Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
I've seen it over here where people blatantly ignore a law passed in 2003. Now it's got teeth. Do people still ignore it? Yes. But the amount of prosecutions has risen.
Stefan[/quote:212pwyjb]
That might be the case but there are thousands of laws in America that we ignore because they are dumb.
Let's see... 1 OHV per 10 acres of land, a maximum of 4 per piece of land, even if it's over 40 acres. Any more than 4 and you need to apply for conditional use (and that'll be $10K). This applies to all unincorporated land in Riverside County. So far so good. Allowable noise levels: 50, 55, or 75 dBA at the property line, depending on the zoning. NOT so good. That's 20dBA BELOW current AMA standard). Even more restrictive is the requirement to stay more than 100 feet (30 metres) from the property line, and 250 feet (83 metres) away from neighbouring homes.
10 acres = 4 hectares, or a piece of land around 200 x 200 metres. Assuming that you have houses on either side, you have a strip of land of 40 x 40 metres to ride on (with the other 80 metres on all sides lying unused because of the 250 ft restriction) AND you have to keep your bike under the 50 dBA limit at the property line. Rather restrictive, no? Even on a 40 acre piece of land, which makes it 400 x 400 metres, you still get hit by your noise regs. 75 dBA is 20dBA under the current AMA limits, if you are lucky to have that kind of zoning.
And considering that Villopoto Sr refers to fines, it is clear that Villopoto Jr has already breached at least one of the above conditions on the byelaw (ordinance) that restricts OHV use on private land at least once. I'm all for private land use (hell, I'd be (*&(#*!@&# if I was told what I can and cannot do in my own backyard), but when it becomes an issue for the law, I'd stick to the law to set a good example, or try to butter up my neighbours sufficiently for them not to complain about me bending a rule or two.
Stefan[/quote:17ne8ahe]
I said "some" not all.
Obviously she is loving that HGH.
Here, a kid (or his folks rather) stand up and ride in a place that no one should be able to stop them from (their own private property) and now he's the anti-Christ. You guys are falling for the tree huggers' schemes.[/quote:2m2ga2lw] Second A-men. (only got a few left..)
The Shop
Free shipping: VITALMX
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Animals are banned from mating publicly within 1,500 feet of a tavern, school, or place of worship.
A regulation in San Francisco makes it unlawful to use used underwear to wipe off cars in a car wash.
Other than the winter weather, how the fuck do you guys live in that shithole?
I got no problem with folks breaking bullshit laws, and not being able to do more or less what you want on your own property (stuff like raping your neighbors and torturing kids notwithstanding) is definitely bullshit.
He's almost rich enough to buy riverside. Go Ryan!
And Will, if the neighbours don't mind, how come he's been fined at least once already? Someone in the neighbourhood must be "not fine" with it, or must've told someone who is "not fine" with it, or else no-one would know that he rides on his own property in violation of the ordinance.
Personally I love the idea of pushing your bike out of the garage and going riding in your backyard very cool (I remember Ronron having a very nice track in HIS backyard a few years back), but when I get a fine, I would have to ask myself the question why I am getting one... and who in the neighbourhood is not fine with me riding in my backyard.
wildbill, that is possible. But if no-one hears him, how would he end up with a fine? He would have had to breach one of the requirements in the ordinance, either being less than 100 feet from the boundary or 250 feet from the nearest house, or the sound at the boundary of his tract of land being over the limit set for his specific zoning (either 50, 55 or 75 dBA).
Stefan[/quote:2n31tinx]
Villopoto's track was Roncada's track. RV bought the house, land and track from Ronron.
Also, take into consideration that I'm going under the assumption that RV has sufficient room to actually ride the bike on a proper track, and that he's not dusting out the neighbors, revving the crap out of his bike at 2AM, or being a drunken jackass.
no thats J-Law...
In my humble opinion, when you purchase a plot of land, you own it, and therefore have the RIGHT to pretty much do whatever the hell you want on it. Lets say for example you buy this 20 acre plot of land decide that you want grass on all of it. You eventually have to mow that grass right? Well your average Briggs and Straton powered push mower makes more than 75db at the property line, specifically when it is mowing at said line. Then of course you need to edge that line, and my gas powered edger is also louder than the 75db limit at that line, of course in the fall when you use your power leaf blower again over the 75db limit. As long as you are not causing possible harm to your neighbors with explosives or a home firing range then it should be up to you as to how you use YOUR property!!!
I have seen photos of RV's tracks (there are 4 on his land) and they are all tits!! Perfectly groomed and watered (which would certainly cut down on the dust). If I lived there I would be on those tracks everyday, and would fight any fines or tickets to the death!!! It is absolutely retarded that when you own property that you can not ride on it. Noise is subjective, several things make unpleasant noise to several people. Like, given the rational used by Saudi California, I should be able to tell the idiot down that the city is fining him for use of that 3000 watt POS stereo in his SUV because he did not opt to have it installed properly and it vibrates every loose item on that truck every 20 minutes ALL DAY. Or how about the other neighbor that thinks it is OK to bring out his BobCat to shovel his driveway (and ONLY his) then follow that up by using an array of snowblowers to get the rest. Or this one, and I know you guys will love this, the middle aged wanna be biker down the street that suits up in leather along with his fat ass wife every sunday that is nice to go for a neighborhood Harley ride with the other 50 middle aged biker wanna be's in the neighborhood. All of that is considered OK, but one young man whom makes his living by riding MX bikes can not ride on his OWN TRACK IN HIS OWN BACKYARD?????
We need a freaking REVOLUTION!!!
word. but our gov only gets away with what we let them. we need to look in the mirror as a society before we start holding our gov to some holy standard.
word. but our gov only gets away with what we let them. we need to look in the mirror as a society before we start holding our gov to some holy standard.[/quote:23f2yk1w]
The problem is 90% of society are fucking idiots.
Pit Row
You're being generous at only 90%!
Seriously though, what about some kind of grandfather clause in Riverside county? Does one exist? For example, Villopoto bought the house before the new law I assume? He obviously bought it with the tracks in mind. It was a significiant investment for him I'm sure. Now, along comes Big Brother to tell him he can no longer use his property as planned. WTF? That's not right! I'm guessing the good citizens of the county voted this thing in? [b:1w0cos84]Atta boy AMA!! Way to protect our right to ride! It's obvious the AMA ain't cutting the mustard in many ways, maybe t's time for a new breed of organization that will care about issues specific to MX and off road enthusiasts, as opposed to the lip service only that the AMA provides[/b:1w0cos84].[/quote:1w0cos84]
Totally agree ol' wise one. Especially in bold. Like the many land closure meetings I've attended, no AMA rep in sight.
They're too busy with their needs and have totally forgotten their core membership and responsibilites to them.
I read the AMA legislative accomplishments of '07....mighty thin on any substansive issues.
Post a reply to: Villopoto is bad for recreational riding.