Why not add a 125 Two Stroke class?

2/2/2014 11:11am
BBTSMX.ORG is working on the ridiculous AMA engine rule, stupid engine classes, lites. SX. 250/450 when it is really a "F" stroke only class. My wife...
BBTSMX.ORG is working on the ridiculous AMA engine rule, stupid engine classes, lites. SX. 250/450 when it is really a "F" stroke only class.
My wife asked me when watching SX a few years back "when do the heavies race?" she thought after seeing the lites class there would be a heavy class. I laughed and thought to myself the AMA is a bunch of idiots.
We have 14 thousand members on fb and counting, any suggestions other than a petition which we are working on would be greatly appreciated.
Its not a dead horse yet.
GuyB wrote:
Apparently it is a dead horse. ;) [img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2014/02/02/44138/s1200_Screen_Shot_2014_02_02_at_10.26.12_AM.jpg[/img]
Apparently it is a dead horse. Wink


Apparently not, try a different browser
GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA US
2/2/2014 11:16am Edited Date/Time 2/2/2014 11:17am
Ah. www.bbtsmx.org and www.bringbacktwostrokemx.org are two different things.

You may have noticed that there's no extra charge here to spell things out. Especially when the difference matters. Smile
2/2/2014 11:22am
Jbrandmx85 wrote:
I don't think 125's would be a good pro class nowadays. As much as I love 2 strokes, they are more of an amateur learning bike...
I don't think 125's would be a good pro class nowadays. As much as I love 2 strokes, they are more of an amateur learning bike nowadays. Don't get me wrong, I think the rules are bs. A 250f and 250t should be able to race the same class. But 125's are just too small for pro racing these days. The game changed when 450's came into the picture
kinda got off topic , Thanks for the redirect
If the 250 F strokes are faster than the big bikes you would think a 125 would make for more exciting racing.The the smaller bikes are more nimble and as for TV coverage the Jr KTM class got what 40 seconds of air time.
2/2/2014 11:26am
GuyB wrote:
Ah. www.bbtsmx.org and www.bringbacktwostrokemx.org are two different things. You may have noticed that there's no extra charge here to spell things out. Especially when the difference...
Ah. www.bbtsmx.org and www.bringbacktwostrokemx.org are two different things.

You may have noticed that there's no extra charge here to spell things out. Especially when the difference matters. Smile
Sorry bout that, so used to chatting with mfgs and vendors, the abbreviation comes 2nd nature.
My apologies

The Shop

GuyB
Posts
35722
Joined
7/10/2006
Location
Aliso Viejo, CA US
2/2/2014 11:29am
kinda got off topic , Thanks for the redirect If the 250 F strokes are faster than the big bikes you would think a 125 would...
kinda got off topic , Thanks for the redirect
If the 250 F strokes are faster than the big bikes you would think a 125 would make for more exciting racing.The the smaller bikes are more nimble and as for TV coverage the Jr KTM class got what 40 seconds of air time.
Not sure I get the logic of how 250s having faster lap times than 450s means that 125s would make for more exciting racing, but okay...
trailhopper
Posts
753
Joined
10/30/2011
Location
NY, NY US
2/2/2014 11:29am
For the love of God.......

Spartacus
Posts
2269
Joined
5/20/2011
Location
PW US
2/2/2014 11:34am
Lord knows Honda would really be behind the idea.
2/2/2014 11:36am
kinda got off topic , Thanks for the redirect If the 250 F strokes are faster than the big bikes you would think a 125 would...
kinda got off topic , Thanks for the redirect
If the 250 F strokes are faster than the big bikes you would think a 125 would make for more exciting racing.The the smaller bikes are more nimble and as for TV coverage the Jr KTM class got what 40 seconds of air time.
GuyB wrote:
Not sure I get the logic of how 250s having faster lap times than 450s means that 125s would make for more exciting racing, but okay...
Trail hoper is right, Mr B, maybe we can chat further on the track walk at Daytona.
motogrady
Posts
3931
Joined
1/27/2008
Location
WV US
2/2/2014 11:59am Edited Date/Time 2/2/2014 1:55pm
This is mainly for the young guys.

