no post about the gorilla?

Piston Slap
Posts
1985
Joined
7/2/2013
Location
Stillwater, OK US
6/1/2016 10:11pm Edited Date/Time 6/1/2016 10:14pm
I thought it was interesting that in the video you can see the gorilla pulling the kids pants up, guess he didn't like him "bustin' a...
I thought it was interesting that in the video you can see the gorilla pulling the kids pants up, guess he didn't like him "bustin' a sag".
Thats wrong bro.

just wrong.....

But I agree with you!!!!

That poor monkey was in his prison, minding his business for mans profit....

Little white manchild gets into cage, he tries to protect it, gets killed for his efforts.

You imprison someone for their whole life then kill them for being benevolent.

Yeah, sounds like 'merica

slipdog
Posts
10055
Joined
7/25/2009
Location
Nor Cal, CA US
6/2/2016 7:52pm
newmann wrote:
Attention whoring for the most part. People don't care about the gorilla anymore than they care about the 200 lions that will be killed for no...
Attention whoring for the most part. People don't care about the gorilla anymore than they care about the 200 lions that will be killed for no benefit to the country since Cecil got popped. Oh look, a Kardashian just went to the restroom and dropped a steaming Kanye...

https://www.rt.com/news/333410-lions-hunters-africa-kill/

"The largest wildlife reserve in Zimbabwe said it may be forced to cull 200 of its lions after the predator’s population “exploded” due to hunters being scared off by international outrage over the killing of Cecil the lion last year.


Bubye Valley Conservancy, which is home to more lions than anywhere else in the south African country, said that the population of over 500 was too much for the reserve, the National Post reports.

The big cats have been decimating the population of antelopes and giraffes, and even wild dogs, cheetahs, and leopards, which have become easy prey after a dry summer left the grass short."
"dropping a Kanye" love that newmann. "sending a fax to Obama" "dropping the cosby kids at the pool" Writing a letter to nixon...... on and on...
"dropping a Kanye" love that newmann.

"sending a fax to Obama"

"dropping the cosby kids at the pool"

Writing a letter to nixon......

on and on

But i do like that dropping that Kanye



The Rock
Posts
8758
Joined
3/21/2007
Location
HAIKU, HI US
6/2/2016 7:54pm Edited Date/Time 6/2/2016 7:58pm
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real...
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real cool about it all and protecting the child until all the heathens started yelling, thus scaring the gorilla and causing it to drag the child. The zoo didn't want a lawsuit of any kind so they took lethal action. The mother is actually the directer of a children's daycare believe it or not.
This ^^^^

Great post. Couldn't said it better myself and thanks for day care tidbit.

She will no doubt see an increase in business after her stellar demonstration of her child handling skills.

More proof of the bizarro world we all live in. I'd like to been born earlier and have already checked out before things got this crazy to tell you the truth

The Shop

grimey
Posts
396
Joined
7/5/2009
Location
Burbizzle, CA US
6/2/2016 8:19pm
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real...
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real cool about it all and protecting the child until all the heathens started yelling, thus scaring the gorilla and causing it to drag the child. The zoo didn't want a lawsuit of any kind so they took lethal action. The mother is actually the directer of a children's daycare believe it or not.
The Rock wrote:
This ^^^^ Great post. Couldn't said it better myself and thanks for day care tidbit. She will no doubt see an increase in business after her...
This ^^^^

Great post. Couldn't said it better myself and thanks for day care tidbit.

She will no doubt see an increase in business after her stellar demonstration of her child handling skills.

More proof of the bizarro world we all live in. I'd like to been born earlier and have already checked out before things got this crazy to tell you the truth
WOW.
In that logic, why stop there guys?

What do her coworkers and friends say about her as a parent? Does the mother have an attention disability? You!!...You saw the child alone from adult supervision and didn't stop him immediately and get security!? Why didn't you direct the onlookers away and hush them to help zoo officials? Why is there no spotter for the exhibit?! Why is there no tranquilizer capable of stunning a large animal immediately down for this exact situation?! Is the child's autism misdiagnosis to blame?

