Call to Action by MX Sports

anniebert
Posts
144
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
El Segundo, CA, USA
Edited Date/Time 1/22/2012 1:02pm

I KNOW THERE'S A FEW OTHER POST GOING AROUND ON THIS, BUT THIS WAS JUST SENT TO ME FROM MX SPORTS....READ BELOW

URGENT: Call to Action from MX Sports

Dear Industry Leaders, Racers, Fans and Enthusiasts,

Yesterday, a law went into effect prohibiting the sale of minicycles to children under the age of 13 as a result of the lead content in the machines (Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act of 2008, Title I, Section 101). This law, which arguably applies to both motorcycles and ATVs, treats any children's product that contains more lead than the limit established by law as a banned hazardous substance.

We have already begun to experience the devastating consequences of this new legislation upon our sport, as OEMs have already pulled these machines from their showroom floors. Youth racing is the foundation of our sport. That is when most of you fell in love with motorcycles in the first place, only to grow up to bring your own kids back to the racetracks. Only now, they can't ride.

On behalf of MX Sports (Loretta Lynn's), Racer Productions (GNCC), and ATVPG (ATV Amateur Nationals), we are extremely concerned with the short- and long-range effects of this new legislation, as the first rounds in all of our various series are less than two weeks away, and all include classes for youth racers under the age of 13. But it's not just our events - WORCS, NMA, Mini Os, SETRA, etc., are all adversely impacted.

It is our opinion that the new law is inapplicable to off-highway motorsports, as neither motorcycles nor ATVs have the potential for ingestion, and lead from motorcycles is not likely to be absorbed into the bloodstream or present a health hazard. Let's face it - when was the last time someone swallowed a motorcycle? Any other interpretation would be silly. Be that as it may, the law will continue to adversely affect our industry unless and until an exemption is granted.

Presently, there is a petition for an immediate temporary exemption pending before the Consumer Product Safety Commission ("CPSC") filed by the Motorcycle Industry Council (MIC) on behalf of the OEMs, distributors, and industry associations. This petition, if granted, would enable our industry to move forward this racing season while the applicability of the law to the off-highway industry is determined.

What can you do?

A form letter for submission to the CPSC in support of the petition for exemption is attached as prepared by the MIC. The letter will also be available this weekend at the Indy tradeshow. Simply print out one copy for each person in your family and submit it ASAP. In the meantime, AMA is preparing a letter for submission by its membership to the CPSC. Be on the lookout for that one as well.

Also, an electronic form letter has been prepared by State Representative Tom Self of Missouri. Please go his website at www.tomself.com. Just fill in your name and address and hit "Submit" to register your support. Please submit this letter on behalf of every member of your family - regardless of age.

What else can you do?

Contact your congressmen and senators; let them know that this legislation will have the unintended consequences of crippling an entire industry. Surely, it could not have been the spirit or intent of the new law to apply to motorcycles or bicycles (which apparently have lead in the brake cables).

Time is of the essence. The very future of our sport and of our industry depends on this. We must support the pending petition before the commencement of the national racing season.

Please give this matter your immediate attention, and forward this letter to EVERY PERSON available ASAP.

Thank you,

c.

Carrie Coombs Russell

DOWNLOAD CPSC FORM LETTER HERE---See below

February 16, 2009

Acting Chairman Nancy Nord
Commissioner Thomas Moore
U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission
4330 East-West Highway
Bethesda, MD 20814

Re: MIC and SVIA Petitions for Temporary Final Rule to Exclude a Class of Materials under Section 101(b) of the Consumer Product Safety Improvement Act

Dear Chairman Nord and Commissioner Moore:

My company is in the business of selling youth ATVs, youth off-highway motorcycles (OHMs), parts or accessories for and/or services relating to those vehicles. I am writing to urge you to grant the above-referenced petitions filed by the Motorcycle Industry Council (MIC), the Specialty Vehicle Institute of America (SVIA) and several manufacturers and distributors.