In the beginning,
1900s to the 1930s,
the relative new form of transport here in the States known as motorcycling,
was on very hard times.

There was a Great Depression going on.

Harley Davidson got together with the AMA,
a branch even then of the FIM,
and created a series of races.

They called it class C racing.

Class A racing had been the norm until this point.
Class A racing was like Motogp was a few years ago,
full factory bikes and professional riders.
The board and dirttrack racers that the teams of the day were on, could not be had by the average guy.
Most of the stuff in the pits were prototypes, one offs, and for the day, so exotic, some could not
relate to what was on the track and what they rode to work.
The Flying Merkles, the Indians, the Aces's and the Factory Harley's, sure, that stuff was cool,
but it didn't look anything close to the bikes the average Joe was on. Or could get.

And times were hard.

And Harley needed to sell bikes, lots of them.

And the AMA needed members, lot's of them.

So, the factory teams, as they known it at the time, either up and quit, were disbanded,
couldn't make the big, big rule of this new class (200 had to me made and sold to the public),
or went bankrupt.

Suddenly, the bike that won the AMA Championship in 1937, hell, you could buy one at the local dealer.
And it looked like the one you rode to work.

Harley sold bikes, Indian sold bikes, the AMA got members, most all others went out of business and poof,
Class C Racing was born.

And it's this basic formula that exists to this day, here in the States anyway.

A group of people, the manufacturers, approach the AMA and say, hey, we want to make and sell a ton of bikes.
We want them to be X ccs, and X strokes, and weigh between this and that.

If the numbers are big enough, if it's worth it to the AMA, they will then set up a series and all will make money.

The average guy will see a bike win, or do good, and think, "yeah, that's what I want".
And buy one.

And that's the way it is.

Until enough of the manufactures commit to something different, maybe making something they really don't want to, without running the rest off, it's gonna stay the way it is.
2/2/2014 12:14pm
in the time it takes for dahlgren to say a bunch of bs you could have 2 6 lap heat races and a 10 lap main
2/2/2014 12:18pm
@motogrady , Thanx 4 the info . The key is AMA members and that maybe not enough to sway the power's at work, but with out members and fans...what do they have
Hondas CRF150R has failed even after Honda created their own series ( from what I understand ) There is always hope, especially when CBS still uses two stroke sound bites in their SX commercials.
newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
2/2/2014 12:20pm
ssraccent wrote:
[img]https://troll.me/images/facepalm-picard/not-this-shit-again.jpg[/img]
Coming from a guy with a Honda avatar....LMAO. You take your Honda survey yet? They could really use your help after I filled mine out.Laughing
newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
2/2/2014 12:22pm
What we really need is another 22 Chad Reed threads today.
GrapeApe
Posts
8823
Joined
6/7/2010
Location
Mc Kinney, TX US
2/2/2014 12:47pm
I spent way too much time on bringbackwoodentennisraquets.com today. I'll check out the 2 stroke site tomorrow.
trailhopper
Posts
753
Joined
10/30/2011
Location
NY, NY US
2/2/2014 1:41pm
GrapeApe wrote:
I spent way too much time on bringbackwoodentennisraquets.com today. I'll check out the 2 stroke site tomorrow.
Grinning Grinning Grinning
Jarid332
Posts
5360
Joined
8/15/2006
Location
Somewhere north of Toronto CA
Fantasy
2/2/2014 1:48pm
they should race 3 wheelers
mxpappy711
Posts
252
Joined
6/11/2009
Location
Hummelstown, PA US
2/2/2014 2:19pm
There is 2 stroke racing everywhere but at the pro level. Buy one,race and there you go you have 2 stroke racing. I do it all the time. I even ride a 2 stroke on the street, Yamaha no longer makes the RD400, but I have lots of fun on mine. I am old enough to remember when 2strokes started dominating racing ( 1970's) I bet the BSA guys sounded a lot like the whiney 2stroke guys do now (minus the inter web). I don't know if they bought 2 strokes, kept riding their big thumpers or quit riding. My guess is all of the above.
2/2/2014 3:04pm
I do agree,
why not??
GuyB wrote:
A couple reasons? You'd need all the manufacturers doing it. Not just Yamaha and KTM. You'd also need bikes that are homologated for it. I don't...
A couple reasons?

