How Long Before Feld Steals Karnow's Title Sponsor?

GrapeApe
Profile picture for user GrapeApe
Posts
9001
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX, USA
GrapeApe 10/26/2022 8:53am
10/26/2022 8:53am Edited Date/Time 10/26/2022 11:05am
Magoofan wrote:
You know there's a huge difference between the two. To deny this fact is utterly ridiculous.

LungButter wrote:
There is? Some studies say that beating off every day (or regularly) is actually good for a man's health. Energy drinks are poison and cause cancer...
There is?

Some studies say that beating off every day (or regularly) is actually good for a man's health.

Energy drinks are poison and cause cancer.

What is worse? Being healthy or getting cancer?
So, the argument, that many are failing to articulate, is that porn is actually addictive and porn addiction has the potential to become a societal problem if it isn't already. The kids aren't just finding their old man's Playboys in his closet and seeing a still shot of saggy boobs and overgrown bush. They are watching the real deal in 4K online and forming "relationships" without having to talk face to face with actual women. When boys prefer to date their hand exclusively instead of courting women, we have a problem.

Before everyone throws their fleshlights at my head, I'm not against Kernow's sponsorship. Seems fairly benign. My view may change if I tune it to see Jason Anderson riding his Sybian Kawasaki over the Alexis Texas finish line doubles.

6
5
disbanded
Profile picture for user disbanded
Posts
6966
Joined
8/26/2007
Location
Evergreen, CO, USA
disbanded 10/26/2022 8:54am
10/26/2022 8:54am
Do yall have jobs, or no?
1
1
fourfourone
Profile picture for user fourfourone
Posts
3046
Joined
10/14/2017
Location
86oh, CT, USA
fourfourone 10/26/2022 8:55am
10/26/2022 8:55am
fourfourone wrote:
It's a porn site if more that 90% of the content porn lol. Don't be so naive. Content creator platform... yea for porn.. Sad attempt. try...
It's a porn site if more that 90% of the content porn lol. Don't be so naive. Content creator platform... yea for porn.. Sad attempt. try again.
Nathaniel129 wrote:
Yes it's basically a porn site, BUT he's not explicitly promoting that side of it. From his interview on Pulp it actually sounds like him NOT...
Yes it's basically a porn site, BUT he's not explicitly promoting that side of it. From his interview on Pulp it actually sounds like him NOT promoting that side of it was a condition of his sponsorship. I'm just guessing but maybe they decided to sponsor him on the Corp level so he DIDN'T get the girls like last year.

Nobody is saying you can't have your own moral standard man, we are just saying stop being so self-righteous your entire argument and point is lost because you have ZERO time for anyone else's opinion.

News flash, as far as the morality goes I'm probably pretty close to you on this one. However, I have no right to tell them to "fix" their business or tell them who they throw money at.

As far as the parenting thing goes, like I said before, if a set of graphics on a bike is the tipping point for your kid to drop down into the "porn addiction" side of things, there were other failures along the way. If a parent is sheltering their kids so much they don't know what's out there, God help them when they step out on their own.

Karnow is free to take money from whoever he wants, and he should be. If a guy like Trey Canard was still racing and was offered that sponsorship, I am ASSUMING he wouldn't take it. Which is ALSO fine.

Stop assuming every person who doesn't agree with you is just a piece of garbage human being and is just as entitled to their opinion as you are.
You need to read the entire thread....it's clear you didn't
Magoofan
Profile picture for user Magoofan
Posts
10401
Joined
5/4/2021
Location
Shadow Glen (for those who remember), CA, USA
Magoofan 10/26/2022 8:58am
10/26/2022 8:58am
If Feld allows this, I hope families with kids take a stand, not attend or support
these events and it hurts Felds bottom line.

Shit ain't right and it doesn't belong in our sport that is loaded with little kids.

Those giving this clown hero status....In a couple years nobody will even know who Karnow is.

Done here.