Why the fuck does negligence only lie on the parent. Ultimately it's the entire zoo system and our involvement, is it not?
I can't believe the shit that spews out grown men's mouths sometimes.

Understand it's fundamentally a grey area, treat it as such. Something bad happened at a zoo? well, then don't have a fucking zoo. Oh, you still want a zoo? Well then keep reading comments like these.
Jimmy_Sloan
Posts
1424
Joined
9/20/2015
Location
Oak Harbor, WA US
6/2/2016 8:38pm Edited Date/Time 6/2/2016 8:48pm
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real...
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real cool about it all and protecting the child until all the heathens started yelling, thus scaring the gorilla and causing it to drag the child. The zoo didn't want a lawsuit of any kind so they took lethal action. The mother is actually the directer of a children's daycare believe it or not.
The Rock wrote:
This ^^^^ Great post. Couldn't said it better myself and thanks for day care tidbit. She will no doubt see an increase in business after her...
This ^^^^

Great post. Couldn't said it better myself and thanks for day care tidbit.

She will no doubt see an increase in business after her stellar demonstration of her child handling skills.

More proof of the bizarro world we all live in. I'd like to been born earlier and have already checked out before things got this crazy to tell you the truth
Just curious about how many children you have and have raised? Children can get a way in an instant and any parent knows this and has experienced it. Also, several gorilla experts have said that unequivocally the gorilla was not protecting the child, it was posturing the child in front of it and showing signs of agitation.
grimey
Posts
396
Joined
7/5/2009
Location
Burbizzle, CA US
6/2/2016 11:34pm
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real...
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real cool about it all and protecting the child until all the heathens started yelling, thus scaring the gorilla and causing it to drag the child. The zoo didn't want a lawsuit of any kind so they took lethal action. The mother is actually the directer of a children's daycare believe it or not.
The Rock wrote:
This ^^^^ Great post. Couldn't said it better myself and thanks for day care tidbit. She will no doubt see an increase in business after her...
This ^^^^

Great post. Couldn't said it better myself and thanks for day care tidbit.

She will no doubt see an increase in business after her stellar demonstration of her child handling skills.

More proof of the bizarro world we all live in. I'd like to been born earlier and have already checked out before things got this crazy to tell you the truth
Just curious about how many children you have and have raised? Children can get a way in an instant and any parent knows this and has...
Just curious about how many children you have and have raised? Children can get a way in an instant and any parent knows this and has experienced it. Also, several gorilla experts have said that unequivocally the gorilla was not protecting the child, it was posturing the child in front of it and showing signs of agitation.
Jimmy I agree with everything but the "expert guerrilla" talk. Truth is not a single person , expert, or mother could guarantee with certainty what the animal would have done. Pisses me off people assume one way or the other and run with it.YOU JUST DONT KNOW. Therefore, we end up here.

And for all the parent bashers, there is not a single person on this board that hasn't gotten lost as a child, or lost your kids for even a moment.
agn5009
Posts
6750
Joined
6/8/2012
Location
State College, PA US
6/3/2016 1:52am
That is exactly what I was thinking. That zoo has some splainin' to do. Beyond that, I thought the zoo officials made it very clear. They...
That is exactly what I was thinking. That zoo has some splainin' to do.

Beyond that, I thought the zoo officials made it very clear. They shot the gorilla because they were not sure how it would react if tranquilized. I'm 100% certain they did not want to shoot that gorilla. My guess is that they were thinking, "If we don't shoot this ape, and it rips this kid into five pieces, we're going to be tarred, feathered, and run out of town on a rail."

From my perspective, they were "Damned if we do, damned if we don't."
They shot the gorilla because it was the best choice to make. They did not know how, in an agitated state, it would react to being...
They shot the gorilla because it was the best choice to make. They did not know how, in an agitated state, it would react to being tranquilized, and it also could have fallen on the child and drown him in the water.