You'd need all the manufacturers doing it. Not just Yamaha and KTM.

You'd also need bikes that are homologated for it. I don't think anyone does that.
You are dead wrong Guy B.

If what your say is true explain the four stroke revolution? Other brands didn't have bikes to compete for years.

Instead of spreading propaganda and lies you don't have to say anything.
Socket946
Posts
2018
Joined
8/25/2013
Location
AZ US
2/2/2014 3:08pm
If Wilson had a faster lap time than any 450, why not add a 125 two stroke class? Any thoughts? [img]https://p.vitalmx.com/photos/forums/2014/02/02/44127/s1200_url_14.jpg[/img]
If Wilson had a faster lap time than any 450, why not add a 125 two stroke class?
Any thoughts?


Robgvx
Posts
4018
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
GB
2/2/2014 3:14pm
They have a 125 class at GPs. They even have a 300 two stroke class this year (although heaven knows why it's 300).

So why not in the US?

(Do KTM65s have to be homologated for AMA racing?)
motogrady
Posts
3931
Joined
1/27/2008
Location
WV US
2/2/2014 3:15pm Edited Date/Time 2/2/2014 3:17pm
I do agree,
why not??
GuyB wrote:
A couple reasons? You'd need all the manufacturers doing it. Not just Yamaha and KTM. You'd also need bikes that are homologated for it. I don't...
A couple reasons?

You'd need all the manufacturers doing it. Not just Yamaha and KTM.

You'd also need bikes that are homologated for it. I don't think anyone does that.
You are dead wrong Guy B. If what your say is true explain the four stroke revolution? Other brands didn't have bikes to compete for years...
You are dead wrong Guy B.

If what your say is true explain the four stroke revolution? Other brands didn't have bikes to compete for years.

Instead of spreading propaganda and lies you don't have to say anything.
No, GuyB is pretty much correct.

The big players, mainly Yamaha and Honda, got real green, and chose to quit making
2 strokes for the street, I dunno, late 70's..
Honda never really wanted to make the smoker.
Seems they felt entities like the EPA and Greenpiece would win out and they just
wanted to be ready for the future.

It was Yamaha that bullied, or lobbied the cheater rule with the AMA.

Why Motogp got rid of the 500s, I'd also think the manufactures were behind that.

I mean, who want's to race something you can't build and make a buck on?

Political correctness, that's what killed them.
Shawn142
Posts
2602
Joined
10/27/2008
Location
Burleson, TX US
2/2/2014 3:56pm Edited Date/Time 2/2/2014 3:58pm
Robgvx wrote:
They have a 125 class at GPs. They even have a 300 two stroke class this year (although heaven knows why it's 300). So why not...
They have a 125 class at GPs. They even have a 300 two stroke class this year (although heaven knows why it's 300).

So why not in the US?

(Do KTM65s have to be homologated for AMA racing?)
Why is it needed? Where would you put it in the program that is now basically 4 hours of live TV? Why is the 2-stroke mafia ENTIRELY dependent on DC and MXSports to run a 2-stroke class? Is no one else on earth capable of being a promoter of a professional event?