2
27

The Shop

See All »
MotoTribology 10/26/2022 8:58am
10/26/2022 8:58am
GrapeApe wrote:
So, the argument, that many are failing to articulate, is that porn is actually addictive and porn addiction has the potential to become a societal problem...
So, the argument, that many are failing to articulate, is that porn is actually addictive and porn addiction has the potential to become a societal problem if it isn't already. The kids aren't just finding their old man's Playboys in his closet and seeing a still shot of saggy boobs and overgrown bush. They are watching the real deal in 4K online and forming "relationships" without having to talk face to face with actual women. When boys prefer to date their hand exclusively instead of courting women, we have a problem.

Before everyone throws their fleshlights at my head, I'm not against Kernow's sponsorship. Seems fairly benign. My view may change if I tune it to see Jason Anderson riding his Sybian Kawasaki over the Alexis Texas finish line doubles.

Yeah....but her doubles....

2
3
R VanKamp77
Profile picture for user R VanKamp77
Posts
499
Joined
8/15/2022
Location
Portland, TN, USA
R VanKamp77 10/26/2022 8:59am
10/26/2022 8:59am
Some of you boomers really showing your age in here. For those of us not sponsored by AARP, I can assure you 'OnlyFans' only means one thing among people aged 13-24: Pornography.

Nobody cares if Karnow is posting LCQ insider content. It'll never be an athlete platform.
6
Nathaniel129 10/26/2022 8:59am
10/26/2022 8:59am
fourfourone wrote:
It's a porn site if more that 90% of the content porn lol. Don't be so naive. Content creator platform... yea for porn.. Sad attempt. try...
It's a porn site if more that 90% of the content porn lol. Don't be so naive. Content creator platform... yea for porn.. Sad attempt. try again.
Nathaniel129 wrote:
Yes it's basically a porn site, BUT he's not explicitly promoting that side of it. From his interview on Pulp it actually sounds like him NOT...
Yes it's basically a porn site, BUT he's not explicitly promoting that side of it. From his interview on Pulp it actually sounds like him NOT promoting that side of it was a condition of his sponsorship. I'm just guessing but maybe they decided to sponsor him on the Corp level so he DIDN'T get the girls like last year.

Nobody is saying you can't have your own moral standard man, we are just saying stop being so self-righteous your entire argument and point is lost because you have ZERO time for anyone else's opinion.

News flash, as far as the morality goes I'm probably pretty close to you on this one. However, I have no right to tell them to "fix" their business or tell them who they throw money at.

As far as the parenting thing goes, like I said before, if a set of graphics on a bike is the tipping point for your kid to drop down into the "porn addiction" side of things, there were other failures along the way. If a parent is sheltering their kids so much they don't know what's out there, God help them when they step out on their own.

Karnow is free to take money from whoever he wants, and he should be. If a guy like Trey Canard was still racing and was offered that sponsorship, I am ASSUMING he wouldn't take it. Which is ALSO fine.

Stop assuming every person who doesn't agree with you is just a piece of garbage human being and is just as entitled to their opinion as you are.
fourfourone wrote:
You need to read the entire thread....it's clear you didn't
Wrong. But keep going man...even the people who agree with you are disagreeing with you 🍻
fourfourone
Profile picture for user fourfourone
Posts
3046
Joined
10/14/2017
Location
86oh, CT, USA
fourfourone 10/26/2022 8:59am
10/26/2022 8:59am
agn5008 wrote:
“OF doesn’t give a shit about their original business model” - yes, they do. They want the adult content side of it gone. They have tried...
“OF doesn’t give a shit about their original business model” - yes, they do. They want the adult content side of it gone. They have tried before but they would have failed. They’re trying very hard to promote the celebrity/athlete side of it so it can become more popular on that front. If that ever actually happens then you will see adult content be banned on their platform.

Onlyfans exploiting women? Seriously? Do you think onlyfans is forcing women to take their clothes off? Do you really have the mindset that these women aren’t intelligent enough to make a decision such as that on their own? Are you seriously threatened by the fact that a woman chooses to take her clothes off for money?

