I hope Reed don't design any more tracks.

[quote="Crash82":26kbq56w]The track sucked...jump, jump, go ahead and jump. I liked Atlanta better. How did Davi crash?[/quote:26kbq56w]

If they didn't add the walls at A-town, we would have been dealing with 35 second lap times.

I thought this track was a lot more fun to watch the top guys ride on and still had some pretty good racing.

I thought it was cool, but could have used a better whoop section.

[quote="Crash82":d2dxwoeh]The track sucked...jump, jump, go ahead and jump. I liked Atlanta better. How did Davi crash?[/quote:d2dxwoeh]

Alanta was a rutted up piece of shit.

i hope you don't post anymore...so what.

The Indy track was great. Many different rhythms and ruts. Supercross is supposed to be technical! Not every SX should be like Reed's design, but it was a great track design.

I really liked this track, and I'm one of those people who gets bored watching riders pogo-stick around. They had multiple line choices and the track kicked their asses! Did you see how many of those guys were sucking wind by the end of the main?!

It worked real well. There were lots of opportunities for passing and many great battles through the ryhtym section. How can you complain?

[quote="Crash82":2awnxjbm][quote="motoxcwat":2awnxjbm]It worked real well. There were lots of opportunities for passing and many great battles through the ryhtym section. How can you complain?[/quote:2awnxjbm]

I agree with all that, it was to fast and to smooth I guess. I can complain becasue this is Motodrive.[/quote:2awnxjbm]

word.

KDubs track was the best one of the season so far IMO. It was really fast and filled with huge jumps. The racing that night might not have been so amazing but the tv coverage showed how gnarly the track was.

Indy has terrible dirt so whatever track they build is going to be shit. That dirt sucks. It always breaks down so bad that it's 1/2 plywood a few laps into the 450 main.

a2 hands down

I liked K-Dubs 3-3-3 through the rhythm section. Got Jeffro all twitterpated too.

The dirt at Indy looked great, what are you talking about?

[quote="BobbyM":1b65byu8]i hope you don't post anymore...so what.[/quote:1b65byu8]



X 2

[quote="Trinitite":1kr447i7]
Indy has terrible dirt so whatever track they build is going to be shit. That dirt sucks. [/quote:1kr447i7]

looks like shit. No traction either!
[img:1kr447i7]http://www.vitalmx.com/images/photos/10005/normal_619318688_1204444032…]

They need some rocks and logs in their tracks.

[quote="Trinitite":333svrco]KDubs track was the best one of the season so far IMO. It was really fast and filled with huge jumps. The racing that night might not have been so amazing but the tv coverage showed how gnarly the track was.

Indy has terrible dirt so whatever track they build is going to be shit. That dirt sucks. It always breaks down so bad that it's 1/2 plywood a few laps into the 450 main.[/quote:333svrco]
Houston was one lined and fast, only cool thing about it was the finish line.
Reed made a really cool technical track.

the track was good. the whoops took down many riders in practice and even in the races. the rythem sections had soooo much variety to them. from being at the race, i liked the track. good design.

45 sec lap times! ughhh.

Yeah the dirt sucked... I mean thats why RC and everyone states that it has the best dirt. Ding ding everyone. We have a message board genius here. Hey does somebody have any common sense? Someone is looking for some...

This track was really cool. It had rhythm sections, triples, a finish line jump, and whoops. That was so neat.

this was the best track weve seen all series

The section that Windham went 333 on was sick, but my favorite was that rhythm section that had the two launch jumps in it. That was cool.

...haha man yall needed to ride the track first and then complain about it.. the track layout was awesome and it was plenty of passing lines everywhere.It was rutty throughout the day and it was probably real rutty in the supercross main event.I think the idea of the top guys designing the tracks is great cause it shows how they perfer a track .. compare the last 2 and you'll see. windham loves a fast flowing track and reed likes a technical track with a lot more timing to it .