Gorilla experts have said that the way the the gorilla was posturing the boy in front of him was a sign of aggression, that boy's life was in imminent danger.
Yeah but the internet experts disagree Woohoo
ns503
Posts
4585
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
NS Toolies CA
6/3/2016 4:21am
Really curious to see exactly how that kid got in that enclosure & the trouble he had to go to to do it. Seems without knowing that, there isn't much to base an opinion on one way or the other - and I haven't seen it yet.
6/3/2016 2:14pm
I thought it was interesting that in the video you can see the gorilla pulling the kids pants up, guess he didn't like him "bustin' a...
I thought it was interesting that in the video you can see the gorilla pulling the kids pants up, guess he didn't like him "bustin' a sag".
Thats wrong bro. just wrong..... But I agree with you!!!! That poor monkey was in his prison, minding his business for mans profit.... Little white manchild...
Thats wrong bro.

just wrong.....

But I agree with you!!!!

That poor monkey was in his prison, minding his business for mans profit....

Little white manchild gets into cage, he tries to protect it, gets killed for his efforts.

You imprison someone for their whole life then kill them for being benevolent.

Yeah, sounds like 'merica

That was a Gorilla, not a monkey. The little white manchild you speak of was actually a little black manchild.
Carry on.
TDeath21
Posts
6515
Joined
2/22/2011
Location
Somewhere, MO US
6/3/2016 2:38pm
From what I've read, there were a lot of barriers the child had to get through in order to fall into the enclosure. Going off of this information, it is safe to say that it would have taken longer than "just a few seconds" for the child to get in there. Therefore, I'm going to put the mother 100% at fault for this. You have to keep a better eye on your kids than that.

After the child is in there and the gorilla was acting the way it was, they had no choice but to put it down. That was the right call.

I'm not a parent, but I have a question for those that are. If your child does fall in like that, would you jump in as well and protect your child at all costs? Or would you wait and hope for the best, putting your trust in the zookeepers to essentially save your child's life?

On a related topic, I fucking hate zoos. I'll never go to one for the rest of my life. I'm not a crazy vegan animal activist or anything, but it's awful to keep animals in an enclosure for our viewing pleasure.
6/3/2016 3:12pm
Well I just wasted 20 minutes trying to find an interview that Anderson Cooper did with the guy that raised the Gorilla. It was very good and really would add to the thread. But, I was unable to find it.
Titan1
Posts
9416
Joined
2/3/2010
Location
Lehi, UT US
6/3/2016 3:19pm
TDeath21 wrote:
From what I've read, there were a lot of barriers the child had to get through in order to fall into the enclosure. Going off of...
From what I've read, there were a lot of barriers the child had to get through in order to fall into the enclosure. Going off of this information, it is safe to say that it would have taken longer than "just a few seconds" for the child to get in there. Therefore, I'm going to put the mother 100% at fault for this. You have to keep a better eye on your kids than that.

After the child is in there and the gorilla was acting the way it was, they had no choice but to put it down. That was the right call.

I'm not a parent, but I have a question for those that are. If your child does fall in like that, would you jump in as well and protect your child at all costs? Or would you wait and hope for the best, putting your trust in the zookeepers to essentially save your child's life?

On a related topic, I fucking hate zoos. I'll never go to one for the rest of my life. I'm not a crazy vegan animal activist or anything, but it's awful to keep animals in an enclosure for our viewing pleasure.
The parents are at fault...but the zoo is as well...they shouldn't have enclosures that have a lot of barriers to get through in order to get into them...they should have enclosures that are impossible to get into.

Its easy for those that don't have to say "just keep a better eye on your kids"...my wife an I boarder on helicopter parents (when it comes to public places with our kids) and there have been a few times where one of my kids have seemingly disappeared, and its taken a few minutes to find them. Not because we weren't paying attention, but because kids have a mind of their own...

For example, I was watching my then 4 year old daughter at this small playground at a park...she'd been going down the slide, walking around to the back (out of my sight for 20-30 seconds, tops) climbing the ladder and then coming back down the slide. There was maybe 10 kids there with her. She goes down the slide, walks around to the back and I see a blond pony tail and pink shirt waiting in line for the slide...it's not for another maybe 30 seconds, that I realize its not my daughter (but another little girl)...my heart drops, as I realize I don't know where my daughter is. Frantically running around the park, I finally find her a hundred yards away, trying to get a drink at the water fountain on the other side of the bathrooms. Sure, if something bad had happened (she get kidnapped or hit by a car or something) there'd be a lot of people telling me I need to keep a better eye on my kid...but I was watching my kid.

