Posts
8758
Joined
3/21/2007
Location
HAIKU, HI, USA
Edited Date/Time
2/28/2016 5:35am
Mauidex's 11 years thread got me thinking on how a lot of people bag on the MX2 23 years and out rule.
I wonder if any of these same people think it is good having life time 250 SX riders in the US? My father may he RIP wasn't happy when Dowd was riding the 125 class in SX either.
Is it time we have a 250 SX Elite Series to handle these lifers and have the existing 250 East West series be what I thought they were all along, a development series for up and comers.
I wonder if any of these same people think it is good having life time 250 SX riders in the US? My father may he RIP wasn't happy when Dowd was riding the 125 class in SX either.
Is it time we have a 250 SX Elite Series to handle these lifers and have the existing 250 East West series be what I thought they were all along, a development series for up and comers.
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
DeCal Works Huge Plastic Inventory of UFO and Polisport kits.
Free shipping: VITALMX
Please forgive me Michael if I missed a thread(s) comparing these two issues in the past. I personally don't see how any who thinks the MX2 age rule is a bad thing can be against 250 SX lifers.
And shoot me for wanting a support class for up and comers at SX and an Elite class for the lifers. And don't tell me AX cross either. Just throwing stuff out for bench racing not curing cancer here
DPW right on
What's a Team's intention when it hires a rider?
Who's left of you remove all the riders over 23?
Post a reply to: 250 SX lifers good/MX2 age limit bad?