The 2-stroke guys should join the WMX on the sidelines with protest signs and pitchforks. I don't think bringing back 2-strokes is a bad idea but you guys have complained about this shit long enough. It's time for someone to stop whining and take some initiative if racing 2-strokes is so important.
HenryA
Posts
3784
Joined
12/29/2011
Location
Stockholm SE
2/2/2014 3:59pm
That engine is in the wrong frame. Huh
2/2/2014 4:09pm Edited Date/Time 2/2/2014 4:12pm
kinda got off topic , Thanks for the redirect If the 250 F strokes are faster than the big bikes you would think a 125 would...
kinda got off topic , Thanks for the redirect
If the 250 F strokes are faster than the big bikes you would think a 125 would make for more exciting racing.The the smaller bikes are more nimble and as for TV coverage the Jr KTM class got what 40 seconds of air time.
GuyB wrote:
Not sure I get the logic of how 250s having faster lap times than 450s means that 125s would make for more exciting racing, but okay...
People really do not seem to understand why 2 Strokes are slower. It is not about peak HP...or power to weight. I guess 99% of pinger fanboyz have actually never run a dyno....or read Gordon Blair's book (http://www.amazon.com/Design-Simulation-Two-Stroke-Engines-Gordon/dp/15…).

Two strokes make too high of a percentage of peak power at small throttle openings. This has to do with expansion chamber dynamics. When you are on a 4 stroke...and you fly into a corner...you can roll on the throttle smooth. When you barely crack the throttle on a thumper...you get a small small % of peak power. This is even more true of EFI...where you can tailor ignition timing and mixture as a function of manifold pressure (which is a good proxy for throttle opening.)
This means you can transition from braking to throttle smoothly...and corner closer to the limit of the tires and bike.

When you are a pinger...and you open the throttle even a crack...you get too much power. This forces you to have to compromise your corner speed to accommodate the hit. You have to actually corner differently because the throttle hit is too strong. This is why even a 250 thumper will beat a 250 pinger. Yeah yeah...you can cut a track to favor a 2s...by making all the turns very tight 180s...with no berms...but if you have a track with a variety of corners...the thumper will be faster on 4 out of 5 of them.

Changing the displacement equivalent rules will not change anything. The more "accurate" throttle response of a thumper is simply too large of an advantage. Unfortunately...physics are not just a good idea...they are pretty much the law.
motogrady
Posts
3931
Joined
1/27/2008
Location
WV US
2/2/2014 4:18pm Edited Date/Time 2/2/2014 4:18pm
Robgvx wrote:
They have a 125 class at GPs. They even have a 300 two stroke class this year (although heaven knows why it's 300). So why not...
They have a 125 class at GPs. They even have a 300 two stroke class this year (although heaven knows why it's 300).

So why not in the US?

(Do KTM65s have to be homologated for AMA racing?)
Shawn142 wrote:
Why is it needed? Where would you put it in the program that is now basically 4 hours of live TV? Why is the 2-stroke mafia...
Why is it needed? Where would you put it in the program that is now basically 4 hours of live TV? Why is the 2-stroke mafia ENTIRELY dependent on DC and MXSports to run a 2-stroke class? Is no one else on earth capable of being a promoter of a professional event?

The 2-stroke guys should join the WMX on the sidelines with protest signs and pitchforks. I don't think bringing back 2-strokes is a bad idea but you guys have complained about this shit long enough. It's time for someone to stop whining and take some initiative if racing 2-strokes is so important.
I don't agree Shawn, the bitching, the new classes in Europe (which run their own rules,
for whatever reason), plus the fact not enough bought into the Honda 150 thing,
may be an indication of things to come.

You gotta stay on them, this kind of stuff takes years.

As far as Startedtoo Late, the 2 stroke can be ported to behave very similar to a 4 as far as power delivery.

CC to CC, the 2 stroke wins every time.