Continue to throw baseless accusations out there. It makes you look smarter, trust me 😂 show me proof where onlyfans is forcing any of these women (or men) to do anything they don’t want and I’ll get on board with you. But until you show me that proof, I’ll continue to acknowledge the fact that you’re just a clown who makes stuff up.

And yeah, it is all about the money. Literally everything in life is about money. No one opens a business thinking “gee I hope this fails!” 😂
fourfourone wrote:
OF wants to get rid of the porn side BUT THEY DON'T. Are you really that dense lol. Its 90% of their business. Why can't you...
OF wants to get rid of the porn side BUT THEY DON'T. Are you really that dense lol. Its 90% of their business.

Why can't you read!

I never said OF is forcing anyone to do anything. AGAIN READ.

I said they create an easy avenue for young women to take their clothes off for money (whitch is what they do)

What baseless claims have I made?


agn5008 wrote:
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old...
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old dudes. It's all about the money.”

Exploit definition: to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage.

I’m failing to see where onlyfans is exploiting anyone? The content producer has free reign over what they charge. They can post stuff for free or charge a million dollars for a photo. It’s totally up to them. But onlyfans is taking advantage of the women 😂

Maybe onlyfans is giving women the opportunity to make money doing something they enjoy? Nah, that can’t be right. Women are too stupid to make clear and concise decisions on their own. They have to be told what they can and can’t do by our fellow superior men! 🙄
Giving young females an easy platform to take of their clothes off for money and then taking a percentage is not exploitation?

1
13
The real Sasquatch 10/26/2022 8:59am
10/26/2022 8:59am
Yes Onlyfans did try to ban the adult content and then unbanned it after seeing how much money would be lost. That doesn't mean that they are not still trying to grow the non porn side. For them to change , they need to be around and still in business to be able to change.So allowing the Adult content to stay keeps them around, and gives them the funds to help make that happen. I think they do not want to be thought of as onlyporn and belimited to that market. I tend to agree with the posts that say porn is not the worst thing a kid could be exposed to . Nevermind that you have to pay to access onlyfans content. Having a smartphone gives kids easier access to porn than telling them the name of a website that they have to pay to see it on.Many people used to ,maybe still do, think of the internet as just a place to find porn. All a kid has to do to look up porn is have access to the internet and know how to go online and think of what they want to see. If anything Onlyfans is doing a better job at restricting your kids from seeing porn on their site than any parent who allows their kid to go online. I don't know all of the types of adult content they allow, or if anything is restricted. But again its all protected by a payment gateway. I personally like that an outside the industry company has chosen Motocross to be a part of helping them get more into other types of content. That they can see the value .
2
4
Broseph
Profile picture for user Broseph
Posts
1218
Joined
4/28/2018
Location
Stevenson, WA, USA
Broseph 10/26/2022 9:03am
10/26/2022 9:03am
Magoofan wrote:
You know there's a huge difference between the two. To deny this fact is utterly ridiculous.

LungButter wrote:
There is? Some studies say that beating off every day (or regularly) is actually good for a man's health. Energy drinks are poison and cause cancer...
There is?

Some studies say that beating off every day (or regularly) is actually good for a man's health.

Energy drinks are poison and cause cancer.

What is worse? Being healthy or getting cancer?
GrapeApe wrote:
So, the argument, that many are failing to articulate, is that porn is actually addictive and porn addiction has the potential to become a societal problem...
So, the argument, that many are failing to articulate, is that porn is actually addictive and porn addiction has the potential to become a societal problem if it isn't already. The kids aren't just finding their old man's Playboys in his closet and seeing a still shot of saggy boobs and overgrown bush. They are watching the real deal in 4K online and forming "relationships" without having to talk face to face with actual women. When boys prefer to date their hand exclusively instead of courting women, we have a problem.

Before everyone throws their fleshlights at my head, I'm not against Kernow's sponsorship. Seems fairly benign. My view may change if I tune it to see Jason Anderson riding his Sybian Kawasaki over the Alexis Texas finish line doubles.

