Posts
5077
Joined
9/15/2010
Location
Falcon, CO, USA
Like your view points to this video.
An honest question with no Hook, Just like to see what your take is.
All the Best
Reese95w and those that think alike
Saw this last night.
You're wasting your time with him, and others of his type.
You'll get nothing from them but criticism of the messengers involved.
Or in his case, another lame ass, homemade meme.
A lot of those questions about the original footage were asked way back when.
Then the hysteria over what they wanted you to focus on took over.
That new footage is very telling.
And fits right into the narrative of orchestration.
So much facial recognition technology used conveniently as needed.
All ties in with the subject matter in the 4th amendment thread.
Makes you wonder what they're so afraid of ??
One thing to remember,
Our founding fathers were pro insurrection as a way to keep our government from becoming all powerful.
Seems it's kind of late for that.
It is a good question of why the pipe bomber hasn't been caught.
However this is a typical Tucker interview, full of half truths and diversionary tactics.
They say the cops didn't react quick enough, when someone off the street comes up to a police car and says there's a pipe bomb over there, I wouldn't expect the police to sprint out of their car with guns drawn, just going off of al my interactions with LEO'S. They probably radioed it in first then went to check it out.
There are major questions about what happened with the secret service that day regarding deleted text messages and stuff.
Another diversionary tactic is the talk about the cellular geofencing data, if the bomber didn't have a cell phone they xant be geofenced. If I'm planting pipe bombs I'm not carrying a cell phone, pretty basic stuff.
Another diversionary tactic us talking about facial recognition. Facial recognition doesn't work very well when a face us covered obviously. As far as other J6 criminals being identified with facial recognition, the FBI has been putting out tons of pictures asking do you know who this is. Is that facial recognition? Technically it is, but that's not what's implied. Obviously the fbi has other means in their tool belt as well, but when you post videos to your Facebook page of you breaking into the capital it takes some balls to blame that on facial recognition.
BUT, the most telling diversionary tactic in the interview is saying that the videos released are 1.6 or 1.8 frames per second and because of that facial recognition can not be applied. First of all there is 1 video that gas a low frame rate, i dont know whats up with that. But all the other videos of the bomb placer are of a somewhat normal appearing surveillance video frame rate. Second, the frame rate has nothing to do with the resolution of the video so how would it affect any facial recognition? They are depending on their audience not knowing what these technical terms mean to not understand what they are saying in fill in what tucker and the other guy are implying. You can find the fbi released videos here instead of watching them in the interview.
https://www.fbi.gov/contact-us/field-offices/washingtondc/news/press-re…
I would like to see video or transcripts of testimony of the retired fbi guy instead of relying on the interviewee's interpretation of his body language.
The founding fathers were not pro-insurrection. Their response to Shays Rebellion and Article 1 section 10, Article 2 section 4, and Article 3 section 3 of the Constitution tell you so.
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
So much disinformation/diversionary statements here
Are you trying to imply that the glowy thingy in his hand (aka cellphone) is not a cellphone?
And yes, frame rate is absolutely an issue in frame recognition. The algorithm may take 5% of distinguishable pixels from one frame and 15% from the next until there is enough data to analyze. SMH, and this from an engineer.
TM
Did you watch the videos on the fbi website? They are not less than 2 fps. But really the facial recognition thing is a red herring anyway.
I don't know if you can determine the glowy thing is a cell phone in this video, they appear to put it up to their head, then drop their hands without it, then grab it back off their head.
Besides that a cellphone type device could be used but not connected to any cellular network. I have plenty of old cellphones with no Sim cards that could be used for maps.
Wow, you're really pulling straws now. BTW, the government never claimed he didn't have a phone. The claim was that the cell tower data was corrupted and they could not find him with corrupted data. But you go ahead and walk around with 2 phones because your working one is no good for maps.
And to expand on your earlier disclaimer, "the police were calling it in". If they thought it was credible enough to "call in" surely they thought it was credible enough to not let kids walk by it? As someone I know used to say, "you people"
TM
As someone I know used to say; when they resort to insults you know your over the target.
There were many questionable actions by police and secret service that day. I'm not going to excuse the police for lackadaisical police work, but it doesnt really prove anything one way or the other. Police and secret service actions would look different if it weren't for the mob breaking into the capital while both houses of congress were in joint session.
I don't carry 2 phones, I hope you understand the point I was making about how a phone can be a disconnected device but still provide navigation around the city for rondezvous points etc. As far as corrupted data, do you have a primary source for that? Forgive me but I have a hard time taking these guys words on face value.
There's alot of fog around J6 and I don't like that anymore than you do.