And to answer your question...if that was my son...I would have had to be held out of the enclosure...I would have been down there right away. I probably would have made the situation worse and got us both killed...but I just don't see myself standing by and waiting for help. I'd of done something and tried to protect my kid, and if it cost me my own life, then so be it.

And a zoo's main purpose is to raise awareness for the wild animals...they get people engaged with the animals, they educate about the animals, which then gives people a vested interest in them, so that they are more likely to help protect them and their habitat. The animals there don't know any different, they've been in captivity their entire lives...and as a result are incapable of surviving in the wild anyway...so not use them to raise awareness for their species?
6/3/2016 4:01pm
TDeath21 wrote:
From what I've read, there were a lot of barriers the child had to get through in order to fall into the enclosure. Going off of...
From what I've read, there were a lot of barriers the child had to get through in order to fall into the enclosure. Going off of this information, it is safe to say that it would have taken longer than "just a few seconds" for the child to get in there. Therefore, I'm going to put the mother 100% at fault for this. You have to keep a better eye on your kids than that.

After the child is in there and the gorilla was acting the way it was, they had no choice but to put it down. That was the right call.

I'm not a parent, but I have a question for those that are. If your child does fall in like that, would you jump in as well and protect your child at all costs? Or would you wait and hope for the best, putting your trust in the zookeepers to essentially save your child's life?

On a related topic, I fucking hate zoos. I'll never go to one for the rest of my life. I'm not a crazy vegan animal activist or anything, but it's awful to keep animals in an enclosure for our viewing pleasure.
First off - Glad to see multiple comments like the above regarding zoos and the ridiculous concept of caging the animals for our amusement. Archaic concept from a time when you couldn't get on youtube or turn on HD tv shows to watch the animals. Zoo animals are a sad shell of the wild specimens they are supposed to represent.

The rest of this isn't directed at any post in particular, just my (extreme) opinions.

Regarding the killing of the gorilla - typical American media style 'mass agitation'. People are upset about a single Gorilla...where's the upheaval over continual poaching of gorillas in Africa for things like meat and heads/feet/hands for "collectors"? Of the species of Gorillas in the wild, there are something like 500-1000 left in the world of 'mountain gorillas' - the rarest species. Give it 20 years, that number will be down to a quarter. Move along sheeple, nothing to see here.

Should the gorilla have been killed? Yes. Although I'm of the mindset that she loses the child - relocate him to a family who's been trying unsuccessfully to have a child for 2 years but can't. I guarantee they won't lose him.

Although technically, Darwinism was thwarted - if a kid is dumb enough to climb into a gorilla enclosure (regardless of the barriers there's gorillas in there you dumbass) I'm sorry but he probably will have stuck a fork in a socket at some point.
We're 7+ billion strong, let's stop acting like it's a big deal (to others besides the parents & close relatives).
For the record I don't have a kid (and don't want any - it's irresponsible today).

Excerpt from the CNN interview:
"We continue to praise God for His grace and mercy, and to be thankful to the Cincinnati Zoo for their actions taken to protect our child," the boy's family said. "
The picture is getting more clear here.
You fail as a parent to properly maintain overview on your child in a potentially hazardous location. Your child falls (climbs) into a gorilla enclosure despite numerous warning signs and physical barriers, resulting in the gorilla being killed and god is the one who made that happen? Please go
Flame on vitards
Spartacus
Posts
2269
Joined
5/20/2011
Location
PW US
6/3/2016 4:07pm
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real...
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real cool about it all and protecting the child until all the heathens started yelling, thus scaring the gorilla and causing it to drag the child. The zoo didn't want a lawsuit of any kind so they took lethal action. The mother is actually the directer of a children's daycare believe it or not.
huck wrote:
You obviously don't have kids....
people should have to take a test before they are allowed to procreate.
6/3/2016 4:07pm
"And a zoo's main purpose is to raise awareness for the wild animals...they get people engaged with the animals, they educate about the animals, which then gives people a vested interest in them, so that they are more likely to help protect them and their habitat. The animals there don't know any different, they've been in captivity their entire lives...and as a result are incapable of surviving in the wild anyway...so not use them to raise awareness for their species? "