Well said Grape Bro.
1
Sandusky26
Profile picture for user Sandusky26
Posts
3516
Joined
7/28/2021
Location
Eastern, NC, USA
Sandusky26 10/26/2022 9:04am
10/26/2022 9:04am
GrapeApe wrote:
So, the argument, that many are failing to articulate, is that porn is actually addictive and porn addiction has the potential to become a societal problem...
So, the argument, that many are failing to articulate, is that porn is actually addictive and porn addiction has the potential to become a societal problem if it isn't already. The kids aren't just finding their old man's Playboys in his closet and seeing a still shot of saggy boobs and overgrown bush. They are watching the real deal in 4K online and forming "relationships" without having to talk face to face with actual women. When boys prefer to date their hand exclusively instead of courting women, we have a problem.

Before everyone throws their fleshlights at my head, I'm not against Kernow's sponsorship. Seems fairly benign. My view may change if I tune it to see Jason Anderson riding his Sybian Kawasaki over the Alexis Texas finish line doubles.

I've been dating my hand for years and I turned out alright.
3
4
R VanKamp77
Profile picture for user R VanKamp77
Posts
499
Joined
8/15/2022
Location
Portland, TN, USA
R VanKamp77 10/26/2022 9:05am
10/26/2022 9:05am
fourfourone wrote:
OF wants to get rid of the porn side BUT THEY DON'T. Are you really that dense lol. Its 90% of their business. Why can't you...
OF wants to get rid of the porn side BUT THEY DON'T. Are you really that dense lol. Its 90% of their business.

Why can't you read!

I never said OF is forcing anyone to do anything. AGAIN READ.

I said they create an easy avenue for young women to take their clothes off for money (whitch is what they do)

What baseless claims have I made?


agn5008 wrote:
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old...
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old dudes. It's all about the money.”

Exploit definition: to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage.

I’m failing to see where onlyfans is exploiting anyone? The content producer has free reign over what they charge. They can post stuff for free or charge a million dollars for a photo. It’s totally up to them. But onlyfans is taking advantage of the women 😂

Maybe onlyfans is giving women the opportunity to make money doing something they enjoy? Nah, that can’t be right. Women are too stupid to make clear and concise decisions on their own. They have to be told what they can and can’t do by our fellow superior men! 🙄
fourfourone wrote:
Giving young females an easy platform to take of their clothes off for money and then taking a percentage is not exploitation?

Taking advantage of gullible young girls fetish for being desired and addiction to status by offering them a seamless platform to expose themselves is absolutely exploitation. Anyone who disagrees is checked out of reality. Nevermind the underage girls problem they have.
1
14
ns503
Profile picture for user ns503
Posts
4618
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
NS Toolies, CA
ns503 10/26/2022 9:06am
10/26/2022 9:06am
fourfourone wrote:
OF wants to get rid of the porn side BUT THEY DON'T. Are you really that dense lol. Its 90% of their business. Why can't you...
OF wants to get rid of the porn side BUT THEY DON'T. Are you really that dense lol. Its 90% of their business.

Why can't you read!

I never said OF is forcing anyone to do anything. AGAIN READ.

I said they create an easy avenue for young women to take their clothes off for money (whitch is what they do)

What baseless claims have I made?


agn5008 wrote:
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old...
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old dudes. It's all about the money.”

Exploit definition: to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage.

I’m failing to see where onlyfans is exploiting anyone? The content producer has free reign over what they charge. They can post stuff for free or charge a million dollars for a photo. It’s totally up to them. But onlyfans is taking advantage of the women 😂

Maybe onlyfans is giving women the opportunity to make money doing something they enjoy? Nah, that can’t be right. Women are too stupid to make clear and concise decisions on their own. They have to be told what they can and can’t do by our fellow superior men! 🙄
fourfourone wrote:
Giving young females an easy platform to take of their clothes off for money and then taking a percentage is not exploitation?

