Upgrade to enjoy this feature!
Vital MX fantasy is free to play, but Premium users receive great benefits. Premium benefits include:
- View and download rider stats
- Pick trends
- Create a private league
- And more!
Only $10 for all 2026 SX, MX, and SMX series.
Forget about the wins. Look at the record books and try to find the the 2nd place or worse finishes or dnf or dns. The list is very very short. I believe in 10 years , 120 nationals he never failed to show up and start a race and had one dnf.
As far as supercross who cares. But if you do, only MC has a better record. And RC is the guy who figured out how to beat MC and once he did he dominated MC. MC would have won a couple more titles if not for RC.
i'm ready for a road-trip to the PNW and some epic single-track
The Shop
Luxon 4-Post Bar Mounts
$189.95 - $239.95
Free shipping: VITALMX
I'm going with you...
IceMan's perspective is that MC was better than RC in SX and RC was better than MC in MX. Therefore, neither of them are the GOAT. My perspective of IceMan's opinion is that he's creating a very absolute and never attained quality. He's saying that to qualify as the GOAT, you must be the best in all disciplines. Not very accurate if you ask me. Especially considering MC bowed out of outdoors very early. Some may say he could have won a lot more MX if he didn't leave. Others will say he would have simply been beating by RC anyway. I say that it allowed him to not be worn down for SX which helped his winning ways. RC retired at a younger age but probably had a quite a bit more gate drops. The fact that most of the added gate drops were in the much more grueling MX series and you may see why he quit sooner.
Some are even doing math and using active years and win totals to show win percentages. If we choose to use win percentages we must include some much deeper calculations. Yeah, RC didn't race as many SX races as MC. Based on race count and wins, is his percentage the same?
Parkboys' criteria is age + championships. Using this data, they are pretty equal when it comes to SX. This probably aligns with the percentage I mentioned above.
Someone else mentioned that they were told by someone younger that RC didn't have any competition. Somewhat true, however, it was only because he was that much better. There were plenty of guys that would have done a lot of winning if he weren't there. I wondered when his legacy would start weakening simply because of time. Those that didn't see RC race have no idea how ridiculously awesome he was. There were some that came in and went faster but it royally pissed him off and he ALWAYS figured out what to do. It may have taken a race or two to figure it out, but he always did. RC had several riding styles and bike setups. He was the king of adaptation.
He absolutely dominated in both SX and MX. Imagine if he would have focused on SX like MC. MC's 72 wins would have been decimated. As it was, he destroyed anyway.
Magoo....he was a force that could be felt as he raced by.....
Rick Johnson
Hannah
Arvee
Dungey
Townley
ok, maybe more than a few...but they all have the same iron in them.
For me the GOAT has to be Roger Decoster for total contribution to the sport as a racer, developer, team manager, influence....no one is close.
Pit Row
Post a reply to: For the newbs: there is only 1 GOAT. Just because you "think" someone is dominant, he's not.