Whats up with supercross???

foxrider868
Posts
10
Joined
10/19/2006
Location
Somewhere, PA, USA
Edited Date/Time 1/20/2012 5:12pm
i'm watching the toronto supercross on Speed, and they just showed the highlights of both heats??? Whats up? It's been on for 15 minutes, and all they have to show is the main??

Post edited by: foxrider868, at: 2006/12/03 22:14
|
JPT
Posts
7208
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Cedar Falls, IA, USA
12/3/2006 4:26pm
Pretty much, sucks huh?
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
12/3/2006 10:46pm
JPT wrote:
Pretty much, sucks huh?
I didn't catch the show (forgot to set up a season pass on Tivo), but there was no shortage of action from the day...or main event.

How was the show otherwise?
JPT
Posts
7208
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Cedar Falls, IA, USA
12/4/2006 5:20am
JPT wrote:
Pretty much, sucks huh?
GuyB wrote:
I didn't catch the show (forgot to set up a season pass on Tivo), but there was no shortage of action from the day...or main event...
I didn't catch the show (forgot to set up a season pass on Tivo), but there was no shortage of action from the day...or main event.

How was the show otherwise?
The coverage of the final was good, but that's all we got. I looked at my clock and 28 minutes in all we had seen were summaries of the 2 heats and the LCQ lasting 15-20 seconds each. I was pretty pissed. Luckily the final was great because if we'd had a James or RC runaway it would have been a prety much a bomb.

Like I said on the mean board, if I was a new viewer just checking it out, I'd have moved on about 15 minutes in.
westex
Posts
52
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Big Spring, TX, USA
12/4/2006 10:10am
JPT wrote:
Pretty much, sucks huh?
GuyB wrote:
I didn't catch the show (forgot to set up a season pass on Tivo), but there was no shortage of action from the day...or main event...
I didn't catch the show (forgot to set up a season pass on Tivo), but there was no shortage of action from the day...or main event.

How was the show otherwise?
JPT wrote:
The coverage of the final was good, but that's all we got. I looked at my clock and 28 minutes in all we had seen were...
The coverage of the final was good, but that's all we got. I looked at my clock and 28 minutes in all we had seen were summaries of the 2 heats and the LCQ lasting 15-20 seconds each. I was pretty pissed. Luckily the final was great because if we'd had a James or RC runaway it would have been a prety much a bomb.

Like I said on the mean board, if I was a new viewer just checking it out, I'd have moved on about 15 minutes in.
Alot of the fuzz in the first 30 minutes was first race/show of the year junk. Hopefully they will use heat races as filler in subsequent shows.

The Shop

yzjoker
Posts
32
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Ocoee, FL, USA
12/4/2006 3:27pm
GuyB wrote:
I didn't catch the show (forgot to set up a season pass on Tivo), but there was no shortage of action from the day...or main event...
I didn't catch the show (forgot to set up a season pass on Tivo), but there was no shortage of action from the day...or main event.

How was the show otherwise?
JPT wrote:
The coverage of the final was good, but that's all we got. I looked at my clock and 28 minutes in all we had seen were...
The coverage of the final was good, but that's all we got. I looked at my clock and 28 minutes in all we had seen were summaries of the 2 heats and the LCQ lasting 15-20 seconds each. I was pretty pissed. Luckily the final was great because if we'd had a James or RC runaway it would have been a prety much a bomb.

Like I said on the mean board, if I was a new viewer just checking it out, I'd have moved on about 15 minutes in.
westex wrote:
Alot of the fuzz in the first 30 minutes was first race/show of the year junk. Hopefully they will use heat races as filler in subsequent...
Alot of the fuzz in the first 30 minutes was first race/show of the year junk. Hopefully they will use heat races as filler in subsequent shows.
They had great coverage of the main but, the first twenty minutes sucked.
Chad Reed is reborn.
fcr
Posts
9348
Joined
12/1/2006
Location
Monkeys Eyebrow, YE
12/4/2006 4:59pm
JPT wrote:
The coverage of the final was good, but that's all we got. I looked at my clock and 28 minutes in all we had seen were...
The coverage of the final was good, but that's all we got. I looked at my clock and 28 minutes in all we had seen were summaries of the 2 heats and the LCQ lasting 15-20 seconds each. I was pretty pissed. Luckily the final was great because if we'd had a James or RC runaway it would have been a prety much a bomb.

Like I said on the mean board, if I was a new viewer just checking it out, I'd have moved on about 15 minutes in.
westex wrote:
Alot of the fuzz in the first 30 minutes was first race/show of the year junk. Hopefully they will use heat races as filler in subsequent...
Alot of the fuzz in the first 30 minutes was first race/show of the year junk. Hopefully they will use heat races as filler in subsequent shows.
yzjoker wrote:
They had great coverage of the main but, the first twenty minutes sucked.
Chad Reed is reborn.
Agree, the heat coverage was less than subpar. The camera focus was also weak. Just glad to have coverage. I can see poker on ESPN or Fox, at any time of the day!
BamBamm13
Posts
482
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Garden Grove, CA, USA
12/7/2006 1:39pm
westex wrote:
Alot of the fuzz in the first 30 minutes was first race/show of the year junk. Hopefully they will use heat races as filler in subsequent...
Alot of the fuzz in the first 30 minutes was first race/show of the year junk. Hopefully they will use heat races as filler in subsequent shows.
yzjoker wrote:
They had great coverage of the main but, the first twenty minutes sucked.
Chad Reed is reborn.
fcr wrote:
Agree, the heat coverage was less than subpar. The camera focus was also weak. Just glad to have coverage. I can see poker on ESPN or...
Agree, the heat coverage was less than subpar. The camera focus was also weak. Just glad to have coverage. I can see poker on ESPN or Fox, at any time of the day!
fcr wrote:
Agree, the heat coverage was less than subpar. The camera focus was also weak. Just glad to have coverage. I can see poker on ESPN or Fox, at any time of the day!
Laughing
raddad
Posts
2286
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Wrenshall, MN, USA
12/7/2006 3:15pm Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 5:53pm
JPT wrote:
Pretty much, sucks huh?
GuyB wrote:
I didn't catch the show (forgot to set up a season pass on Tivo), but there was no shortage of action from the day...or main event...
I didn't catch the show (forgot to set up a season pass on Tivo), but there was no shortage of action from the day...or main event.

How was the show otherwise?
It was ok, still a few camera cut aways at exactly the time something good was about to happen and still the same kinda mono tone "pingish" calling of the action. They still have not taken a look at MOTO GP or the Canadian nationals for a "how to" lesson. Overall it was much the same as we are used to over the last few years other than the complaints the other guys just told you about..but it sure is nice to have next day broadcast!
DadeRacing
Posts
20
Joined
12/7/2006
Location
Highland, IL, USA
12/8/2006 8:02am
No matter how great it is to have it on soon(I listen live anyhow)
I think the coverage is horrible, cameras aren't where they should be, they miss everything, and the heat coverage only gave a few seconds of
coverage, jeez gimme Krista Voda, Emigs comments seem ok, but just like Denny he looks lost when someones still talking and he doesnt know what to do with his emotions til its his turn. I love it when CBS sports does it the camera angles seem real cool, more money I guess?

Anyway for us real fans I think Live webcast is the way, then Tv as our backup to see what they were talkin about...

D.A.D.E.

Post a reply to: Whats up with supercross???

The Latest