Titan - I believe that's the predominant 'purpose' of the zoo but I fail to see that actually being the case. Kids can learn much more from reading, researching, etc on animals like this.
If I can recall the last time I was at a zoo, it was overcrowded with snot-nosed kids who couldn't care any more about tapping on the glass to try to get an animal to react, which they don't and are called 'boring' then they want to move on to the ice cream/candy/gift shop.
Children don't learn appreciation for animals from a day at the zoo unless they already have it beforehand via parenting instilling the mentality. Sorry
6/3/2016 4:08pm
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real...
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real cool about it all and protecting the child until all the heathens started yelling, thus scaring the gorilla and causing it to drag the child. The zoo didn't want a lawsuit of any kind so they took lethal action. The mother is actually the directer of a children's daycare believe it or not.
huck wrote:
You obviously don't have kids....
Spartacus wrote:
people should have to take a test before they are allowed to procreate.
This
Titan1
Posts
9416
Joined
2/3/2010
Location
Lehi, UT US
6/3/2016 4:16pm
"And a zoo's main purpose is to raise awareness for the wild animals...they get people engaged with the animals, they educate about the animals, which then...
"And a zoo's main purpose is to raise awareness for the wild animals...they get people engaged with the animals, they educate about the animals, which then gives people a vested interest in them, so that they are more likely to help protect them and their habitat. The animals there don't know any different, they've been in captivity their entire lives...and as a result are incapable of surviving in the wild anyway...so not use them to raise awareness for their species? "

Titan - I believe that's the predominant 'purpose' of the zoo but I fail to see that actually being the case. Kids can learn much more from reading, researching, etc on animals like this.
If I can recall the last time I was at a zoo, it was overcrowded with snot-nosed kids who couldn't care any more about tapping on the glass to try to get an animal to react, which they don't and are called 'boring' then they want to move on to the ice cream/candy/gift shop.
Children don't learn appreciation for animals from a day at the zoo unless they already have it beforehand via parenting instilling the mentality. Sorry
Think what you want. I couldn't care less.
6/3/2016 5:44pm
Remember when the kids harassed the tigers at the San Francisco zoo...
APLMAN99
Posts
12474
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR US
Fantasy
6/3/2016 6:49pm
TDeath21 wrote:
From what I've read, there were a lot of barriers the child had to get through in order to fall into the enclosure. Going off of...
From what I've read, there were a lot of barriers the child had to get through in order to fall into the enclosure. Going off of this information, it is safe to say that it would have taken longer than "just a few seconds" for the child to get in there. Therefore, I'm going to put the mother 100% at fault for this. You have to keep a better eye on your kids than that.

After the child is in there and the gorilla was acting the way it was, they had no choice but to put it down. That was the right call.

I'm not a parent, but I have a question for those that are. If your child does fall in like that, would you jump in as well and protect your child at all costs? Or would you wait and hope for the best, putting your trust in the zookeepers to essentially save your child's life?

On a related topic, I fucking hate zoos. I'll never go to one for the rest of my life. I'm not a crazy vegan animal activist or anything, but it's awful to keep animals in an enclosure for our viewing pleasure.
First off - Glad to see multiple comments like the above regarding zoos and the ridiculous concept of caging the animals for our amusement. Archaic concept...
First off - Glad to see multiple comments like the above regarding zoos and the ridiculous concept of caging the animals for our amusement. Archaic concept from a time when you couldn't get on youtube or turn on HD tv shows to watch the animals. Zoo animals are a sad shell of the wild specimens they are supposed to represent.

The rest of this isn't directed at any post in particular, just my (extreme) opinions.