Downloaded these videos from the fbi website and it's telling me they are at 10fps and 30fps, not the less than 2fps tucker and the other guy were going on about. Makes you wonder what else they lie about.
Nope, they said that video provided to them by the DNC was the lower frames per sec. Are any of these the video they were talking about? Or are they different clips? 🤔 makes me more wonder why YOU are so intent on discrediting it? Where were you on Jan 5 and 6 with your old phone that you took the sim out of? Using it for mapping your way around to avoid cameras.
TM
I'm just asking questions
My shit woulda worked
It did work, it was never intended to go off. It did exactly what a prop is supposed to do. Misdirect peoples thoughts. It must be tiring being wrong all the time.
I must be fucking blind, at what point in the video is their a cell phone or anything that resembles one?
Which videos from the dnc were they talking about? Where can I find them?
In the tucker video or on the revolver site.
If you go to 14:00 in the tucker interview they are talking about frame rate and show the video that is the 3rd screenshot I posted from the 10fps video I downloaded from the fbi site. I may have been misled by tuckers shotty production, but thats kind of the point. The video they show from when the person informed the cops is obviously not 2fps.
The story they are pushing is that the pipe bombs were planted at the time of discovery by capital police, not by the hooded backpack wearer the night before, to make the whole j6 thing seem worse, but in all reality it ended up being a superfluous event given what happened at the capital that day.
Don't know about frame rates and all, my question is why,
Why were folks planting Pipe bombs?
metro police and secret service knew about it but did nothing?
Capital police come by and get a pic of the bomb that confirms they knew about it from the person that put it there.
Tells me there was Plan "B" in place if the first narrative didn't work?
Or, this was in the plan all along but it didn't go as they wanted. or did it?
Pit Row
Plan B in case the insurrection ploy didn't work as intended.
What's ironic is the type of people who will down vote or say I'm wrong are the same types who complain about all the sketchy stuff our government does in other countries.
On the other hand they could have been planted as a way to draw DC police attention away from the the capital as the riot was bearing down.
There's proof that the Capital police chief wanted the national guard there but Pelosi shut that down.
On the other hand they could have been planted some random person in dc that didn't know what they were doing.
And that random person made sure to tell the Metro police and Secret service that they put a pipe bomb 15 ft from there SUV?
Why not put that person in the back of the SUV and bring them to jail?
Can you point ro the proof that Pelosi shut down national guard?
In the revolver article it says the guy that talked to the cops was a plain clothes capital police officer bur the source is a pay walled article by some other low level news site.
Ex-Capitol Police Chief Says Requests For National Guard Denied 6 Times In Riots
https://www.npr.org/2021/01/11/955548910/ex-capitol-police-chief-rebuff…
Now, How trust worthy is the Chief?
Early, stop.
Just motherfucking god damn fucking, stop.
How Convenient for Pelosi to be shooting a DOC (By her Daughter) the exact time this "Insurrection" was going down.
All the information coming out screams false Flag
Your own article states, "Sund told the Post that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the "optics" of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence.", but it doesn't say who actually rejected the national guard.
I know, I know, "BUT WHO DOES PAUL IRVING WORK FOR?!"
I will say, it's wild the lengths you guys will go to tied A to X to D to R to 2 to B to Pelosi to try and make this look like some giant ass cover up instead of what it was, a bunch of Trump fan boys, decked out in a shit ton of Trump fanboy swag, getting high on their own supply and doing some shit they shouldn't have done and or were too stupid to realize what they were doing.
Insurrection, eh, doing a bunch of dumbass shit to try and stop the certification of an election, yeah. But like you all love to say when it comes to black people getting shot by the cops, "fuck around and find out."
Right. and all involved got fired by Pelosi. OK, we'll say resigned but we all know.
Or they probably did resigned because they were being micro managed by Pelosi
If the TRUMP crew were to "Insurrect" do you think they would go in unarmed?
Out of pure curiosity...
If you (and to all you other guys on this board), if you all believe all this shit runs this fucking deep, and democracy (under this administration) is truly as at stake as you all claim it is, and everyone in the government is a pedo, then what are you actually doing about it other than posting in a non-moto section of a motocross forum?
I didn't say the TRUMP crew went there to insurrect (obviously, you can read it in the post).
What I said was, the TRUMP crew that was there was too stupid to realize what they were doing could be classified as insurrection when it comes to their punishment for being too stupid to know what they were doing could be classified as insurrection. The TRUMP crew in my family didn't participate in J6 but they're for sure dumb enough to have done it had it happened outside their front door.
That said, how dumb do you have to be to enter the capitol building by force and not expect to be punished? But, but, but they didn't force their way in, did they...
Post a reply to: Reese95w and those that think alike