While most parts of youth powersports products are compliant with the CPSIA lead limits, some parts unavoidably contain small quantities of lead in excess of the CPSIA limits, such as the valve stems on the tires, the aluminum in some brake components and the terminals on the batteries, to name some examples. Lead in these components is necessary, either because small amounts of lead are needed for safety (such as machining the deep grooves on tire valves, which is needed to assure tire air retention) or functionality (such as the lead in battery terminals, which is needed to conduct electricity). Because these small quantities of lead are unavoidable, powersports businesses had to cease selling youth products on February 10, 2009 and will need relief from the CPSIA requirements in order to resume selling these products.

In enacting the CPSIA, Congress gave you the tools to grant merited, common-sense exclusions from the lead standards. Children do not eat, lick or mouth ATV or OHM parts. Relief from the CPSIA’s lead content requirements for youth ATVs and OHMs should be granted because the lead-containing components, parts and accessories pose no risk of causing measurable increase in blood lead levels in children ages 12 and younger.

I also am very concerned about an unintended consequence of the CPSIA. Applying the new lead content regulations to youth ATVs has resulted in many youth models being unavailable to families, and may result in more youth riding adult size ATVs. CPSC, the ATV industry, consumer groups, safety advocates and parents all agree that the key to improving ATV safety for riders under the age of 16 is to keep them off of ATVs designed for adults.

I urge you to grant the petitions for temporary exclusions filed by MIC, SVIA and the manufacturers/distributors.

Respectfully Submitted,


_______________________________
Name:__________________________
Company: _______________________
Address: ________________________
________________________________




|
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA, USA
2/11/2009 8:55pm
Thanks, you beat me to it...it'll get posted to the homepage soon.
avidchimp
Posts
5877
Joined
7/9/2008
Location
EGL, MN, USA
2/11/2009 10:44pm
Done.
anniebert
Posts
144
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
El Segundo, CA, USA
2/11/2009 11:17pm
GuyB wrote:
Thanks, you beat me to it...it'll get posted to the homepage soon.
Need to get a 2-stroke Tongue little quicker on the throttle response. Braapppphhhh

On a serious note, This law is so FUBAR. I'm glad I could do my part.
41NDT
Posts
855
Joined
3/19/2007
Location
AU
2/12/2009 2:51am
Done
Don't know if it will ever affect Oz but if it is affecting Moto-X anywhere in the world then submit away

The Shop

RMZ819
Posts
1320
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
USA
2/12/2009 2:53am
So what does this mean to LL's. Can hey run any classes that are 12 and under.
sc961
Posts
2242
Joined
12/11/2006
Location
Hutchinson, MN, USA
2/12/2009 5:05am
Similar to the sound issues at hand, this one has been in the pipeline of discussion at a government level for some time now.

When the leadership of our sport allows the government to make decisions that negatively impact everyone, without some sort of interaction prior to those decisions we all lose.

You can count on the safety and sound issues being addressed next. You can bet the latest tragedy with Jeremy Lusk will drive more discussion related to safety issues, even though it wasn't a direct result of moto cross racing. If the Motorsports industry isn't proactive in getting to the government leadership to educate them, and show them what the venues are doing to deal with the concerns, you can bet MX as we know will be legislated away.
RNagy052
Posts
768
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Bryceville, FL, USA
2/12/2009 6:28am Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 10:27pm
RMZ819 wrote:
So what does this mean to LL's. Can hey run any classes that are 12 and under.
Hmmm,,,,, then maybe 45+ will get their gates back.

Another question, do Cobra's have lead? What is the effect on that company? Or does this law only impact imports? Are they basically out of business?
SteveS
Posts
5598
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
USA
2/12/2009 6:37am
All bikes contain at least one or two parts which exceed the lead limit: wire terminals and valve stems at the least. Many of the alloys used elsewhere may also contain some lead.

