Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
The Shop
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Free shipping: VITALMX
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Rent Free.
They were 'scraped' on Friday. Not created on Friday. Scraped is (I had to look it up myself) when data is collected from a site. It makes perfect sense that sometime over the 24 hours after the attack that any site affiliated with him would be 'scraped'. The article that you link to doesn't say that the sites were created after the attack.
Serves what “end”?
What in that article pointed to the websites being created after the event? The only mention is of scraping, which isn't anything close to creating the website. So how is pointing that out grasping at straws?
Trying to be rational without any personal attacks, just wondering how you came to the conclusion of me grasping for straws for pointing out that the article didn't come close to saying what was claimed.
"What does it mean to scrape a website?
Web scraping is the process of using bots to extract content and data from a website. Unlike screen scraping, which only copies pixels displayed onscreen, web scraping extracts underlying HTML code and, with it, data stored in a database. The scraper can then replicate entire website content elsewhere."
So where does it say that scraping a website means the new site is created from a specific person?
It basically just says the new site can be created from "any" site. Or what am I missing?
Where did the original content come from?
So you're alleging that the scraped site with very right wing posts is in alignment with a guy that lives in a bus plastered with LGBTQ... , BLM, and other left wing material? That makes sense to you? Why would you think that content came from a lefty to begin with?
And that would explain grasping at straws.
TM
It's pretty much out there.
TM
But you brought up a great point. In order to 'scrape' a site, it has to be there to begin with.
Pit Row
But you're trying to get people to believe the data that was there to begin with is from a David DePepe.
And you have no evidence to support that. You don't even have evidence to support that is was "scraped"
vs just "created". The only thing you really know is that this guy lived a life of "lefty". Complete opposite of
what you want people to believe. You have a hard sell because you're basically saying
"who you gonna believe, me or your lying eyes?"
TM
I really do.
Oh, the humanity!
TM
lede
/lēd/
nounUS
the opening sentence or paragraph of a news article, summarizing the most important aspects of the story.
"the lede has been rewritten and the headline changed"
Do you feel it is okay to revel in an 82 year old man getting his head broken by a hammer?
But to answer your question, no, and I don't believe that is what you are seeing as much as people bewildered by the convoluted, nonsensical story that they are trying to peddle.
I’m not trying to get people to believe what you are claiming. I pointed out that the article posted that was supposed to show that the websites were created after the attack didn’t show that at all. The article did show what they represented as evidence that the site was ‘scraped’ within 24 hours of the attack. That shouldn’t be surprising to anyone, should it?
As far as evidence, what evidence do you have that this guy lived a life of ‘lefty’? News reports? Did you actually see him carrying on his ‘lefty’ life?
It’s a shame that these things so often get framed in a 2 dimensional, single line of partisanship. Seeing things as only left or right because one thinks that there are two ‘sides’ is unhealthy at best.
This guy obviously appears to have some huge mental health issues. I don’t give a rat’s ass which ‘side’ you feel the need to lump him on, it’s pretty apparent that he bought the Q pill hook, line, and sinker.
It's that the left instantly blamed the right with no credible information. Even President Joe Biden got in
on the circus. The fun is showing how stupid they are acting about it. The stupid stories they try to promote,
and to show how lame their narrative is, that's the fun part. So you can try to make it about something other
than what it is, to attempt to shame people to not talk about it but that really doesn't work anymore.
You'd think that the side promoting all the disinformation would have some shame when you call them out
on their bogus shit but no, they just keep coming with more bogus shit. So yes it's fun to poke holes in their
narrative. And it's so predictable, They did the same shit with Gabby Gifford and Jared Laughner.
If you could just see my surprised face right now that they lied about that one too. It's just blatant lies,
all the time. So yes, IT'S FUN!
TM
Post a reply to: If