Is YouTube exploiting their content creators?
1
3
R VanKamp77
Profile picture for user R VanKamp77
Posts
499
Joined
8/15/2022
Location
Portland, TN, USA
R VanKamp77 10/26/2022 9:07am
10/26/2022 9:07am
agn5008 wrote:
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old...
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old dudes. It's all about the money.”

Exploit definition: to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage.

I’m failing to see where onlyfans is exploiting anyone? The content producer has free reign over what they charge. They can post stuff for free or charge a million dollars for a photo. It’s totally up to them. But onlyfans is taking advantage of the women 😂

Maybe onlyfans is giving women the opportunity to make money doing something they enjoy? Nah, that can’t be right. Women are too stupid to make clear and concise decisions on their own. They have to be told what they can and can’t do by our fellow superior men! 🙄
fourfourone wrote:
Giving young females an easy platform to take of their clothes off for money and then taking a percentage is not exploitation?

ns503 wrote:
Is YouTube exploiting their content creators?
apples to oranges. post discarded.
10
H.E.penyypacker432 10/26/2022 9:08am
10/26/2022 9:08am
Magoofan wrote:
If Feld allows this, I hope families with kids take a stand, not attend or support these events and it hurts Felds bottom line. Shit ain't...
If Feld allows this, I hope families with kids take a stand, not attend or support
these events and it hurts Felds bottom line.

Shit ain't right and it doesn't belong in our sport that is loaded with little kids.

Those giving this clown hero status....In a couple years nobody will even know who Karnow is.

Done here.




What about energy drinks? Those actually kill kids. What about twisted tea? What about the team sponsored by the grow house? You sound like an entitled old man who’s opinion is the only right one.
3
4
mxracer828
Profile picture for user mxracer828
Posts
212
Joined
5/23/2020
Location
Lake Elsinore, CA, USA
mxracer828 10/26/2022 9:10am
10/26/2022 9:10am
GrapeApe wrote:
So, the argument, that many are failing to articulate, is that porn is actually addictive and porn addiction has the potential to become a societal problem...
So, the argument, that many are failing to articulate, is that porn is actually addictive and porn addiction has the potential to become a societal problem if it isn't already. The kids aren't just finding their old man's Playboys in his closet and seeing a still shot of saggy boobs and overgrown bush. They are watching the real deal in 4K online and forming "relationships" without having to talk face to face with actual women. When boys prefer to date their hand exclusively instead of courting women, we have a problem.

Before everyone throws their fleshlights at my head, I'm not against Kernow's sponsorship. Seems fairly benign. My view may change if I tune it to see Jason Anderson riding his Sybian Kawasaki over the Alexis Texas finish line doubles.

Sandusky26 wrote:
I've been dating my hand for years and I turned out alright.
Heard your dating her 5 sisters too hahaha
3
1
fourfourone
Profile picture for user fourfourone
Posts
3046
Joined
10/14/2017
Location
86oh, CT, USA
fourfourone 10/26/2022 9:12am
10/26/2022 9:12am
agn5008 wrote:
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old...
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old dudes. It's all about the money.”

Exploit definition: to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage.

I’m failing to see where onlyfans is exploiting anyone? The content producer has free reign over what they charge. They can post stuff for free or charge a million dollars for a photo. It’s totally up to them. But onlyfans is taking advantage of the women 😂

Maybe onlyfans is giving women the opportunity to make money doing something they enjoy? Nah, that can’t be right. Women are too stupid to make clear and concise decisions on their own. They have to be told what they can and can’t do by our fellow superior men! 🙄
fourfourone wrote:
Giving young females an easy platform to take of their clothes off for money and then taking a percentage is not exploitation?

ns503 wrote:
Is YouTube exploiting their content creators?
Not even in the same ball park.
7
soggy
Profile picture for user soggy
Posts
8951
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
soggy 10/26/2022 9:12am
10/26/2022 9:12am
agn5008 wrote:
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old...
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old dudes. It's all about the money.”

Exploit definition: to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage.

