Democratic Colorado Governor appointed supreme court bans Donald Trump from Ballot in 2024

This is gonna be an amazing year for The Court 

Good idea, make Trump look more like anti-establishment. Piss off his supporters as well, great idea.....

When does the political silly season actually start and end? Jan 1 to Jan 1.

Chickenshit Democrats just cant handle a fair fight. I don't like Trump but I really don't like 3rd world political parties.

This will quickly be resolved by our supreme court. 

What else are they going to conjure up next ??

Because the dems are scared fucking shitless right now.

biden is now seen by all as a doddering old fool. 

They've missed the boat as far as getting someone to run against him for the nomination. 

So this is just the first of many acts of desperation. 

Neither side of the scumbag swamp (R's or D's) are going to allow Trump in office again.

Bank it. 

They have an opinion and not much else.  You know what they say about opinions…

In the meantime, over 121,000 illegal immigrants were caught by our border agents in the past 15 days.

While another 11,000 evaded them.

And our economy is still going down the toilet.

I am beginning to think Trump should probably drop out. If he wins the Presidency, the powers that be will harass him, his family, his supporters, to render him ineffectual in the office. He and his supporters will constantly be on defense. If he doesn't win, his supporters will go absolutely ape shit. I get so exhausted from the media telling me daily that Trump voters are mental midgets, that there has to be something wrong with them, or they are revolutionary non-patriots. Despite them being half the citizens of this country, citizens of this country like everyone else. I also get so tired of the media and political elite insisting on the contradiction that Trump himself is way too stupid to be President, yet at the same time he is a criminal mastermind who duped the entire world into relinquishing the most powerful office in the world through a cabal with international powers. The recurring theme I have seen in most books I have read about the Trump Presidency (pro or con) is that he did not do anything the way it used to be done in the White House or federal government or had much respect for convention. Lots of folks loved that, some it really pissed off. To those that Trump pissed off, they cannot grasp that many in this country are fed up with how our federal government works, Trump upset the ant hill so many piss ants lived upon. It will be his doom, unfortunately he cannot win this fight he chose, noble or not. I think everyone knows this, his supporters and detractors alike.

Find the part where it includes a President, and that's assuming that he was convicted of an insurrection. It should take about 5 minutes to throw this out in the SCOTUS.

Fourteenth Amendment  Equal Protection and Other Rights

Section 3 Disqualification from Holding Office

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

That pesky Constitution thing always gets in the way, doesn't it?

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice-President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.

 shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability

You forgot to highlight the important part…  when was he engaged in an insurrection?  Jan 6?  Sorry, but if there were any proof he was involved, he’d have been charged  

Nasty Nancy had a whole lot more to do with that than Trump  

.

If he were to drop out, it would send a signal that they could pull whatever kind of bullshit shenanigans they choose, in order to retain power and control over the masses.

He was charged, 4-count indictment Aug 1.

With insurrection?

People act like if Trump wasn’t the nominee, the Dems don’t  have about a hundred things lined up to attack the next nominee with… and they probably couldn’t fight it as well as Trump. 

Also, even if the insurrection was criminally charged ( I didn’t see that language, but it may be there) , they shouldn’t be able to act on that without a conviction. 

 

Insurrection. 

🤣😂🤣😂🤣

Led by tourguides disguised as capital law enforcement officers.

The bar to bar (shout out to Art Eckman!) a presidential candidate must be excruciatingly high. And Trump hasn’t hit it.

Secondly, Trump will not bow out of the ‘24 election…because he doesn’t intend to win. The plan in 2016 revolved around rebuilding his brand & revenue streams, which unfortunately for Trump landed him in the White House.  His primary goal in ‘24 is the same, where a close loss will provide momentum for him to execute new private business ventures.  It’s genius when you think about it.  Unless he wins again. 

This is what democrats call democracy.  

this whole thing is the biggest circus.

1. he's never been CONVICTED of anything!!! So this court found him guilty without holding court at all. Ummmmm....that's not a good precedent.
2. he will now be bounced from every blue state ballot if this holds up (it shouldn't)

3.he's going to pound the ever loving shit out of every person that crossed him in this witchhunt and I can't blame him frankly, which is also a terrible precedent.

Libs are setting the flag on fire due to their TDS, and it's horrific to watch.

Ah yes, the rebuild of his brand instead of president. Is this your opinion or fact? 

Fuck Polis!...... he'll like it

More accurately, it's what they call saving democracy.   

Democracy ~ 'rule by the people'. An example of this is any system of government in which people vote their elected representatives"

That sounds more like a Right thing rather than what the Left is doing

Our republic is not ruled by the people despite what many believe 

By their standard of insurrection, we could have a discussion about how bad our government is, and what we think the solution is, and that's considered an insurrection. You don't have to do anything, you don't have to have any plan, and best of all, you can absolutely know your opinion for the solution will never happen. But you're an insurrectionist.

Let's imagine for 1 minute that DT was not running for another term in 2020. If he thought the election was rigged, which nobody believes he thinks anything else. As president, should he not try to rectify the fraud? Because that's really what you're after, if a president has a good faith belief that there was fraud, the president should do nothing? In this case he told the people to go protest patriotically and peacefully.

I am not sure whose point you are making. Democracy or saving democracy would be letting everyone vote for their preferred candidate, and the polls show that to be DJT. 

Right there with you.  "Saving Democracy", is the bullet in the last argument chamber the dims use when all other talking points have failed.  They say it repeatedly these days, they do what they're doing to save democracy from the big bad orange man.