Major Bias

GuyB wrote:

Here's a short list of things I object to... Unless you're a disgruntled repeat customer or a longtime lurker, you've been here for what...five days? It's...

Here's a short list of things I object to...

Unless you're a disgruntled repeat customer or a longtime lurker, you've been here for what...five days? It's generally not a good look for a noob to come in and tell someone how they should run the place. I think one of the "rules" for forum participation is to get a feel for it. Sometimes that means doing more reading than posting. Coming in on week one and trying to be the 400-pound gorilla usually isn't going to work that well.

Your rants about various MSM outlets (now deleted) in the Dumbgeon thread didn't go unnoticed. We don't do religion or politics in here...except MAYBE where it relates to the sport.

I think I have a certain amount of patience for opposing viewpoints. But it's not an infinite amount, especially if the forum member is attempting to be disruptive. In other words, settle down, Beavis.

Harry Backmon wrote:

You must be the arithmetic man - you add trouble, subtract pleasure, divide attention, and multiply ignorance.

motogreasey wrote:

I am unsure how me asking questions about deleted threads and forum manipulation, makes me a 400lb gorilla. They are simple questions, that can easily be...

I am unsure how me asking questions about deleted threads and forum manipulation, makes me a 400lb gorilla. They are simple questions, that can easily be answered , Without resorting to name calling, Beavis!

As for the MSM "rants" as you call them. I was in discussion with someone else in the dumbgeon. I don't care if it was noticed, there was nothing there that should make anyone bat an eye. But seriously, you remove posts from the dumbgeon too?

I can accept your points for the most part, RIGHT UP UNTIL you start name calling. So, you have no problem taking people to task over their "words", yet you do the same thing! There's a word for that but I don't feel the need.

Also, I am NOT attempting to be disruptive. It started with simple questions, about a thread that was deleted. I've seen the same question asked MANY times. A problem doesn't disappear, by simply ignoring it...

motogreasey wrote:

I am unsure how me asking questions about deleted threads and forum manipulation, makes me a 400lb gorilla. They are simple questions, that can easily be...

I am unsure how me asking questions about deleted threads and forum manipulation, makes me a 400lb gorilla. They are simple questions, that can easily be answered , Without resorting to name calling, Beavis!

As for the MSM "rants" as you call them. I was in discussion with someone else in the dumbgeon. I don't care if it was noticed, there was nothing there that should make anyone bat an eye. But seriously, you remove posts from the dumbgeon too?

I can accept your points for the most part, RIGHT UP UNTIL you start name calling. So, you have no problem taking people to task over their "words", yet you do the same thing! There's a word for that but I don't feel the need.

Also, I am NOT attempting to be disruptive. It started with simple questions, about a thread that was deleted. I've seen the same question asked MANY times. A problem doesn't disappear, by simply ignoring it...

GuyB wrote:

No, it's a pop-quiz to see how quick a learner you are. If you're going to go out in a blaze of glory, make sure that...

No, it's a pop-quiz to see how quick a learner you are. If you're going to go out in a blaze of glory, make sure that the last one is really good.

motogreasey wrote:

You have zero tolerance when people disagree with you. What I find interesting is your allowance of those that attack others, on your behalf. Regardless if...

You have zero tolerance when people disagree with you. What I find interesting is your allowance of those that attack others, on your behalf. Regardless if you like it or not, my point is valid and has been expressed many times. I have done nothing disrespectful and any harsh words are simply retaliatory.

What have I done to deserve ANY judgement?

Harry Backmon wrote:

Haha! That is hilarious! Zing!

motogreasey wrote:

Sounds like too much Kathy Griffin for you.

Harry Backmon wrote:

You must be the arithmetic man - you add trouble, subtract pleasure, divide attention, and multiply ignorance.

Harry Backmon wrote:

You must be the arithmetic man - you add trouble, subtract pleasure, divide attention, and multiply ignorance.

motogreasey wrote:

Please explain to me how that is? You just post words because you like how they sound, when in fact they have no relevance! What have...

Please explain to me how that is? You just post words because you like how they sound, when in fact they have no relevance! What have I done that is so, over the top, to deserve your ridiculous reply? asking questions, pointing out something others have a problem with?

motogreasey wrote:

Sounds like too much Kathy Griffin for you.

Harry Backmon wrote:

You must be the arithmetic man - you add trouble, subtract pleasure, divide attention, and multiply ignorance.

IWreckALot wrote:

No man. . . he's just a realist. . . who knows the score. He said so himself.

Harry Backmon wrote:

Does anyone here know anything about snowmobiling and PED use?

Harry Backmon wrote:

Does anyone here know anything about snowmobiling and PED use?

kkawboy14 wrote:

I know it’s hard to PEDal a snowmobile or even push it!

GuyB wrote:

No, it's a pop-quiz to see how quick a learner you are. If you're going to go out in a blaze of glory, make sure that...

No, it's a pop-quiz to see how quick a learner you are. If you're going to go out in a blaze of glory, make sure that the last one is really good.

motogreasey wrote:

You have zero tolerance when people disagree with you. What I find interesting is your allowance of those that attack others, on your behalf. Regardless if...