I’m failing to see where onlyfans is exploiting anyone? The content producer has free reign over what they charge. They can post stuff for free or charge a million dollars for a photo. It’s totally up to them. But onlyfans is taking advantage of the women 😂

Maybe onlyfans is giving women the opportunity to make money doing something they enjoy? Nah, that can’t be right. Women are too stupid to make clear and concise decisions on their own. They have to be told what they can and can’t do by our fellow superior men! 🙄
fourfourone wrote:
Giving young females an easy platform to take of their clothes off for money and then taking a percentage is not exploitation?

R VanKamp77 wrote:
Taking advantage of gullible young girls fetish for being desired and addiction to status by offering them a seamless platform to expose themselves is absolutely exploitation...
Taking advantage of gullible young girls fetish for being desired and addiction to status by offering them a seamless platform to expose themselves is absolutely exploitation. Anyone who disagrees is checked out of reality. Nevermind the underage girls problem they have.
The part your forgetting is that the girls do it willingly and get to set there own prices and I don’t hear them complaining.

The site has made millionaires out the content creators.
4
4

Pit Row

See All »
agn5008
Profile picture for user agn5008
Posts
2048
Joined
3/8/2021
Location
PA, PA, USA
Fantasy
58th
agn5008 10/26/2022 9:13am
10/26/2022 9:13am
LungButter wrote:
So if we gotta save the kids, at what point do we ban energy drinks? Do you have a stance on most of the industry being...
So if we gotta save the kids, at what point do we ban energy drinks?

Do you have a stance on most of the industry being propped up by poison in a can?
Magoofan wrote:
You know there's a huge difference between the two. To deny this fact is utterly ridiculous.

Yeah, one is incredibly unhealthy and the other is a completely normal product of life.

I can easily monitor what my children are doing on the internet. It takes a little bit of parenting and effort on my end (I know some of you apparently aren’t willing to put forth that effort) but with drugs, alcohol and energy drinks it’s a little more difficult. I can’t watch their every move when they’re off running around with friends. Again, it comes down to parenting and discussing those topics with my children as they’re coming to the age of experimenting and making bad decisions. I’m not going to rely on a dirt bike shroud graphic to explain what’s right and wrong to my children. I’ll do that myself.
9
1
soggy
Profile picture for user soggy
Posts
8951
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
soggy 10/26/2022 9:13am
10/26/2022 9:13am
fourfourone wrote:
Giving young females an easy platform to take of their clothes off for money and then taking a percentage is not exploitation?

ns503 wrote:
Is YouTube exploiting their content creators?
fourfourone wrote:
Not even in the same ball park.
Actually YouTube is because the amount they pay their creators is minuscule. Same with any music streaming site. Only fans is the only platform actually getting it right.
5
2
LungButter
Profile picture for user LungButter
Posts
8684
Joined
1/9/2016
Location
Yellow Pine, ID, USA
LungButter 10/26/2022 9:14am
10/26/2022 9:14am
H.E.penyypacker432 wrote:
What about energy drinks? Those actually kill kids. What about twisted tea? What about the team sponsored by the grow house? You sound like an entitled...
What about energy drinks? Those actually kill kids. What about twisted tea? What about the team sponsored by the grow house? You sound like an entitled old man who’s opinion is the only right one.
Nobody cares about the poison drinks bro... we just can't have girls making easy money and dudes beating off to it.

Nevermind the irony that Monster has an Army of half naked chicks running around every event to promote their poison.
13
4
GrapeApe
Profile picture for user GrapeApe
Posts
9001
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX, USA
GrapeApe 10/26/2022 9:16am
10/26/2022 9:16am
GrapeApe wrote:
So, the argument, that many are failing to articulate, is that porn is actually addictive and porn addiction has the potential to become a societal problem...
So, the argument, that many are failing to articulate, is that porn is actually addictive and porn addiction has the potential to become a societal problem if it isn't already. The kids aren't just finding their old man's Playboys in his closet and seeing a still shot of saggy boobs and overgrown bush. They are watching the real deal in 4K online and forming "relationships" without having to talk face to face with actual women. When boys prefer to date their hand exclusively instead of courting women, we have a problem.

