My bold Trump - Iran/Israel breakdown

3 Tres
Posts
390
Joined
4/2/2023
Location
Albany, OR, USA
Edited Date/Time 6/21/2025 12:40pm

I figured I'd start my own thread, because what the hell, ML's fee is pretty dang reasonable.

 

Ok, so I've been tracking this conflict decently close the past week. How it was going wasn't making much sense to me, until I think I had an epiphany on a key breakthrough, which is the Trump factor.

 

I'll start off by saying that I'm a thrice Trump voter, and threw some cash his way during the last election. I know this guy ain't the messiah, but come on, the Democrats are a fricken joke of the highest magnitude, especially during this past election cycle. If I'm going to have a leader captured by the military industrial complex running things, I'd rather have someone with some entertainment mixed in, rather than a fake as f*ck moral superiority complex asshole shoveling woke BS out by the ton.

 

The epiphany would be that I think that Trump is faking it with the tough on Iran/ starting a new middle east regime change talk. I think that he would rather stick to his strengths: tough on the border, tough on illegals, pissing off liberals and patting himself on the back. I don't think he wants to stick his neck out with another regime change operation. In the past he has been very critical of the disaster of Iraq and Afghanistan. I think he'd rather just stick to running meme coin crypto scams and getting himself and his family more cash. Hey, it's a free country, and if you want to buy the next shit-coin, that's on you.

 

The reason I think he's faking it is because he's probably getting a shit-ton of pressure from the neo-cons and war mongers. I'm sure they love the belligerent social media posts like "Iran must surrender unconditionally!!" I think he knows that if doesn't play ball, that he'll get RFK'd by these military industrial complex f*ck-tards. I think he's putting on a big show of it and just buying time. Initially alot of his backers like Tucker were critical of his rhetoric, but have since cooled down and got in line. I think they must have either been notified, or have read between the lines on what the strategy is. 

 

Time will tell on if I'm way off base here.

10
|
6/21/2025 3:34pm
3 Tres wrote:
I figured I'd start my own thread, because what the hell, ML's fee is pretty dang reasonable. Ok, so I've been tracking this conflict decently close the...

I figured I'd start my own thread, because what the hell, ML's fee is pretty dang reasonable.

 

Ok, so I've been tracking this conflict decently close the past week. How it was going wasn't making much sense to me, until I think I had an epiphany on a key breakthrough, which is the Trump factor.

 

I'll start off by saying that I'm a thrice Trump voter, and threw some cash his way during the last election. I know this guy ain't the messiah, but come on, the Democrats are a fricken joke of the highest magnitude, especially during this past election cycle. If I'm going to have a leader captured by the military industrial complex running things, I'd rather have someone with some entertainment mixed in, rather than a fake as f*ck moral superiority complex asshole shoveling woke BS out by the ton.

 

The epiphany would be that I think that Trump is faking it with the tough on Iran/ starting a new middle east regime change talk. I think that he would rather stick to his strengths: tough on the border, tough on illegals, pissing off liberals and patting himself on the back. I don't think he wants to stick his neck out with another regime change operation. In the past he has been very critical of the disaster of Iraq and Afghanistan. I think he'd rather just stick to running meme coin crypto scams and getting himself and his family more cash. Hey, it's a free country, and if you want to buy the next shit-coin, that's on you.

 

The reason I think he's faking it is because he's probably getting a shit-ton of pressure from the neo-cons and war mongers. I'm sure they love the belligerent social media posts like "Iran must surrender unconditionally!!" I think he knows that if doesn't play ball, that he'll get RFK'd by these military industrial complex f*ck-tards. I think he's putting on a big show of it and just buying time. Initially alot of his backers like Tucker were critical of his rhetoric, but have since cooled down and got in line. I think they must have either been notified, or have read between the lines on what the strategy is. 

 

Time will tell on if I'm way off base here.

Something is up. A lot of head scratching about-face moments i agree.

1
6/21/2025 3:43pm

He wants to make a deal, so he can say he made a deal. He will benefit from it somehow. I’d be surprised if he does the right thing on this. 

1
3
Gworm
Posts
2802
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
6/21/2025 4:10pm
He wants to make a deal, so he can say he made a deal. He will benefit from it somehow. I’d be surprised if he does...

He wants to make a deal, so he can say he made a deal. He will benefit from it somehow. I’d be surprised if he does the right thing on this. 

Can you tell us what the right thing is..?

2
1
6/21/2025 4:32pm
Gworm wrote:

Can you tell us what the right thing is..?

Take out the Islamic regime that wants to have a nuclear bomb, because if they get it, there will be a cascade of events take place that are no good for the world. Their whole ideology is based on a global caliphate. Sounds like he can do no wrong in your eyes. He does good and bad things, he’s been vacillating on this. I suspect he will not follow through and allow the regime to stay in power with some kind of assurance they won’t try to make a nuke. 

4

The Shop

SEEMEFIRST
Posts
13939
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Arlington, TX, USA
6/21/2025 4:43pm
Gworm wrote:

Can you tell us what the right thing is..?

Take out the Islamic regime that wants to have a nuclear bomb, because if they get it, there will be a cascade of events take place...

Take out the Islamic regime that wants to have a nuclear bomb, because if they get it, there will be a cascade of events take place that are no good for the world. Their whole ideology is based on a global caliphate. Sounds like he can do no wrong in your eyes. He does good and bad things, he’s been vacillating on this. I suspect he will not follow through and allow the regime to stay in power with some kind of assurance they won’t try to make a nuke. 

A regime change, as in troops on the ground battling for years?

I don't think that is the right thing. 

Maybe some precision airstrikes on the nuclear complex, and if Iran wants a regime change, let them do it themselves. 