You have zero tolerance when people disagree with you. What I find interesting is your allowance of those that attack others, on your behalf. Regardless if you like it or not, my point is valid and has been expressed many times. I have done nothing disrespectful and any harsh words are simply retaliatory.

What have I done to deserve ANY judgement?

kkawboy14 wrote:

I have to tell you, I’ve been here from the very beginning of this raggedy joint, I’ve busted on Guyb, disagreed with Guyb, started plenty of...

I have to tell you, I’ve been here from the very beginning of this raggedy joint, I’ve busted on Guyb, disagreed with Guyb, started plenty of stupid threads that got booted to the dumbgeon and I’m still here!

motogreasey wrote:

I am unsure how me asking questions about deleted threads and forum manipulation, makes me a 400lb gorilla. They are simple questions, that can easily be...

I am unsure how me asking questions about deleted threads and forum manipulation, makes me a 400lb gorilla. They are simple questions, that can easily be answered , Without resorting to name calling, Beavis!

As for the MSM "rants" as you call them. I was in discussion with someone else in the dumbgeon. I don't care if it was noticed, there was nothing there that should make anyone bat an eye. But seriously, you remove posts from the dumbgeon too?

I can accept your points for the most part, RIGHT UP UNTIL you start name calling. So, you have no problem taking people to task over their "words", yet you do the same thing! There's a word for that but I don't feel the need.

Also, I am NOT attempting to be disruptive. It started with simple questions, about a thread that was deleted. I've seen the same question asked MANY times. A problem doesn't disappear, by simply ignoring it...

GuyB wrote:

One man's problem is another man's solution. And some people just like to argue for the sake of arguing. I'm not one of those people.

GuyB wrote:

One man's problem is another man's solution. And some people just like to argue for the sake of arguing. I'm not one of those people.

kkawboy14 wrote:

If he was truly a realist, he would realize that in the real world he’s not the boss of most of the realities he lives in

billyp330 wrote:

your posting suggest otherwise.. I dont completely agree with motogreasey as he seems to be letting the argument get the best of him, but i do...

your posting suggest otherwise..

I dont completely agree with motogreasey as he seems to be letting the argument get the best of him, but i do agree with his main point of the censorship. Its not needed. If i dont agree with someones post or just think its just clickbait i dont read it or just dont comment on it. I get to choose for myself. I dont need anyone to censor it for me.

You run a cool website and many on here will gladly gargle you because of it. I think you let that get to your head too much sometimes, but it is what it is. You are only human and everyone does it.

I'll admit it. I am a contrarian. But, I like to keep an open mind as much as possible and don't feel the need to silence anyone I dont agree with.

motogreasey wrote:

Do you really consider that constructive? Personally, doesn't matter to me. I'm not the one pulling threads, nor am I the one puling threads with an...

Do you really consider that constructive? Personally, doesn't matter to me. I'm not the one pulling threads, nor am I the one puling threads with an inability to clearly and professionally offer a reasonable explanation. Beavis!

I can use Beavis, right? I mean, you did... Seriously, is that going to get me "clicked"? Just asking?

kkawboy14 wrote:

He posted those words to make you think......seems like you didn’t think hard enough!

GuyB wrote:

Let's see...I can argue with you, or I can work on Pit Bits. Which one of those sounds like a better option?

huck wrote:

So just because some of us might agree with how / what guyb does, it means we 'gargle him'?

EABOD!

billyp330 wrote:

your posting suggest otherwise.. I dont completely agree with motogreasey as he seems to be letting the argument get the best of him, but i do...

your posting suggest otherwise..

I dont completely agree with motogreasey as he seems to be letting the argument get the best of him, but i do agree with his main point of the censorship. Its not needed. If i dont agree with someones post or just think its just clickbait i dont read it or just dont comment on it. I get to choose for myself. I dont need anyone to censor it for me.

You run a cool website and many on here will gladly gargle you because of it. I think you let that get to your head too much sometimes, but it is what it is. You are only human and everyone does it.

I'll admit it. I am a contrarian. But, I like to keep an open mind as much as possible and don't feel the need to silence anyone I dont agree with.

mattyhamz2 wrote:

Well, I see this has gone well so far. Pretty sure this falls under the category of "Disrupting the Forum"

kkawboy14 wrote:

He posted those words to make you think......seems like you didn’t think hard enough!

motogreasey wrote:

That's literal garbage! Thanks for your effort!

motogreasey wrote:

Pit bits! But I know we'll go down this road again. Just looking for real answers, so we can solve the issue at hand. I don't...

Pit bits!

But I know we'll go down this road again. Just looking for real answers, so we can solve the issue at hand. I don't like kicking the can!

mattyhamz2 wrote:

Well, I see this has gone well so far. Pretty sure this falls under the category of "Disrupting the Forum"

motogreasey wrote:

Asking questions about a deleted thread, is disrupting the forum? O.K., then!

GuyB wrote:

Let's see...I can argue with you, or I can work on Pit Bits. Which one of those sounds like a better option?

GuyB wrote:

Sorry, but I don't really feel that there's an "issue at hand" to solve.

In the meantime, where should this thread go? Non-Moto, or Dumbgeon?