Before everyone throws their fleshlights at my head, I'm not against Kernow's sponsorship. Seems fairly benign. My view may change if I tune it to see Jason Anderson riding his Sybian Kawasaki over the Alexis Texas finish line doubles.

Sandusky26 wrote:
I've been dating my hand for years and I turned out alright.
I don't think randy or roostbuckets would agree
1
1
Sandusky26
Profile picture for user Sandusky26
Posts
3516
Joined
7/28/2021
Location
Eastern, NC, USA
Sandusky26 10/26/2022 9:19am
10/26/2022 9:19am
GrapeApe wrote:
So, the argument, that many are failing to articulate, is that porn is actually addictive and porn addiction has the potential to become a societal problem...
So, the argument, that many are failing to articulate, is that porn is actually addictive and porn addiction has the potential to become a societal problem if it isn't already. The kids aren't just finding their old man's Playboys in his closet and seeing a still shot of saggy boobs and overgrown bush. They are watching the real deal in 4K online and forming "relationships" without having to talk face to face with actual women. When boys prefer to date their hand exclusively instead of courting women, we have a problem.

Before everyone throws their fleshlights at my head, I'm not against Kernow's sponsorship. Seems fairly benign. My view may change if I tune it to see Jason Anderson riding his Sybian Kawasaki over the Alexis Texas finish line doubles.

Sandusky26 wrote:
I've been dating my hand for years and I turned out alright.
GrapeApe wrote:
I don't think randy or roostbuckets would agree
Sometimes we go on double dates.
2
2
agn5008
Profile picture for user agn5008
Posts
2048
Joined
3/8/2021
Location
PA, PA, USA
Fantasy
58th
agn5008 10/26/2022 9:22am
10/26/2022 9:22am Edited Date/Time 10/26/2022 9:23am
agn5008 wrote:
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old...
“ OF doesn't give a shit about their original business model. They will continue to exploit young women to take their clothes off for horny old dudes. It's all about the money.”

Exploit definition: to make use of meanly or unfairly for one's own advantage.

I’m failing to see where onlyfans is exploiting anyone? The content producer has free reign over what they charge. They can post stuff for free or charge a million dollars for a photo. It’s totally up to them. But onlyfans is taking advantage of the women 😂

Maybe onlyfans is giving women the opportunity to make money doing something they enjoy? Nah, that can’t be right. Women are too stupid to make clear and concise decisions on their own. They have to be told what they can and can’t do by our fellow superior men! 🙄
fourfourone wrote:
Giving young females an easy platform to take of their clothes off for money and then taking a percentage is not exploitation?

R VanKamp77 wrote:
Taking advantage of gullible young girls fetish for being desired and addiction to status by offering them a seamless platform to expose themselves is absolutely exploitation...
Taking advantage of gullible young girls fetish for being desired and addiction to status by offering them a seamless platform to expose themselves is absolutely exploitation. Anyone who disagrees is checked out of reality. Nevermind the underage girls problem they have.
So you consider someone doing something completely under their own free power to make money is exploitation? These girls are given 100% free reign over their choice to do this, the type of content they produce, and amount of money they charge. You consider that exploitation? And yeah, of course onlyfans has to make a profit. It would be a pretty awful business model if they didn’t.

Shit, I better have a conversation with my employer. They make me do stuff I don’t wanna do all the time. I must be getting exploited big time! I must be a victim!
13
3
crowe660
Profile picture for user crowe660
Posts
2281
Joined
8/15/2020
Location
USA
crowe660 10/26/2022 9:24am
10/26/2022 9:24am
Big doubles no trouble.
1
fourfourone
Profile picture for user fourfourone
Posts
3046
Joined
10/14/2017
Location
86oh, CT, USA
fourfourone 10/26/2022 9:30am
10/26/2022 9:30am
fourfourone wrote:
Giving young females an easy platform to take of their clothes off for money and then taking a percentage is not exploitation?

