Posts
1739
Joined
10/22/2009
Location
Moto Paradise, UT
US
Give this a watch if you're capable of learning things that are opposed to what you have already been taught. Especially if you have or are planning to have children. And please don't offer criticism if you're not willing to watch it first.
Lost me at "Download"
Having said that a guy that works for me is convinced vaccines caused his daughters autism. And seeing her progress from day one to now (age 5) I don't disagree with him.
While I believe there's an association with vaccines, I think like anything else, the more you get, the higher probability. Having said that. I/we had our children vaccinated but did not follow the time line scheduled. We spread them out. And I think maybe excluded 1 or 2. Would we do it again? Yes. Some of the diseases are so bad, we don't even have a concept because the vaccine did it's job and we don't see it anymore. But we've been having illegal immigrants bringing in all sorts of old erridacated diseases that we now have to worry about. Do you even know high high the percentage is of illegals that test positive for TB? Crazy high!
You don't need to download it. Just click play.
Oh, duh..... I'll check it out this afternoon
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Free shipping: VITALMX
Here's a handy synopsis
Might want to research that study a bit. Henry Ford Health itself denounced it as scientifically unsound and misleading. Unvaccinated children had ZERO cases? That’s a near zero probability finding.
HFH doesn't even agree with how the results of their study were presented in the movie.
Henry Ford Health Vaccine Study Fact Check | Henry Ford Health - Detroit, MI
Quote from their statement:
The draft wasn’t submitted for publication or shared with the public because the data and analyses were flawed, and it’s irresponsible to share scientifically flawed studies with the public.
You obviously didn't watch the film. You're just regurgitating propaganda from the pharma owned media instead of processing the information for yourself. All of that is addressed in the film.
Oh, the irony…
Eugenics was extremely popular and almost universally accepted as the way forward within the upper classes and wealthy elites in the early twentieth century. These types of sociopathic tendencies practiced by the elites has not faded since then. Mass vaccinations were and still are pushed by institutions controlled by these groups.
I tend to believe that vaccines today are much like many highly processed food products… Yes, they do contain the vaccine, but they also contain many other toxic chemicals that can seriously hinder the development of children and adults. Doing it this way makes it extremely hard to criticize because yes, vaccines do have vaccines in them and they do work, but they also contain many other toxic chemicals that do have serious health risks and DO NOT NEED TO BE IN THERE. The rich elites get the good clean shit and the rest of us get the shit.
Doing it this way would also make being critical of vaccines very difficult because so many studies are so contradictory towards eachother other depending on the context one looks at them from. The results are so ambiguous that vaccines have become almost irreproachable, which imo is by design.
I wouldn’t vaccinate my kids.
I did watch the whole thing (tbh I listened to it mostly while doing spreadsheet work). It was actually pretty well balanced while still leaning toward the producers pov. A couple thoughts.
The ethical concerns for double blind testing childhood vaccines is legitimate.
Regarding the TDAP vaccine study in Africa, if a vaccinated kid has a 2x chance of death vs an unvaccinated kid wouldn't we see a lot more kids dying? Deaths are one of the truly reliable health statistics we have and there hasn't been an increase in kids dying since the TDAP vaccine was introduced in 2002.
They did highlight some of the short comings of the study in the video which was nice, I read through the white paper and I have some questions, these are all my thoughts not regurgitated from other commentors.
The median time for monitoring for unvaccinated kids is much lower than for vaccinated kids. This was addressed in the video but worth pointing out again. The unvaccinated kids averaged only 2 annual Dr visits but those with trouble averaged 5 so it seems the troubled kids greatly brought up the average for unvaccinated Dr visits. Also using 1 doctor visit baseline as a criteria for analysis seems pretty incomplete.
I would think a health system this big would have more than 18k kids info over the course of 16 years, why was there so much of a mismatch in race and trouble at birth between the 2 cohorts? There's 3 times the percentage of troubled birth kids in the vaccinated cohort vs the unvaccinated. They do some statistical analysis to control for this but it seems weird to me to not match groups better.
Looking at the instances of adverse conditions, I would ask how many individuals are represented in this, is each instance unique to a kid or was 1 kid diagnosed (coded by the health system) with 5 of these conditions? Considering the median treatment time and average Dr visits it seems easy for an unvaccinated kid to not be diagnosed if they see the Dr 2 times in the first year of birth and that's it. This was briefly discussed in the video. The autism diagnosis rate is much lower than the 3% number that is being thrown around now.
I will agree with the conclusion in the video that more studies like this should be done.
1. As always, follow the money.
2. Keep in mind that Rockefeller was the money behind establishing “western medicine”, which brings us back to #1…
I think that’s a good assessment. Clearly this topic merits further objective investigation. These types of studies can be difficult. How do you accurately measure illness in kids if they don’t get sick?
Who knew that the 72-dose vaccine schedule starting with an infant that weighs a few pounds with a developing neural and immune system is hazardous?
Just a handful of the hazardous materials:
Aluminum phosphate - chemical compound synthetic form of aluminum
Ammonium thiocyanate - chemical compound of cyanide, used in fertilizer
Amorphous aluminum hydroxyphosphate sulfate - a form of an aluminum adjuvant
B-propiolactone (Beta-propiolactone) - disinfecting agent
Dipotassium Phosphate - used in fertilizers
Disodium phosphate anhydrous - preservative
Formaldehyde - colorless poisonous gas used as an antiseptic, disinfectant; preservative
Glutaraldehyde - disinfectant; chemical preservative
Monosodium glutamate (MSG) - preservative
Octoxynol-10 - cleansing agent
Polysorbate 80 (tween80) - emulsifier and detergent, a chemical compound that has the ability to cross the blood-brain barrier
Potassium aluminum sulfate - combination of potassium, aluminum, and sulfur; used for flame resistance
Sodium taurochenodeoxycholate - detergent
Thimerosal - mercury-based preservative
2-Phenoxyethanol - a chemical preservative
https://ks.childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Ingredient-List-for-Vaccines.pdf
Checks "movies and the people who make them are good when it fits my narrative" bingo card box.
Checks "an industry whose products are so safe that they demanded and received total liability immunity from the US government" bingo card box.
Correction, that's the "an industry whose products are so safe that they paid for and received total liability immunity from US gubernment" bingo card box.
"Follow the money" is spot on most times, but I don't understand trying to kill off your money stream.
Fewer people = fewer sales.
Pit Row
Not watching something because it goes against your narrative is actually a much narrower perspective. You can learn a lot by listening to people you disagree with, instead of just shouting them down.
The trick is to injure them so they need your products for life. The ones they kill are just collateral damage.
Here’s an inconvenient study, no matter how much you try and clean your bike, there is always a spot of dirt somewhere.
What do you say to someone that's never owned a bike but tells you if that's true you must not be washing it right?
"I'll bring you one next weekend, and you can educate me".
What if they refuse but continue to criticize your bike washing skills? What does that make them?
Lonely?
Post a reply to: An Inconvenient Study