Regarding the killing of the gorilla - typical American media style 'mass agitation'. People are upset about a single Gorilla...where's the upheaval over continual poaching of gorillas in Africa for things like meat and heads/feet/hands for "collectors"? Of the species of Gorillas in the wild, there are something like 500-1000 left in the world of 'mountain gorillas' - the rarest species. Give it 20 years, that number will be down to a quarter. Move along sheeple, nothing to see here.

Should the gorilla have been killed? Yes. Although I'm of the mindset that she loses the child - relocate him to a family who's been trying unsuccessfully to have a child for 2 years but can't. I guarantee they won't lose him.

Although technically, Darwinism was thwarted - if a kid is dumb enough to climb into a gorilla enclosure (regardless of the barriers there's gorillas in there you dumbass) I'm sorry but he probably will have stuck a fork in a socket at some point.
We're 7+ billion strong, let's stop acting like it's a big deal (to others besides the parents & close relatives).
For the record I don't have a kid (and don't want any - it's irresponsible today).

Excerpt from the CNN interview:
"We continue to praise God for His grace and mercy, and to be thankful to the Cincinnati Zoo for their actions taken to protect our child," the boy's family said. "
The picture is getting more clear here.
You fail as a parent to properly maintain overview on your child in a potentially hazardous location. Your child falls (climbs) into a gorilla enclosure despite numerous warning signs and physical barriers, resulting in the gorilla being killed and god is the one who made that happen? Please go
Flame on vitards
So if you believe that the mother should lose the child over something like this, you'd obviously support taking children out of any household that a parent has put their child on a motorcycle and the child has suffered an injury, right? I mean, how could a parent not understand that those motorcycles are dangerous and such, so actively choosing to put your child on one is infinitely more negligent than simply losing sight of them for a few moments.

Right?
newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
6/3/2016 7:09pm
TDeath21 wrote:
From what I've read, there were a lot of barriers the child had to get through in order to fall into the enclosure. Going off of...
From what I've read, there were a lot of barriers the child had to get through in order to fall into the enclosure. Going off of this information, it is safe to say that it would have taken longer than "just a few seconds" for the child to get in there. Therefore, I'm going to put the mother 100% at fault for this. You have to keep a better eye on your kids than that.

After the child is in there and the gorilla was acting the way it was, they had no choice but to put it down. That was the right call.

I'm not a parent, but I have a question for those that are. If your child does fall in like that, would you jump in as well and protect your child at all costs? Or would you wait and hope for the best, putting your trust in the zookeepers to essentially save your child's life?

On a related topic, I fucking hate zoos. I'll never go to one for the rest of my life. I'm not a crazy vegan animal activist or anything, but it's awful to keep animals in an enclosure for our viewing pleasure.
First off - Glad to see multiple comments like the above regarding zoos and the ridiculous concept of caging the animals for our amusement. Archaic concept...
First off - Glad to see multiple comments like the above regarding zoos and the ridiculous concept of caging the animals for our amusement. Archaic concept from a time when you couldn't get on youtube or turn on HD tv shows to watch the animals. Zoo animals are a sad shell of the wild specimens they are supposed to represent.

The rest of this isn't directed at any post in particular, just my (extreme) opinions.

Regarding the killing of the gorilla - typical American media style 'mass agitation'. People are upset about a single Gorilla...where's the upheaval over continual poaching of gorillas in Africa for things like meat and heads/feet/hands for "collectors"? Of the species of Gorillas in the wild, there are something like 500-1000 left in the world of 'mountain gorillas' - the rarest species. Give it 20 years, that number will be down to a quarter. Move along sheeple, nothing to see here.

Should the gorilla have been killed? Yes. Although I'm of the mindset that she loses the child - relocate him to a family who's been trying unsuccessfully to have a child for 2 years but can't. I guarantee they won't lose him.

Although technically, Darwinism was thwarted - if a kid is dumb enough to climb into a gorilla enclosure (regardless of the barriers there's gorillas in there you dumbass) I'm sorry but he probably will have stuck a fork in a socket at some point.
We're 7+ billion strong, let's stop acting like it's a big deal (to others besides the parents & close relatives).
For the record I don't have a kid (and don't want any - it's irresponsible today).