5
6/21/2025 4:53pm
SEEMEFIRST wrote:
A regime change, as in troops on the ground battling for years?I don't think that is the right thing. Maybe some precision airstrikes on the nuclear...

A regime change, as in troops on the ground battling for years?

I don't think that is the right thing. 

Maybe some precision airstrikes on the nuclear complex, and if Iran wants a regime change, let them do it themselves. 

Sounds like he did the right thing in getting rid of the nuke sites. It’s up to the people to take their country back. Ayotollah needs removed one way or another. Iranians are good people. 

5
2
Gworm
Posts
2802
Joined
4/5/2017
Location
Monett, MO, USA
6/21/2025 5:21pm
SEEMEFIRST wrote:
A regime change, as in troops on the ground battling for years?I don't think that is the right thing. Maybe some precision airstrikes on the nuclear...

A regime change, as in troops on the ground battling for years?

I don't think that is the right thing. 

Maybe some precision airstrikes on the nuclear complex, and if Iran wants a regime change, let them do it themselves. 

Sounds like he did the right thing in getting rid of the nuke sites. It’s up to the people to take their country back. Ayotollah needs...

Sounds like he did the right thing in getting rid of the nuke sites. It’s up to the people to take their country back. Ayotollah needs removed one way or another. Iranians are good people. 

I agree… sorry to sound snarky above, but I honestly wanted to hear your thoughts. 

1
6/21/2025 5:25pm Edited Date/Time 6/21/2025 5:26pm
Gworm wrote:

I agree… sorry to sound snarky above, but I honestly wanted to hear your thoughts. 

No worries. I’m snarky too. Glad he pulled the trigger. I just hope sleeper cells aren’t activated here. I thought he was bsing with threats, because he does talk too much. It works in his favor sometimes though. 

2
SEEMEFIRST
Posts
13939
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
Arlington, TX, USA
6/21/2025 5:30pm
Gworm wrote:

I agree… sorry to sound snarky above, but I honestly wanted to hear your thoughts. 

No worries. I’m snarky too. Glad he pulled the trigger. I just hope sleeper cells aren’t activated here. I thought he was bsing with threats, because...

No worries. I’m snarky too. Glad he pulled the trigger. I just hope sleeper cells aren’t activated here. I thought he was bsing with threats, because he does talk too much. It works in his favor sometimes though. 

I was about to ask what you were talking about when saying he "pulled the trigger".

I didn't realize that he had. I thought he was going to wait awhile a see if they wanted to negotiate.

Guess it was a feint.

Let's see how Iran responds to that.

4
3 Tres
Posts
390
Joined
4/2/2023
Location
Albany, OR, USA
6/21/2025 5:34pm
SEEMEFIRST wrote:
A regime change, as in troops on the ground battling for years?I don't think that is the right thing. Maybe some precision airstrikes on the nuclear...

A regime change, as in troops on the ground battling for years?

I don't think that is the right thing. 

Maybe some precision airstrikes on the nuclear complex, and if Iran wants a regime change, let them do it themselves. 

Sounds like he did the right thing in getting rid of the nuke sites. It’s up to the people to take their country back. Ayotollah needs...

Sounds like he did the right thing in getting rid of the nuke sites. It’s up to the people to take their country back. Ayotollah needs removed one way or another. Iranians are good people. 

Well they have the Ayotollah because the CIA already pulled off a regime change over there back in the day. I'm sure it'll work out way better this time though.

1
1
TeamGreen
Posts
37228
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
6/21/2025 5:43pm

Passat…

I think the B2s have already completed their mission and are RTB.

Im jus’ sayin’…

4
3
6/21/2025 5:56pm
3 Tres wrote:
Well they have the Ayotollah because the CIA already pulled off a regime change over there back in the day. I'm sure it'll work out way...

Well they have the Ayotollah because the CIA already pulled off a regime change over there back in the day. I'm sure it'll work out way better this time though.

Let the Iranians do it. Their choice if they want to remain a rogue state when they could flourish, but I suspect they would choose more freedom. 

1
olds cool
Posts
4226
Joined
1/17/2010
Location
Claremont, NC, USA
6/21/2025 7:12pm
TeamGreen wrote:

Passat…

I think the B2s have already completed their mission and are RTB.

Im jus’ sayin’…

Thanks to those crews we now live in a world where Iran has no nuclear weapon capability in their foreseeable future.

11
1
ThatOneMXGuy
Posts
1073
Joined
12/28/2023
Location
Somewhere, MO, USA
6/22/2025 6:29am
IMG 0649 3

A simple Google search disproves this propaganda ass Facebook junk.

Yeah. That’s almost all fake lol.

6
olds cool
Posts
4226
Joined
1/17/2010
Location
Claremont, NC, USA
6/22/2025 5:56pm
IMG 0649 3

A simple Google search disproves this propaganda ass Facebook junk.

Are you saying the MSM lied to us when they reported on these events?

Asking for a friend.

3
1
7/3/2025 9:04am

FMF APPROVES TRUMPS MESSAGE TO IRAN:

 

FMF BOMBS AWAY.jpg?VersionId=7o4wp5gVq3anps90fcgJp8vW9y

 

2
3
TeamGreen
Posts
37228
Joined
11/25/2008
Location
Thru-out, CA, USA
7/3/2025 9:16am
Rosso391 wrote:
FMF APPROVES TRUMPS MESSAGE TO IRAN:  

FMF APPROVES TRUMPS MESSAGE TO IRAN:

 

FMF BOMBS AWAY.jpg?VersionId=7o4wp5gVq3anps90fcgJp8vW9y

 

Well, they don’t call it Mega-Bomb for nothing, 

1
1

Post a reply to: My bold Trump - Iran/Israel breakdown

The Latest