R VanKamp77 wrote:
Taking advantage of gullible young girls fetish for being desired and addiction to status by offering them a seamless platform to expose themselves is absolutely exploitation...
Taking advantage of gullible young girls fetish for being desired and addiction to status by offering them a seamless platform to expose themselves is absolutely exploitation. Anyone who disagrees is checked out of reality. Nevermind the underage girls problem they have.
agn5008 wrote:
So you consider someone doing something completely under their own free power to make money is exploitation? These girls are given 100% free reign over their...
So you consider someone doing something completely under their own free power to make money is exploitation? These girls are given 100% free reign over their choice to do this, the type of content they produce, and amount of money they charge. You consider that exploitation? And yeah, of course onlyfans has to make a profit. It would be a pretty awful business model if they didn’t.

Shit, I better have a conversation with my employer. They make me do stuff I don’t wanna do all the time. I must be getting exploited big time! I must be a victim!
#facepalm
10
Motoxdoc
Profile picture for user Motoxdoc
Posts
2711
Joined
11/8/2009
Location
Steamboat Springs, CO, USA
Motoxdoc 10/26/2022 9:33am
10/26/2022 9:33am Edited Date/Time 10/26/2022 9:37am
I love it, you can see where people stand on this social issue. This is a great profiling thread.
I struggled as a privateer in the early 80s and understand his plight. So you can all profile me…Logan Karnow is my hero.
And the title of the thread is legit. I could see that happening.
4
3
peelout
Profile picture for user peelout
Posts
18403
Joined
1/6/2011
Location
Ogden, UT, USA
peelout 10/26/2022 9:39am
10/26/2022 9:39am
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging deep to find it. you literally can not see anything on the home page. first you have to have an account, then after you search for the bad stuff, you still can't see anything without subscribing/purchasing a plan to view it. by that point it's no longer an accident, you have to go out of you way to access anything on OF.

you can literally find worse shit on Google. hell, sometimes i get some really bad shit with a seemingly innocent search. YouTube, IG, SnapChat, TikTok, Twitter... all those platforms it's easier to access "porn" than OF.

get the fuck outta' here
29
4
soggy
Profile picture for user soggy
Posts
8951
Joined
12/3/2018
Location
USA
soggy 10/26/2022 9:40am
10/26/2022 9:40am
peelout wrote:
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging...
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging deep to find it. you literally can not see anything on the home page. first you have to have an account, then after you search for the bad stuff, you still can't see anything without subscribing/purchasing a plan to view it. by that point it's no longer an accident, you have to go out of you way to access anything on OF.

you can literally find worse shit on Google. hell, sometimes i get some really bad shit with a seemingly innocent search. YouTube, IG, SnapChat, TikTok, Twitter... all those platforms it's easier to access "porn" than OF.

get the fuck outta' here
No I’m sure they didn’t. They only know what they read on Parler and infowars.
7
8
SoCalMX70
Profile picture for user SoCalMX70
Posts
3580
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
SoCalMX70 10/26/2022 9:46am
10/26/2022 9:46am Edited Date/Time 10/26/2022 9:48am
peelout wrote:
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging...
did any of you woke dorks actually type in OnlyFans dot com and see what comes up? it's impossible to see any inappropriate content without digging deep to find it. you literally can not see anything on the home page. first you have to have an account, then after you search for the bad stuff, you still can't see anything without subscribing/purchasing a plan to view it. by that point it's no longer an accident, you have to go out of you way to access anything on OF.

you can literally find worse shit on Google. hell, sometimes i get some really bad shit with a seemingly innocent search. YouTube, IG, SnapChat, TikTok, Twitter... all those platforms it's easier to access "porn" than OF.

get the fuck outta' here
Wait, the guys AGAINST this sponsor are the "woke" ones? I'm lost.
2
1

Post a reply to: How Long Before Feld Steals Karnow's Title Sponsor?