Excerpt from the CNN interview:
"We continue to praise God for His grace and mercy, and to be thankful to the Cincinnati Zoo for their actions taken to protect our child," the boy's family said. "
The picture is getting more clear here.
You fail as a parent to properly maintain overview on your child in a potentially hazardous location. Your child falls (climbs) into a gorilla enclosure despite numerous warning signs and physical barriers, resulting in the gorilla being killed and god is the one who made that happen? Please go
Flame on vitards
APLMAN99 wrote:
So if you believe that the mother should lose the child over something like this, you'd obviously support taking children out of any household that a...
So if you believe that the mother should lose the child over something like this, you'd obviously support taking children out of any household that a parent has put their child on a motorcycle and the child has suffered an injury, right? I mean, how could a parent not understand that those motorcycles are dangerous and such, so actively choosing to put your child on one is infinitely more negligent than simply losing sight of them for a few moments.

Right?
Since nearly everyone here thinks we evolved from apes and the mother is responsible for the ape being murdered, shouldn't she be charged with murder? That's what happens when you get your buddy killed in a robbery attempt. Whistling
sumdood
Posts
8844
Joined
3/11/2013
Location
San Clemente, CA US
Fantasy
6/3/2016 7:30pm
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real...
The mother was negligent and should be forced to pay for the cost of the gorilla and any investigation that takes place. Gorilla was actually real cool about it all and protecting the child until all the heathens started yelling, thus scaring the gorilla and causing it to drag the child. The zoo didn't want a lawsuit of any kind so they took lethal action. The mother is actually the directer of a children's daycare believe it or not.
huck wrote:
You obviously don't have kids....
Spartacus wrote:
people should have to take a test before they are allowed to procreate.
Vasectomy's at birth. Then when you're married (to a female) have the same last name, a good job and a plan for raising a child, you can come in for your free vasectomy reversal. If you pass a basic IQ test of course.
6/3/2016 7:34pm
I have misplaced my children on three occasions.
6/4/2016 8:10am
APLMAN99 wrote:
So if you believe that the mother should lose the child over something like this, you'd obviously support taking children out of any household that a...
So if you believe that the mother should lose the child over something like this, you'd obviously support taking children out of any household that a parent has put their child on a motorcycle and the child has suffered an injury, right? I mean, how could a parent not understand that those motorcycles are dangerous and such, so actively choosing to put your child on one is infinitely more negligent than simply losing sight of them for a few moments.

Right?
Simple ignorance is far worse than acknowledging risks and still participating.

If I take your example and project it onto the gorilla situation it would read like this (I think):

A mother takes her child to ride at a local track. Said child gets hurt participating in riding - in the ensuing day the track owner, designer, and maintenance crew are all imprisoned and the track closed to prevent further injury.
Might be a bit of a stretch but I think that's fairly parallel?

Your comment makes me think though - Why aren't waivers signed going into the zoo? Because no one would go probably.
It's an enclosed space filled with large, potentially carnivorous animals - I think at this day and age when you sign waivers at the public pool is it really that far fetched?
APLMAN99
Posts
12474
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
Tualatin, OR US
Fantasy
6/4/2016 9:23am
APLMAN99 wrote:
So if you believe that the mother should lose the child over something like this, you'd obviously support taking children out of any household that a...
So if you believe that the mother should lose the child over something like this, you'd obviously support taking children out of any household that a parent has put their child on a motorcycle and the child has suffered an injury, right? I mean, how could a parent not understand that those motorcycles are dangerous and such, so actively choosing to put your child on one is infinitely more negligent than simply losing sight of them for a few moments.

Right?
Simple ignorance is far worse than acknowledging risks and still participating. If I take your example and project it onto the gorilla situation it would read...
Simple ignorance is far worse than acknowledging risks and still participating.

If I take your example and project it onto the gorilla situation it would read like this (I think):

A mother takes her child to ride at a local track. Said child gets hurt participating in riding - in the ensuing day the track owner, designer, and maintenance crew are all imprisoned and the track closed to prevent further injury.
Might be a bit of a stretch but I think that's fairly parallel?