The letter above from MXSports is designed for dealers and industry to send to the CPSC.

The electronic form letter that is sent from www.tomself.com is meant for every citizen to submit. It goes automatically to senators, congressmen, and the cpsc.
danno919
Posts
17
Joined
9/23/2008
Location
Holly, MI, USA
2/12/2009 6:42am
I sent mine in through the www.tomself.com site. Very easy and quick
augiedog
Posts
89
Joined
10/31/2006
Location
Loveland, CO, USA
2/12/2009 8:29am
done
andymoto
Posts
4771
Joined
11/28/2007
Location
Carmichael, CA, USA
2/12/2009 10:30am
I've never known a youngster that got lead poisioning from a mini or any other motorized 2, 3 or 4 wheeler.

Think about it. Who do you know affected from lead poisioning of OHVs?

Sondy132001
Posts
4042
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
Mission Viejo, CA, USA
2/12/2009 11:15am
I had heard that the plastics the Japanese manufacturers use on the little bikes are from China (much cheaper) and contain too much lead, so hence the ban, is there somehting else that can be done ?

S
Sledneck
Posts
1201
Joined
1/23/2009
Location
Steamboat Springs, CO, USA
2/12/2009 11:55am
The loop hole in that wording is selling to someone under 13.

Since when does a kid that age walk into the dealer and plunk down 4 grand?
Sledneck
Posts
1201
Joined
1/23/2009
Location
Steamboat Springs, CO, USA
2/12/2009 11:57am
SteveS wrote:
All bikes contain at least one or two parts which exceed the lead limit: wire terminals and valve stems at the least. Many of the alloys...
All bikes contain at least one or two parts which exceed the lead limit: wire terminals and valve stems at the least. Many of the alloys used elsewhere may also contain some lead.

The letter above from MXSports is designed for dealers and industry to send to the CPSC.

The electronic form letter that is sent from www.tomself.com is meant for every citizen to submit. It goes automatically to senators, congressmen, and the cpsc.
How many kids lick 9 volt batteries? How many kids lick the valve stems and wire connects on an 80?

Dude, if you lick that valve stem, the tingle is so cool.
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
2/12/2009 12:02pm Edited Date/Time 4/16/2016 10:27pm
Sledneck wrote:
The loop hole in that wording is selling to someone under 13. Since when does a kid that age walk into the dealer and plunk down...
The loop hole in that wording is selling to someone under 13.

Since when does a kid that age walk into the dealer and plunk down 4 grand?
SEC. 101. CHILDREN’S PRODUCTS CONTAINING LEAD; LEAD PAINT

RULE.

(a) GENERAL LEAD BAN.—

(1) TREATMENT AS A BANNED HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCE.—

Except as expressly provided in subsection (b) beginning on

the dates provided in paragraph (2), any children’s product

(as defined in section 3(a)(16) of the Consumer Product Safety

Act (15 U.S.C. 2052(a)(16))) that contains more lead than the

limit established by paragraph (2) shall be treated as a banned

hazardous substance under the Federal Hazardous Substances

Act (15 U.S.C. 1261 et seq.).


‘‘(16) CHILDREN’S PRODUCT.—The term ‘children’s product’

means a consumer product designed or intended primarily for

children 12 years of age or younger. In determining whether

a consumer product is primarily intended for a child 12 years

of age or younger, the following factors shall be considered:

‘‘(A) A statement by a manufacturer about the intended

use of such product, including a label on such product

if such statement is reasonable.

‘‘( B ) Whether the product is represented in its packaging,

display, promotion, or advertising as appropriate

for use by children 12 years of age or younger.

‘‘(C) Whether the product is commonly recognized by

consumers as being intended for use by a child 12 years

of age or younger.


