word and eliminate the Iranian civilization.
Weird for the party of compassion.
Like little Chuckie Schumer, the grill master, he'd rather have had Trump keep his word and eliminate the Iranian civilization.
Weird for the party of compassion.
What makes you think there won't be a deal? Because it's not on your time line? Because you don't understand the process? Because you don't like the process? What was it about every other president that you think they did it better or more effective?
You said that making a deal and negotiating were not related . That I confused the two even though it is the definition of the word negotiating.
While I'm glad he hasn't killed off an entire population, why even say that if everybody knows its a bluff? Unless he's just trying to buy more time so they can get more troops in place to follow through with that threat, or maybe they are just trying to locate the current leader, track his movements and plan out another extradition and in that case what is said wouldn't matter . How is showing the person You are negotiating with that You are lying and not to take Your word going to help make a deal? You are right, I do not understand the benefit of negotiating by saying stuff in bad faith.
I give people the benefit of their argument or position being legit. But then they say or do things that make it look like they are just trolling . That hurts the trust between me and whoever, and my willingness to engage and trust that the person is saying things they believe. It seems like a very basic premise of human interaction.
One thing I liked better about many other presidents is how they listened to their advisors and not the leader of a foreign country that convinced them into going to war with Iran . While also ignoring more advisors who told him that Iran would do many of the things they have done.
There's a long list of things I have disliked or not agreed with that past presidents have done too.
Pit Row
"What makes you think there won't be a deal?"
A deal requires trust, Trump has shown he is willing to renege on a deal and twice attacked while in negotiations, the Iranians don't trust Trump.
"What was it about every other president that you think they did it better or more effective?"
Iran may not have liked them or the deal, but there was a level of trust the US President would uphold the deal.
Wrong on both. Deals don't require trust. And previous president's didn't "uphold any deals" they just folded and gave money hoping they didn't have to actually deal with the problem. How did that work out? Not so well.
I don’t make deals with those I don’t trust. How do deals not require trust?
Wow, just wow.
Companies do licensing deal all the time with other companies they don't even know. They do however monitor verification. Do you think the insurance company that writes your insurance policy knows you from L2S?
Politicians on both sides suck, ‘cause politicians suck, but to wish a generation would die out is not rational. In the future your generation will loathed too, but it’s not a rational loathing because you know full well that many different types of people belong to every generation.
Having a strong dislike for politicians is understandable but your fellow man not so much. Your fellow man with opposing political views is still closer to you than a politician that shares your views.
Being centrist may not be viewed favourably these days but it’s quite bizarre watching the lunacy at the extremes from this perspective. Like anyone has moral high ground when morality is such a temporary position.
I’d bet insurance companies dig into who a person is more than we know. Data is a big deal and they want every bit of it they can get
Maybe a poor word choice but that seems like what it will take to get them out of office. 4 of the last 5 presidents were born between 1942-1946.
That’s going all the way back to 1992. For 35 years we’ve continued to elect older and older presidents. The last two seemingly suffering from dementia while in office.
Trump doesn’t have dementia, I do believe he’s exhausted though.
"You said that making a deal and negotiating were not related . That I confused the two even though it is the definition of the word negotiating."
Show me where I said that. That's why nobody takes you serious. You outright lie about what people say. Or, you just don't understand what you read. Which is it?
TM
"You're confusing agreeing to a deal and negotiating. You're obviously a terrible negotiator."
You mean like this guy.... Jay Jones, a Democratic politician who later became Virginia’s attorney general.
In 2022 private text messages (revealed publicly in 2025), Jones:
Fantasized about shooting a Republican politician, Todd Gilbert.
Wrote a scenario where “two bullets” would go to Gilbert.
Also made disturbing remarks about Gilbert’s family/children.
Post a reply to: Diplomacy