Your comment makes me think though - Why aren't waivers signed going into the zoo? Because no one would go probably.
It's an enclosed space filled with large, potentially carnivorous animals - I think at this day and age when you sign waivers at the public pool is it really that far fetched?
You're completely off on ignorance vs. willful action, obviously.

And you lost me on the part about jailing anyone. I certainly haven't spoken for that nor have any of the zoo employees been jailed, so it really doesn't make any sense here.

You, however, called for the woman to lose her child so it's a pretty fair question to ask why you wouldn't be railing for parents who knowingly put their children at high risk to lose theirs.
Titan1
Posts
9416
Joined
2/3/2010
Location
Lehi, UT US
6/4/2016 11:00am Edited Date/Time 6/4/2016 11:01am
People who haven't ever had children are absolutely unqualified to critique anyone's parenting. They are akin to the football jocks who think racing Moto is easy because the bike does all the work...absolutely oblivious, and they are best served to stfu about the subject.

There are plenty of crappy parents in the world...but sometimes great parents make honest mistakes. Honest mistakes shouldn't be cause for jail time or losing their kids. I believe there is a difference between a mistake and negligence.
Spartacus
Posts
2269
Joined
5/20/2011
Location
PW US
6/4/2016 12:18pm
huck wrote:
You obviously don't have kids....
Spartacus wrote:
people should have to take a test before they are allowed to procreate.
sumdood wrote:
Vasectomy's at birth. Then when you're married (to a female) have the same last name, a good job and a plan for raising a child, you...
Vasectomy's at birth. Then when you're married (to a female) have the same last name, a good job and a plan for raising a child, you can come in for your free vasectomy reversal. If you pass a basic IQ test of course.
Clearly IQ is not an indicator of fitness to raise a child. Examples abound.

Lets blame the zoo, taking personal responsibility for your actions and those of your children is out of the question.


Jimmy_Sloan
Posts
1424
Joined
9/20/2015
Location
Oak Harbor, WA US
6/4/2016 1:11pm Edited Date/Time 6/4/2016 1:14pm
First off - Glad to see multiple comments like the above regarding zoos and the ridiculous concept of caging the animals for our amusement. Archaic concept...
First off - Glad to see multiple comments like the above regarding zoos and the ridiculous concept of caging the animals for our amusement. Archaic concept from a time when you couldn't get on youtube or turn on HD tv shows to watch the animals. Zoo animals are a sad shell of the wild specimens they are supposed to represent.

The rest of this isn't directed at any post in particular, just my (extreme) opinions.

Regarding the killing of the gorilla - typical American media style 'mass agitation'. People are upset about a single Gorilla...where's the upheaval over continual poaching of gorillas in Africa for things like meat and heads/feet/hands for "collectors"? Of the species of Gorillas in the wild, there are something like 500-1000 left in the world of 'mountain gorillas' - the rarest species. Give it 20 years, that number will be down to a quarter. Move along sheeple, nothing to see here.

Should the gorilla have been killed? Yes. Although I'm of the mindset that she loses the child - relocate him to a family who's been trying unsuccessfully to have a child for 2 years but can't. I guarantee they won't lose him.

Although technically, Darwinism was thwarted - if a kid is dumb enough to climb into a gorilla enclosure (regardless of the barriers there's gorillas in there you dumbass) I'm sorry but he probably will have stuck a fork in a socket at some point.
We're 7+ billion strong, let's stop acting like it's a big deal (to others besides the parents & close relatives).
For the record I don't have a kid (and don't want any - it's irresponsible today).

Excerpt from the CNN interview:
"We continue to praise God for His grace and mercy, and to be thankful to the Cincinnati Zoo for their actions taken to protect our child," the boy's family said. "
The picture is getting more clear here.
You fail as a parent to properly maintain overview on your child in a potentially hazardous location. Your child falls (climbs) into a gorilla enclosure despite numerous warning signs and physical barriers, resulting in the gorilla being killed and god is the one who made that happen? Please go
Flame on vitards
Your parents should have adopted your attitude when thinking about having children. Suggesting that the child be taken away from the parents is completely idiotic.

Post a reply to: no post about the gorilla?

The Latest