‘‘(D) The Age Determination Guidelines issued by the

Commission staff in September 2002, and any successor

to such guidelines
500 Mike
Posts
1150
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Kingwood, TX, USA
2/12/2009 5:06pm
Why did MX Sports just spring into action on this today.... after the ban has already taken place? If the legislation has been out there since August, why didn't they do anything prior to now?
Cory976
Posts
279
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Littleton, CO, USA
2/12/2009 10:15pm
So. It prohibits the sale of minicycles to children under 13. What kid under 13 years old actually signs the paperwork and actually makes the purchase of the machine with his own money anyway? 99.9% of the time, the parent or may'be sponsor actually BUY's the motorcycle. So from the way it is worded, you just have to be 14 years old? There is your loophole!
SIMX
Posts
633
Joined
8/21/2006
Location
USA
2/13/2009 2:30pm
500 Mike wrote:
Why did MX Sports just spring into action on this today.... after the ban has already taken place? If the legislation has been out there since...
Why did MX Sports just spring into action on this today.... after the ban has already taken place? If the legislation has been out there since August, why didn't they do anything prior to now?
$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
KAWboy14
Posts
6502
Joined
12/31/2007
Location
Austin, TX, USA
2/13/2009 4:02pm
i thought the ama takes care of these kind of deals now that they are out of pro racing....
SteveS
Posts
5598
Joined
8/16/2006
Location
USA
2/13/2009 6:03pm
Cory976 wrote:
So. It prohibits the sale of minicycles to children under 13. What kid under 13 years old actually signs the paperwork and actually makes the purchase...
So. It prohibits the sale of minicycles to children under 13. What kid under 13 years old actually signs the paperwork and actually makes the purchase of the machine with his own money anyway? 99.9% of the time, the parent or may'be sponsor actually BUY's the motorcycle. So from the way it is worded, you just have to be 14 years old? There is your loophole!
It doesn't prohibit sales to children. It prohibits all products that are used by children which contain lead.
twister
Posts
419
Joined
2/14/2009
Location
Toronto, CA
2/14/2009 5:27pm
I know this doesn't help much but for those of you close to the border your welcome to come up and race at our local clubs.You can probably find storage for your bikes up here.
AMP
Posts
3
Joined
2/15/2009
Location
Tulsa, OK, USA
2/15/2009 9:25pm
It is not that they contain lead, the problem is the parts have not been tested and certified that they do not contain lead.

This was posted on our district site, the letter is from Greg Robinson, Owner of Unadilla...

"Good Afternoon...forget the good, as our country has descended into lunacy.

I have spent most of the day on two conference calls relative to the subject line above, and I must say I am rather concerned about the fate of our sport and industry. Not to mention our local communities for the further loss of jobs and $$ that our industry brings in each year. It is certainly that dire..believe me.

As of yesterday, all the OEMs had to pull for sale all new youth minicycles and atvs for those under the age of 13...this under order of the CPSC due to lead content of plastics and certain metals. As of yesterday, a dealer or private individual can no longer provide parts or service, to these affected machines, in which there is a possibility that those same parts may contain lead...no oil changes, plastic, levers, engine cases, etc, etc..goggles, helmets, clothing, knee braces..you name it. You may think that is just for new machines, but it is for everything new and used.

The CPSC also ruled that machines under 85cc are considered toxic to the health of young children.

Effective yesterday, Honda has pulled replacement parts from their service system for these machines pending lead certification...this takes 400 days. KTM, Suzuki, Kawasaki, and Yamaha are doing the same thing. If you have a 1,2,3 year old machine, you won't be able to buy most parts for it very soon.

Yamaha is sending out restrictions to its dealers saying that an 85cc bike can only be sold, and should only be operated by someone over the age of 13.

Now to the fun part for us as a race promoter.

*Because the manufacturers are now issuing these guidelines, we as promoters cannot allow a youth under the age of 13 to participate for two reasons.

*We are allowing someone to participate in a sanctioned activity on a vehicle that has been determined by the manufacturer and the CPSC to be unsafe for that age level.

*We are allowing someone to participate in a sanctioned activity on a vehicle that the CPSC has determined is a toxic substance.