Take a CR500, put a low end pipe and some low end porting, sure, it won't hit like it can, but it will still
eat a 450 4 for breakfast.
newmann
Posts
24438
Joined
4/1/2008
Location
US
2/2/2014 4:45pm
Robgvx wrote:
They have a 125 class at GPs. They even have a 300 two stroke class this year (although heaven knows why it's 300). So why not...
They have a 125 class at GPs. They even have a 300 two stroke class this year (although heaven knows why it's 300).

So why not in the US?

(Do KTM65s have to be homologated for AMA racing?)
Shawn142 wrote:
Why is it needed? Where would you put it in the program that is now basically 4 hours of live TV? Why is the 2-stroke mafia...
Why is it needed? Where would you put it in the program that is now basically 4 hours of live TV? Why is the 2-stroke mafia ENTIRELY dependent on DC and MXSports to run a 2-stroke class? Is no one else on earth capable of being a promoter of a professional event?

The 2-stroke guys should join the WMX on the sidelines with protest signs and pitchforks. I don't think bringing back 2-strokes is a bad idea but you guys have complained about this shit long enough. It's time for someone to stop whining and take some initiative if racing 2-strokes is so important.
motogrady wrote:
I don't agree Shawn, the bitching, the new classes in Europe (which run their own rules, for whatever reason), plus the fact not enough bought into...
I don't agree Shawn, the bitching, the new classes in Europe (which run their own rules,
for whatever reason), plus the fact not enough bought into the Honda 150 thing,
may be an indication of things to come.

You gotta stay on them, this kind of stuff takes years.

As far as Startedtoo Late, the 2 stroke can be ported to behave very similar to a 4 as far as power delivery.

CC to CC, the 2 stroke wins every time.

Take a CR500, put a low end pipe and some low end porting, sure, it won't hit like it can, but it will still
eat a 450 4 for breakfast.
X2, Honda has spent a fortune trying to get the sheep to flock to the 150. Funny how the 4 stroke fanboys always show up en masse to the two stroke threads.
CASH476
Posts
612
Joined
2/27/2009
Location
Perth AU
2/2/2014 5:30pm
motogrady wrote:
No, GuyB is pretty much correct. The big players, mainly Yamaha and Honda, got real green, and chose to quit making 2 strokes for the street...
No, GuyB is pretty much correct.

The big players, mainly Yamaha and Honda, got real green, and chose to quit making
2 strokes for the street, I dunno, late 70's..
Honda never really wanted to make the smoker.
Seems they felt entities like the EPA and Greenpiece would win out and they just
wanted to be ready for the future.

It was Yamaha that bullied, or lobbied the cheater rule with the AMA.

Why Motogp got rid of the 500s, I'd also think the manufactures were behind that.

I mean, who want's to race something you can't build and make a buck on?

Political correctness, that's what killed them.
The rule was there long before anyone (except one Yamaha guy) thought it could be an advantage to anyone.
CASH476
Posts
612
Joined
2/27/2009
Location
Perth AU
2/2/2014 5:39pm
BBTSMX.ORG is working on the ridiculous AMA engine rule, stupid engine classes, lites. SX. 250/450 when it is really a "F" stroke only class. My wife...
BBTSMX.ORG is working on the ridiculous AMA engine rule, stupid engine classes, lites. SX. 250/450 when it is really a "F" stroke only class.
My wife asked me when watching SX a few years back "when do the heavies race?" she thought after seeing the lites class there would be a heavy class. I laughed and thought to myself the AMA is a bunch of idiots.
We have 14 thousand members on fb and counting, any suggestions other than a petition which we are working on would be greatly appreciated.
Its not a dead horse yet.
Good luck with that facebook petition bro, they are always effective Laughing Kony must have been shaking in his boots in 2012
jndmx
Posts
9691
Joined
1/20/2008
Location
South Kingston, RI US
2/2/2014 5:46pm
Can we bring back Joey Heatherton while we are at it?

She was super hot and fun back in the 70's too.

Post a reply to: Why not add a 125 Two Stroke class?

The Latest