If you think I am joking, consider the following

*MX Sports is considering removing youth classes from the Loretta Lynn's program, GNCC, and ATV Nationals...we run all three of these series and I can tell you that these classes make up over 1/3 of our entries and more than half of our attendance.

*The AMA will be forced to ban youths under 13 from any AMA amateur or pro competition due to legal ramifications. The same will apply to local districts and sanctioning bodies, as insurance will not be available to cover this exposure.

*The lifeblood of our sport are these kids..if they cannot participate, they will find something else to do, and we will not get them back. They will not race, watch, or buy products. That means Mom, Dad and older brothers/sisters won't be there either.

*Unadilla would most likely not participate in any form of amateur racing..with only half or less of the entries left, it wouldn't be financially possible.

DO I HAVE YOUR ATTENTION YET!

There are two efforts going on right now to get a temporary stay granted by the CPSC for "Off Road Vehicles." The MIC (Motorcycle Industry Council) and Missouri State House Rep Mike Sense(#4 in line in the MO st govt) are both developing grass roots letter campaigns through websites to develop a ground swell of support for this stay. Keep in mind this is only temporary, and unless a Federal injunction or legislation is developed, this isn't going away.

There are several opinions floating around on this subject saying that our thinking is flawed and that only the sale of new units is affected...if that is the case, why are helmet, goggle, sneakers, sunglasses, OEM parts and accessories, and dealer service being pulled for these units???

I will leave you with this..if indeed this is overblown, and we are right that we shouldn't be affected by this, it still doesn't mean that we can't/won't be sued by someone using this logic, and worse yet, convince a jury that the above is true. If it gets that far, you will have spent nearly a million $$ in your own defense, just to prove you were right all along.

IS IT WORTH THAT TO YOU?

I will get you info on the two websites, and I encourage you to beg everyone you know that rides, owns, promotes, or attends an off road sporting event to get everyone they know in the same manner to fill out one of these letters...Every Mom Dad and Kid should individually enter their name. Then they should contact their local representatives too.

Thanks for listening, and please do not think you can't make a difference..contact your local representatives as well..explain the economic impact this will have..educate yourself on this subject as quickly as you can."

Greg Robinson
VP Marketing
Unadillla Motorsports
(c) 315-725-9537 greg@unadillamx.com

Go immediatly to: http://www.tomself.com and send a letter to Congress to put a stop to this insanity.


--------------------
Attend the Outlaw Winter Nationals 08-09
http://www.geocities.com/oreillydirttrack
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0KqVk3Q1Gek
918-902-5786
JB 19
Posts
4353
Joined
3/8/2009
Location
Marion, OH, USA
3/8/2009 11:46am
What about the cars that these kids ride around in everyday? Do they contain no lead? Should children be banned from riding in cars? (because I know there is lead in the batteries) How about door knobs in houses? I don't know......just asking.
flarider
Posts
25496
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Daytona Beach, FL, USA
3/8/2009 12:43pm
People who talk silly shit prove a few things;

They do not pay attention
They do not do any actual research
and are of no help towards a solution
wardy
Posts
1794
Joined
3/31/2008
Location
USA
3/8/2009 9:15pm
man that was so what 3 weeks ago?????

sheezzzz.
croom mx
Posts
1964
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
miami, FL, USA
3/11/2009 6:15am
tatonka
Posts
247
Joined
8/31/2006
Location
Evergreen, CO, USA
4/4/2009 10:08am
Read this from the AMA....

Posted April 3, 2009

PICKERINGTON, Ohio -- Acting Chairman Nancy Nord of the federal Consumer Product Safety Commission has decided to hold off for a year enforcing the new lead law that has forced dealers to yank youth-model off-road motorcycles and ATVs off their showroom floors.

For the rest of the story click this link:
http://www.amadirectlink.com/news/story.asp?id=775

Post a reply to: Call to Action by MX Sports

The Latest